The fraction of cells that resume growth after acetic acid addition is a strain-dependent parameter of acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

FEMS Yeast Research

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 642-653

  Swinnen, Steve ^a   Fernández Niño, Miguel ^a   González Ramos, Daniel ^b,c   van Maris, Antonius J A ^b,c   Nevoigt, Elke ^a  

^a JACOBS UNIVERSITY BREMEN   (Germany)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c KLUYVER CENTRE FOR GENOMICS OF INDUSTRIAL FERMENTATION   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Acetic acid tolerance; Cell to cell heterogeneity; Intraspecies diversity; Lignocellulose; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Yeast

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; ALCOHOL;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; CELL GROWTH; CELL HETEROGENEITY; CELL POPULATION; FUNGAL CELL; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS GROWTH; LATENT PERIOD; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; NONHUMAN; PH; PHENOTYPE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRAIN IMPROVEMENT; DRUG EFFECTS; DRUG TOLERANCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; TOXICITY;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ACETIC ACID; DRUG TOLERANCE; GENETIC VARIATION; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84902075335     PISSN: 15671356     EISSN: 15671364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1567-1364.12151     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abbott DA & Ingledew WM (2004) Buffering capacity of whole corn mash alters concentrations of organic acids required to inhibit growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and ethanol production. Biotechnol Lett 26: 1313-1316.
2. Abbott DA, Zelle RM, Pronk JT & van Maris AJ (2009) Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of carboxylic acids: current status and challenges. FEMS Yeast Res 9: 1123-1136.
3. Almeida B, Ohlmeier S, Almeida AJ, Madeo F, Leao C, Rodrigues F & Ludovico P (2009) Yeast protein expression profile during acetic acid-induced apoptosis indicates causal involvement of the TOR pathway. Proteomics 9: 720-732.
4. Argueso JL, Carazzolle MF, Mieczkowski PA et al. (2009) Genome structure of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain widely used in bioethanol production. Genome Res 19: 2258-2270.
5. Avery SV (2006) Microbial cell individuality and the underlying sources of heterogeneity. Nat Rev Microbiol 4: 577-587.
6. Bellissimi E, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT & van Maris AJ (2009) Effects of acetic acid on the kinetics of xylose fermentation by an engineered, xylose-isomerase-based Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. FEMS Yeast Res 9: 358-364.
7. Bishop AL, Rab FA, Sumner ER & Avery SV (2007) Phenotypic heterogeneity can enhance rare-cell survival in 'stress-sensitive' yeast populations. Mol Microbiol 63: 507-520.
8. Booth IR & Statford N (2003) Acidulants and low pH. Food Preservatives (Russel N & Gould G, eds), pp. 25-48. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.
9. Brandberg T, Franzen CJ & Gustafsson L (2004) The fermentation performance of nine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch and fed-batch cultures in dilute-acid wood hydrolysate. J Biosci Bioeng 98: 122-125.
10. Brandberg T, Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJ, Franzen CJ & Gustafsson L (2007) Continuous fermentation of wheat-supplemented lignocellulose hydrolysate with different types of cell retention. Biotechnol Bioeng 98: 80-90.
11. Carmelo V, Santos H & Sa-Correia I (1997) Effect of extracellular acidification on the activity of plasma membrane ATPase and on the cytosolic and vacuolar pH of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1325: 63-70.
12. Carreto L, Eiriz MF, Gomes AC, Pereira PM, Schuller D & Santos MA (2008) Comparative genomics of wild type yeast strains unveils important genome diversity. BMC Genomics 9: 524.
13. Casal M, Cardoso H & Leao C (1996) Mechanisms regulating the transport of acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 142(Pt 6): 1385-1390.
14. Casal M, Cardoso H & Leao C (1998) Effects of ethanol and other alkanols on transport of acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 665-668.
15. Chandel AK, da Silva SS & Singh OV (2011) Detoxification of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for improved bioethanol production. Biofuel Production - Recent Developments and Prospects (Dos Santos Bernardes MA, ed.), pp. 225-246. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia.
