Chaotropicity: A key factor in product tolerance of biofuel-producing microorganisms

Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Volumn 33, Issue , 2015, Pages 228-259

  Cray, Jonathan A ^a   Stevenson, Andrew ^a   Ball, Philip ^b   Bankar, Sandip B ^c   Eleutherio, Elis CA ^d   Ezeji, Thaddeus C ^e   Singhal, Rekha S ^f   Thevelein, Johan M ^g   Timson, David J ^a   Hallsworth, John E ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Chemical Engineering College of Engineering Bharati Vidyapeeth University ^*  (United Kingdom)

^c BHARATI VIDYAPEETH DEEMED UNIVERSITY   (India)

^d FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^e OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^g UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHANOL; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; YEAST;

ALCOHOL CONCENTRATIONS; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL TOLERANCE; FERMENTATION PRODUCTS; KNOWLEDGE BASED STRATEGIES; MACROMOLECULAR SYSTEMS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE STRAINS; SOLUBILITY LIMITS;

BIOFUELS;

ALCOHOL; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; BUTANOL; TOXIN; WATER; BIOFUEL;

ACIDITY; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIAL METABOLISM; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; CHAOTROPICITY; CHEMICAL PARAMETERS; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; ENERGY YIELD; FERMENTATION; FLEXIBILITY; GROWTH INHIBITION; HYDROPHILICITY; MACROMOLECULE; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; NONHUMAN; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; PSEUDOMONAS PUTIDA; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STABILITY; TEMPERATURE; UPREGULATION; WATER ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; BIOSYNTHESIS; HUMAN; METABOLISM;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BIOFUELS; BUTANOLS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; HUMANS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84940363584     PISSN: 09581669     EISSN: 18790429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2015.02.010     Document Type: Review

References (226)

1. Randazzo C.L., Pitino I., Ribbera A., Caggia C. Pecorino Crotonese cheese: study of bacterial population and flavour compounds. Food Microbiol 2010, 27:363-374.
2. Cray J.A., Bell A.N.W., Bhaganna P., Mswaka A.Y., Timson D.J., Hallsworth J.E. The biology of habitat dominance; can microbes behave as weeds?. Microb Biotechnol 2013, 6:453-492.
3. Bhaganna P., Volkers R.J.M., Bell A.N.W., Kluge K., Timson D.J., McGrath J.W., Ruijssenaars H.J., Hallsworth J.E. Hydrophobic substances induce water stress in microbial cells. Microb Biotechnol 2010, 3:701-716.
4. Ball P., Hallsworth J.E. Water structure and chaotropicity: their uses and abuses. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2015, 17:8297-8305. 10.1039/C4CP04564E.
5. Hallsworth J.E., Heim S., Timmis K.N. Chaotropic solutes cause water stress in Pseudomonas putida. Environ Microbiol 2003, 5:1270-1280.
6. Hallsworth J.E., Yakimov M.M., Golyshin P.N., Gillion J.L.M., D'Auria G., Alves F.L., La Cono V., Genovese M., McKew B.A., Hayes S.L., et al. Limits of life in MgCl2-containing environments: chaotropicity defines the window. Environ Microbiol 2007, 9:803-813.
7. Cray J.A., Russell J.T., Timson D.J., Singhal R.S., Hallsworth J.E. A universal measure of chaotropicity and kosmotropicity. Environ Microbiol 2013, 15:287-296.
8. Yakimov M.M., La Cono V., La Spada G., Bortoluzzi G., Messina E., Smedile F., Arcadi E., Borghini M., Ferrer M., Schmitt-Koplin P., et al. Microbial community of seawater-brine interface of the deep-sea brine Lake Kryos as revealed by recover of mRNA are active below the chaotropicity limit of life. Environ Microbiol 2015, 17:364-382.
9. Ezeji T., Milne C., Price N.D., Blaschek H.P. Achievements and perspectives to overcome the poor solvent resistance in acetone and butanol-producing microorganisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 85:1697-1712.
10. Rummel J.D., Beaty D.W., Jones M.A., Bakermans C., Barlow N.G., Boston P.J., Chevrier V.F., Clark B.C., de Vera J.P.P., Gough R.V., et al. A new analysis of Mars 'Special Regions': findings of the second MEPAG Special Regions Science Analysis Group (SR-SAG2). Astrobiology 2014, 14:887-968.
11. Hallsworth J.E. Ethanol-induced water stress in yeast. J Ferment Bioeng 1998, 85:125-137.
12. Rühl J., Schmid A., Blank L.M. Selected Pseudomonas putida strains able to grow in the presence of high butanol concentrations. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75:4653-4656.
13. Shi D.J., Wang C.L., Wang K.M. Genome shuffling to improve thermotolerance, ethanol tolerance and ethanol productivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2009, 36:139-147.
14. Bleoanca I., Silva A.R.C., Pimentel C., Rodrigues-Pousada C., Menezes R.A. Relationship between ethanol and oxidative stress in laboratory and brewing yeast strains. J Biosci Bioeng 2013, 116:697-705.
15. Chin J.P., Megaw J., Magill C.L., Nowotarski K., Williams J.P., Bhaganna P., Linton M., Patterson M.F., Underwood G.J.C., Mswaka A.Y., et al. Solutes determine the temperature windows for microbial survival and growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:7835-7840.
16. Benítez T., del Castillo L., Aguilera A., Conde J., Cerdáolmedo E. Selection of wine yeasts for growth and fermentation in the presence of ethanol and sucrose. Appl Environ Microbiol 1983, 45:1429-1436.
17. Trevisol E.T., Panek A.D., Mannarino S.C., Eleutherio E.C. The effect of trehalose on the fermentation performance of aged cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 90:697-704.
18. Bankar S.B., Survase S.A., Ojamo H., Granström T. Biobutanol: the outlook of an academic and industrialist. RSC Adv 2013, 3:24734-24757.
19. Ezeji T.C., Qureshi N., Blaschek H.P. Microbial production of a biofuel (acetone-butanol-ethanol) in a continuous bioreactor: impact of bleed and simultaneous product removal. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 2013, 36:109-116.
