Cardiovascular imaging: The past and the future, perspectives in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 50, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 557-570

  Wintersperger, Bernd J ^a,b   Bamberg, Fabian ^c   De Cecco, Carlo N ^d,e  

^a TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^d MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^e SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

computed tomography; coronary arteries; delayed enhancement; heart; late gadolinium enhancement; magnetic resonance imaging; myocardial infarction; myocardial perfusion; myocardial viability; vessels

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CARDIAC IMAGING; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY CALCIUM SCORE; HEART; HEART FUNCTION; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); MUSCLE BLOOD VESSEL; MYOCARDIAL BLOOD SUPPLY; MYOCARDIAL DIFFERENTIATION; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TISSUE DIFFERENTIATION; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84939540606     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000164     Document Type: Review

References (261)

1. Elliott LP, Jue KL, Amplatz K,. A roentgen classification of cardiac malpositions. Invest Radiol. 1966; 1: 17-28.
2. Raphael MJ, Steiner RE,. Flow patterns in the pulmonary veins of man studied by wedged pulmonary angiography. Preliminary report. Invest Radiol. 1967; 2: 401-409.
3. Wood M, Griswold MA, Henkelman RM, Inflection points in MR technology. Invest Radiol. 2015: 50; 645-656.
4. Lell MM, Wildberger JE, Alkadhi H, Technological advances in computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2015: 50; 629-644.
5. Pietsch H,. Contrast media for x-ray and MRI: development, current status and future perspectives. Invest Radiol. 2015: 50; 671-678.
6. Hawkes RC, Holland GN, Moore WS, Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tomography of the normal heart. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1981; 5: 605-612.
7. Herfkens RJ, Higgins CB, Hricak H, Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the cardiovascular system: normal and pathologic findings. Radiology. 1983; 147: 749-759.
8. Higgins CB, Byrd BF 2nd, McNamara MT, Magnetic resonance imaging of the heart: a review of the experience in 172 subjects. Radiology. 1985; 155: 671-679.
9. Heidelberger E, Petersen SB, Lauterbur PC,. Aspects of cardiac diagnosis using synchronized NMR imaging. Eur J Radiol. 1983; 3 (suppl 1): 281-285.
10. Lanzer P, Botvinick EH, Schiller NB, Cardiac imaging using gated magnetic resonance. Radiology. 1984; 150: 121-127.
11. Stark DD, Higgins CB, Lanzer P, Magnetic resonance imaging of the pericardium: normal and pathologic findings. Radiology. 1984; 150: 469-774.
12. Markiewicz W, Sechtem U, Kirby R, Measurement of ventricular volumes in the dog by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987; 10: 170-177.
13. Haase A, Frahm J, Matthaei D, FLASH imaging. Rapid NMR imaging using low flip angle pulses. J Magn Res. 1986; 67: 258-266.
14. Sechtem U, Pflugfelder PW, White RD, Cine MR imaging: potential for the evaluation of cardiovascular function. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987; 148: 239-246.
15. Sechtem U, Pflugfelder PW, Cassidy MM, Mitral or aortic regurgitation: quantification of regurgitant volumes with cine MR imaging. Radiology. 1988; 167: 425-430.
16. Pflugfelder PW, Sechtem UP, White RD, Quantification of regional myocardial function by rapid cine MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988; 150: 523-9.
17. Pflugfelder PW, Sechtem UP, White RD, Noninvasive evaluation of mitral regurgitation by analysis of left atrial signal loss in cine magnetic resonance. Am Heart J. 1989; 117: 1113-1119.
18. Atkinson DJ, Edelman RR,. Cineangiography of the heart in a single breath hold with a segmented turboFLASH sequence. Radiology. 1991; 178: 357-360.
19. Semelka RC, Tomei E, Wagner S, Interstudy reproducibility of dimensional and functional measurements between cine magnetic resonance studies in the morphologically abnormal left ventricle. Am Heart J. 1990; 119: 1367-73.
20. Debatin JF, Nadel SN, Paolini JF, Cardiac ejection fraction: phantom study comparing cine MR imaging, radionuclide blood pool imaging, and ventriculography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1992; 2: 135-142.
21. Debatin JF, Nadel SN, Sostman HD, Magnetic resonance imaging-cardiac ejection fraction measurements. Phantom study comparing four different methods. Invest Radiol. 1992; 27: 198-204.
22. Sakuma H, Fujita N, Foo TK, Evaluation of left ventricular volume and mass with breath-hold cine MR imaging. Radiology. 1993; 188: 377-380.
23. Fieno DS, Jaffe WC, Simonetti OP, TrueFISP: assessment of accuracy for measurement of left ventricular mass in an animal model. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002; 15: 526-531.
24. Barkhausen J, Ruehm SG, Goyen M, MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-Angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study. Radiology. 2001; 219: 264-269.
25. Plein S, Bloomer TN, Ridgway JP, Steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging of the heart: comparison with segmented k-space gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001; 14: 230-236.
26. Moon JC, Lorenz CH, Francis JM, Breath-hold FLASH and FISP cardiovascular MR imaging: left ventricular volume differences and reproducibility. Radiology. 2002; 223: 789-797.
27. Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K, Dietrich O, Single breath-hold real-Time cine MR imaging: improved temporal resolution using generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) algorithm. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13: 1931-1936.
28. Reeder SB, Wintersperger BJ, Dietrich O, Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-To-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil. Magn Reson Med. 2005; 54: 748-754.
