Dual source dual-energy computed tomography of acute myocardial infarction: Correlation with histopathologic findings in a canine model

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 290-297

  Zhang, Long Jiang ^a   Peng, Jin ^b   Wu, Sheng Yong ^c   Yeh, Benjamin M ^d   Zhou, Chang Sheng ^a   Lu, Guang Ming ^a  

^a JINLING HOSPITAL   (China)

^b Bailu Hospital   (China)

^c Medical Imaging Institute of Tianjin   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dual energy; Dual source CT; Myocardial infarction

Indexed keywords

IOPROMIDE;

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DOG; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMAGE QUALITY; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77952530864     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181dfda60     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Weustink AC, Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, et al. Reliable high-speed coronary computed tomography in symptomatic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50: 786-794.
2. Brodoefel H, Burgstahler C, Tsiflikas I, et al. Dual-source CT: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcification on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Radiology. 2008;247:346-355.
3. Huber DJ, Lapray JF, Hessel SJ. In vivo evaluation of experimental myocar-dial infarcts by ungated computed tomography. Am J Roentgenol. 1981;136: 469-473.
4. Krug KB, Bovenschulte H, Geissler HJ, et al. In vivo measurements of coronary blood flow using 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography (MDCT) in a porcine model. Rofo. 2009;181:220-229.
5. George RT, Jerosch-Herold M, Silva C, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using dynamic 64-detector computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:815-822.
6. George RT, Silva C, Cordeiro MA, et al. Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:153-160.
7. Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Pietsch H, et al. Quantitative whole heart stress perfusion CT imaging as non-invasive assessment of hemodynamics in coronary artery stenosis: preliminary animal experience. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:298-305.
8. Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Rosenblum MA, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:306-313.
9. Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, et al. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1510-1517.
10. Thieme SF, Becker CR, Hacker M, et al. Dual energy CT for the assessment of lung perfusion\correlation to scintigraphy. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68:369-374.
11. Zhang LJ, Zhao YE, Wu SY, et al. Pulmonary embolism detection with dual-energy CT: experimental study of dual-source CT in rabbits. Radiology. 2009;252:61-70.
12. Krissak R, Henzler T, Reichert M, et al. Enhanced visualization of lung vessels for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism using dual energy CT angiog-raphy. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:341-346.
13. Zhang LJ, Chai X, Wu SY, et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism by dual energy CT: correlation with perfusion scintigraphy and pathohistological findings in rabbits. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:2844-2854.
14. Tran DN, Straka M, Roos JE, et al. Dual-energy CT discrimination of iodine and calcium: experimental results and implications for lower extremity CT angiography. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:160-171.
15. Watanabe Y, Uotani K, Nakazawa T, et al. Dual-energy direct bone removal CT angiography for evaluation of intracranial aneurysm or stenosis: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol. 2009;19: 1019-1024.
16. Lell MM, Kramer M, Klotz E, et al. Carotid computed tomography angiog-raphy with automated bone suppression: a comparative study between dual energy and bone subtraction techniques. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:322-328.
17. Sommer WH, Johnson TR, Becker CR, et al. The value of dual-energy bone removal in maximum intensity projections of lower extremity computed tomography angiography. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:285-292.
18. Behrendt FF, Schmidt B, Plumhans C, et al. Image fusion in dual energy computed tomography: effect on contrast enhancement, signal-to-noise ratio and image quality in computed tomography angiography. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:1-6.
19. Takahashi N, Hartman RP, Vrtiska TJ, et al. Dual-energy CT iodine-subtraction virtual unenhanced technique to detect urinary stones in an iodine-filled collecting system: a phantom study. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:1169-1173.
20. Boll DT, Patil NA, Paulson EK, et al. Renal stone assessment with dual-energy multidetector CT and advanced postprocessing techniques: improved characterization of renal stone composition\pilot study. Radiology. 2009; 250:813-820.
21. Graser A, Johnson TR, Bader M, et al. Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2008; 43:112-119.
22. Scheffel H, Stolzmann P, Frauenfelder T, et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the detection of urinary stone disease. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:823-829.