20. Pais T.P., Foulquié-Moreno M.R., Hubmann G., Duitama J., Swinnen S., Goovaerts A., Yang Y., Dumortier F., Thevelein J.M. Comparative polygenic analysis of maximal ethanol accumulation capacity and tolerance to high ethanol levels of cell proliferation in yeast. PLoS Genet 2013, 9:e1003548.
21. Fields P.A. Review: protein function at thermal extremes: balancing stability and flexibility. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 2001, 129:417-431.
22. Ferrer M., Chernikova T.N., Yakimov M.M., Golyshin P.N., Timmis K.N. Chaperonins govern growth of Escherichia coli at low temperatures. Nat Biotechnol 2003, 21:1266-1267.
23. Hallsworth J.E., Prior B.A., Nomura Y., Iwahara M., Timmis K.N. Compatible solutes protect against chaotrope (ethanol)-induced, nonosmotic water stress. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003, 69:7032-7034.
24. Williams J.P., Hallsworth J.E. Limits to life in hostile environments; no barriers to biosphere function?. Environ Microbiol 2009, 11:3292-3308.
25. Bell A.N., Magill E., Hallsworth J.E., Timson D.J. Effects of alcohols and compatible solutes on the activity of β-galactosidase. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2013, 169:786-794.
26. Ly H.V., Longo M.L. The influence of short-chain alcohols on interfacial tension, mechanical properties, area/molecule, and permeability of fluid lipid bilayers. Biophys J 2004, 87:1013-1033.
27. Ma M., Liu Z.L. Mechanisms of ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 87:829-845.
28. Aranda A., del Olmo M. Response to acetaldehyde stress in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves a strain-dependent regulation of several ALD genes and is mediated by the general stress response pathway. Yeast 2003, 20:747-759.
29. Lievens B., Hallsworth J.E., Belgacem Z.B., Pozo M.I., Stevenson A., Willems K.A., Jacquemyn H. Microbiology of sugar-rich environments: diversity, ecology, and system constraints. Environ Microbiol 2015, 17:278-298.
30. Weber S., Stubner S., Conrad R. Bacterial populations colonizing and degrading rice straw in anoxic paddy soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001, 67:1318-1327.
31. Pryde S.E., Duncan S.H., Hold G.L., Stewart C.S., Flint H.J. The microbiology of butyrate formation in the human colon. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002, 217:133-139.
32. Peu P., Brugère H., Pourcher A.M., Kérourédan M., Godon J.J., Delgenès J.P., Dabert P. Dynamics of a pig slurry microbial community during anaerobic storage and management. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006, 72:3578-3585.
33. Wang X., Hoefel D., Saint C.P., Monis P.T., Jin B. The isolation and microbial community analysis of hydrogen producing bacteria from activated sludge. J Appl Microbiol 2007, 103:1415-1423.
34. Perrone B., Giacosa S., Rolle L., Cocolin L., Rantsiou K. Investigation of the dominance behavior of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains during wine fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol 2013, 165:156-162.
35. Galeote V.A., Blondin B., Dequin S., Sablayrolles J.M. Stress effects of ethanol on fermentation kinetics by stationary-phase cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Lett 2001, 23:677-681.
36. Heluane H., Evans M.R., Dagher S.F., Bruno-Bárcena J.M. Meta-analysis and functional validation of nutritional requirements of solventogenic clostridia growing under butanol stress conditions and co-utilization of d-glucose and d-xylose. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011, 77:4473-4485.
37. Lanoue A., Burlat V., Henkes G.J., Koch I., Schurr U., Rose U.S. De novo biosynthesis of defense root exudates in response to Fusarium attack in barley. New Phytol 2010, 185:577-588.
38. Sainsbury P.D., Hardiman E.M., Ahmad M., Otani H., Seghezzi N., Eltis L.D., Bugg T.D. Breaking down lignin to high-value chemicals: the conversion of lignocellulose to vanillin in a gene deletion mutant of Rhodococcus jostii RHA1. ACS Chem Biol 2013, 8:2151-2156.
39. Almeida J.R., Bertilsson M., Gorwa-Grauslund M.F., Gorsich S., Lidén G. Metabolic effects of furaldehydes and impacts on biotechnological processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2009, 82:625-638.
40. Allen S.A., Clark W., McCaffery J.M., Cai Z., Lanctot A., Slininger P.J., Liu Z.L., Gorsich S.W. Furfural induces reactive oxygen species accumulation and cellular damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 2010, 3:1-10.
41. Mode of Action of Antifungal Agents 1984, Cambridge University Press. A.P.J. Trinci, J.F. Ryley (Eds.).
42. Cray J.A., Bhaganna P., Singhal R.S., Patil S.V., Saha D., Chakraborty R., Iwaguchi S., Timson D.J., Hallsworth J.E. Chaotropic and hydrophobic stress mechanisms of antifungal substances. Modern Fungicides and Antifungal Compounds 2014, vol VII:73-80. Deutsche Phytomedizinische Gesellschaft, Braunschweig.
43. McCammick E.M., Gomase V.S., Timson D.J., McGenity T.J., Hallsworth J.E. Water-hydrophobic compound interactions with the microbial cell. Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology-Hydrocarbons, Oils and Lipids: Diversity, Properties and Formation 2010, Vol 2:1451-1466. Springer, New York.
44. Serghat S., Mathlouthi M., Hoopman T., Birch G.G. Solute-solvent interactions and the sweet taste of small carbohydrates. I. Effect of solvent polarity on solution properties. Food Chem 1992, 45:25-32.
45. Cascorbi I., Bittrich H., Ricklinkat J., Voss W., Seyfarth A., Foret M. Effects of a heterogenous set of xenobiotics on growth and plasma membranes of mammalian and fungal cell cultures. Ecotox Environ Saf 1993, 26:113-126.
46. Kabelitz N., Santos P.M., Heipieper H.J. Effect of aliphatic alcohols on growth and degree of saturation of membrane lipids in Acinetobacter calcoaceticus. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2003, 220:223-227.
47. das Neves L.C.M., Converti A., Penna T.C.V. Biogas production: new trends for alternative energy sources in rural and urban zones. Chem Eng Technol 2009, 32:1147-1153.
