Individual differences in a within-subjects risky-choice framing study

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 248-257

  Mahoney, Kevin T ^a   Buboltz, Walter ^a   Levin, Irwin P ^b   Doverspike, Dennis ^c   Svyantek, Daniel J ^d  

^a LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

^d AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Framing; Risk taking

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958179246     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.035     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Blais A.-R., Weber E.U. A Domain Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) Scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision-Making 2006, 1:33-47.
2. Bromiley P., Curley S.P. Individual differences in risk. Risk-taking behavior 1992, 87-132. John Wiley & Sons, Oxford. J.F. Yates (Ed.).
3. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E. Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal 1982, 23:509-520.
4. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 112:155-159.
5. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1998, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
6. Epstein S. Cognitive-experiential self-theory. Advanced personality 1998, 211-238. Plenum Press, New York. D.F. Barone, M. Hersen (Eds.).
7. Epstein S., Pacini R., Denes-Raj V., Heier H. Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 71:390-405.
8. Erker, S. (2000). The importance of individual difference variables to decision making under conditions of risk. A dissertation. University of Akron.
9. Fagley N.S., Miller P.M. The effects of decision framing on choice of risky vs. certain options. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1987, 39:264-277.
10. Fagley N.S., Miller P.M. The effect of framing on choice: Interactions with risk-taking propensity, cognitive style, and sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1990, 16:496-510.
11. Fischhoff B. Predicting frames. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1983, 9:103-116.
12. Frisch D. Reasons for framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1993, 54:399-429.
13. Kahneman D.A. Perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist 2003, 58:697-720.
14. Kahneman D.A., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47:263-292.
15. Keeney R.L., Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs 1976, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
16. Kogan N., Wallach M.A. Risk-taking: A study in cognition and personality 1964, Holt, Rinhart & Winston, New York.
17. Kuehberger A. Theoretical conceptions of framing effects in risky decisions. Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations 1997, Routledge, London. R. Ranyard, W.R. Crozier, O. Svenson (Eds.).
18. Kuehberger A. The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1998, 75:23-55.
19. Kuehberger A., Schulte-Mecklenbeck M., Perner J. The effects of framing, reflection, probability, and payoff on risk preference in choice tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1999, 78:204-231.
20. Lauriola M., Russo P.M., Lucidi F., Violani C., Levin I.P. The role of personality in positively and negatively framed risky health decisions. Personality and Individual Differences 2005, 38:45-59.
21. LeBoeuf R.A., Shafir E. Deep thoughts and shallow frames: On the susceptibility to framing effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2003, 16:77-92.
22. Levin I.P., Chapman D.P. Risk taking, frame of reference, and characterization of victim groups in AIDS treatment decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1990, 26:421-434.
23. Levin I.P., Gaeth G.J., Schreiber J., Lauriola M. A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 2002, 88:411-429.
24. Levin I.P., Schneider S.L., Gaeth G.J. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1998, 76:149-188.
25. Loewenstein G.F., Weber E.U., Hsee C.K., Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin 2001, 127:267-286.
26. Norris, P., & Epstein, S. (submitted for publication). A short-form of the rational-experiential inventory and support for its validity.
27. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric theory 1978, McGraw-Hill, New York. 2nd ed.
28. Parker A.M., Bruine de Bruin W., Fischhoff B. Maximizers versus satisficers: Decision-making styles, competence, and outcomes. Judgment and Decision Making 2007, 2:342-350.
29. Parker A.M., Fischhoff B. Decision-making competence: External validation through an individual differences approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2005, 18:1-27.
30. Peters E., Västfjäll D., Slovic P., Mertz C., Mazzocco K., Dickert S. Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science 2006, 17:407-413.
31. Schneider S.L., Lopes L.L. Reflection in preferences under risk: Who and when may suggest why. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptions and Performance 1986, 12:535-548.
32. Shiloh S., Salton E., Sharobi D. Individual differences in rational and intuitive thinking styles as predictors of heuristic responses and framing effects. Personality and Individual Differences 2002, 32:415-429.
33. Shure G.H., Meeker R.J. A personality/attitudes schedule for use in experimental bargaining studies. Journal of Psychology 1967, 65:233-252.
34. Simon A.F., Fagley N.S., Halleran J.G. Decision framing: Moderating effects of individual differences and cognitive processing. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2004, 17:77-93.
35. Smith S.M., Levin I.P. Need for cognition and choice framing effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1996, 9:283-290.
36. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology 1997, 89:342-357.
37. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Individual differences in framing and conjunction effects. Thinking & Reasoning 1998, 4:289-317.
38. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Discrepancies between normative and descriptive models of decision making and the understanding/acceptance principle. Cognitive Psychology 1999, 38:349-385.
39. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2000, 23:645-726.
40. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008, 94:672-695.
41. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981, 211:453-458.
42. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business 1984, 59:S251-S278.
43. Weber E.U., Blais A., Betz N.E. A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2002, 15:263-290.
44. Weller, J. A., Levin, I. P., & Denburg, N. (2010). Trajectory of risky decision making for potential gains and losses from ages 5 to 85. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. doi:10.1002/bdm.690.
45. Yates F.J., Stone E.R. The risk construct. Risk-taking behavior 1992, Vols. 1-25. John Wiley & Sons, Oxford.
46. Zaleskiewicz T. Beyond risk seeking and risk aversion: Personality and the dual nature of economic risk taking. European Journal of Personality 2001, 15:105-122.