K-Space and time sensitivity encoding-accelerated myocardial perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: Comparison with 1.5 T

Radiology

Volumn 249, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 493-500

  Plein, Sven ^a,b   Schwitter, Juerg ^c   Suerder, Daniel ^c   Greenwood, John P ^b   Boesiger, Peter ^a   Kozerke, Sebastian ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b LEEDS GENERAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^c Hospital Zurich   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOBUTROL; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROC CURVE; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; AGED; ARTIFACT; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EXERCISE TEST; FEASIBILITY STUDY; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADENOSINE; ADULT; AGED; ARTIFACTS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; EXERCISE TEST; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 56149093323     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2492080017     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cheng AS, Pegg TJ, Karamitsos TD, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3-tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with 1.5-tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49(25):2440-2449.
2. Araoz PA, Glockner JF, McGee KP, et al. 3 Tesla MR imaging provides improved contrast in first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging over a range of gadolinium doses. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2005;7(3):559-564.
3. Gutberlet M, Noeske R, Schwinge K, Freyhardt P, Felix R, Niendorf T. Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: feasibility and implications for clinical applications. Invest Radiol 2006;41(2):154-167.
4. Gutberlet M, Spors B, Grothoff M, et al. Comparison of different cardiac MRI sequences at 1.5 T/3.0 T with respect to signaltonoise and contrast-to-noise ratios: initial experience. Rofo 2004;176(6):801-808.
5. Theisen D, Wintersperger BJ, Huber A, Dietrich O, Reiser MF, Schonberg SO. Myocardial perfusion imaging with Gadobutrol: a comparison between 3 and 1.5 Tesla with an identical sequence design. Invest Radiol 2007;42(7):499-506.
6. Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M, et al. Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 2000;101(12):1379-1383.
7. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 2001;103(18):2230- 2235.
8. Lee DC, Simonetti OP, Harris KR, et al. Magnetic resonance versus radionuclide pharmacological stress perfusion imaging for flow-limiting stenoses of varying severity. Circulation 2004;110(1):58-65.
9. Giang TH, Nanz D, Coulden R, et al. Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multi-centre experience. Eur Heart J 2004;25(18):1657- 1665.
10. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42(5):952-962.
11. Wiesinger F, Boesiger P, Pruessmann KP. Electrodynamics and ultimate SNR in parallel MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004;52(2):376-390.
12. Tsao J, Boesiger P, Pruessmann KP. k-t BLAST and k-t SENSE: dynamic MRI with high frame rate exploiting spatiotemporal correlations. Magn Reson Med 2003;50(5):1031-1042.
13. Baltes C, Kozerke S, Hansen MS, Pruessmann KP, Tsao J, Boesiger P. Accelerating cine phasecontrast flow measurements using k-t BLAST and k-t SENSE. Magn Reson Med 2005;54(6):1430-1438.
14. Plein S, Ryf S, Schwitter J, Radjenovic A, Boesiger P, Kozerke S. Dynamic contrastenhanced myocardial perfusion MRI accelerated with k-t SENSE. Magn Reson Med 2007;58(4):777-785.
15. Gebker R, Jahnke C, Paetsch I, et al. MR myocardial perfusion imaging with k-space and time broad-use linear acquisition speed-up technique: feasibility study. Radiology 2007;245(3):863-871.
16. Trattnig S, Pinker K, Ba-Ssalamah A, Nöbauer-Huhmann IM. The optimal use of contrast agents at high field MRI. Eur Radiol 2006;16(6):1280-1287.
17. Kim D, Gonen O, Oesingmann N, Axel L. Comparison of the effectiveness of saturation pulses in the heart at 3T. Magn Reson Med 2008;59(1):209-215.
18. Wieben O, Francois C, Reeder SB. Cardiac MRI of ischemic heart disease at 3 T: potential and challenges. Eur J Radiol 2008;65(1):15-28.