48. Alsaker K.V., Paredes C., Papoutsakis E.T. Metabolite stress and tolerance in the production of biofuels and chemicals: gene-expression-based systems analysis of butanol, butyrate and acetate stresses in the anaerobe Clostridium acetobutylicum. Biotechnol Bioeng 2010, 105:1131-1147.
49. Alves F.L., Stevenson A., Baxter E., Gillion J.L.M., Hejazi F., Morrison I.E., Prior B.A., McGenity T.J., Rangel D., Magan E.N., Timmis N., Hallsworth K.N.J.E. Concomitant osmotic and chaotropicity-induced stresses in Aspergillus wentii: compatible solutes determine the biotic window. Curr Genet 2015, (in press).
50. Gasch A.P., Spellman P.T., Kao C.M., Carmel-Harel O., Eisen M.B., Storz G., Botstein D., Brown P.O. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 2000, 11:4241-4257.
51. Zhang Y., Ezeji T.C. Transcriptional analysis of Clostridium beijerinckii NCIMB 8052 to elucidate role of furfural stress during acetone butanol ethanol fermentation. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013, 6:66.
52. Caspeta L., Chen Y., Ghiaci P., Feizi A., Buskov S., Hallström B.M., Petranovic D., Nielsen J. Altered sterol composition renders yeast thermotolerant. Science 2014, 346:75-78.
53. Pereira F.B., Guimarães P.M., Teixeira J.A., Domingues L. Robust industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for very high gravity bio-ethanol fermentations. J Biosci Bioeng 2011, 112:130-136.
54. Yu K.O., Jung J., Ramzi A.B., Choe S.H., Kim S.W., Park C., Han S.O. Increased ethanol production from glycerol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with enhanced stress tolerance from the overexpression of SAGA complex components. Enzyme Microb Technol 2012, 51:237-243.
55. Stambuk B.U., Panek A.D., Crowe J.H., Crowe L.M., de Araujo P.S. Expression of high-affinity trehalose-H+ symport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1998, 1379:118-128.
56. Yang K.M., Woo J.M., Lee S.M., Park J.B. Improving ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by overexpressing an ATP-binding cassette efflux pump. Chem Eng Sci 2013, 103:74-78.
57. Dunlop M.J. Engineering microbes for tolerance to next-generation biofuels. Biotechnol Biofuels 2011, 4:32.
58. Dunlop M.J., Dossani Z.Y., Szmidt H.L., Chu H.C., Lee T.S., Keasling J.D., Hadi M.Z., Mukhopadhyay A. Engineering microbial biofuel tolerance and export using efflux pumps. Mol Syst Biol 2011, 7:487.
59. Bernal P., Segura A., Ramos J.L. Compensatory role of the cis-trans-isomerase and cardiolipin synthase in the membrane fluidity of Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E. Environ Microbiol 2007, 9:1658-1664.
60. Park S.H., Oh K.H., Kim C.K. Adaptive and cross-protective responses of Pseudomonas sp. DJ-12 to several aromatics and other stress shocks. Curr Microbiol 2001, 43:176-181.
61. Lee S.Y., Kim H.M., Cheon S. Metabolic engineering for the production of hydrocarbon fuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2015, 33:15-22.
62. Nicolau S.A., Gaida S.M., Papoutsakis E.T. A comparative view of metabolite and substrate stress and tolerance in microbial bioprocessing: from biofuels and chemicals, to biocatalysis and bioremediation. Metab Eng 2010, 12:307-331.
63. Benaroudj N., Lee D.H., Goldberg A.L. Trehalose accumulation during cellular stress protects cells and cellular proteins from damage by oxygen radicals. J Biol Chem 2001, 276:24261-24267.
64. Herdeiro R.S., Pereira M.D., Panek A.D., Eleutherio E.C. Trehalose protects Saccharomyces cerevisiae from lipid peroxidation during oxidative stress. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006, 1760:340-346.
65. Basso L.C., De Amorim H.V., De Oliveira A.J., Lopes M.L. Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. FEMS Yeast Res 2008, 8:1155-1163.
66. da Costa Morato Nery D., da Silva C.G., Mariani D., Fernandes P.N., Pereira M.D., Panek A.D., Eleutherio E.C. The role of trehalose and its transporter in protection against reactive oxygen species. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008, 1780:1408-1411.
67. Oku K., Watanabe H., Kubota M., Fukuda S., Kurimoto M., Tsujisaka Y., Komori M., Inoue Y., Sakurai M. NMR and quantum chemical study on the OH⋯π and CH⋯O interactions between trehalose and unsaturated fatty acids: implication for the mechanism of antioxidant function of trehalose. J Am Chem Soc 2003, 125:12739-12748.
68. Swinnen S., Fernández-Niño M., González-Ramos D., Maris A.J., Nevoigt E. The fraction of cells that resume growth after acetic acid addition is a strain-dependent parameter of acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2014, 14:642-653.
69. Wang Y., Li X., Mao Y., Blaschek H. Genome-wide dynamic transcriptional profiling in Clostridium beijerinckii NCIMB 8052 using single nucleotide resolution RNA-Seq. BMC Genomics 2012, 13:102.
70. Wang S., Zhang Y., Dong H., Mao S., Zhu Y., Wang R., Luan G., Li Y. Formic acid triggers the "acid crash" of acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation by Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011, 77:1674-1680.
71. Stanley D., Fraser S., Chambers P.J., Rogers P., Stanley G.A. Generation and characterisation of stable ethanol-tolerant mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 37:139-149.
72. Rangel D.E.N. Stress induced cross-protection against environmental challenges on prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbes. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 27:1281-1296.
73. Henderson C.M., Block D.E. Examining the role of membrane lipid composition in determining the ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 2014, 80:2966-2972.
74. du Preez J.C., Bosch M., Prior B.A. Temperature profiles of growth and ethanol tolerance of the xylose-fermenting yeasts Candida shehatae and Pichia stipitis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1987, 25:521-525.