16. Csoma H, Zakany N, Capece A, Romano P & Sipiczki M (2010) Biological diversity of Saccharomyces yeasts of spontaneously fermenting wines in four wine regions: comparative genotypic and phenotypic analysis. Int J Food Microbiol 140: 239-248.
17. Demeke MM, Dietz H, Li Y et al. (2013) Development of a D-xylose fermenting and inhibitor tolerant industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with high performance in lignocellulose hydrolysates using metabolic and evolutionary engineering. Biotechnol Biofuels 6: 89.
18. Fay JC & Benavides JA (2005) Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 1: 66-71.
19. Fernandes AR, Mira NP, Vargas RC, Canelhas I & Sa-Correia I (2005) Saccharomyces cerevisiae adaptation to weak acids involves the transcription factor Haa1p and Haa1p-regulated genes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 337: 95-103.
20. Garay-Arroyo A, Covarrubias AA, Clark I, Nino I, Gosset G & Martinez A (2004) Response to different environmental stress conditions of industrial and laboratory Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63: 734-741.
21. Geiler-Samerotte K, Bauer C, Li S, Ziv N, Gresham D & Siegal M (2013) The details in the distributions: why and how to study phenotypic variability. Curr Opin Biotechnol 24: 752-759.
22. Giannattasio S, Guaragnella N & Marra E (2012) Molecular mechanisms of programmed cell death induced by acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbial Stress Tolerance for Biofuels, Microbiology Monographs, Vol. 22 (Liu ZL, ed.), pp. 57-75. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
23. Giannattasio S, Guaragnella N, Zdralevic M & Marra E (2013) Molecular mechanisms of Saccharomyces cerevisiae stress adaptation and programmed cell death in response to acetic acid. Front Microbiol 4: 33.
24. Graves T, Narendranath NV, Dawson K & Power R (2006) Effect of pH and lactic or acetic acid on ethanol productivity by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in corn mash. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 33: 469-474.
25. Haitani Y, Tanaka K, Yamamoto M, Nakamura T, Ando A, Ogawa J & Shima J (2012) Identification of an acetate-tolerant strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and characterization by gene expression analysis. J Biosci Bioeng 114: 648-651.
26. Holyoak CD, Bracey D, Piper PW, Kuchler K & Coote PJ (1999) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae weak-acid-inducible ABC transporter Pdr12 transports fluorescein and preservative anions from the cytosol by an energy-dependent mechanism. J Bacteriol 181: 4644-4652.
27. Hong KK & Nielsen J (2012) Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a key cell factory platform for future biorefineries. Cell Mol Life Sci 69: 2671-2690.
28. Hou X & Yao S (2012) Improved inhibitor tolerance in xylose-fermenting yeast Spathaspora passalidarum by mutagenesis and protoplast fusion. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93: 2591-2601.
29. Kawahata M, Masaki K, Fujii T & Iefuji H (2006) Yeast genes involved in response to lactic acid and acetic acid: acidic conditions caused by the organic acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cultures induce expression of intracellular metal metabolism genes regulated by Aft1p. FEMS Yeast Res 6: 924-936.
30. Kvitek DJ, Will JL & Gasch AP (2008) Variations in stress sensitivity and genomic expression in diverse S. cerevisiae isolates. PLoS Genet 4: e1000223.
31. Lambert RJ & Stratford M (1999) Weak-acid preservatives: modelling microbial inhibition and response. J Appl Microbiol 86: 157-164.
32. Li BZ & Yuan YJ (2010) Transcriptome shifts in response to furfural and acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86: 1915-1924.
33. Lindberg L, Santos AX, Riezman H, Olsson L & Bettiga M (2013) Lipidomic profiling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zygosaccharomyces bailii reveals critical changes in lipid composition in response to acetic acid stress. PLoS One 8: e73936.
34. Linden T, Peetre J & Hahn-Hagerdal B (1992) Isolation and characterization of acetic acid-tolerant galactose-fermenting strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from a spent sulfite liquor fermentation plant. Appl Environ Microbiol 58: 1661-1669.
35. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM et al. (2009) Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458: 337-341.
36. Mira NP, Becker JD & Sa-Correia I (2010a) Genomic expression program involving the Haa1p-regulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae response to acetic acid. OMICS 14: 587-601.
