Dual-process theories: A metacognitive perspective

In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Thompson, Valerie A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Metacognitive experiences; Reasoning attempt; S2 intervention; Second order judgement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922761302     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0008     Document Type: Chapter

References (127)

1. Arbuthnott, K.D. Arbuthnott, D.W., and Thompson, V.A. (2005) The mind in therapy: Cognitive science for practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.
2. Ball, L.J., Lucas, E.J., Miles, J.N.V., and Gale, A.G. (2003) Inspection times and the selection task: What do eye-movements reveal about relevance effects? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 56, 1053-77.
3. Bargh, J.A. (2007) Social psychological approaches to consciousness. In P.D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, and E. Thompson (eds). The Cambridge handbook of consciousness, 555-69. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Begg, I. and Harris, G. (1982) On the interpretation of syllogisms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 595-620.
5. Benjamin, A.S., Bjork, R.A., and Schwartz, B.L. (1998) The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55-68.
6. Brewer, W.F. and Sampaio, C. (2006) Processes leading to confidence and accuracy in sentence recognition: A metamemory approach. Memory, 14, 540-52.
7. Brokmole, J.R. and Hendersen, J.M. (2005). Object appearance, disappearance, and attention prioritization in real-world scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1061-7.
8. Burson, K.A., Larrick, R.P., and Klayman, J. (2006) Skilled or unskilled, but still unaware of it: How perceptions of difficulty drive miscalibration in relative comparisons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 60-77.
9. Busey, T.A., Tunnicliff, J., Loftus, GR., and Loftus, E.F. (2000) Accounts of the confidenceaccuracy relation in recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 26-48.
10. Chapman, G.B. and Johnson, E.J. (2002) Incorporating the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman (eds) Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, 120-38. Cambridge University Press, New York.
11. Chen, S. and Chaiken, S. (1999) The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken and Y. Trope (eds) Dual-process theories in social psychology, 73-96. The Guilford Press, New York.
12. Costermans, J., Lories, G., and Ansay, C. (1992) Confidence level and feeling of knowing in question answering: The weight of inferential processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 142-50.
13. Cowley, E. (2004) Recognition confidence, recognition accuracy and choice. Journal of Business Research, 57, 641-6.
14. Daniel, D.B. and Klaczynski, P.A. (2006) Developmental and individual differences in conditional reasoning: Effects of logic instructions and alternative antecedents. Child Development, 77, 339-54.
15. De Neys, W. (2006a) Automatic-heuristic and executive-analytic processing during reasoning: Chronometric and dual-task considerations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1070-100.
16. De Neys, W. (2006b) Dual processing in reasoning: Two systems but one reasoner. Psychological Science, 17, 428-33.
17. De Neys, W., Schaeken, W., and d'Ydewalle, G. (2005) Working memory and counterexample retrieval for causal conditionals. Thinking & Reasoning, 11, 123-50.
18. Desoete, A. and Roeyers, H. (2006) Metacognitive macroevaluations in mathematical problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 16, 12-25.
19. Desoete, A., Roeyers, H, and De Clercq, A. (2003) Can offline metacognition enhance mathematical problem solving? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 188-200.
20. Dewhurst, S.A. and Hitch, G.J. (1997) Illusions of familiarity caused by cohort activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 566-71.
21. Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., and Kruger, J. (2003) Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 83-7.
22. Efklides, A., Samara, A., and Petropoulou, M. (1999) Feeling of difficulty: An aspect of monitoring that influences control. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 461-76.
23. Epley, N. (2004) A tale of tuned decks? Anchoring as accessibility and anchoring as adjustment. In Koehler, D.E. and Harvey, N. (eds). Blackwell Handbook of judgment and decision-making, 240-57. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA.
24. Evans, J.St.B.T. (1996) Deciding before you think: Relevance and reasoning in the selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 223-40.
25. Evans, J.St.B.T. (1998) Matching bias in conditional reasoning: Do we understand it after 25 years? Thinking & Reasoning, 4, 45-82.
26. Evans, J.St.B.T. (2006) The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 378-95.
27. Evans, J.St.B.T. (2007) On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 13, 321-9.
28. Evans, J.St.B.T. and Curtis-Holmes, J. (2005) Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 11, 382-9.
29. Evans, J.St.B.T. and Over, D.E. (1996) Rationality and reasoning. Psychology Press, Hove.
30. Evans, J.St.B.T. and Wason, P.C. (1976) Rationalization in a reasoning task. British Journal of Psychology, 67, 479-86.
