Dual-energy CT perfusion during pharmacologic stress for the assessment of myocardial perfusion defects using a second-generation dual-source CT: A comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 44-52

  Kim, Sung Mok ^a   Chang, Sung A ^a   Shin, Wonseon ^a,b   Choe, Yeon Hyeon ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Kangwon National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Dual energy; Dual source computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Myocardial perfusion; Pharmacological stress

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DEFECTS; DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; HEART; MAGNETISM; RESONANCE;

CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DUAL-ENERGY; DUAL-ENERGY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DUAL-SOURCE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIES; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION; PERFUSION DEFECTS; PERFUSION IMAGING; PHARMACOLOGICAL STRESS;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ADENOSINE; GADOBUTROL; IOMEPROL;

AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DUAL ENERGY MYOCARDIAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY PERFUSION IMAGING; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HEART STRESS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADENOSINE; AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE TEST; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84892846145     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: 15323145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182a77626     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, et al. Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:540-549
2. Petersilka M, Bruder H, Krauss B, et al. Technical principles of dual source CT. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68:362-368
3. Ruzsics B, Lee H, Zwerner PL, et al. Dual-energy CT of the heart for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemia-initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2414-2424
4. Ruzsics B, Schwarz F, Schoepf UJ, et al. Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104:318-326
5. Wang R, Yu W, Wang Y, et al. Incremental value of dual-energy CT to coronary CT angiography for the detection of significant coronary stenosis: Comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and single photon emission computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;27:647-656
6. Ko SM, Choi JW, Song MG, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine-induced stress dual-energy computed tomography of the heart: Comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and conventional coronary angiography. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:26-35
7. Ko SM, Choi JW, Hwang HK, et al. Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive anatomic and functional assessment with dual-source CT and adenosine-induced stress dual-energy CT for detection of significant coronary stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:512-520
8. Meyer M, Nance JW Jr, Schoepf UJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of substituting dual-energy CT for SPECT in the assessment of myocardial perfusion for the workup of coronary artery disease. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:3719-3725
9. Weininger M, Schoepf UJ, Ramachandra A, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic real-Time myocardial perfusion CT and adenosine-stress first-pass dual-energy myocardial perfusion CT for the assessment of acute chest pain: Initial results. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:3703-3710
10. Mehra VC, Valdiviezo C, Arbab-Zadeh A, et al. A stepwise approach to the visual interpretation of CT-based myocardial perfusion. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5:357-369
11. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;105:539-542
12. Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, et al. National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol. 2006;79:968-980
13. Henzler T, Fink C, Schoenberg SO, et al. Dual-energy CT: Radiation dose aspects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:S16-S25
14. Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Rosenblum MA, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: Initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:306-313
15. Wang Y, Qin L, Shi X, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: Comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:521-529
16. Geleijns J, Joemai RM, Dewey M, et al. Radiation exposure to patients in a multicenter coronary angiography trial (CORE 64). AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:1126-1132
17. Yamada M, Jinzaki M, Kuribayashi S, et al. Beam-hardening correction for virtual monochromatic imaging of myocardial perfusion via fast-switching dual-kVp 64-slice computed tomography: A pilot study using a human heart specimen.Circ J. 2012;76:1799-1801
18. Groothuis JG, Beek AM, Brinckman SL, et al. Low to intermediate probability of coronary artery disease: Comparison of coronary CT angiography with first-pass MR myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology. 2010;254:384-392