29. Gutberlet M, Schwinge K, Freyhardt P, Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15: 1586-1597.
30. Wintersperger BJ, Bauner K, Reeder SB, Cardiac steady-state free precession CINE magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 tesla: impact of parallel imaging acceleration on volumetric accuracy and signal parameters. Invest Radiol. 2006; 41: 141-147.
31. Wintersperger BJ, Reeder SB, Nikolaou K, Cardiac CINE MR imaging with a 32-channel cardiac coil and parallel imaging: impact of acceleration factors on image quality and volumetric accuracy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006; 23: 222-7.
32. Wintersperger BJ, Sincleair S, Runge VM, Dual breath-hold magnetic resonance cine evaluation of global and regional cardiac function. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17: 73-80.
33. Vincenti G, Monney P, Chaptinel J, Compressed sensing single-breath-hold CMR for fast quantification of LV function, volumes, and mass. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 7: 882-892.
34. Higgins CB, Herfkens R, Lipton MJ, Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of acute myocardial infarction in dogs: alterations in magnetic relaxation times. Am J Cardiol. 1983; 52: 184-188.
35. Wesbey G, Higgins CB, Lanzer P, Imaging and characterization of acute myocardial infarction in vivo by gated nuclear magnetic resonance. Circulation. 1984; 69: 125-130.
36. Brady TJ, Goldman MR, Pykett IL, Proton nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of regionally ischemic canine hearts: effect of paramagnetic proton signal enhancement. Radiology. 1982; 144: 343-347.
37. Goldman MR, Brady TJ, Pykett IL, Quantification of experimental myocardial infarction using nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and paramagnetic ion contrast enhancement in excised canine hearts. Circulation. 1982; 66: 1012-1016.
38. Wesbey GE, Higgins CB, McNamara MT, Effect of gadolinium-DTPA on the magnetic relaxation times of normal and infarcted myocardium. Radiology. 1984; 153: 165-169.
39. Runge VM, Clanton JA, Wehr CJ, Gated magnetic resonance imaging of acute myocardial ischemia in dogs: application of multiecho techniques and contrast enhancement with GD DTPA. Magn Reson Imaging. 1985; 3: 255-266.
40. McNamara MT, Wesbey GE, Brasch RC, Magnetic resonance imaging of acute myocardial infarction using a nitroxyl spin label (PCA). Invest Radiol. 1985; 20: 591-595.
41. McNamara MT, Higgins CB, Schechtmann N, Detection and characterization of acute myocardial infarction in man with use of gated magnetic resonance. Circulation. 1985; 71: 717-724.
42. Been M, Smith MA, Ridgeway JP, Characterisation of acute myocardial infarction by gated magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet. 1985; 2: 348-350.
43. Lima JA, Judd RM, Bazille A, Regional heterogeneity of human myocardial infarcts demonstrated by contrast-enhanced MRI. Potential mechanisms. Circulation. 1995; 92: 1117-1125.
44. Judd RM, Lugo-Olivieri CH, Arai M, Physiological basis of myocardial contrast enhancement in fast magnetic resonance images of 2-day-old reperfused canine infarcts. Circulation. 1995; 92: 1902-1910.
45. Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lima JA, Myocardial Gd-DTPA kinetics determine MRI contrast enhancement and reflect the extent and severity of myocardial injury after acute reperfused infarction. Circulation. 1996; 94: 3318-3326.
46. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation. 1999; 100: 1992-2002.
47. Baer FM, Voth E, Schneider CA, Comparison of low-dose dobutamine-gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography with [18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. A functional and morphological approach to the detection of residual myocardial viability. Circulation. 1995; 91: 1006-1015.
48. Sandstede JJ, Bertsch G, Beer M, Detection of myocardial viability by low-dose dobutamine cine MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 1999; 17: 1437-1443.
49. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 1445-1453.
50. Schvartzman PR, Srichai MB, Grimm RA, Nonstress delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging of the myocardium predicts improvement of function after revascularization for chronic ischemic heart disease with left ventricular dysfunction. Am Heart J. 2003; 146: 535-541.
51. Gerber BL, Rochitte CE, Melin JA, Microvascular obstruction and left ventricular remodeling early after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2734-2741.
52. Gerber BL, Garot J, Bluemke DA, Accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in predicting improvement of regional myocardial function in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1083-1089.
53. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology. 2001; 218: 215-223.
54. Kellman P, Arai AE, McVeigh ER, Phase-sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium-delayed hyperenhancement. Magn Reson Med. 2002; 47: 372-383.
55. Huber AM, Schoenberg SO, Hayes C, Phase-sensitive inversion-recovery MR imaging in the detection of myocardial infarction. Radiology. 2005; 237: 854-860.
56. Klumpp B, Fenchel M, Hoevelborn T, Assessment of myocardial viability using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla. Invest Radiol. 2006; 41: 661-667.
57. Cheng AS, Robson MD, Neubauer S, Irreversible myocardial injury: assessment with cardiovascular delayed-enhancement MR imaging and comparison of 1.5 and 3.0 T-initial experience. Radiology. 2007; 242: 735-742.
58. Huber A, Bauner K, Wintersperger BJ, Phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) single-shot TrueFISP for assessment of myocardial infarction at 3 tesla. Invest Radiol. 2006; 41: 148-153.
59. Bauner KU, Muehling O, Wintersperger BJ, Inversion recovery single-shot TurboFLASH for assessment of myocardial infarction at 3 Tesla. Invest Radiol. 2007; 42: 361-371.
60. Viallon M, Jacquier A, Rotaru C, Head-To-head comparison of eight late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac MR (LGE CMR) sequences at 1.5 tesla: from bench to bedside. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 34: 1374-1387.