75. Casey G.P., Ingledew W.M. Ethanol tolerance in yeasts. Crit Rev Microbiol 1986, 13:219-280.
76. Sá-Correia I., Van Uden N. Temperature profiles of ethanol tolerance: effects of ethanol on the minimum and the maximum temperatures for growth of the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces fragilis. Biotechnol Bioeng 1983, 25:1665-1667.
77. Arroyo-López F.N., Orlić S., Querol A., Barrio E. Effects of temperature, pH and sugar concentration on the growth parameters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. kudriavzevii and their interspecific hybrid. Int J Food Microbiol 2009, 131:120-127.
78. Passoth V., Tabassum M.R., Nair HASm TIukova I., Ståhlberg J. Enhanced ethanol production from wheat straw by integrated storage and pre-treatment (ISP). Enzyme Microb Technol 2013, 52:105-110.
79. Baer S.H., Blaschek H.P., Smith T.L. Effect of butanol challenge and temperature on lipid composition and membrane fluidity of butanol-tolerant Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl Environ Microbiol 1987, 53:2854-2861.
80. López-Malo M., Querol A., Guillamon J.M. Metabolomic comparison of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the cryotolerant species S. bayanus var. uvarum and S. kudriavzevii during wine fermentation at low temperature. PLOS ONE 2013, 8:e60135.
81. Mansure J.J.C., Panek A.D., Crowe L.M., Crowe J.H. Trehalose inhibits ethanol effects on intact yeast cells and liposomes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1994, 1191:309-316.
82. Eleutherio E.C.A., Araujo P.S., Panek A.D. Role of the trehalose carrier in dehydration resistance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1993, 1156:263-266.
83. Lupi L., Comez L., Paolantoni M., Fioretto D., Ladanyi B.M. Dynamics of biological water: insights from molecular modeling of light scattering in aqueous trehalose solutions. J Phys Chem B 2012, 116:7499-7508.
84. Winther L.R., Qvist J., Halle B. Hydration and mobility of trehalose in aqueous solution. J Phys Chem B 2012, 116:9196-9207.
85. Hallsworth J.E., Magan N. Effect of carbohydrate type and concentration on polyhydroxy alcohol and trehalose content of conidia of three entomopathogenic fungi. Microbiology 1994, 140:2705-2713.
86. Li J., Chen X., Qi B., Luo J., Zhuang X., Su Y., Wan Y. Continuous acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) fermentation with in situ solvent recovery by silicalite-1 filled PDMS/PAN composite membrane. Energy Fuels 2013, 28:555-562.
87. Piotrowski J.S., Zhang Y., Bates D.M., Keating D.H., Sato T.K., Ong I.M., Landick R. Death by a thousand cuts: the challenges and diverse landscape of lignocellulosic hydrolysate inhibitors. Front Microbiol 2014, 5:90.
88. van der Pol E.C., Bakker R.R., Baets P., Eggink G. By-products resulting from lignocellulose pretreatment and their inhibitory effect on fermentations for (bio) chemicals and fuels. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2014, 98:9579-9593.
89. Zheng H., Wang X., Yomano L.P., Shanmugan K.T., Ingram L.O. Increase in furfural tolerance in ethanologenic Escherichia coli LY180 by plasmid-based expression of thyA. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012, 78:4346-4352.
90. Zhang Y., Ezeji T.C. Elucidating and alleviating impacts of lignocellulose-derived microbial inhibitors on Clostridium beijerinckii during fermentation of Miscanthus giganteus to butanol. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2014, 41:1505-1516.
91. Han B., Ujor V., Lai L.B., Gopalan V., Ezeji T.C. Use of proteomic analysis to elucidate the role of calcium on acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) fermentation in Clostridium beijerinckii NCIMB 8052. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013, 79:282-293.
92. Ujor V., Agu C.V., Gopalan V., Ezeji T.C. Glycerol supplementation of the growth medium enhances in situ detoxification of furfural by Clostridium beijerinckii during butanol fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2014, 98:6511-6521.
93. Agbor V.B., Cicek N., Sparling R., Berlin A., Levin D.B. Biomass pretreatment: fundamentals toward application. Biotechnol Adv 2011, 29:675-685.
94. Rollin J.A., Tam T.K., Zhang Y.H.P. New biotechnology paradigm: cell-free biosystems for biomanufacturing. Green Chem 2013, 15:1708-1719.
95. Guterl J.K., Garbe D., Carsten J., Steffler F., Sommer B., Reiße S., Philipp A., Haack M., Ruhmann B., Koltermann A., et al. Cell-free metabolic engineering: production of chemicals by minimized reaction cascades. ChemSusChem 2012, 5:2165-2172.
96. Stevenson A., Cray J.A., Williams J.P., Santos R., Sahay R., Neuenkirchen N., McClure C.D., Grant I.R., Houghton J.D.R., Quinn J.P., et al. Is there a common water activity for the three domains of life?. ISME J 2014, (in press). 10.1038/ismej.2014.219.
97. Cray J.A., Houghton J.D.R., Cooke L.R., Hallsworth J.E. A simple inhibition coefficient for quantifying potency of biocontrol agents against plant-pathogenic fungi. Biol Control 2014, 81:93-100.
98. Wyatt T.T., Golovina E.A., van Leeuwen M.R., Hallsworth J.E., Wösten H.A.B., Dijksterhuis J. A decreasein bulk water and mannitol and accumulation of trehalose and trehalose-based oligosaccharides define a two-stage maturation process towards extreme stress resistance in ascospores of Neosartorya fischeri (Aspergillus fischeri). Environ Microbiol 2015, 17:383-394.
99. Rangel D.E.N., Braga G.U.L., Fernandes É.K.K., Keyser C.A., Hallsworth J.E., Roberts D.W. Stress tolerance and virulence of insect-pathogenic fungi are determined by environmental conditions during conidial formation. Curr Genet 2015, (in press). 10.1007/s00294-015-0477-y.
100. Huang Y., Begum M., Chapman B., Hocking A.D. Effect of reduced water activity and reduced matric potential on the germination of xerophilic and non-xerophilic fungi. Int J Food Microbiol 2010, 140:1-5.
101. Brown A.D. Microbial Water Stress Physiology, Principles and Perspectives 1990, John Wiley and Sons, United Kingdom.
