Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: Incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging

Radiology

Volumn 260, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 689-698

  Bamberg, Fabian ^a,b   Becker, Alexander ^a   Schwarz, Florian ^a   Marcus, Roy P ^a   Greif, Martin ^a   Von Ziegler, Franz ^a   Blankstein, Ron ^c   Hoffmann, Udo ^b   Sommer, Wieland H ^a   Hoffmann, Verena S ^d   Johnson, Thorsten R C ^a   Becker, Hans Christoph R ^a   Wintersperger, Bernd J ^a   Reiser, Maximilian F ^a   Nikolaou, Konstantin ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HEMODYNAMICS; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; POWER ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; MALE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 80051881656     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110638     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Budoff M.J., Achenbach S., Blumenthal R.S., et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006;114(16):1761-1791. (Pubitemid 44607126)
2. Taylor A.J., Cerqueira M., Hodgson J.M., et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ ASNC/NASCI /SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 2010;122(21):e525-e555. Published October 25, 2010. Accessed November 2010.
3. Tonino P.A., De Bruyne B., Pijls N.H., et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;360(3):213-224.
4. Hachamovitch R., Hayes S.W., Friedman J.D., Cohen I., Berman D.S. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography . Circulation 2003;107(23):2900-2907.
5. Nieman K., Shapiro M.D., Ferencik M., et al. Reperfused myocardial infarction: Contrast-enhanced 64-section CT in comparison to MR imaging. Radiology 2008;247(1):49-56.
6. George R.T., Silva C., Cordeiro M.A., et al. Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48(1):153-160. (Pubitemid 43929222)
7. Schuleri K.H., Centola M., George R.T., et al. Characterization of peri-infarct zone heterogeneity by contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography: A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53(18):1699-1707.
8. Blankstein R., Shturman L.D., Rogers I.S., et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54(12):1072-1084.
9. George R.T., Arbab-Zadeh A., Miller J.M., et al. Adenosine stress 64-and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: A pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2(3):174-182.
10. Tamarappoo B.K., Dey D., Nakazato R., et al. Comparison of the extent and severity of myocardial perfusion defects measured by CT coronary angiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3(10):1010-1019.
11. Rocha-Filho J.A., Blankstein R., Shturman L.D., et al. Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology 2010;254(2):410-419.
12. Bastarrika G., Ramos-Duran L., Rosenblum M.A., Kang D.K., Rowe G.W., Schoepf U.J. Adenosinestress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: Initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol 2010;45(6):306-313.
13. Bamberg F., Klotz E., Flohr T., et al. Dynamic myocardial stress perfusion imaging using fast dual-source CT with alternating table positions: Initial experience. Eur Radiol 2010;20(5):1168-1173.
14. Kajander S., Joutsiniemi E., Saraste M., et al. Cardiac positron emission tomography/ computed tomography imaging accurately detects anatomically and functionally signifi cant coronary artery disease. Circulation 2010;122(6):603-613.
15. Austen W.G., Edwards J.E., Frye R.L., et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51(suppl 4):5-40.
16. Cerqueira M.D., Weissman N.J., Dilsizian V., et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105(4):539-542. (Pubitemid 34262671)
17. Bruder H., Raupach R., Klotz E., Stierstorfer K., Flohr T Spatio-temporal filtration of dynamic CT data using diffusion filters In: Samei E, Hsieh J, eds Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2009 - physics of medical imaging Vol 7258 Bellingham, Wash: SPIE-the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2009;725857.
18. Kern M.J. Coronary physiology revisited: Practical insights from the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Circulation 2000;101(11):1344-1351. (Pubitemid 30158625)
19. Pijls N.H., De Bruyne B., Peels K., et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996;334(26):1703-1708. (Pubitemid 26193622)
20. Hanley J.A., McNeil B.J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143(1):29-36. (Pubitemid 12142173)
21. DeLong E.R., DeLong D.M., Clarke-Pearson D.L. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44(3):837-845.
22. Zhou X.H., Obuchowski N.A., McClish D.A. Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience, 2002.
23. Serruys P.W., di Mario C., Piek J., et al. Prognostic value of intracoronary flow velocity and diameter stenosis in assessing the shortand long-term outcomes of coronary balloon angioplasty: The DEBATE Study (Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe). Circulation 1997;96(10):3369-3377. (Pubitemid 27513407)
24. Shaw L.J., Heller G.V., Travin M.I., et al. Cost analysis of diagnostic testing for coronary artery disease in women with stable chest pain: Economics of Noninvasive Diagnosis(END) Study Group. J Nucl Cardiol 1999;6(6):559-569. (Pubitemid 30028631)
25. Blankstein R., Di Carli M.F. Integration of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion imaging . Nat Rev Cardiol 2010;7(4):226-236.
26. Meijboom W.B., Van Mieghem C.A., Van Pelt N., et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: Computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional cor onary angiography and correlation with frac tional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52(8):636-643.
27. Muizelaar J.P., Fatouros P.P., Schröder M.L. A new method for quantitative regional cerebral blood volume measurements using computed tomography. Stroke 1997;28(10):1998-2005. (Pubitemid 27459010)
28. George R.T., Jerosch-Herold M., Silva C., et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using dynamic 64-detector computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2007;42(12):815-822. (Pubitemid 350126563)