61. Cherryman GR, Pirovano G, Kirchin MA,. Gadobenate dimeglumine in MRI of acute myocardial infarction: results of a phase III study comparing dynamic and delayed contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with EKG, (201)Tl SPECT, and echocardiography. Invest Radiol. 2002; 37: 135-145.
62. Bauner KU, Reiser MF, Huber AM,. Low dose gadobenate dimeglumine for imaging of chronic myocardial infarction in comparison with standard dose gadopentetate dimeglumine. Invest Radiol. 2009; 44: 95-104.
63. Wildgruber M, Stadlbauer T, Rasper M, Single-dose gadobutrol in comparison with single-dose gadobenate dimeglumine for magnetic resonance imaging of chronic myocardial infarction at 3 T. Invest Radiol. 2014; 49: 728-734.
64. Wagner M, Schilling R, Doeblin P, Macrocyclic contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging of chronic myocardial infarction: intraindividual comparison of gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine. Eur Radiol. 2013; 23: 108-114.
65. Schlosser T, Hunold P, Herborn CU, Myocardial infarct: depiction with contrast-enhanced MR imaging-comparison of gadopentetate and gadobenate. Radiology. 2005; 236: 1041-1046.
66. Durmus T, Schilling R, Doeblin P, Gadobutrol for magnetic resonance imaging of chronic myocardial infarction: intraindividual comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine. Invest Radiol. 2012; 47: 183-188.
67. Diesbourg LD, Prato FS, Wisenberg G, Quantification of myocardial blood flow and extracellular volumes using a bolus injection of Gd-DTPA: kinetic modeling in canine ischemic disease. Magn Reson Med. 1992; 23 (2): 239-253.
68. Arheden H, Saeed M, Higgins CB, Measurement of the distribution volume of gadopentetate dimeglumine at echo-planar MR imaging to quantify myocardial infarction: comparison with 99mTc-DTPA autoradiography in rats. Radiology. 1999; 211: 698-708.
69. Arheden H, Saeed M, Higgins CB, Reperfused rat myocardium subjected to various durations of ischemia: estimation of the distribution volume of contrast material with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology. 2000; 215: 520-528.
70. Flacke SJ, Fischer SE, Lorenz CH,. Measurement of the gadopentetate dimeglumine partition coefficient in human myocardium in vivo: normal distribution and elevation in acute and chronic infarction. Radiology. 2001; 218: 703-710.
71. Messroghli DR, Niendorf T, Schulz-Menger J, T1 mapping in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2003; 5: 353-359.
72. Bauner KU, Biffar A, Theisen D, Extracellular volume fractions in chronic myocardial infarction. Invest Radiol. 2012; 47: 538-545.
73. Iles L, Pfluger H, Phrommintikul A, Evaluation of diffuse myocardial fibrosis in heart failure with cardiac magnetic resonance contrast-enhanced T1 mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52: 1574-1580.
74. Sibley CT, Noureldin RA, Gai N, T1 Mapping in cardiomyopathy at cardiac MR: comparison with endomyocardial biopsy. Radiology. 2012; 265: 724-732.
75. Ugander M, Oki AJ, Hsu LY, Extracellular volume imaging by magnetic resonance imaging provides insights into overt and sub-clinical myocardial pathology. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33: 1268-1278.
76. Sado DM, White SK, Piechnik SK, Identification and assessment of Anderson-Fabry disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance noncontrast myocardial T1 mapping. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 6: 392-398.
77. Karamitsos TD, Piechnik SK, Banypersad SM, Noncontrast T1 mapping for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 6: 488-497.
78. Kellman P, Arai AE, Xue H,. T1 and extracellular volume mapping in the heart: estimation of error maps and the influence of noise on precision. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013; 15: 56.
79. Kellman P, Xue H, Chow K, Optimized saturation recovery protocols for T1-mapping in the heart: influence of sampling strategies on precision. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014; 16: 55.
80. Roujol S, Weingartner S, Foppa M, Accuracy, precision, and reproducibility of four T1 mapping sequences: a head-To-head comparison of MOLLI, ShMOLLI, SASHA, and SAPPHIRE. Radiology. 2014; 272: 683-689.
81. Kellman P, Hansen MS,. T1-mapping in the heart: accuracy and precision. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014; 16: 2.
82. Paulin S, von Schulthess GK, Fossel E, MR imaging of the aortic root and proximal coronary arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987; 148: 665-670.
83. Edelman RR, Manning WJ, Burstein D, Coronary arteries: breath-hold MR angiography. Radiology. 1991; 181: 641-643.
84. Manning WJ, Li W, Edelman RR,. A preliminary report comparing magnetic resonance coronary angiography with conventional angiography. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328: 828-832.
85. Duerinckx AJ, Urman MK,. Two-dimensional coronary MR angiography: analysis of initial clinical results. Radiology. 1994; 193: 731-738.
86. Danias PG, Roussakis A, Ioannidis JP,. Diagnostic performance of coronary magnetic resonance angiography as compared against conventional X-ray angiography: a meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 1867-1876.
87. Stuber M, Botnar RM, Danias PG, Contrast agent-enhanced, free-breathing, three-dimensional coronary magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999; 10: 790-799.
88. Regenfus M, Ropers D, Achenbach S, Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis using contrast-enhanced three-dimensional breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 44-50.
89. Ropers D, Regenfus M, Stilianakis N, A direct comparison of noninvasive coronary angiography by electron beam tomography and navigator-echo-based magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of restenosis following coronary angioplasty. Invest Radiol. 2002; 37: 386-392.