31. Evans, J.St.B.T., Handley, S., and Over, D.E. (2003) Conditionals and conditional probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 29, 321-55.
32. Evans, J.St.B.T., Newstead, S.E., Allen, J.L., and Pollard, P. (1994) Debiasing by instruction: The case of belief bias. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 263-85.
33. Feeney, A., Scrafton, S., Duckworth, A., and Handley, S.J. (2004) The story of some: Everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 121-32.
34. Finucane, M.L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., and Johnson, S.M. (2000) The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1-17.
35. Frederick, S. (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25-42.
36. Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., and Kleinbolting, H. (1991) Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98, 506-28.
37. Gilhooly, K.J., Wynn, V., Philips, L.H., Llogie, R.H., and Della Sala, S. (2002) Visuospatial and verbal working memory in the five-disc Tower of London task: An individual differences approach. Thinking & Reasoning, 8, 165-78.
38. Gill, M.J., Swann, W.B. Jr., and Sivera, D.H. (1998) On the genesis of confidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1101-14.
39. Handley, S.J., Capon, A., Beveridge, M., Dennis, I., and Evans, J.St.B.T. (2004) Working memory, inhibitory control and the development of children's reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 10, 175-95.
40. Harmon-Jones, E. and Allen, J.J.B. (2001) The role of affect in the mere exposure effect: Evidence from psychophysiological and individual differences approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 889-98.
41. Hearst, E. (1991) Psychology and nothing. American Scientist, 79, 432-43.
42. Hertzog, C. and Robinson, A. E. (2005) Metacognition and intelligence. In O. Wilhelm and R.W. Engle (eds) Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence, 101-23. Sage Publications, Inc, Sage.
43. Jacoby, L.L. and Whitehouse, K. (1989) An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126-35.
44. Jacoby, L.L., Kelley, C.M., and Dywan, J. (1989) Memory attributions. In H.L. Roediger III, and F.I.M. Craik (eds) Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving, 391-422. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, NJ.
45. Johnson-Laird, P.N. and Byrne, R.M.J. (1991) Deduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, NJ.
46. Jonsson, A.C. and Allwood, C.M. (2003) Stability and variability in the realism of confidence judgements over time, content domain, and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 559-74.
47. Kahneman, D. (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720.
48. Kelley, C.M. and Jacoby, L.L. (1993) The construction of subjective experience: Memory attributions. In M. Davies and G. W. Humphreys (eds) Consciousness: Psychological and philosophical essays, 74-89. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA.
49. Kelley, C.M. and Jacoby, L.L. (1996) Adult egocentrism: Subjective experience versus analytic bases for judgment. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 157-75.
50. Klaczynski, P.A. and Robinson, B. (2000) Personal theories, intellectual ability, and epistemological beliefs: Adult age differences in everyday reasoning biases. Psychology and Aging, 15, 400-16.
51. Koriat, A. (1993) How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609-39.
52. Koriat, A. (1995) Dissociating knowing and the feeling of knowing: Further evidence for the accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 311-33.
53. Koriat, A. (1997) Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-70.
54. Koriat, A. (2007) Metacognition and consciousness. In P.D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, and E. Thompson (eds) The Cambridge handbook of consciousness, 289-326. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
55. Koriat, A. and Levy-Sadot, R. (1999) Processes underlying metacognitive judgments: Information-based and experience-based monitoring of one's own knowledge. In S. Chaiken, and Y. Trope (eds) Dual-process theories in social psychology, 483-502. Guilford Press, New York.
56. Koriat, A., Bjork, R.A., Sheffer, L., and Bar, S.K. (2004) Predicting one's own forgetting: The role of experience-based and theory-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 643-56.
57. Koriat, A., Levy-Sadot, R., Edry, E., and de Marcas, S. (2003) What do we know about what we cannot remember? Accessing the semantic attributes of words that cannot be recalled. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1095-105.
58. Krendl, A.C., Macrae, C.N., Kelley, W.M., Fugelsang, J.A., and Heatherton, T.F. (2006) The good, the bad, and the ugly: An fMRI investigation of the functional anatomic correlates of stigma. Social Neuroscience, 1, 5-15.
59. Kruger, J. (1999) Lake Wobegon be gone! The 'below-average effect' and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 221-32.
60. Lin, L.M., Moore, D., and Zabrucky, K.M. (2001) An assessment of students' calibration of comprehension and calibration of performance using multiple measures. Reading Psychology, 22, 111-28.
