Assessing rational and intuitive thinking styles

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 39-47

  Witteman, Cilia ^a,b   Van Bercken, John Den ^a   Claes, Laurence ^c   Godoy, Antonio ^d  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Big five; Intuition; Rationality

Indexed keywords

EID: 62449123397     PISSN: 10155759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759.25.1.39     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Betsch, C. (2004). Präferenz fur Intuition und Deliberation. Inventar zur Erfassung von affekt- und kognitionsbasiertem Entscheiden. [Preference for Intuition and Deliberation (PID): An inventory for assessing affect- and cognition-based decisionmaking]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologic, 25, 179-197.
2. Betsch, C. (2008). Chronic preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision making. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 231-248). New York: Erlbaum.
3. Burns, L.R., & D'Zurilla, T.J.D. (1999). Individual differences in perceived information-processing styles in stress and coping situations: Development and validation of the Perceived Modes of Processing Inventory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 23, 345-371.
4. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Feinstein, J.A., & Jarvis, W.B.G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
5. Costa, PT, & McCrae, R.R. (1989). NEO PI/FFI: Manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
6. Denes-Raj, V., & Epstein, S. (1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 819-829.
7. De Vries, M., Holland, R., & Witteman, C.L.M. (2008). Fitting decisions: Diffuse affect and intuitive versus deliberative decision strategies. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 931-943.
8. Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 586-598.
9. Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 165-192). New York: Guilford.
10. Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724.
11. Epstein, S. (2008). Intuition from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 23-37). New York: Erlbaum.
12. Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390-405.
13. Evans, J. St.B.T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
14. Frederick, S. (2002). Automated choice heuristics. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 548-558). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Goldberg, L.R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-A2.
16. Hammond, K.R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainky inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Hogarth, R.M. (2005). Deciding analytically or trusting your intuition? The advantages and disadvantages of analytic and intuitive thought. In T. Betsch & S. Haberstroh (Eds.), The routines of decision making (pp. 67-82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
19. Jaccard, J., & Wan, C.K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
20. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 28, 697-720.
21. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In D.G.T. Gilovich & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Kirkpatrick, L.A., & Epstein, S. (1992). Cognitive-experiential self-theory and subjective probability: Further evidence for two conceptual systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 534-544.
23. Klein, G. (2003). Intuition at work: Why developing your gut instincts will make you better at what you do. New York: Doubleday.
24. Langan-Fox J., & Shirley D. A. (2003). The nature and measurement of intuition: Cognitive and behavioral interests, personality, and experiences. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 207-222.
25. Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 972-987.
26. Plessner, PL, & Czenna, S. (2008). The benefits of intuition. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 251-265). New York: Erlbaum.
27. Ruiz, V.M. (2006). Factor analysis and hierarchical structure of person-descriptive adjectives in Spanish population. Unpublished manuscript. University of Malaga, Spain.
28. Shafer, A.B. (1999). Brief bipolar markers for the five-factor model of personality. Psychological Reports, 84, 1173-1179.
29. Shiloh, S., Saltan, E., & Sharabi, D. (2002). Individual differences in rational and intuitive thinking styles as predictors of heuristic responses and framing effects. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 415-429.
30. Sloman, S.A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
31. Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-726.
32. Vermulst, A.A., & Gerris, J.R.M. (2006). QBE Quick Big Five persoonlijkheids-vragenlijst. Handleiding [Quick Big Five personality questionnaire. Guideline]. Leeuwarden: LDC.
33. Wilson, T.D. (2002). Strangers to ourselves: Discovering the adaptive unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Witteman, C.L.M., & Van den Bercken, J.H.L. (2007). Intermediate effects in psychodiagnostic classification. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 56-61.