90. Regenfus M, Ropers D, Achenbach S, Diagnostic value of maximum intensity projections versus source images for assessment of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Invest Radiol. 2003; 38: 200-206.
91. Spuentrup E, Bornert P, Botnar RM, Navigator-gated free-breathing three-dimensional balanced fast field echo (TrueFISP) coronary magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol. 2002; 37: 637-642.
92. Deshpande VS, Li D,. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery imaging using 3D trueFISP. Magn Reson Med. 2003; 50: 570-577.
93. Maintz D, Aepfelbacher FC, Kissinger KV, Coronary MR angiography: comparison of quantitative and qualitative data from four techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 182: 515-521.
94. Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M, Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 1863-1869.
95. Bizino MB, Bonetti C, van der Geest RJ, High spatial resolution coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 7 T: comparison with low spatial resolution bright blood imaging. Invest Radiol. 2014; 49: 326-330.
96. Bi X, Deshpande V, Simonetti O, Three-dimensional breathhold SSFP coronary MRA: a comparison between 1.5 T and 3.0 T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005; 22: 206-212.
97. Gharib AM, Abd-Elmoniem KZ, Ho VB, The feasibility of 350 mum spatial resolution coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3 T in humans. Invest Radiol. 2012; 47: 339-345.
98. Piccini D, Monney P, Sierro C, Respiratory self-navigated postcontrast whole-heart coronary MR angiography: initial experience in patients. Radiology. 2014; 270: 378-386.
99. Forman C, Piccini D, Grimm R, Reduction of respiratory motion artifacts for free-breathing whole-heart coronary MRA by weighted iterative reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. 2015; 73: 1885-1895.
100. White RD, Caputo GR, Mark AS, Coronary artery bypass graft patency: noninvasive evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology. 1987; 164: 681-686.
101. Vrachliotis TG, Bis KG, Aliabadi D, Contrast-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography for evaluating patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 168: 1073-1080.
102. Wintersperger BJ, Engelmann MG, von Smekal A, Patency of coronary bypass grafts: assessment with breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography-value of a non-electrocardiographically triggered technique. Radiology. 1998; 208: 345-351.
103. Kalden P, Kreitner KF, Wittlinger T, Assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts: value of different breath- hold MR imaging techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 172: 1359-1364.
104. Bunce NH, Lorenz CH, John AS, Coronary artery bypass graft patency: assessment with true ast imaging with steady-state precession versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 2003; 227: 440-446.
105. Fayad ZA, Fuster V, Fallon JT, Noninvasive in vivo human coronary artery lumen and wall imaging using black-blood magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2000; 102: 506-510.
106. Botnar RM, Kim WY, Bornert P, 3D coronary vessel wall imaging utilizing a local inversion technique with spiral image acquisition. Magn Reson Med. 2001; 46: 848-854.
107. Kim WY, Stuber M, Bornert P, Three-dimensional black-blood cardiac magnetic resonance coronary vessel wall imaging detects positive arterial remodeling in patients with nonsignificant coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2002; 106: 296-299.
108. Botnar RM, Stuber M, Lamerichs R, Initial experiences with in vivo right coronary artery human MR vessel wall imaging at 3 tesla. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2003; 5: 589-594.
109. Yeon SB, Sabir A, Clouse M, Delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance coronary artery wall imaging: comparison with multislice computed tomography and quantitative coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50: 441-447.
110. McNamara MT, Higgins CB, Ehman RL, Acute myocardial ischemia: magnetic resonance contrast enhancement with gadolinium-DTPA. Radiology. 1984; 153: 157-163.
111. Coelho-Filho OR, Rickers C, Kwong RY, MR myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology. 2013; 266: 701-715.
112. Gould KL, Lipscomb K,. Effects of coronary stenoses on coronary flow reserve and resistance. Am J Cardiol. 1974; 34: 48-55.
113. Atkinson DJ, Burstein D, Edelman RR,. First-pass cardiac perfusion: evaluation with ultrafast MR imaging. Radiology. 1990; 174 (3 pt 1): 757-762.
114. Manning WJ, Atkinson DJ, Grossman W, First-pass nuclear magnetic resonance imaging studies using gadolinium-DTPA in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991; 18: 959-965.
115. Schaefer S, van Tyen R, Saloner D,. Evaluation of myocardial perfusion abnormalities with gadolinium-enhanced snapshot MR imaging in humans. Work in progress. Radiology. 1992; 185: 795-801.
116. Wilke N, Simm C, Zhang J, Contrast-enhanced first pass myocardial perfusion imaging: correlation between myocardial blood flow in dogs at rest and during hyperemia. Magn Reson Med. 1993; 29: 485-497.
117. Wilke N, Jerosch-Herold M, Wang Y, Myocardial perfusion reserve: assessment with multisection, quantitative, first-pass MR imaging. Radiology. 1997; 204: 373-384.
118. Slavin GS, Wolff SD, Gupta SN, First-pass myocardial perfusion MR imaging with interleaved notched saturation: feasibility study. Radiology. 2001; 219: 258-263.
119. Ding S, Wolff SD, Epstein FH,. Improved coverage in dynamic contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI using interleaved gradient-echo EPI. Magn Reson Med. 1998; 39: 514-519.
120. Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I, Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2003; 108: 432-437.
121. Schreiber WG, Schmitt M, Kalden P, Dynamic contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion imaging using saturation-prepared TrueFISP. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002; 16: 641-652.