61. Lucangeli, D., Tressoldi, P.E., and Cendron, M. (1998) Cognitive and metacognitive abilities involved in the solution of mathematical word problems: Validation of a comprehensive model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 257-75.
62. Lucas, E.J. and Ball, L.J. (2005) Think-aloud protocols and the selection task: Evidence for relevance effects and rationalisation processes. Thinking & Reasoning, 11, 35-66.
63. Markovits, H. and Doyon, C. (2004) Information processing and reasoning with premises that are empirically false: Interference, working memory, and processing speed. Memory & Cognition, 32, 592-601.
64. Markovits, H. and Quinn, S. (2002) Efficiency of retrieval correlates with 'logical' reasoning from causal conditional premises. Memory & Cognition, 30, 696-706.
65. Matvey, G., Dunlosky, J., and Guttentag, R. (2001) Fluency of retrieval at study affects judgements of learning (JOLs): An analytic or nonanalytic basis for JOLs? Memory and Cognition, 29, 222-33.
66. Mazzoni, G. and Cornoldi, C. (1993) Strategies in study time allocation: Why is study time sometimes not effective? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 47-60.
67. Metcalfe, J. (1986a) Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 288-94.
68. Metcalfe, J. (1986b) Premonitions of insight predict impending error. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 623-34.
69. Metcalfe, J. and Wiebe, D. (1987) Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15, 238-46.
70. Morgan, P.J. and Cleave-Hogg, D. (2002) Comparison between medical students' experience, confidence and competence. Medical Education, 36, 534-9.
71. Nêcka, E. and Orzechowski, J. (2005) Higher-order cognition and intelligence. In R.J. Sternberg and J.E. Pretz (eds) Cognition and intelligence: Identifying mechanisms of the mind, 122-41. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
72. Nelson, T.O. (1993) Judgments of learning and the allocation of study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 269-73.
73. Nelson, T.O. and Dunlosky, J. (1991) When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The 'delayed-JOL effect'. Psychological Science, 2, 267-70.
74. Newstead, S.E. (1989) Interpretational errors in syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 78-91.
75. Newstead, S.E. (2000) What is an ecologically rational heuristic? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 759-60.
76. Newstead, S.E., Pollard, P., and Evans, J.S. (1992) The source of belief bias effects in syllogistic reasoning. Cognition, 45, 257-84.
77. Pacini, R. and Epstein, S. (1999) The relation of rational and experiential information processing style to personality, basic beliefs and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 972-87.
78. Pressley, M. (2003) Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In A. Farstrup and J. Samuels (eds) What Research has to say about Reading Instructions, 291-309. International Reading Association, Newark.
79. Prins, F.J., Veenman, M.J., and Elshout, J.J. (2006) The impact of intellectual ability and metacognition on learning: New support for the threshold of problematicity theory. Learning and Instruction, 16, 374-87.
80. Prowse-Turner, J. and Thompson, V.A. (2007) Factors affecting the confidence-accuracy relationship in deductive reasoning. Manuscript under review.
81. Rajaram, S. (1993) Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition, 21, 89-102.
82. Reber, R. and Schwarz, N. (1999) Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 338-42.
83. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., Winkielman, P. (2004) Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364-82.
84. Reder, L.M., and Ritter, F. E. (1992) What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 435-51.
85. Rehder, B. (1999) Detecting unsolvable algebra word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 669-83.
86. Roberts, M.J. (2004) Heuristics and reasoning I: Making deduction simple. In J. P. Leighton and R. J. Sternberg (eds) The Nature of Reasoning, 234-72. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
87. Roberts, M.J. and Newton, E.J. (2001) Inspection times, the change task, and the rapidresponse selection task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A Human Experimental Psychology, 54, 1031-48.
88. Roberts, M.J., Newstead, S.E., and Griggs, R.A. (2001) Quantifier interpretation and syllogistic reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 7, 173-204.
89. Roediger, H.L. and McDermott, K.B. (1995) Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-14.
90. Rothman, A.J. and Schwarz, N. (1998) Constructing perceptions of vulnerability: Personal relevance and the use of experiential information in health judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1053-64.
91. Sanna, L.J. and Schwarz, N. (2003) Debiasing the hindsight bias: The role of accessibility experiences and (mis)attributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 287-95.
92. Schmidt, J. and Thompson, V.A. (2008) 'At least one' problem with 'some' formal reasoning paradigms. Memory & Cognition, 36, 217-29.
93. Schraw, G., Dunkle, M.E., Bendixen, L.D., and Roedel, T.D. (1995) Does a general monitoring skill exist? Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 433-44.
