Detection of myocardial ischemia by automated, motion-corrected, color-encoded perfusion maps compared with visual analysis of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 3 t: A pilot study

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 48, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 678-686

  Doesch, Christina ^a   Papavassiliu, Theano ^a   Michaely, Henrik J ^a   Attenberger, Ulrike I ^a   Glielmi, Christopher ^b   Süselbeck, Tim ^a   Fink, Christian ^a   Borggrefe, Martin ^a   Schoenberg, Stefan O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b Magnetic Resonance Division   (United States)

Author keywords

AMC color encoded perfusion maps; CA disease; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; myocardial ischemia

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE;

AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PILOT STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STRESS;

EID: 84883448661     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31828c351a     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation. 2001;103:2230Y2235.
2. Doesch C, Seeger A, Hoevelborn T, et al. Adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of ischemic heart disease. Clin Res Cardiol. 2008;97:905Y912.
3. Seeger A, Doesch C, Klumpp B, et al. MR stress perfusion for the detection of flow-limiting stenoses in symptomatic patients with known coronary artery disease and history of stent implantation [in German]. Rofo. 2007;179:1068Y1073.
4. Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation. 2007;115:1769Y1776.
5. Klem I, Heitner JF, Shah DJ, et al. Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1630Y1638.
6. Wilke N, Jerosch-Herold M, Wang Y, et al. Myocardial perfusion reserve: assessment with multisection, quantitative, first-pass MR imaging. Radiology. 1997;204:373Y384.
7. Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M, et al. Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2000;101:1379Y1383.
8. Fenchel M, Kramer U, Helber U, et al. Semiquantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion using magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of appropriate thresholds and segmentation models. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:572Y581.
9. Rieber J, Huber A, Erhard I, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J. 2006;27: 1465Y1471.
10. Hsu LY, Rhoads KL, Holly JE, et al. Quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis with a dual-bolus contrast-enhanced first-pass MRI technique in humans. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;23:315Y322.
11. Attenberger UI, Sourbron SP, Michaely HJ, et al. Retrospective respiratory triggering renal perfusion MRI. Acta Radiol. 2010;51:1163Y1171.
12. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002; 105:539Y542.
13. Huber A, Bauner K,Wintersperger BJ, et al. Phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) single-shot TrueFISP for assessment of myocardial infarction at 3 tesla. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:148Y153.
14. Galbraith JE, Murphy ML, de Soyza N. Coronary angiogram interpretation. Interobserver variability. JAMA. 1978;240:2053Y2056.
15. Yang GZ, Hawkes D, Rueckert D, et al, eds. Unsupervised inline analysis of cardiac perfusion MRI. MICCAI 2009, Part II, LNCS 5762. Berlin, Heidelberg (Germany): Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2009:741Y749.
16. Lindeberg T. Edge detection and ridge detection with automatic scale selection. Int J Comput Vis. 1998;30:117Y154.
17. Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Wahl A, et al. Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion. Circulation. 2004;110:835Y842.
18. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45:255Y268.
19. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307Y310.
20. Di Bella EV, Parker DL, Sinusas AJ. On the dark rim artifact in dynamic contrastenhanced MRI myocardial perfusion studies. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54: 1295Y1299.
21. Cheng AS, Pegg TJ, Karamitsos TD, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3-tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with 1.5-tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2440Y2449.
22. Thomas D, Strach K, Meyer C, et al. Combined myocardial stress perfusion imaging and myocardial stress tagging for detection of coronary artery disease at 3 tesla. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008;10:59.
23. Elkington AG, He T, Gatehouse PD, et al. Optimization of the arterial input function for myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;21:354Y359.
24. Utz W, Niendorf T, Wassmuth R, et al. Contrast-dose relation in first-pass myocardial MR perfusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:1131Y1135.
25. Atkinson DJ, Burstein D, Edelman RR. First-pass cardiac perfusion: evaluation with ultrafast MR imaging. Radiology. 1990;174:757Y762.
26. Wollny G, Ledesma-Carbayo MJ, Kellman P, et al. Exploiting quasiperiodicity in motion correction of free-breathing myocardial perfusion MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29:1516Y1527.
27. Ransohoff DF, Feinstein AR. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med. 1978;299:926Y930.