122. Elkington AG, Gatehouse PD, Cannell TM, Comparison of hybrid echo-planar imaging and FLASH myocardial perfusion cardiovascular MR imaging. Radiology. 2005; 235: 237-243.
123. Theisen D, Wintersperger BJ, Huber A, Myocardial first pass perfusion imaging with gadobutrol: impact of parallel imaging algorithms on image quality and signal behavior. Invest Radiol. 2007; 42: 522-528.
124. Plein S, Schwitter J, Suerder D, k-Space and time sensitivity encoding-Accelerated myocardial perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: comparison with 1.5 T. Radiology. 2008; 249: 493-500.
125. Plein S, Kozerke S, Suerder D, High spatial resolution myocardial perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2008; 29: 2148-2155.
126. Theisen D, Wintersperger BJ, Huber A, Myocardial perfusion imaging with gadobutrol: a comparison between 3 and 1.5 tesla with an identical sequence design. Invest Radiol. 2007; 42: 499-506.
127. Cheng AS, Pegg TJ, Karamitsos TD, Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3-Tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with 1.5-Tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49: 2440-2449.
128. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 1503-16.
129. Rieber J, Huber A, Erhard I, Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 1465-1471.
130. Huber A, Sourbron S, Klauss V, Magnetic resonance perfusion of the myocardium: semiquantitative and quantitative evaluation in comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. Invest Radiol. 2012; 47: 332-338.
131. Lockie T, Ishida M, Perera D, High-resolution magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0-Tesla to detect hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses as determined by fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57: 70-75.
132. Li M, Zhou T, Yang LF, Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial magnetic resonance perfusion to diagnose ischemic stenosis with fractional flow reserve as reference: systematic review and meta-Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 7: 1098-1105.
133. Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF, Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet. 2012; 379: 453-460.
134. Jerosch-Herold M,. Quantification of myocardial perfusion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010; 12: 57.
135. Biglands JD, Magee DR, Sourbron SP, Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Four Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Estimation Methods Used in Cardiac MR Imaging: CE-MARC Substudy. Radiology. 2015; 275: 393-402.
136. Doesch C, Papavassiliu T, Michaely HJ, Detection of myocardial ischemia by automated, motion-corrected, color-encoded perfusion maps compared with visual analysis of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T: a pilot study. Invest Radiol. 2013; 48: 678-686.
137. Otazo R, Kim D, Axel L, Combination of compressed sensing and parallel imaging for highly accelerated first-pass cardiac perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2010; 64: 767-776.
138. Fieno DS, Shea SM, Li Y, Myocardial perfusion imaging based on the blood oxygen level-dependent effect using T2-prepared steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2004; 110: 1284-1290.
139. Arnold JR, Karamitsos TD, Bhamra-Ariza P, Myocardial oxygenation in coronary artery disease: insights from blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging at 3 tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59: 1954-1964.
140. Miyazaki M, Lee VS,. Nonenhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 2008; 248: 20-43.
141. Kuo PH, Kanal E, Abu-Alfa AK, Gadolinium-based MR contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Radiology. 2007; 242: 647-649.
142. Bradley WG Jr, Waluch V,. Blood flow: magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology. 1985; 154: 443-450.
143. Ivancevic MK, Geerts L, Weadock WJ, Technical principles of MR angiography methods. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2009; 17: 1-11.
144. Nederkoorn PJ, van der Graaf Y, Eikelboom BC, Time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis: does a flow void represent severe stenosis? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002; 23: 1779-1784.
145. Valk PE, Hale JD, Kaufman L, MR imaging of the aorta with three-dimensional vessel reconstruction: validation by angiography. Radiology. 1985; 157: 721-725.
146. Prince MR,. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology. 1994; 191: 155-164.
147. Holland GA, Dougherty L, Carpenter JP, Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral abdominal arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996; 166: 971-981.
148. Kramer JH, Grist TM,. Peripheral MR Angiography. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2012; 20: 761-776.
149. Adamis MK, Li W, Wielopolski PA, Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography of the lower extremities: initial evaluation with a multisection two-dimensional time-of-flight sequence. Radiology. 1995; 196: 689-695.
150. Remonda L, Senn P, Barth A, Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002; 23: 213-219.
151. Oudkerk M, van Beek EJ, Wielopolski P, Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and conventional pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a prospective study. Lancet. 2002; 359: 1643-1647.
152. Douek PC, Revel D, Chazel S, Fast MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries and arteries of the lower extremity: value of bolus-enhanced, whole-volume subtraction technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995; 165: 431-437.
153. Foo TK, Saranathan M, Prince MR, Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 1997; 203: 275-280.
154. Shetty AN, Bis KG, Vrachliotis TG, Contrast-enhanced 3D MRA with centric ordering in k space: a preliminary clinical experience in imaging the abdominal aorta and renal and peripheral arterial vasculature. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998; 8: 603-615.
155. Goyen M, Quick HH, Debatin JF, Whole-body three-dimensional MR angiography with a rolling table platform: initial clinical experience. Radiology. 2002; 224: 270-277.
156. Kramer H, Michaely HJ, Matschl V, High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities with a dedicated 36-element matrix coil at 3 Tesla. Invest Radiol. 2007; 42: 477-483.
157. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med. 1996; 36: 345-351.
158. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med. 2002; 47: 1202-1210.
159. Zenge MO, Vogt FM, Brauck K, High-resolution continuously acquired peripheral MR angiography featuring partial parallel imaging GRAPPA. Magn Reson Med. 2006; 56: 859-865.