94. Schunn, C.D., Reder, L.M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Richards, D.R., and Stroffolino, P. J. (1997) To calculate or not to calculate: A source activation confusion model of problem familiarity's role in strategy selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 3-29.
95. Schwarz, N. (2004) Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332-48.
96. Schwarz, N. and Vaughn, L.A. (2002) The availability heuristic revisited: Ease of recall and content of recall as distinct sources of information. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman (eds) Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, 103-119. Cambridge University Press, New York.
97. Schwartz, B.L., Benjamin, A.S., and Bkork, R.A. (1997) The inferential and experiential bases of metamemory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 132-7.
98. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., and Simons, A. (1991) Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195-202.
99. Shynkaruk, J.M. and Thompson, V.A. (2006) Confidence and accuracy in deductive reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 34, 619-32.
100. Sloman, S.A. (2002) Two systems of reasoning. In G. D. Griffin and D. Kahneman (eds) Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, 379-96. Cambridge University Press, New York.
101. Son, L.K. (2004) Spacing one's study: Evidence for a metacognitive control strategy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 3, 601-4.
102. Son, L.K. and Metcalfe, J. (2000) Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 204-21.
103. Son, L.K. and Metcalfe, J. (2005) Judgments of learning: Evidence for a two-stage process. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1116-29.
104. Sperber, D., Cara, F., and Girotto, V. (1995) Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition, 57, 31-95.
105. Sporer, S.L., Penrod, S., Read, D., and Cutler, B. (1995) Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 315-27.
106. Stankov, L. (2000). Complexity, metacognition, and fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 28, 121-43.
107. Stanovich, K.E. (1999) Who is rational?: Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ.
108. Stanovich, K.E. (2004) The robot's rebellion: Finding meaning in the age of Darwin. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
109. Stanovich, K.E. and West, R.F. (2007) Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability. Thinking & Reasoning, 13, 225-47.
110. Thompson, V.A. (1995) Conditional reasoning: The necessary and sufficient conditions. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 1-60.
111. Thompson, V.A. (2000) The task-specific nature of domain-general reasoning. Cognition, 76, 209-68.
112. Todd, P.M. and Gigerenzer, G. (2000) Precis of simple heuristics that make us smart. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 727-80.
113. Todd, P.M. and Gigerenzer, G. (2003) Bounding rationality to the world. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 143-65.
114. Torrens, D., Thompson, V.A., and Cramer, K.M. (1999) Individual differences and the belief bias effect: Mental models, logical necessity, and abstract reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 5, 1-28.
115. Vadeboncoeur, I. and Markovits, H. (1999) The effect of instructions and information retrieval on accepting the premises in a conditional reasoning task. Thinking & Reasoning, 5, 97-113. Taylor & Francis, Oxford.
116. Veenman, M.V.J., Kok, R., and Blöte, A.W. (2005) The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills in early adolescence. Instructional Science, 33, 193-211.
117. Vernon, D. and Usher, M. (2003) Dynamics of metacognitive judgments: Pre-and postretrieval mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 339-46.
118. Verschueren, N., Schaeken, W., and D'Ydewalle, G. (2005) Everyday conditional reasoning: A working memory-dependent tradeoff between counterexample and likelihood use. Memory & Cognition, 33, 107-19.
119. Wason, P.C. and Evans, J.St.B.T. (1975) Dual processing in reasoning? Cognition, 3, 141-54.
120. Whittlesea, B.W.A. (1993) Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1235-53.
121. Whittlesea, B.W. and Jacoby, L.L. (1990) Interaction of prime repetition with visual degradation: Is priming a retrieval phenomenon? Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 546-65.
122. Whittlesea, B.W. Jacoby, L.L., and Girard, K. (1990) Illusions of immediate memory: Evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 716-32.
123. Whittlesea, B.W.A. and Leboe, J.P. (2003) Two fluency heuristics (and how to tell them apart). Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 62-79.
124. Wilson, T.D. and Dunn, E.W. (2004) Self-knowledge: Its limits, value, and potential for improvement. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 493-518.
125. Winkielman, P., Halberstadt, J., Fazendeiro, T., and Catty, S. (2006) Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological Science, 17, 799-806.
126. Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T.A., and Reber, R. (2003) The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch and K.C. Klauer (eds) The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion, 189-217. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
127. Zizak, D.M. and Reber, A.S. (2004) Implicit preferences: The role(s) of familiarity in the structure mere exposure effect. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 336-62.