102. Westman J.O., Taherzadeh M.J., Franzén C.J. Proteomic analysis of the increased stress tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encapsulated in liquid core alginate-chitosan capsules. PLOS ONE 2012, 7:e49335.
103. Chen Y., Zhou T., Liu D., Li A., Xu S., Liu Q., Li B., Ying H. Production of butanol from glucose and xylose with immobilized cells of Clostridium acetobutylicum. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 2013, 18:234-241.
104. Liu D., Chen Y., Ding F.Y., Zhao T., Wu J.L., Guo T., Ren H.F., Li B.B., Niu H.Q., Cao Z., et al. Biobutanol production in a Clostridium acetobutylicum biofilm reactor integrated with simultaneous product recovery by adsorption. Biotechnol Biofuels 2014, 7:5.
105. Wyatt T.T., Wösten H.A.B., Dijksterhuis J. Fungal spores for dispersion in space and time. Adv Appl Microbiol 2013, 85:43-91.
106. Iwahara S., Takegawa K., Kawaguchi K., Okamoto G. The presence of trehalose-containing oligosaccharides in yeast extract. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 1993, 57:1220-1221.
107. Crowe J.H., Crowe L.M., Chapman D. Preservation of membranes in anhydrobiotic organisms: the role of trehalose. Science 1984, 223:701-703.
108. Sootsuwan K., Thanonkeo P., Keeratirakha N., Thanonkeo S., Jaisil P., Yamada M. Sorbitol required for cell growth and ethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis under heat, ethanol, and osmotic stresses. Biotechnol Biofuels 2014, 6:180.
109. Medina A., Schmidt-Heydt M., Rodríguez A., Parra R., Geisen R., Magan N. Impacts of environmental stress on growth, secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters and metabolite production of xerotolerant/xerophilic fungi. Curr Genet 2014, (in press). 10.1007/s00294-014-0455-9.
110. Westman J.O., Ylitervo P., Franzén C.J., Taherzadeh M.J. Effects of encapsulation of microorganisms on product formation during microbial fermentations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2012, 96:1441-1454.
111. Najafpour G., Younesi H., Ismail K.S.K. Ethanol fermentation in an immobilized cell reactor using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresour Technol 2004, 92:251-260.
112. Ruyters S., Mukherjee V., Verstrepen K.J., Thevelein J.M., Willems K.A., Lievens B. Assessing the potential of wild yeasts for bioethanol production. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2015, 42:39-48.
113. Swinnen S., Schaerlaekens K., Pais T., Claesen J., Hubmann G., Yang Y., Demeke M., Fouquié-Moreno M., Goovaerts A., Souvereyns K., et al. Identification of novel causative genes determining the complex trait of high ethanol tolerance in yeast using pooled-segregant whole-genome sequence analysis. Genome Res 2012, 22:975-984.
114. Liu X.B., Gu Q.Y., Yu X.B. Repetitive domestication to enhance butanol tolerance and production in Clostridium acetobutylicum through artificial simulation of bio-evolution. Bioresour Technol 2013, 130:638-643.
115. Wang H., Ji B., Ren H., Meng C. The relationship between lysine 4 on histone H3 methylation levels of alcohol tolerance genes and changes of ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Biotechnol 2014, 7:307-314.
116. Nielsen J., Larsson C., van Maris A., Pronk J. Metabolic engineering of yeast for production of fuels and chemicals. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2013, 24:398-404.
117. Zingaro K.A., Papoutsakis E.T. Toward a semisynthetic stress response system to engineer microbial solvent tolerance. MBio 2012, 3. e00308-12.
118. Zheng H., Wang X., Yomano L.P., Shanmugan K.T., Ingram L.O. Increase in furfural tolerance in ethanologenic Escherichia coli LY180 by plasmid-based expression of thyA. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012, 78:4346-4352.
119. Yuan Y., Bi C., Nicolaou S.A., Zingaro K.A., Ralston M., Papoutsakis E.T. Overexpression of the Lactobacillus plantarum peptidoglycan biosynthesis murA2 gene increases the tolerance of Escherichia coli to alcohols and enhances ethanol production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2014, 98:8399-83411.
120. Bai F.W., Anderson W.A., Moo-Young M. Ethanol fermentation technologies from sugar and starch feedstocks. Biotechnol Adv 2008, 26:89-105.
121. Mukhtar K., Asgher M., Afghan S., Hussain K., Zia-ul-Hussnain S. Comparative study on two commercial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for optimal ethanol production on industrial scale. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010, 2010:419586.
122. Wheals A.E., Basso L.C., Alves D.M.G., Amorim H.V. Fuel ethanol after 25 years. Trends Biotechnol 1999, 17:482-487.
123. Cai Z., Zhang B., Li Y. Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient anaerobic xylose fermentation: reflections perspectives. Biotechnol J 2012, 7:34-46.
124. Bankar S.B., Survase S.A., Ojamo H., Granström T. The two stage immobilized column reactor with an integrated solvent recovery module for enhanced ABE production. Bioresour Technol 2013, 140:269-276.
125. Torija M.J., Rozes N., Poblet M., Guillamón J.M., Mas A. Effects of fermentation temperature on the strain population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int J Food Microbiol 2003, 80:47-53.
126. Kishimoto M. Fermentation characteristics of hybrids between the cryophilic wine yeast Saccharomyces bayanus and the mesophilic wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ferment Bioeng 1994, 77:432-435.
127. Pereira F.B., Gomes D.G., Guimarães P.M.R., Teixeira J.A., Domingues L. Cell recycling during repeated very high gravity bio-ethanol fermentations using the industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain PE-2. Biotechnol Lett 2012, 34:45-53.
128. Hallsworth J.E., Nomura Y. A simple method to determine the water activity of ethanol-containing samples. Biotechnol Bioeng 1999, 62:242-245.
129. Stevenson A., Burkhardt J., Cockell C.S., Cray J.A., Dijksterhuis J., Fox-Powell M., Kee T.P., Kminek G., McGenity T.J., Timmis K.N., et al. Multiplication of microbes below 0.690 water activity: implications for terrestrial and extraterrestrial life. Environ Microbiol 2015, 17:257-277.