160. Schoenberg SO, Rieger J, Weber CH, High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US. Radiology. 2005; 235: 687-698.
161. Voth M, Haneder S, Huck K, Peripheral magnetic resonance angiography with continuous table movement in combination with high spatial and temporal resolution time-resolved MRA With a total single dose (0.1 mmol/kg) of gadobutrol at 3.0 T. Invest Radiol. 2009; 44: 627-633.
162. Stalder AF, Schmidt M, Quick HH, Highly undersampled contrast-enhanced MRA with iterative reconstruction: Integration in a clinical setting. Magn Reson Med. 2014. [Epub ahead of print].
163. Wyttenbach R, Braghetti A, Wyss M, Renal artery assessment with nonenhanced steady-state free precession versus contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 2007; 245: 186-195.
164. Edelman RR, Sheehan JJ, Dunkle E, Quiescent-interval single-shot unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral vascular disease: technical considerations and clinical feasibility. Magn Reson Med. 2010; 63: 951-958.
165. Hodnett PA, Koktzoglou I, Davarpanah AH, Evaluation of peripheral arterial disease with nonenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography. Radiology. 2011; 260: 282-93.
166. Ledley RS, Di Chiro G, Luessenhop AJ, Computerized transaxial x-ray tomography of the human body. Science. 1974; 186: 207-212.
167. Iinuma TA, Tateno Y, Umegaki Y, Proposed system for ultrafast computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1977; 1: 494-499.
168. Boyd DPGR, Quinn JR, Sparks R, A proposed dynamic cardiac 3-D densitometer for early detection and evaluation of heart disease. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1979; 26: 2724-2727.
169. Rumberger JA, Bell MR,. Measurement of myocardial perfusion and cardiac output using intravenous injection methods by ultrafast (cine) computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 1992; 27 (suppl 2): S40-S46.
170. Knollmann FD, Muschick P, Krause W, Detection of myocardial ischemia by electron beam CT. Experimental studies. Acta Radiol. 2001; 42: 386-392.
171. Schmermund A, Gerber T, Behrenbeck T, Measurement of myocardial infarct size by electron beam computed tomography: a comparison with 99mTc sestamibi. Invest Radiol. 1998; 33: 313-321.
172. Sinak LJ, Hoffman EA, Schwartz RS, Three-dimensional cardiac anatomy and function in heart disease in adults: initial results with the dynamic spatial reconstructor. Mayo Clin Proc. 1985; 60: 383-392.
173. Kalender WA, Seissler W, Klotz E, Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. Radiology. 1990; 176: 181-183.
174. Kachelrieß M, Ulzheimer S, Kalender WA,. ECG-correlated imaging of the heart with subsecond multislice CT. IEEE T Med Imaging. 2000; 19: 888-901.
175. Flohr T, Stierstorfer K, Bruder H, Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 16-slice CT scanner. Med Phys. 2003; 30: 832-845.
176. Flohr TG, Stierstorfer K, Ulzheimer S, Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot. Med Phys. 2005; 32: 2536-2547.
177. Mori S, Endo M, Obata T, Clinical potentials of the prototype 256-detector row CT-scanner. Acad Radiol. 2005; 12: 148-154.
178. Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML, Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008; 24: 535-546.
179. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16: 256-268.
180. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990; 15: 827-832.
181. Kondos GT, Hoff JA, Sevrukov A, Electron-beam tomography coronary artery calcium and cardiac events: a 37-month follow-up of 5635 initially asymptomatic low- to intermediate-risk adults. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2571-2576.
182. Shaw LJ, Raggi P, Schisterman E, Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality. Radiology. 2003; 228: 826-33.
183. Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. Jama. 2004; 291: 210-215.
184. Nallamothu BK, Saint S, Bielak LF, Electron-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a meta-Analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2001; 161: 833-838.
185. van der Giessen AG, Toepker MH, Donelly PM, Reproducibility, accuracy, and predictors of accuracy for the detection of coronary atherosclerotic plaque composition by computed tomography: an ex vivo comparison to intravascular ultrasound. Invest Radiol. 2010; 45: 693-701.
186. Otsuka M, Bruining N, Van Pelt NC, Quantification of coronary plaque by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparison with quantitative intracoronary ultrasound. Invest Radiol. 2008; 43: 314-321.
187. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation. 2010; 122: e525-e555.
188. De Cecco CN, Meinel FG, Chiaramida SA, Coronary artery computed tomography scanning. Circulation. 2014; 129: 1341-1345.
189. Ohnesorge BM, Hofmann LK, Flohr TG, Schoepf UJ,. CT for imaging coronary artery disease: defining the paradigm for its application. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2005; 21: 85-104.
190. Flohr TG, Schoepf UJ, Ohnesorge BM,. Chasing the heart: new developments for cardiac CT. J Thorac Imaging. 2007; 22: 4-16.
191. Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K, von Ziegler F, Image quality, motion artifacts, and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0.33-second rotation speed. Invest Radiol. 2006; 41: 436-442.
192. Perisinakis K, Seimenis I, Tzedakis A, Triple-rule-out computed tomography angiography with 256-slice computed tomography scanners: patient-specific assessment of radiation burden and associated cancer risk. Invest Radiol. 2012; 47: 109-115.
193. de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE, Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis. Invest Radiol. 2010; 45: 331-340.
194. Menke J, Unterberg-Buchwald C, Staab W, Head-To-head comparison of prospectively triggered vs retrospectively gated coronary computed tomography angiography: Meta-Analysis of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose. Am Heart J. 2013; 165: 154-163. e3.
195. Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D, Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-Triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J. 2010; 31: 340-346.
196. Renker M, Nance JW Jr, Schoepf UJ, Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction. Radiology. 2011; 260: 390-399.
197. Morsbach F, Desbiolles L, Plass A, Stenosis quantification in coronary CT angiography: impact of an integrated circuit detector with iterative reconstruction. Invest Radiol. 2013; 48: 32-40.
198. Leschka S, Stinn B, Schmid F, Dual source CT coronary angiography in severely obese patients: trading off temporal resolution and image noise. Invest Radiol. 2009; 44: 720-727.
199. Rist CJT, Mueller-Starck J, Arnoldi E, Noninvasive coronary angiography using dual-source computed tomography in patients with atrial fibrillation. Invest Radiol. 2009; 44: 159-167.
200. Sommer WH, Schenzle JC, Becker CR, Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique. Invest Radiol. 2010; 45: 64-71.
201. Jaarsma C, Leiner T, Bekkers SC, Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59: 1719-1728.
202. von Ballmoos MW, Haring B, Juillerat P, Meta-Analysis: diagnostic performance of low-radiation-dose coronary computed tomography angiography. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 154: 413-420.
203. Hadamitzky M, Taubert S, Deseive S, Prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiography during 5 years of follow-up in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2013; 34: 3277-3285.
204. Cook TS, Galperin-Aizenberg M, Litt HI,. Coronary and cardiac computed tomography in the emergency room: current status and future directions. J Thorac Imaging. 2013; 28: 204-216.
205. Lin FY, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, Cardiac chamber volumes, function, and mass as determined by 64-multidetector row computed tomography: mean values among healthy adults free of hypertension and obesity. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2008; 1: 782-786.
206. Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, Dual-step prospective ECG-Triggered 128-slice dual-source CT for evaluation of coronary arteries and cardiac function without heart rate control: a technical note. Eur Radiol. 2010; 20: 2092-2099.
207. Rumberger JA, Feiring AJ, Lipton MJ, Use of ultrafast computed tomography to quantitate regional myocardial perfusion: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987; 9: 59-69.
208. Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Rosenblum MA, Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2010; 45: 306-313.
209. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Meredith IT, Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33: 67-77.
210. Meinel FG, De Cecco CN, Schoepf UJ, First-Arterial-pass dual-energy CT for assessment of myocardial blood supply: do we need rest, stress, and delayed acquisition? Comparison with SPECT. Radiology. 2014; 270: 708-716.
211. Wang Y, Qin L, Shi X, Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198: 521-529.
212. Weininger M, Schoepf UJ, Ramachandra A, Adenosine-stress dynamic real-Time myocardial perfusion CT and adenosine-stress first-pass dual-energy myocardial perfusion CT for the assessment of acute chest pain: initial results. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81: 3703-3710.
213. Zhang LJ, Peng J, Wu SY, Dual source dual-energy computed tomography of acute myocardial infarction: correlation with histopathologic findings in a canine model. Invest Radiol. 2010; 45: 290-297.
214. George RT, Silva C, Cordeiro MA, Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48: 153-160.
215. Ruzsics B, Lee H, Powers ER, Images in cardiovascular medicine. Myocardial ischemia diagnosed by dual-energy computed tomography: correlation with single-photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 2008; 117: 1244-1245.
216. Koonce JD, Vliegenthart R, Schoepf UJ, Accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography for the measurement of iodine concentration using cardiac CT protocols: validation in a phantom model. Eur Radiol. 2014; 24: 512-518.
217. Kang DK, Schoepf UJ, Bastarrika G, Dual-energy computed tomography for integrative imaging of coronary artery disease: principles and clinical applications. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010; 31: 276-291.
218. Vliegenthart R, Pelgrim GJ, Ebersberger U, Dual-energy CT of the heart. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 199 (suppl 5): S54-S63.
219. Ruzsics B, Schwarz F, Schoepf UJ, Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am J Cardiol. 2009; 104: 318-326.
220. So A, Hsieh J, Imai Y, Prospectively ECG-Triggered rapid kV-switching dual-energy CT for quantitative imaging of myocardial perfusion. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 5: 829-836.
221. Zhang LJ, Qi L, Wang J, Feasibility of prospectively ECG-Triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography with 30 mL iodinated contrast agent at 70 kVp: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2014; 24: 1537-1546.
222. Meinel FG, Canstein C, Schoepf UJ, Image quality and radiation dose of low tube voltage 3(rd) generation dual-source coronary CT angiography in obese patients: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 2014; 24: 1643-1650.
223. Yin WH, Lu B, Hou ZH, Detection of coronary artery stenosis with sub-milliSievert radiation dose by prospectively ECG-Triggered high-pitch spiral CT angiography and iterative reconstruction. Eur Radiol. 2013; 23: 2927-2933.
224. Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011; 4: 540-549.
225. Hsiao EM, Rybicki FJ, Steigner M,. CT coronary angiography: 256-slice and 320-detector row scanners. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2010; 12: 68-75.
226. Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Pietsch H, Quantitative whole heart stress perfusion CT imaging as noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics in coronary artery stenosis: preliminary animal experience. Invest Radiol. 2010; 45: 298-305.
227. Haberland U, Klotz E, Abolmaali N,. Performance assessment of dynamic spiral scan modes with variable pitch for quantitative perfusion computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2010; 45: 378-386.
228. Ho KT, Chua KC, Klotz E, Panknin C,. Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-Attenuation curves with dual-source CT. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging. 2010; 3: 811-820.
229. Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS, Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54: 1072-1084.