23. Stolzmann P, Frauenfelder T, Pfammatter T, et al. Endoleaks after endovas-cular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: detection with dual-energy dual-source CT. Radiology. 2008;249:682-691.
24. Chandarana H, Godoy MC, Vlahos I, et al. Abdominal aorta: evaluation with dual-source dual-energy multidetector CT after endovascular repair of aneu-rysms\initial observations. Radiology. 2008;249:692-700.
25. Ruzsics B, Lee H, Zwerner PL, et al. Dual-energy CT of the heart for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemia\initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2414-2424.
26. Ruzsics B, Lee H, Powers ER, et al. Correlation with single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial ischemia diagnosed by dual-energy computed tomography. Circulation. 2008;117:1244-1245.
27. Ruzsics B, Chiaramida SA, Schoepf UJ. Images in cardiology: dual-energy computed tomography imaging of myocardial infarction. Heart. 2009;95:180.
28. Schwarz F, Ruzsics B, Schoepf UJ, et al. Dual-energy CT of the heart\principles and protocols. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68:423-433.
29. Ruzsics B, Schwarz F, Schoepf UJ, et al. Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104:318-326.
30. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. American heart association writing group on myocardial segmentation and registration for cardiac imaging. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomo-graphic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2002;18:539-542.
31. Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS, et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1072-1084.
32. Stirrup J, Nicol E, Underwood SR. Defining myocardial infarction by cardiac computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;24:891-893.
33. Brodoefel H, Klumpp B, Reimann A, et al. Late myocardial enhancement assessed by 64-MSCT in reperfused porcine myocardial infarction: diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:475-483.
34. Baks T, Cademartiri F, Moelker AD, et al. Multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:144-152.
35. Gerber BL, Belge B, Legros GJ, et al. Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2006;113:823-833.
36. Lardo AC, Cordeiro MA, Silva C, et al. Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar. Circulation. 2006;113:394-404.
37. Baks T, Cademartiri F, Moelker AD, et al. Assessment of acute reperfused myocardial infarction with delayed enhancement 64-MDCT. Am J Roentge-nol. 2007;188:W135-W137.
38. Hoffmann U, Millea R, Enzweiler C, et al. Acute myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT in a porcine model. Radiology. 2004;231:697-701.
39. Sommer WH, Johnson TR, Becker CR, et al. The value of dual-energy bone removal in maximum intensity projections of lower extremity computed tomography angiography. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:285-292.
40. Lell MM, Kramer M, Klotz E, et al. Carotid computed tomography angiography with automated bone suppression: a comparative study between dual energy and bone subtraction techniques. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:322-328.
41. Graser A, Johnson TR, Hecht EM, et al. Dual-energy CT in patients suspected of having renal masses: can virtual nonenhanced images replace true nonen-hanced images? Radiology. 2009;252:433-440.
42. Primak AN, Ramirez Giraldo JC, Liu X, et al. Improved dual-energy material discrimination for dual-source CT by means of additional spectral filtration. MedPhys. 2009;36:1359-1369
43. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1-332.
44. Holmes DR III, Fletcher JG, Apel A, et al. Evaluation of non-linear blending in dual-energy computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68:409-413.
45. Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR. Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. Radiology. 2008;248:995-1003.
46. Irie T, Inoue H. Individual modulation of the tube current-seconds to achieve similar levels of image noise in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:1514-1518.
47. Thieme SF, Johnson TR, Lee C, et al. Dual-energy CT for the assessment of contrast material distribution in the pulmonary parenchyma. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:144-149.
48. Pontana F, Faivre JB, Remy-Jardin M, et al. Lung perfusion with dual-energy multidetector-row CT (MDCT): feasibility for the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism in 117 consecutive patients. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:1494-1504.
49. Zhang Y, Zhang ZH, Jin ZY, et al. [Radiological features of dual-energy CT lung perfusion imaging in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: comparison with CT pulmonary angiography]. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2009;31:166-170.
50. Stolzmann P, Kozomara M, Chuck N, et al. In vivo identification of uric acid stones with dual-energy CT: diagnostic performance evaluation in patients. Abdom Imaging. In press.
51. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography\an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277-2284.
52. Brink JA. Technical aspects of helical (spiral) CT. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995;33:825-841.
53. Ho LM, Yoshizumi TT, Hurwitz LM, et al. Dual energy versus single energy MDCT: measurement of radiation dose using adult abdominal imaging protocols. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:1400-1407.