Deciding analytically or trusting your intuition? The advantages and disadvantages of analytic and intuitive thought

The Routines of Decision Making

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 67-82

  Hogarth, Robin M ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920808320     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611826     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 431-441.
2. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462-479.
3. Betsch, T., Fiedler, K., & Brinkmann, J. (1998). Behavioral routines in decision making: The effects of novelty in task presentation and time pressure on routine maintenance and deviation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 861-878.
4. Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., Glockner, A., Haar, T., & Fiedler, K. (2001). The effects of routine strength on adaptation and information search in recurrent decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 23-53.
5. Betsch, T., Plessner, H., Schwieren, C., & Gutig, R. (2001). I like it but I don’t know why: A value- account approach to implicit attitude formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 242-253.
6. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 7-42.
8. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.
9. Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668-1674.
10. Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1978). Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. Psychological Review, 85, 395-416.
11. Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724.
12. Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684-704.
13. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109(1), 75-90.
15. Haberstroh, S., & Betsch, T. (2001). Online strategies versus memory-based strategies in frequency estimation. In P. Sedlmeier & T. Betsch (Eds.), Frequency processing and cognition (pp. 205-220). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
16. Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Hammond, K. R., Hamm, R. M., Grassia, J., & Pearson, T. (1987). Direct comparison of the efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 17, 753-770.
18. Hasher, L., &Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356-358.
19. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1984). Automatic processing of fundamental information: The case of frequency of occurrence. American Psychologist, 39, 1372-1388.
20. Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional consequences of judgmental heuristics. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 197-217.
21. Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
22. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), The psychology of intuitive judgment: Heuristics and biases (pp. 49-81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
25. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Eco nometrica, 47, 263-291.
26. Klein, G. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Kmett, C. A., Arkes, H. R., & Jones, S. K. (1999). The influence of decision aids on high school students’ satisfaction with their college choice decision. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1293-1301.
28. Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Perseus.
29. MacGregor, D. G. (2001). Decomposition for judgmental forecasting and estimation. In J. Scott Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of forecasting: A handbook for researchers and practitioners (pp. 107-123). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
30. McMackin, J., & Slovic, P. (2000). When does explicit justification impair decision making? Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 527-541.
31. Ochsner, K. N., & Lieberman, M. D. (2001). The emergence of social cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist, 56, 717-734.
32. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing:Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
33. Schooler, J. W., &Dougal, S. (1999). The symbiosis of subjective and experimental approaches to intuition. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 280-287.
34. Schooler, J. W., & Engster-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.
35. Schooler, J. W., Ohlsson, S., & Brooks, K. (1993). Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 166-183.
36. Seligman, M. E. P. (1970). On the generality of laws of learning. Psychological Review, 77,406-418.
37. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing:Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
38. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
39. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 161-188.
40. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293-315.
41. Wilson, T. D., Kraft, D., & Dunn, D. S. (1989). The disruptive effects of explaining attitudes: The moderating effect of knowledge about the attitude object. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 379-400.
42. Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101-126.
43. Wilson, T. D., Lisle, D. J., Schooler, J. W., Hodges, S. D., Klaaren, K. J., & LaFleur, S. J. (1993). Introspecting about reasons can reduce post-choice satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 331-339.
44. Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181-192.