High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: Comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US

Radiology

Volumn 235, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 687-698

  Schoenberg, Stefan O ^a   Rieger, Johannes ^a   Weber, Christof H ^a   Michaely, Henrik J ^a   Waggershauser, Tobias ^a   Ittrich, Carina ^b   Dietrich, Olaf ^a   Reiser, Maximilian F ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORONARY STENT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PLOTS AND CURVES; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANK SUM TEST; RENAL ARTERY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; ARTIFACTS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RENAL ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS; STENTS;

EID: 17644381276     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2352031693     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, Kroon AA, de Leeuw PW, van Engelshoven JM. Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135:401-411.
2. Tan KT, van Beek EJ, Brown PW, van Delden OM, Tijssen J, Ramsay LE. Magnetic resonance angiography for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol 2002; 57:617-624.
3. Gilfeather M, Yoon HC, Siegelman ES, et al. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with conventional angiography versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1999; 210:367-372.
4. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Londy F, et al. Morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging of renal artery stenosis: a multireader tricenter study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13:158-169.
5. Vasbinder GBC, De Haan MW, van Engelshoven JMA. Accuracy of CTA and 3D contrast-enhanced MRA as compared to intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for assessment of the number of renal arteries in 356 subjects (abstr). Radiology 2002; 225(P):400.
6. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, et al. Renal Artery Diagnostic Imaging Study in Hypertension (RADISH) Study Group. Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141:674-682.
7. Leertouwer TC, Gussenhoven EJ, Bosch JL, et al. Stent placement for renal arterial stenosis: where do we stand? a meta-analysis. Radiology 2000; 216:78-85.
8. Beebe HG, Chesebro K, Merchant F, Bush W. Results of renal artery balloon angioplasty limit its indications. J Vasc Surg 1988; 8:300-306.
9. Isles CG, Robertson S, Hill D. Management of renovascular disease: a review of renal artery stenting in ten studies. QJM 1999; 92:159-167.
10. Hanekamp CE, Koolen JJ, Pijls NH, Michels HR, Bonnier HJ. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment. Circulation 1999; 99:1015-1021.
11. Schoenberg SO, Rieger J, Nittka M, Dietrich O, Johannson LO, Reiser MF. Renal MR angiography: current debates and developments in imaging of renal artery stenosis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2003; 24:255-267.
12. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Kassner A, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MRA using SENSE. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12:671-677.
13. Rundback JH, Sacks D, Kent KC, et al. Guidelines for the reporting of renal artery revascularization in clinical trials. American Heart Association. Circulation 2002; 106:1572-1585.
14. van Jaarsveld BC, Krijnen P, Pieterman H, et al. The effect of balloon angioplasty on hypertension in atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis. Dutch Renal Artery Stenosis Intervention Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1007-1014.
15. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002; 47:1202-1210.
16. Herborn CU, Lauenstein TC, Ruehm SG, Bosk S, Debatin JF, Goyen M. Intraindividual comparison of gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadobenate dimeglumine, and gadobutrol for pelvic 3D magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol 2003; 38:27-33.
17. De Scheerder I, De Man F, Herregods MC, et al. Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography for measurement of luminal diameters in normal and diseased coronary arteries. Am Heart J 1994; 127:243-251.
18. Schoenberg SO, Bock M, Kallinowski F, Just A. Correlation of hemodynamic impact and morphologic degree of renal artery stenosis in a canine model. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11:2190-2198.
19. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310.
20. Hollander M, Wolfe DA. The two-sample location problem. In: Nonparametric statistical methods. New York, NY: Wiley, 1973; 67-82.
21. Hollander M, Wolfe DA. The one-sample location problem. In: Nonparametric statistical methods. New York, NY: Wiley, 1973; 26-64.
22. Shetty AN, Bis KG, Kirsch M, Weintraub J, Laub G. Contrast-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of renal arteries: optimization of technique and pitfalls. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12:912-923.
23. Mallouhi A, Schocke M, Judmaier W, et al. 3D MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison of volume rendering and maximum intensity projection algorithms. Radiology 2002; 223:509-516.
24. Jeremias A, Huegel H, Lee DP, et al. Spatial orientation of atherosclerotic plaque in non-branching coronary artery segments. Atherosclerosis 2000; 152:209-215.
25. Griswold MA, Kannengiesser S, Heidemann RM, Wang J, Jakob PM. Field-of-view limitations in parallel imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52:1118-1126.
26. Meissner OA, Rieger J, Rieber J, et al. High-resolution MR imaging of human atherosclerotic femoral arteries in vivo: validation with intravascular ultrasound. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:227-231.
27. Blum U, Krumme B, Flugel P, et al. Treatment of ostial renal-artery stenoses with vascular endoprostheses after unsuccessful balloon angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:459-465.
28. Vasbinder GB, Maki JH, Nijenhuis RJ, et al. Motion of the distal renal artery during three-dimensional contrast-enhanced breath-hold MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16:685-696.
29. Cluzel P, Raynaud A, Beyssen B, Pagny JY, Gaux JC. Stenoses of renal branch arteries in fibromuscular dysplasia: results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Radiology 1994; 193:227-232.
30. Paul JF, Cherrak I, Jaulent MC, et al. Interobserver variability in the interpretation of renal digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:1285-1288.
31. van Jaarsveld BC, Pieterman H, van Dijk LC, et al. Inter-observer variability in the angiographic assessment of renal artery stenosis. DRASTIC study group. Dutch Renal Artery Stenosis Intervention Cooperative. J Hypertens 1999; 17:1731-1736.
32. Wasser MN, Westenberg J, van der Hulst VP, et al. Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 202:333-338.