The feasibility of 350 μm spatial resolution coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3 T in humans

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 339-345

  Gharib, Ahmed M ^a   Abd Elmoniem, Khaled Z ^a   Ho, Vincent B ^b   Födi, Eszter ^a   Herzka, Daniel A ^c   Ohayon, Jacques ^a   Stuber, Matthias ^c   Pettigrew, Roderic I ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

3 T; cardiac MR; coronary MRA

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HIGH RESOLUTION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

EID: 84861101546     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182479ec4     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M, et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med. 2001;345: 1863-1869.
2. Sakuma H, Ichikawa Y, Chino S, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenosis with whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1946-1950.
3. Sakuma H, Ichikawa Y, Suzawa N, et al. Assessment of coronary arteries with total study time of less than 30 minutes by using whole-heart coronary MR angiography. Radiology. 2005;237:316-321.
4. Stuber M, Botnar RM, Spuentrup E, et al. Three-dimensional high-resolution fast spin-echo coronary magnetic resonance angiography. Magn Reson Med. 2001;45:206-211.
5. Sommer T, Hackenbroch M, Hofer U, et al. Coronary MR angiography at 3.0 T versus that at 1.5 T: initial results in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. Radiology. 2005;234:718-725.
6. Liu X, Bi X, Huang J, et al. Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 T: comparison with steady-state free precession technique at 1.5 T. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:663-668.
7. Prompona M, Cyran C, Nikolaou K, et al. Contrast-enhanced whole-heart MR coronary angiography at 3.0 T using the intravascular contrast agent gadofosveset. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:369-374.
8. Yang Q, Li K, Liu X, et al. Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0-T: a comparative study with x-ray angiography in a single center. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:69-76.
9. Stuber M, Botnar RM, Fischer SE, et al. Preliminary report on in vivo coronary MRA at 3 Tesla in humans. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48:425-429.
10. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A, et al. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomographyVinitial experience. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57:331-335.
11. Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML, et al. Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;24:535-546.
12. de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:331-340.
13. Schoepf UJ, Zwerner PL, Savino G, et al. Coronary CTangiography. Radiology. 2007;244:48-63.
14. Fischer SE, Wickline SA, Lorenz CH. Novel real-time R-wave detection algorithm based on the vectorcardiogram for accurate gated magnetic resonance acquisitions. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:361-370.
15. Stuber M, Botnar RM, Danias PG, et al. Double-oblique free-breathing high resolution three-dimensional coronary magnetic resonance angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:524-531.
16. Stuber M, Botnar RM, Danias PG, et al. Submillimeter three-dimensional coronary MR angiography with real-time navigator correction: comparison of navigator locations. Radiology. 1999;212:579-587.
17. Danias PG, McConnell MV, Khasgiwala VC, et al. Prospective navigator correction of image position for coronary MR angiography. Radiology. 1997;203: 733-736.
18. Brittain JH, Hu BS, Wright GA, et al. Coronary angiography with magnetizationprepared T2 contrast. Magn Reson Med. 1995;33:689-696.
19. Botnar RM, Stuber M, Danias PG, Kissinger KV, Manning WJ. Improved coronary artery definition with T2-weighted, free-breathing, three-dimensional coronary MRA. Circulation. 1999;99:3139-3148.
20. Liu X, Zhao X, Huang J, et al. Comparison of 3D free-breathing coronary MR angiography and 64-MDCT angiography for detection of coronary stenosis in patients with high calcium scores. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:1326-1332.
21. Etienne A, Botnar RM, Van Muiswinkel AM, et al. "Soap-bubble" visualization and quantitative analysis of 3D coronary magnetic resonance angiograms. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48:658-666.
22. McConnell MV, Khasgiwala VC, Savord BJ, et al. Comparison of respiratory suppression methods and navigator locations for MR coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:1369-1375.
23. Herzog C, Arning-Erb M, Zangos S, et al. Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. Radiology. 2006;238:75-86.
24. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975;51(suppl 4):5-40.
25. Achenbach S. Computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1919-1928.
26. Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA. 2006;296:403-411.
27. Herzka DA, Gharib AM. Should all patients with suspected coronary artery disease undergo coronary angiography with 16-row MDCT? Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007;4:74-75.
28. Johnson KR, Patel SJ, Whigham A, et al. Three-dimensional, time-resolved motion of the coronary arteries. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2004;6:663-673.
29. Wagner M, Rosler R, Lembcke A, et al. Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 1.5 Tesla: does a blood-pool contrast agent improve diagnostic accuracy? Invest Radiol. 2011;46:152-159.