Increased ethanol production from glycerol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with enhanced stress tolerance from the overexpression of SAGA complex components

Enzyme and Microbial Technology

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 237-243

  Yu, Kyung Ok ^a   Jung, Ju ^a   Ramzi, Ahmad Bazli ^a   Choe, Se Hoon ^a   Kim, Seung Wook ^a   Park, Chulhwan ^b   Han, Sung Ok ^a  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

^b Kwangwoon University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Ethanol; Glycerol; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; SAGA complex; SPT; Stress tolerance

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR MEMBRANES; CO-EXPRESSION; COMPLEX COMPONENTS; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL STRESS; ETHANOL YIELD; GLYCEROL PRODUCTION; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; OVER-EXPRESSION; PARENT STRAIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE STRAINS; SAGA COMPLEX; SPT; STRESS TOLERANCE; YEAST STRAIN;

CELL MEMBRANES; ELASTICITY; ETHANOL; GLYCEROL; YEAST;

STRAIN;

GLYCEROL; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SAGA; TREHALOSE;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CELL MEMBRANE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; NONHUMAN; OSMOTIC STRESS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRESS;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GLYCEROL; HEAT-SHOCK RESPONSE; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TATA-BOX BINDING PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; UP-REGULATION;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84864958428     PISSN: 01410229     EISSN: 18790909     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2012.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Hou L., Cao X., Wang C. A novel approach for the improvement of ethanol fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 2010, 56:495-500.
2. Liu J.J., Ding W.T., Zhang G.C., Wang J.Y. Improving ethanol fermentation performance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in very high-gravity fermentation through chemical mutagenesis and meiotic recombination. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2011, 91:1239-1246.
3. Diaz-Montano D.M., Favela-Torres E., Cordova J. Improvement of growth, fermentative efficiency and ethanol tolerance of Kloeckera africana during the fermentation of Agave tequilana juice by addition of yeast extract. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2010, 90:321-328.
4. Yu K.O., Kim S.W., Han S.O. Reduction of glycerol production to improve ethanol yield in an engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae using glycerol as a substrate. Journal of Biotechnology 2010, 150:209-214.
5. Bro C., Regenberg B., Forster J., Nielsen J. In silico aided metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved bioethanol production. Metabolic Engineering 2006, 8:102-111.
6. Geertman J.M., van Maris A.J., van Dijken J.P., Pronk J.T. Physiological and genetic engineering of cytosolic redox metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved glycerol production. Metabolic Engineering 2006, 8:532-542.
7. Hirasawa T., Yoshikawa K., Nakakura Y., Nagahisa K., Furusawa C., Katakura Y., et al. Identification of target genes conferring ethanol stress tolerance to Saccharomyces cerevisiae based on DNA microarray data analysis. Journal of Biotechnology 2007, 131:34-44.
8. Zheng D.Q., Wu X.C., Tao X.L., Wang P.M., Li P., Chi X.Q., et al. Screening and construction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with improved multi-tolerance and bioethanol fermentation performance. Bioresource Technology 2011, 102:3020-3027.
9. Alper H., Stephanopoulos G. Global transcription machinery engineering: a new approach for improving cellular phenotype. Metabolic Engineering 2007, 9:258-267.
10. Hou L., Cao X., Wang C., Lu M. Effect of overexpression of transcription factors on the fermentation properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae industrial strains. Letters in Applied Microbiology 2009, 49:14-19.
11. Yu K.O., Kim S.W., Han S.O. Engineering of glycerol utilization pathway for ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresource Technology 2010, 101:4157-4161.
12. Yang J., Bae J.Y., Lee Y.M., Kwon H., Moon H.Y., Kang H.A., et al. Construction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with enhanced ethanol tolerance by mutagenesis of the TATA-binding protein gene and identification of novel genes associated with ethanol tolerance. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2011, 108:1776-1787.
13. Sordillo J., Vespa D., Haggerty L., Youngs F., Gold D., Milton D. Development of a new isotopically labeled internal standard for ergosterol measurement by GC/MS. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 2009, 11:1513-1517.
14. Yu K.O., Jung J., Ramzi A.B., Kim S.W., Park C., Han S.O. Improvement of ethanol yield from glycerol via conversion of pyruvate to ethanol in metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2012, 166:856-865.
15. Alper H., Stephanopoulos G. Engineering for biofuels: exploiting innate microbial capacity or importing biosynthetic potential?. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2009, 7:715-723.
16. Lewis J.G., Learmonth R.P., Attfield P.V., Watson K. Stress co-tolerance and trehalose content in baking strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 1997, 18:30-36.
17. Beney L., Gervais P. Influence of the fluidity of the membrane on the response of microorganisms to environmental stresses. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2001, 57:34-42.
18. Watanabe D., Wu H., Noguchi C., Zhou Y., Akao T., Shimoi H. Enhancement of the initial rate of ethanol fermentation due to dysfunction of yeast stress response components Msn2p and/or Msn4p. Applied and Environment Microbiology 2011, 77:934-941.
19. Oh B.R., Seo J.W., Heo S.Y., Hong W.K., Luo L.H., Joe M.H., et al. Efficient production of ethanol from crude glycerol by a Klebsiella pneumoniae mutant strain. Bioresource Technology 2011, 102:3918-3922.
20. Zhao X.Q., Bai F.W. Mechanisms of yeast stress tolerance and its manipulation for efficient fuel ethanol production. Journal of Biotechnology 2009, 144:23-30.