Diagnostic performance of hyperaemic myocardial blood flow index obtained by dynamic computed tomography: Does it predict functionally significant coronary lesions?

European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 85-94

  Rossi, Alexia ^a,b   Dharampal, Anoeshka ^b   Wragg, Andrew ^a   Davies, L Ceri ^a   Van Geuns, Robert Jan ^b   Anagnostopoulos, Costantinos ^a   Klotz, Ernst ^c   Kitslaar, Pieter ^d,e   Broersen, Alexander ^e   Mathur, Anthony ^a   Nieman, Koen ^b   Hunink, M G Myriam ^b,f   De Feyter, Pim J ^b   Petersen, Steffen E ^a   Pugliese, Francesca ^a,g  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

^d Medis Medical Imaging Systems bv   (Netherlands)

^e LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^f HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^g AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

coronary artery disease; coronary computed tomography angiography; dynamic contrast enhanced computed tomography; myocardial blood flow; myocardial perfusion

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY LESION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; GUIDE WIRE; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL BLOOD FLOW INDEX; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MYOCARDIAL BLOOD FLOW; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION;

ADENOSINE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CHEST PAIN; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84891380013     PISSN: 20472404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jet133     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. DeBruyne B, PijlsNH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, PirothZet al. Fractionalflow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2012;367:991-1001.
2. Bamberg F, Hinkel R, Schwarz F, Sandner TA, Baloch E, Marcus R et al. Accuracy of dynamic computed tomography adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in estimating myocardial blood flow at various degrees of coronary artery stenosis using a porcine animal model. Invest Radiol 2012;47:71-7.
3. GeorgeRT, Jerosch-Herold M, Silva C, KitagawaK, Bluemke DA, Lima JA et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using dynamic 64-detector computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2007;42:815-22.
4. Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Pietsch H, Schmidt B, Allmendinger T, Haberland U et al. Quantitative whole heart stress perfusion CT imaging as noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics in coronary artery stenosis: preliminary animal experience. Invest Radiol 2010;45:298-305.
5. Rossi A, UitterdijkA, Dijkshoorn M, Klotz E, Dharampal A, van StratenMet al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow by adenosine-stress CT perfusion imaging in pigs during various degrees of stenosis correlates well with coronary artery blood flow and fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;14:331-8.
6. So A, Hsieh J, Li JY, Hadway J, Kong HF, Lee TY. Quantitative myocardial perfusion measurement usingCTperfusion: a validation study in a porcine model of reperfused acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;28:1237-48.
7. Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, Marcus RP, Greif M, von Ziegler F et al. Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology 2011;260:689-98.
8. Ho KT, Chua KC, Klotz E, Panknin C. Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:811-20.
9. Wang Y, Qin L, Shi X, Zeng Y, Jing H, Schoepf UJ et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:521-9.
10. So A, Wisenberg G, Islam A, Amann J,RomanoW, BrownJ et al. Non-invasive assessment of functionally relevant coronary artery stenoses with quantitative CT perfusion: preliminary clinical experiences. Eur Radiol 2012;22:39-50.
11. Boogers MJ, Schuijf JD, Kitslaar PH, vanWerkhoven JM, de Graaf FR, Boersma E et al. Automated quantification of stenosis severity on 64-slice CT: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:699-709.
12. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105:539-42.
13. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2816-21.
14. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, IrwigLMet al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARDinitiative. BMJ 2003;326:41-4.
15. Genders TS, Spronk S, StijnenT, SteyerbergEW, Lesaffre E, HuninkMG.Methods for calculating sensitivity and specificity of clustered data: a tutorial. Radiology 2012;265: 910-6.
16. Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS, Rocha-Filho JA, Okada DR, Sarwar A et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1072-84.
17. Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, Wieser M, ScheffelH, WyssCet al. Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:540-9.
18. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Vavere AL, Bengel FM, Lardo AC et al. Computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with 320-row detector computed tomography accurately detects myocardial ischemia in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:333-40.
19. KoBS, Cameron JD, Meredith IT, Leung M, Antonis PR, NasisAet al.Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 2012;33:67-77.
20. Rocha-Filho JA, Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Bezerra HG, Okada DR, Rogers IS et al. Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology 2010;254:410-9.
21. Techasith T, Cury RC. Stress myocardial CT perfusion: an update and future perspective. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:905-16.
22. Hajjiri MM, Leavitt MB, Zheng H, Spooner AE, Fischman AJ, Gewirtz H. Comparison of positron emission tomography measurement of adenosine-stimulated absolute myocardial blood flow versus relative myocardial tracer content for physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity and location. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:751-8.
23. Kajander SA, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M, Pietila M, Ukkonen H, Saraste A et al. Clinical value of absolute quantification of myocardial perfusion with (15)O-water in coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:678-84.
24. Pijls NH, Sels JW. Functional measurement of coronary stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1045-57.
25. Chareonthaitawee P, Kaufmann PA, Rimoldi O, Camici PG. Heterogeneity of resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow in healthy humans. Cardiovasc Res 2001;50: 151-61.
26. Morton G, Chiribiri A, Ishida M, Hussain ST, Schuster A, Indermuehle A et al. Quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1546-55.
27. McArdle BA, Dowsley TF, deKemp RA,Wells GA, Beanlands RS. Does rubidium-82 PET have superior accuracy to SPECT perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary disease?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1828-37.
28. Kajander S, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M, Pietila M, Ukkonen H, Saraste A et al. Cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging accurately detects anatomically and functionally significant coronary artery disease. Circulation 2010; 122:603-13.
29. Meijboom WB,VanMieghem CA, van Pelt N,Weustink A, Pugliese F, MolletNRet al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52:636-43.
30. Sarno G, Decraemer I, Vanhoenacker PK, De Bruyne B, Hamilos M, Cuisset T et al. On the inappropriateness of noninvasive multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to trigger coronary revascularization: a comparison with invasive angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:550-7.
31. WijnsW, Kolh P, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Falk V, Folliguet Tet al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2501-55.
32. Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, Berman DS, Koo BK, van Mieghem C et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA 2012; 308:1237-45.