Myocardium: Dynamic versus single-shot CT perfusion imaging

Radiology

Volumn 269, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 378-386

  Huber, Armin M ^a   Leber, Vivian ^a   Gramer, Bettina M ^a   Muenzel, Daniela ^a   Leber, Alexander ^b   Rieber, Johannes ^b   Schmidt, Martin ^b   Vembar, Mani ^c   Hoffmann, Ellen ^b   Rummeny, Ernst ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b KLINIKUM BOGENHAUSEN   (Germany)

^c PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; IOMEPROL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DYNAMIC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC PERFUSION IMAGING; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; MALE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS TESTING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; RADIATION ATTENUATION; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REFERENCE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE SHOT COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC PERFUSION IMAGING; YOUDEN INDEX;

AGED; COMORBIDITY; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; IOPAMIDOL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84886660181     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13121441     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006;114(16):1761-1791. (Pubitemid 44607126)
2. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/ NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 2010;122(21):e525-e555.
3. Rieber J, Huber A, Erhard I, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 2006;27(12):1465-1471. (Pubitemid 43998081)
4. Huber A, Sourbron S, Klauss V, et al. MR perfusion of the myocardium: semiquantitative and quantitative evaluation in comparison to coronary angiography and intracoronary pressure wire examination. Invest Radiol 2012;47(6):332-338.
5. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 2003;107(23):2900-2907.
6. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;360(3):213-224.
7. George RT, Silva C, Cordeiro MA, et al. Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48(1):153-160. (Pubitemid 43929222)
8. Ruzsics B, Schwarz F, Schoepf UJ, et al. Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am J Cardiol 2009;104(3):318-326.
9. Nieman K, Shapiro MD, Ferencik M, et al. Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrastenhanced 64-section CT in comparison to MR imaging. Radiology 2008;247(1):49-56.
10. Schuleri KH, Centola M, George RT, et al. Characterization of peri-infarct zone heterogeneity by contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53(18):1699-1707.
11. Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS, et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54(12):1072-1084.
12. George RT, Jerosch-Herold M, Silva C, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using dynamic 64-detector computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2007;42(12):815-822. (Pubitemid 350126563)
13. Bamberg F, Klotz E, Flohr T, et al. Dynamic myocardial stress perfusion imaging using fast dual-source CT with alternating table positions: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2010;20(5):1168-1173.
14. Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, et al. Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology 2011;260(3):689-698.
15. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2(3):174-182.
16. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Cerci RJ, et al. Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-MDCT: the CT angiography and perfusion methods of the CORE320 multicenter multinational diagnostic study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197(4):829-837.
17. Bartúnek J, Sys SU, Heyndrickx GR, Pijls NH, De Bruyne B. Quantitative coronary angiography in predicting functional significance of stenoses in an unselected patient cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26(2):328-334.
18. Pijls N H J, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996;334(26):1703-1708. (Pubitemid 26193622)
19. Gramer BM, Muenzel D, Renz V, et al. Impact of iterative reconstruction on CNR and SNR in dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging in an animal model. Eur Radiol 2012;22(12):2654-2661.
20. Bruder H, Raupach R, Klotz E, Stierstorfer K, Flohr T. Spatio-temporal filtration of dynamic CT data using diffusion filters. In: Samei E, Hsieh J, eds. Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2009-physics of medical imaging. Vol 7258. Bellingham, Wash: SPIE-the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2009;725-857.
21. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105(4):539-542. (Pubitemid 34262671)
22. Mahnken AH, Bruners P, Katoh M, Wildberger JE, Günther RW, Buecker A. Dynamic multi-section CT imaging in acute myocardial infarction: preliminary animal experience. Eur Radiol 2006;16(3):746-752. (Pubitemid 44149389)
23. Hsiao EM, Rybicki FJ, Steigner M. CT coronary angiography: 256-slice and 320-detector row scanners. Curr Cardiol Rep 2010;12(1):68-75.
24. Wong DT, Ko BS, Cameron JD, et al. Transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary computed tomography angiography is a novel noninvasive approach to the identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61(12):1271- 1279.
25. Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Pietsch H, et al. Quantitative whole heart stress perfusion CT imaging as noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics in coronary artery stenosis: preliminary animal experience. Invest Radiol 2010;45(6):298-305.
26. Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Rosenblum MA, Kang DK, Rowe GW, Schoepf UJ. Adenosinestress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol 2010;45(6):306-313.