130. Ferry M.S., Hasty J., Cookson N.A. Synthetic biology approaches to biofuel production. Biofuels 2012, 3:9-12.
131. Hallsworth J.E., Magan N. Manipulation of intracellular glycerol and erythritol enhances germination of conidia at low water availability. Microbiology 1995, 29:7-13.
132. Sauer T., Galinski E.A. Bacterial milking: a novel bioprocess for production of compatible solutes. Biotechnol Bioeng 1998, 57:306-313.
133. Kar J.R., Hallsworth J.E., Singhal R.S. Fermentative production of glycine betaine and trehalose from acid whey using Actinopolyspora halophila (MTCC 263). Environ Technol Innov 2015, (in press). 10.1016/j.eti.2015.02.001.
134. Marcolli C., Peter T. Water activity in polyol/water systems: new UNIFAC parameterization. Atmos Chem Phys 2005, 5:1545-1555.
135. Stevenson A., Hallsworth J.E. Water and temperature relations of soil Actinobacteria. Environ Microbiol Rep 2014, 6:744-755.
136. Duda V.I., Danilevich V.N., Suzina N.E., Shorokhova A.P., Dmitriev V.V., Mokhova O.N., Akimov V.N. Changes in the fine structure of microbial cells induced by chaotropic salts. Mikrobiologiya 2004, 73:341-349.
137. Cardoso Generoso W., Schadeweg V., Oreb M., Boles E. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of butanol isomers. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2015, 33:1-7.
138. Jia K., Zhang Y., Li Y. Systematic engineering of microorganisms to improve alcohol tolerance. Eng Life Sci 2010, 10:422-429.
139. Harrison J.P., Hallsworth J.E., Cockell C.S. Reduction of the temperature sensitivity of Halomonas hydrothermalis by iron starvation combined with microaerobic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015, 81:2156-2162.
140. Zhao X.Q., Bai F.W. Zinc and yeast stress tolerance: micronutrient plays a big role. J Biotechnol 2012, 158:176-183.
141. Krivoruchko A., Nielsen J. Production of natural products through metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2015, 35:7-15.
142. Hamaguchi K., Geiduschek E.P. The effect of electrolytes on the stability of the deoxyribonucleate helix. J Am Chem Soc 1962, 84:1329-1338.
143. Beales N. Adaptation of microorganisms to cold temperatures, weak acid preservatives, low pH, and osmotic stress: a review. Comp Rev Food Sci F 2004, 3:1-20.
144. Demeke M.M., Dumortier F., Li Y., Broeckx T., Foulquié-Moreno M.R., Thevelein J.M. Combining inhibitor tolerance and d-xylose fermentation in industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient lignocellulose-based bioethanol production. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013, 6:120.
145. Palmqvist E., Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour Technol 2000, 74:25-33.
146. Klinke H.B., Thomsen A.B., Ahring B.K. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2004, 66:10-26.
147. Mosier N., Wyman C., Dale B., Elander R., Lee Y.Y., Holtzapple M., Ladisch M. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 2005, 96:673-686.
148. da Silva G.P., Mack M., Contiero J. Glycerol: a promising and abundant carbon source for industrial microbiology. Biotechnol Adv 2009, 27:30-39.
149. Amin G., Van den Eynde E., Verachtert H. Determination of by-products formed during the ethanolic fermentation, using batch and immobilized cell systems of Zymomonas mobilis and Saccharomyces bayanus. Eur J Appl Microbiol 1983, 18:1-5.
150. Maiorella B., Blanch H.W., Wilke C.R. By-product inhibition. Effects on ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 1983, 25:103-121.
151. Lafon-Lafourcade S., Geneix C., Ribereau-Gayon P. Inhibition of alcoholic fermentation of grape must by fatty acids produced by yeasts and their elimination by yeast ghosts. Appl Environ Microbiol 1984, 47:1246-1249.
152. Huang C., Zhu D.H., Wu H., Lou W.Y., Zong M.H. Evaluating the influence of inhibitors present in lignocellulosic hydrolysates on the cell membrane integrity of oleaginous yeast Trichosporon fermentans by flow cytometry. Process Biochem 2014, 49:395-401.
153. Delgenes J.P., Moletta R., Navarro J.M. Effects of lignocellulose degradation products on ethanol fermentations of glucose and xylose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Zymomonas mobilis, Pichia stipitis, and Candida shehatae. Enzyme Microb Technol 1996, 19:220-225.
154. Klinke H.B., Ahring B.K., Schmidt A.S., Thomsen A.B. Characterization of degradation products from alkaline wet oxidation of wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 2002, 82:15-26.
155. Liu X., Gu Q., Liao C., Yu X. Enhancing butanol tolerance and preventing degeneration in Clostridium acetobutylicum by 1-butanol-glycerol storage during long-term preservation. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 69:192-197.
156. Wecker M.S., Zall R.R. Production of acetaldehyde by Zymomonas mobilis. Appl Environ Microbiol 1987, 53:2815-2820.
157. Stanley G.A., Douglas N.G., Every E.J., Tzanatos T., Pamment N.B. Inhibition and stimulation of yeast growth by acetaldehyde. Biotechnol Lett 1993, 15:1199-1204.
158. Zaldivar J., Martinez A., Ingram L.O. Effect of selected aldehydes on the growth and fermentation of ethanologenic Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng 1999, 65:24-33.
159. Lütke-Eversloh T., Bahl H. Metabolic engineering of Clostridium acetobutylicum: recent advances to improve butanol production. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2011, 22:634-647.
160. Knoshaug E.P., Zhang M. Butanol tolerance in a selection of microorganisms. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2009, 153:13-20.
161. Paredes C.J., Alsaker K.V., Papoutsakis E.T. A comparative genomic view of clostridial sporulation and physiology. Nat Rev Microbiol 2005, 3:969-978.
162. Cocolin L., Bisson L.F., Mills D.A. Direct profiling of the yeast dynamics in wine fermentations. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2000, 189:81-87.
163. Di Maro E., Ercolini D., Coppola S. Yeast dynamics during spontaneous wine fermentation of the Catalanesca grape. Int J Food Microbiol 2007, 117:201-210.
