Individual differences in need for cognition and decision making in the Iowa Gambling Task

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 112-116

  Harman, Jason L ^a  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Iowa Gambling Task; Need for cognition; Risky decision making

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955624366     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.021     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Arkes H.R. Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing. Psychological Bulletin 1991, 110(3):486-498.
2. Bechara A. Iowa Gambling Task Professional Manual 2007, Psychological Assessment Resources, Boca Raton, Fl.
3. Bechara A., Damasio H. Decision-making and addiction (part I): Impaired activation of somatic states in substance dependent individuals when pondering decisions with negative future consequences. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40(10):1675-1689.
4. Bechara A., Damasio A.R., Damasio H., Anderson S.W. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 1994, 50(1-3):7-15.
5. Bechara A., Damasio H., Tranel D., Damasio A.R. The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: Some questions and answers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9(4):159-162.
6. Bechara A., Dolan S., Hindes A. Decision-making and addiction (part II): Myopia for the future or hypersensitivity to reward?. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40(10):1690-1705.
7. Bechara A., Tranel D., Damasio H. Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain: A Journal of Neurology 2000, 123(11):2189-2202.
8. Brand M., Recknor E.C., Grabenhorst F., Bechara A. Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2007, 29(1):86-99.
9. Bruine de Bruin W., Parker A.M., Fischhoff B. Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 92(5):938-956.
10. Buelow M.T., Suhr A. Construct validity of the Iowa Gambling Task. Neuropsychology Review 2009, 19(1):102-114.
11. Busemeyer J.R., Stout C. A contribution of cognitive decision models to clinical assessment: Decomposing performance on the Bechara gambling task. Psychological Assessment 2002, 14(3):253-262.
12. Cacioppo J.T., Petty E. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1982, 42(1):116-131.
13. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., Feinstein J.A., Jarvis W.B.G. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin 1996, 119(2):197-253.
14. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., Kao C.F. The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment 1984, 48(3):306-307.
15. Carnevale, J., Inbar, Y., & Lerner, J. S. (2010). Individual differences in need for cognition and decision making competence among leaders. Personality and Individual Differences, doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.023.
16. Chatterjee S., Heath T.B., Milberg S.J., France K.R. The differential processing of price in gains and losses: The effects of frame and need for cognition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2000, 13(1):61-75.
17. Desmeules R., Bechara A., Dube L. Subjective valuation and asymmetrical motivational systems: Implications of scope insensitivity for decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2008, 21(2):211-224.
18. Evans C.E., Kemish K., Turnbull O.H. Paradoxical effects of education on the Iowa Gambling Task. Brain and Cognition 2004, 54(3):240-244.
19. Gigerenzer G., Todd P.M. Simple heuristics that make us smart 2000, the ABC Group, Oxford University Press, Cary, NC.
20. Hamstra M.R., Bolderdijk J.W., Veldstra J.L. Everyday risk taking as a function of regulatory focus. Journal of Research in Personality 2011, 45(1):134-137.
21. Higgins E.T. Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist 1997, 52(12):1280-1300.
22. Klein G. Sources of power: How people make decisions 1999, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
23. LeBoeuf R.A., Shafir E. Deep thoughts and shallow frames; on the susceptibility to framing effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2003, 16(2):77-92.
24. Levin I.P., Gaeth G.J., Schreiber J., Lauriola M. A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2002, 88(1):411-429.
25. Maia T.V., McClelland L. The somatic marker hypothesis: Still many questions but no answers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 9(4):162-164.
26. Monterosso J., Ehrman R., Napier K.L., O'Brien C.P., Childress A.R. Three decision-making tasks in cocaine-dependent patients: Do they measure the same construct?. Addiction 2001, 96(12):1825-1837.
27. Scholer A.A., Higgins E.T. Distinguishing levels of approach and avoidance: An analysis using regulatory focus theory. Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation 2008, 489-504. Psychology Press, New York. A.J. Elliot (Ed.).
28. Smith S.M., Levin P. Need for cognition and choice framing effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1996, 9(4):283-290.
29. Suzuki A., Hirota A., Takasawa N., Shigemasu K. Application of the somatic marker hypothesis to individual differences in decision making. Biological Psychology 2003, 65(1):81-88.
30. Weller J.A., Levin I.P., Bechara A. Do individual differences in Iowa Gambling Task performance predict adaptive decision making for risky gains and losses?. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2010, 32(2):141-150.
31. Wood S., Busemeyer J., Koling A., Cox C.R., Davis H. Older adults as adaptive decision makers: evidence from the Iowa gambling task. Psychology and Aging 2005, 20(2):220-225.
32. Yechiam E., Busemeyer R. Comparison of basic assumptions embedded in learning models for experience-based decision making. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12(3):387-402.
33. Yechiam E., Busemeyer J.R., Stout J.C., Bechara A. Using cognitive models to map relations between neuropsychological disorders and human decision-making deficits. Psychological Science 2005, 16(12):973-978.
34. Yechiam E., Kanz J.E., Bechara A., Stout J.C., Busemeyer J.R., Altmaier E.M., et al. Neurocognitive deficits related to poor decision making in people behind bars. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15(1):44-51.
35. Yechiam E., Veinott E.S., Busemeyer J.R., Stout J.C. Cognitive models for evaluating basic decision processes in clinical populations. Advances in clinical cognitive science: Formal modeling of processes and symptoms 2007, 81-111. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US.