230. Cury RC, Magalhaes TA, Borges AC, Dipyridamole stress and rest myocardial perfusion by 64-detector row computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2010; 106: 310-315.
231. Cury RC, Magalhaes TA, Paladino AT, Dipyridamole stress and rest transmural myocardial perfusion ratio evaluation by 64 detector-row computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011; 5: 443-448.
232. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009; 2: 174-182.
233. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with 320-row detector computed tomography accurately detects myocardial ischemia in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 5: 333-340.
234. Kachenoura N, Gaspar T, Lodato JA, Combined assessment of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion using multidetector computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2009; 103: 1487-1494.
235. Nasis A, Ko BS, Leung MC, Diagnostic accuracy of combined coronary angiography and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-detector computed tomography: pilot study. Eur Radiol. 2013; 23: 1812-21.
236. Osawa K, Miyoshi T, Koyama Y, Additional diagnostic value of first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging without stress when combined with 64-row detector coronary CT angiography in patients with coronary artery disease. Heart. 2014; 100: 1008-1015.
237. Rocha-Filho JA, Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology. 2010; 254: 410-419.
238. Rochitte CE, George RT, Chen MY, Computed tomography angiography and perfusion to assess coronary artery stenosis causing perfusion defects by single photon emission computed tomography: the CORE320 study. Eur Heart J. 2014; 35: 1120-1130.
239. Kim SM, Chang SA, Shin W, Dual-energy CT perfusion during pharmacologic stress for the assessment of myocardial perfusion defects using a second-generation dual-source CT: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014; 38: 44-52.
240. Ko SM, Choi JW, Hwang HK, Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive anatomic and functional assessment with dual-source CT and adenosine-induced stress dual-energy CT for detection of significant coronary stenosis. Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198: 512-520.
241. Ko SM, Choi JW, Song MG, Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine-induced stress dual-energy computed tomography of the heart: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and conventional coronary angiography. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21: 26-35.
242. Ko SM, Park JH, Hwang HK, Direct comparison of stress- and rest-dual-energy computed tomography for detection of myocardial perfusion defect. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 30 (suppl 1): 41-53.
243. Wang R, Yu W, Wang Y, Incremental value of dual-energy CT to coronary CT angiography for the detection of significant coronary stenosis: comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and single photon emission computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011; 27: 647-656.
244. Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology. 2011; 260: 689-698.
245. Bamberg F, Marcus RP, Becker A, Dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia as determined by MR imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2014; 7: 267-277.
246. Greif M, von Ziegler F, Bamberg F, CT stress perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis as defined by FFR. Heart. 2013; 99: 1004-1011.
247. Huber AM, Leber V, Gramer BM, Myocardium: dynamic versus single-shot CT perfusion imaging. Radiology. 2013; 269: 378-386.
248. Rossi A, Dharampal A, Wragg A, Diagnostic performance of hyperaemic myocardial blood flow index obtained by dynamic computed tomography: does it predict functionally significant coronary lesions? Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 15: 85-94.
249. Wang Y, Qin L, Shi X, Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198: 521-529.
250. Bamberg F, Hinkel R, Schwarz F, Accuracy of dynamic computed tomography adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in estimating myocardial blood flow at various degrees of coronary artery stenosis using a porcine animal mode. l. Invest Radiol. 2012; 47: 71-77.
251. Schoellnast H, Tillich M, Deutschmann MJ, Aortoiliac enhancement during computed tomography angiography with reduced contrast material dose and saline solution flush: influence on magnitude and uniformity of the contrast column. Invest Radiol. 2004; 39: 20-26.
252. Schindera ST, Graca P, Patak MA, Thoracoabdominal-Aortoiliac multidetector-row CT angiography at 80 and 100 kVp: assessment of image quality and radiation dose. Invest Radiol. 2009; 44: 650-655.
253. Wintersperger B, Jakobs T, Herzog P, Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15: 334-341.
254. Yamamoto S, McWilliams J, Arellano C, Dual-energy CT angiography of pelvic and lower extremity arteries: dual-energy bone subtraction versus manual bone subtraction. Clin Radiol. 2009; 64: 1088-1096.
255. Tran DN, Straka M, Roos JE, Dual-energy CT discrimination of iodine and calcium: experimental results and implications for lower extremity CT angiography. Acad Radiol. 2009; 16: 160-171.
256. Marin D, Fananapazir G, Mileto A, Dual-energy multi-detector row CT with virtual monochromatic imaging for improving patient-To-patient uniformity of aortic enhancement during CT angiography: an in vitro and in vivo study. Radiology. 2014; 272: 895-902.
257. Sommer WH, Becker CR, Haack M, Time-resolved CT angiography for the detection and classification of endoleaks. Radiology. 2012; 263: 917-926.
258. Sommer WH, Bamberg F, Johnson TR, Diagnostic accuracy of dynamic computed tomographic angiographic of the lower leg in patients with critical limb ischemia. Invest Radiol. 2012; 47: 325-331.
259. Sommer T, Fehske W, Holzknecht N, Aortic dissection: a comparative study of diagnosis with spiral CT, multiplanar transesophageal echocardiography, and MR imaging. Radiology. 1996; 199: 347-352.
260. Jacobs JE LLJ, Abbara S, Akers SR, Expert Panel on Cardiac Imaging. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute chest pain-suspected aortic dissection [online publication]. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology (ACR); 2014: 11.
261. Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Kock MC, Hunink MG,. Lower extremity arterial disease: multidetector CT angiography meta-Analysis. Radiology. 2007; 245: 433-439.