164. Heard G.M., Fleet G.H. The effects of temperature and pH on the growth of yeast species during the fermentation of grape juice. J Appl Bacteriol 1988, 65:23-28.
165. Pretorius I.S. Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast 2000, 16:675-729.
166. Ramos A.J., Marín S. Spoiling microorganisms. Juice Processing: Quality, Safety and Value-Added Opportunities 2014, 311-328. CRC Press. V. Falguera, A. Ibarz (Eds.).
167. Neumann G., Römheld V. Root excretion of carboxylic acids and protons in phosphorus-deficient plants. Plant Soil 1999, 211:121-130.
168. Kourtev P.S., Ehrenfeld J.G., Häggblom M. Experimental analysis of the effect of exotic and native plant species on the structure and function of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 2003, 35:895-905.
169. Mandal S.M., Chakraborty D., Dey S. Phenolic acids act as signaling molecules in plant-microbe symbioses. Plant Signal Behav 2010, 5:359-368.
170. Bartwal A., Mall R., Lohani P., Guru S.K., Arora S. Role of secondary metabolites and brassinosteroids in plant defense against environmental stresses. J Plant Growth Regul 2013, 32:216-232.
171. Ezeji T.C., Qureshi N., Blaschek H.P. Acetone butanol ethanol (ABE) production from concentrated substrate: reduction in substrate inhibition by fed-batch technique and product inhibition by gas stripping. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2004, 63:653-658.
172. Seo J.S., Chong H., Park H.S., Yoon K.O., Jung C., Kim J.J., Hong J.H., Kim H., Kim J.H., Kil J.I., et al. The genome sequence of the ethanologenic bacterium Zymomonas mobilis ZM4. Nat Biotechnol 2005, 23:63-68.
173. Liu S., Qureshi N. How microbes tolerate ethanol and butanol. New Biotechnol 2009, 26:117-121.
174. Palmqvist E., Grage H., Meinander N.Q., Hahn-Hägerdal B. Main and interaction effects of acetic acid, furfural, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid on growth and ethanol productivity of yeasts. Biotechnol Bioeng 1999, 63:46-55.
175. Ando S., Arai I., Kiyoto K., Hanai S. Identification of aromatic monomers in steam-exploded poplar and their influences on ethanol fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ferment Technol 1986, 64:567-570.
176. Jönsson L.J., Palmqvist E., Nilvebrant N.O., Hahn-Hägerdal B. Detoxification of wood hydrolysates with laccase and peroxidase from the white-rot fungus Trametes versicolor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1998, 49:691-697.
177. Larsson S., Quintana-Sáinz A., Reimann A., Nilvebrant N.O., Jönsson L.J. Influence of lignocellulose-derived aromatic compounds on oxygen-limited growth and ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2000, 84-86:617-632.
178. Ezeji T.C., Qureshi N., Blaschek H.P. Butanol production from agricultural residues: impact of degradation products on Clostridium beijerinckii growth and butanol fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007, 97:1460-1469.
179. Chandel A.K., da Silva S.S., Singh O.V. Detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates: biochemical and metabolic engineering toward white biotechnology. Bioenergy Res 2013, 6:388-401.
180. Huang H., Guo X., Li D., Liu M., Wu J., Ren H. Identification of crucial yeast inhibitors in bio-ethanol and improvement of fermentation at high pH and high total solids. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:7486-7493.
181. Thomas K.C., Hynes S.H., Ingledew W.M. Effects of particulate materials and osmoprotectants on very-high-gravity ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 1994, 60:1519-1524.
182. Chen C.K., Blaschek H.P. Acetate enhances solvent production and prevents degeneration in Clostridium beijerinckii BA101. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1999, 52:170-173.
183. Inoue T., Iefuji H., Fujii T., Soga H., Satoh K. Cloning and characterization of a gene complementing the mutation of an ethanol sensitive mutant of sake yeast. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2000, 64:229-236.
184. Tao X., Zheng D., Liu T., Wang P., Zhao W., Zhu M., Jiang X., Zhao Y., Wu X. A novel strategy to construct yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for very high gravity fermentation. PLOS ONE 2012, 7:e31235.
185. Honga M.E., Leea K.S., Yub B.J., Sunga Y.J., Park S.M., Koob H.M., Kweona D.H., Park J.C., Jinc Y.S. Identification of gene targets eliciting improved alcohol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through inverse metabolic engineering. J Biotechnol 2010, 149:52-59.
186. Takagi H., Takaoka M., Kawaguchi A., Kubo Y. Effect of l-proline on sake brewing and ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005, 71:8656-8662.
187. Zhu L., Dong H., Zhang Y., Li Y. Engineering the robustness of Clostridium acetobutylicum by introducing glutathione biosynthetic capability. Metab Eng 2011, 13:426-434.
188. Algar E.M., Scopes R.K. Studies on cell-free metabolism: ethanol production by extracts of Zymomonas mobilis. J Biotechnol 1985, 2:275-287.
189. Allain E.J. Cell-free ethanol production: the future of fuel ethanol?. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2007, 82:117-120.
190. Sharma S.C. A possible role of trehalose in osmotolerance and ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2006, 152:11-15.
191. Panagou E.Z., Hondrodimou O., Mallouchos A., Nychas G.J. A study on the implications of NaCl reduction in the fermentation profile of Conservolea natural black olives. Food Microbiol 2011, 28:1301-1307.
192. Oren A. Halobacterium sodomense sp. nov., a Dead Sea Halobacterium with an extremely high magnesium requirement. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1983, 33:381-386.
193. Salvachúa D., Prieto A., López-Abelairas M., Lu-Chau T., Martínez Á.T., Martínez M.J. Fungal pretreatment: an alternative in second-generation ethanol from wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:7500-7506.
194. Zhang Y., Han B., Ezeji T.C. Biotransformation of furfural and 5-hydroxymethyl furfural (HMF) by Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 during butanol fermentation. New Biotechnol 2012, 29:345-351.
195. Koopman F., Wierckx N., de Winde J.H., Ruijssenaars H.J. Identification and characterization of the furfural and 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural degradation pathways of Cupriavidus basilensis HMF14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:4919-4924.