37. Mira NP, Teixeira MC & Sa-Correia I (2010b) Adaptive response and tolerance to weak acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a genome-wide view. OMICS 14: 525-540.
38. Mira NP, Palma M, Guerreiro JF & Sa-Correia I (2010c) Genome-wide identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required for tolerance to acetic acid. Microb Cell Fact 9: 79.
39. Mollapour M & Piper PW (2007) Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation targets the yeast Fps1 aquaglyceroporin for endocytosis, thereby rendering cells resistant to acetic acid. Mol Cell Biol 27: 6446-6456.
40. Narendranath NV, Thomas KC & Ingledew WM (2001) Effects of acetic acid and lactic acid on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a minimal medium. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 26: 171-177.
41. Nevoigt E (2008) Progress in metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 72: 379-412.
42. Palmqvist E & Hahn-Hägerdal B (2000) Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification. Bioresour Technol 74: 17-24.
43. Palmqvist E, Grage H, Meinander NQ & Hahn-Hagerdal B (1999) Main and interaction effects of acetic acid, furfural, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid on growth and ethanol productivity of yeasts. Biotechnol Bioeng 63: 46-55.
44. Pampulha ME & Loureiro-Dias MC (1990) Activity of glycolytic enzymes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the presence of acetic acid. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 34: 375-380.
45. Pampulha ME & Loureiro-Dias MC (2000) Energetics of the effect of acetic acid on growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 184: 69-72.
46. Piper P, Calderon CO, Hatzixanthis K & Mollapour M (2001) Weak acid adaptation: the stress response that confers yeasts with resistance to organic acid food preservatives. Microbiology 147: 2635-2642.
47. Raser JM & O'Shea EK (2004) Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression. Science 304: 1811-1814.
48. Roesch A, Fukunaga-Kalabis M, Schmidt EC, Zabierowski SE, Brafford PA, Vultur A, Basu D, Gimotty P, Vogt T & Herlyn M (2010) A temporarily distinct subpopulation of slow-cycling melanoma cells is required for continuous tumor growth. Cell 141: 583-594.
49. Schacherer J, Shapiro JA, Ruderfer DM & Kruglyak L (2009) Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 458: 342-345.
50. Stratford M, Steels H, Nebe-von-Caron G, Novodvorska M, Hayer K & Archer DB (2013) Extreme resistance to weak-acid preservatives in the spoilage yeast Zygosaccharomyces bailii. Int J Food Microbiol 166: 126-134.
51. Tenreiro S, Rosa PC, Viegas CA & Sa-Correia I (2000) Expression of the AZR1 gene (ORF YGR224w), encoding a plasma membrane transporter of the major facilitator superfamily, is required for adaptation to acetic acid and resistance to azoles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 16: 1469-1481.
52. Tenreiro S, Nunes PA, Viegas CA, Neves MS, Teixeira MC, Cabral MG & Sa-Correia I (2002) AQR1 gene (ORF YNL065w) encodes a plasma membrane transporter of the major facilitator superfamily that confers resistance to short-chain monocarboxylic acids and quinidine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 292: 741-748.
53. Thomas KC, Hynes SH & Ingledew WM (2002) Influence of medium buffering capacity on inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth by acetic and lactic acids. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 1616-1623.
54. Ullah A, Orij R, Brul S & Smits GJ (2012) Quantitative analysis of the modes of growth inhibition by weak organic acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 8377-8387.
55. van Dijken JP, Bauer J, Brambilla L et al. (2000) An interlaboratory comparison of physiological and genetic properties of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Enzyme Microb Technol 26: 706-714.
56. Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA & Van Dijken JP (1992) Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 8: 501-517.
57. Viegas CA, Almeida PF, Cavaco M & Sa-Correia I (1998) The H(+)-ATPase in the plasma membrane of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is activated during growth latency in octanoic acid-supplemented medium accompanying the decrease in intracellular pH and cell viability. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 779-783.
58. Wang QM, Liu WQ, Liti G, Wang SA & Bai FY (2012) Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural environments remote from human activity. Mol Ecol 21: 5404-5417.
59. Zha Y, Muilwijk B, Coulier L & Punt PJ (2012) Inhibitory compounds in lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysates during hydrolysate fermentation processes. J Bioprocess Biotech 2: 112.