Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): A prospective trial

The Lancet

Volumn 379, Issue 9814, 2012, Pages 453-460

  Greenwood, John P ^a   Maredia, Neil ^a   Younger, John F ^a   Brown, Julia M ^b   Nixon, Jane ^b   Everett, Colin C ^b   Bijsterveld, Petra ^a   Ridgway, John P ^c   Radjenovic, Aleksandra ^a   Dickinson, Catherine J ^c   Ball, Stephen G ^a   Plein, Sven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c LEEDS GENERAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM; TETROFOSMIN TC 99M;

ADULT; ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84856669252     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: 1474547X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61335-4     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. WHO Cardiovascular disease http://www.who.int/cardiovascular-diseases/en/ (accessed March 14, 2011).
2. NICE Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/TA073guidance.pdf (accessed Nov 18).
3. G Mowatt, L Vale, M Brazzelli et al. Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and economic evaluation, of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction Health Technol Assess 8 2004 1 207
4. LJ Shaw, CN Bairey Merz, CJ Pepine for the WISE investigators Insights from the NHLBI-sponsored women's ischemia syndrome evaluation (WISE) study: part I: gender differences in traditional and novel risk factors, symptom evaluation, and gender-optimized diagnostic strategies J Am Coll Cardiol 47 3 suppl 2006 S4 20
5. RJ Kim, E Wu, A Rafael et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction N Engl J Med 343 2000 1445 1453
6. WY Kim, PG Danias, M Stuber et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses N Engl J Med 345 2001 1863 1869 (Pubitemid 33716560)
7. I Klem, JF Heitner, DJ Shah et al. Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging J Am Coll Cardiol 47 2006 1630 1638
8. RY Kwong, AE Schussheim, S Rekhraj et al. Detecting acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging Circulation 107 2003 531 537 (Pubitemid 36176800)
9. S Plein, JP Greenwood, JP Ridgway, G Cranny, SG Ball, MU Sivananthan Assessment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging J Am Coll Cardiol 44 2004 2173 2181 (Pubitemid 39576037)
10. JP Greenwood, JF Younger, J Ridgway, MU Sivananthan, SG Ball, S Plein Safety and diagnostic accuracy of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging versus exercise tolerance testing early after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction Heart 93 2007 1363 1368 (Pubitemid 351480131)
11. N Al-Saadi, E Nagel, M Gross et al. Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance Circulation 101 2000 1379 1383 (Pubitemid 30169858)
12. JR Panting, PD Gatehouse, GZ Yang et al. Echo-planar magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging: parametric map analysis and comparison with thallium SPECT J Magn Reson Imaging 13 2001 192 200 (Pubitemid 32066655)
13. J Schwitter, D Nanz, S Kneifel et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography Circulation 103 2001 2230 2235 (Pubitemid 32433710)
14. I Paetsch, C Jahnke, A Wahl et al. Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion Circulation 110 2004 835 842 (Pubitemid 39096012)
15. N Ishida, H Sakuma, M Motoyasu et al. Noninfarcted myocardium: correlation between dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial MR imaging and quantitative coronary angiography Radiology 229 2003 209 216 (Pubitemid 37152126)
16. SD Wolff, J Schwitter, R Coulden et al. Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study Circulation 110 2004 732 737 (Pubitemid 39056274)
17. TH Giang, D Nanz, R Coulden et al. Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multi-centre experience Eur Heart J 25 2004 1657 1665 (Pubitemid 39209287)
18. J Schwitter, CM Wacker, AC van Rossum et al. MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial Eur Heart J 29 2008 480 489 (Pubitemid 351264187)
19. JP Greenwood, N Maredia, A Radjenovic et al. Clinical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in coronary heart disease: the CE-MARC study Trials 10 2009 62
20. PL Tilkemeier, CD Cooke, GB Grossman, BD McCallister Jr, RP Ward Standardized reporting of radionuclide myocardial perfusion and function J Nucl Cardiol 16 2009 650
21. RC Hendel, FJ Wackers, DS Berman et al. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology consensus statement: reporting of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging studies J Nucl Cardiol 13 2006 e152 e156
22. WG Hundley, D Bluemke, JG Bogaert et al. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance guidelines for reporting cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 11 2009 5
23. MD Cerqueira, NJ Weissman, V Dilsizian for the American Heart Association writing group on myocardial segmentation and registration for cardiac imaging Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association Circulation 105 2002 539 542 (Pubitemid 34262671)
24. MJ Henzlova, MD Cerqueira, JJ Mahmarian, SS Yao for the Quality Assurance Committee of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Stress protocols and tracers J Nucl Cardiol 13 2006 e80 e90
25. TA Holly, BG Abbott, M Al-Mallah et al. Single photon-emission computed tomography J Nucl Cardiol 17 2010 941 973
26. A Agresti, BA Coull Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions Am Stat 52 1998 119 126
27. RB D'Agostino Sr, RS Vasan, MJ Pencina et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study Circulation 117 2008 743 753 (Pubitemid 351640675)
28. WG Hundley, DA Bluemke, JP Finn et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology oundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents Circulation 121 2010 2462 2508
29. RC Hendel, MR Patel, CM Kramer et al. CCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/ SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology J Am Coll Cardiol 48 2006 1475 1497
30. M Hamon, G Fau, G Née, J Ehtisham, R Morello, M Hamon Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 12 2010 29
31. I Klem, S Greulich, JF Heitner et al. Value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress perfusion testing for the detection of coronary artery disease in women JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1 2008 436 445 (Pubitemid 351998675)
32. PA Tonino, WF Fearon, B De Bruyne et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation J Am Coll Cardiol 55 2010 2816 2821