196. Gillies A.T., Taylor R., Gestwicki J.E. Synthetic lethal interactions in yeast reveal functional roles of J protein co-chaperones. Mol Biosyst 2012, 8:2901-2908.
197. Jung Y.J., Park H.D. Antisense-mediated inhibition of acid trehalase (ATH1) gene expression promotes ethanol fermentation and tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Lett 2005, 27:1855-1859.
198. Takagi H., Matsui F., Kawaguchi A., Wu H., Shimoi H., Kubo Y. Construction and analysis of self-cloning sake yeasts that accumulate proline. J Biosci Bioeng 2007, 103:377-380.
199. Lam F.H., Ghaderi A., Fink G.R., Stephanopoulos G. Engineering alcohol tolerance in yeast. Science 2014, 346:71-75.
200. Pagliardini J., Hubmann G., Alfenore S., Nevoigt E., Bideaux C., Guillouet S.E. The metabolic costs of improving ethanol yield by reducing glycerol formation capacity under anaerobic conditions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact 2013, 12:29.
201. Ventura J.R., Hu H., Jahng D. Enhanced butanol production in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 by double overexpression of 6-phosphofructokinase and pyruvate kinase genes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013, 97:7505-7516.
202. Ullah M.W., Khattak W.A., Ul-Islam M., Khan S., Park J.K. Bio-ethanol production through simultaneous saccharification and fermentation using an encapsulated reconstituted cell-free enzyme system. Biochem Eng J 2014, 91:110-119.
203. Gombert A.K., van Maris A.J. Improving conversion yield of fermentable sugars into fuel ethanol in 1st generation yeast-based production processes. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2015, 33:81-86.
204. Jadhav S.B., Harde S., Bankar S.B., Granström T., Ojamo H., Singhal R.S., Survase S.A. A green process for the production of butanol from butyraldehyde using alcohol dehydrogenase: process details. R Soc Chem Adv 2014, 4:14597-14602.
205. Stewart G.G., D'Amore T., Panchal C.J., Russell I. Factors that influence the ethanol tolerance of brewer's yeast strains during high gravity wort fermentations. MBAA TQ 1988, 25:47-53.
206. Izard A., Goma G., Soucaille P. Effects of various alcoholic supplements on the growth rate of Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1989, 31:179-183.
207. Luong J.H.T. Generalization of monod kinetics for analysis of growth data with substrate inhibition. Biotechnol Bioeng 1987, 29:242-248.
208. Aguilera A. Formamide sensitivity: a novel conditional phenotype in yeast. Genetics 1994, 136:87-91.
209. Kasemets K., Nisamedtinov I., Laht T.M., Abner K., Paalme T. Growth characteristics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C in changing environmental conditions: auxo-acceerostat study. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2007, 92:109-128.
210. Patel R., Rajkumar S. Isolation and characterization of phenol degrading yeast. J Basic Microbiol 2009, 49:216-219.
211. Guinchant M.J. Etude sur la fonction acide dans les derives metheniques et methiniques. Ann Chem 1918, 10:30-84.
212. Swietoslawski W., Starczewska H. Influence of certain corrections on the results of measurements of the heat of combustion of organic substances. Bull Int Acad Pol Sci Lett Cl Med 1928, 85-97.
213. Chao J., Rossini F.D. Heats of combustion, formation, and isomerization of nineteen alkanols. J Chem Eng Data 1965, 10:374-379.
214. Mosselman C., Dekker H. Enthalpies of formation of n-alkan-1-ols. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1975, 1:417-424.
215. Fenwick J.O., Harrop D., Head A.J. Thermodynamic properties of organic oxygen compounds. 46. Enthalpies of formation of ethyl acetate and 1-hexanoix acid. J Chem Thermodyn 1978, 10:687-690.
216. Kabo G.Y., Miroshnichenko E.A., Frenkel M.L., Kozyro A.A., Simirskii V.V., Krasulin A.P., Vorob'eva V.P., Lebedev Y.A. Thermochemistry of urea alkyl derivatives. Bull Acad Sci USSR Div Chem Sci 1990, 39:662-667.
217. Knauth P., Sabbah R. Energetics of intra- and intermolecular bonds in ω-alkanediols (II). Thermochemical study of 1,2-ethanediol, 1,3-propanediol, 1,4-butanediol, and 1,5-pentanediol at 298.15K. Struct Chem 1990, 1:43-46.
218. Papina T.S., Pimenova S.M., Luk'yanova V.A., Kolesov V.P. Standard enthalpies of formation of benzyl alcohol and α,α,α-trichlorotoluene. Russ J Phys Chem (Engl Transl) 1995, 69:1951-1953.
219. Miyawaki O., Tatsuno M. Thermodynamic analysis of alcohol effect on thermal stability of proteins. J Biosci Bioeng 2011, 111:198-203.
220. McKarns S.C., Hansch C., Caldwell W.S., Morgan W.T., Moore S.W., Doolittle D.J. Correlation between hydrophobicity of short-chain aliphatic alcohols and their ability to alter plasma membrane integrity. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1997, 36:62-70.
221. Hohl L., Cruess W.V. Effect of temperature, variety of juice, and method of increasing sugar content on maximum alcohol production by S. ellipsoideus. J Food Sci 1936, 1:405-411.
222. Ryu Y.W., Jung J.K. Effect of fermentation temperature on the production of high content alcohol. Korean J Microbiol 1982, 20:67.
223. Hayashida S., Ohta K. Formation of high concentrations of alcohol by various yeasts. J Inst Brew 1981, 87:42-44.
224. Hallsworth J.E., Nomura Y., Iwahara M. Ethanol-induced water stress and fungal growth. J Ferment Bioeng 1998, 86:451-456.
225. Harrison J.P., Gheeraet N., Tsigelnitskiy D., Cockell C.S. The limits for life under multiple extremes. Trends Microbiol 2013, 21:204-212.
226. Tomas C.A., Beamish J., Papoutsakis E.T. Transcriptional analysis of butanol stress and tolerance in Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Bacteriol 2004, 86:2006-2018.