Diagnostic accuracy of combined coronary angiography and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-detector computed tomography: Pilot study

European Radiology

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1812-1821

  Nasis, Arthur ^a   Ko, Brian S ^a   Leung, Michael C ^a   Antonis, Paul R ^a   Nandurkar, Dee ^b   Wong, Dennis T ^a   Kyi, Leo ^a   Cameron, James D ^a   Troupis, John M ^b   Meredith, Ian T ^a   Seneviratne, Sujith K ^a,c  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b MMC   (Australia)

^c SOUTHERN HEALTH   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adenosine stress myocardial perfusion; Coronary artery disease; Multidetector computed tomography; Myocardial ischaemia; Single photon emission computed tomography

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; IOHEXOL; METHOXY ISOBUTYL ISONITRILE TECHNETIUM TC 99M;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CARDIOLOGIST; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CT SPECT SCANNER; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MALE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PILOT STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIATION DOSE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCINTILLATION CAMERA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; STENOSIS;

ADENOSINE; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERFUSION; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84879010056     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2788-z     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Beller G, Zaret B (2000) Contributions of nuclear cardiology to diagnosis and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 101:1465-1478
2. Shaw L, Iskandrian A (2004) Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 11:171-185
3. Davies R, Goldberg A, Forman S et al (1997) Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study two-year follow-up: outcomes of patients randomized to initial strategies of medical therapy versus revascularization. Circulation 95:2037-2043
4. Erne P, Schoenenberger A, Burckhardt D et al (2007) Effects of percutaneous coronary interventions in silent ischemia after myocardial infarction: the SWISSI II randomized controlled trial. JAMA 297:1985-1991
5. Hachamovitch R, Hayes S, Friedman J et al (2003) Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 107:2900-2907
6. Shaw L, Berman D, Maron D et al (2008) Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 117:1283-1291
7. Schuhbäck A, Marwan M, Gauss S et al (2012) Interobserver agreement for the detection of atherosclerotic plaque in coronary CT angiography: comparison of two low-dose image acquisition protocols with standard retrospectively ECG-gated reconstruction. Eur Radiol 22:1529-1536
8. Budoff M, Dowe D, Jollis J et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1724-1732
9. Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F et al (2009) Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation 120:867-875
10. Neefjes L, Rossi A, Genders T et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography: a randomized comparison of different acquisition protocols. Eur Radiol 23:614-622
11. Rispler S, Keidar Z, Ghersin E et al (2007) Integrated single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:1059-1067
12. Hacker M, Jakobs T, Hack N et al (2007) Sixty-four slice spiral CT angiography does not predict the functional relevance of coronary artery stenoses in patients with stable angina. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:4-10
13. Ko B, Cameron J, Meredith I et al (2012) Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 33:67-77
14. Gervaise A, Osemont B, Lecocq S et al (2012) CT image quality improvement using adaptive iterative dose reduction with wide-volume acquisition on 320-detector CT. Eur Radiol 22:295-301
15. Blankstein R, Shturman L, Rogers I et al (2009) Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1072-1084
16. George R, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller J et al (2009) Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2:174-182
17. Okada D, Ghoshhajra B, Blankstein R et al (2010) Direct comparison of rest and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion CT with rest and stress SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 17:27-37
18. Rocha-Filho J, Blankstein R, Shturman L et al (2010) Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology 254:410-419
19. Mehra V, Valdiviezo C, Arbab-Zadeh A et al (2011) A stepwise approach to the visual interpretation of CT-based myocardial perfusion. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:357-369
20. Austen W, Edwards J, Frye R et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery. Circulation 51:5-40
21. Cerqueira M, Weissman N, Dilsizian V et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539-542
22. Shrimpton P, Hillier M, Lewis M, Dunn M (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79:968-980
23. Newcombe R (1998) Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med 17:857-872
24. Zweig M, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 39:561-577
25. DeLong E, DeLong D, Clarke-Pearson D (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837-845
26. Pencina M, D'Agostino R Sr, D'Agostino R Jr, Vasan R (2008) Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 27:157-172, discussion 207-12
27. George R, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller J et al (2012) Computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with 320-row detector computed tomography accurately detects myocardial ischemia in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5:333-340
28. Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F et al (2011) Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology 260:689-698
29. Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Rosenblum M, Kang D, Rowe G, Schoepf U (2010) Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol 45:306-313
30. Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A et al (2011) Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4:540-549
31. Garcia E, Faber T, Esteves F (2011) Cardiac dedicated ultrafast SPECT cameras: new designs and clinical implications. J Nucl Med 52:210-217
32. Taylor A, Cerqueira M, Hodgson J et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/ NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate use criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 4:e1-e33
33. Techasith T, Cury R (2011) Stress myocardial CT perfusion: an update and future perspective. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:905-916
34. Tonino P, Fearon W, De Bruyne B et al (2010) Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:2816-2821
35. Jung P, Rieber J, Stork S et al (2008) Effect of contrast application on interpretability and diagnostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with intermediate coronary lesions: comparison with myocardial fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 29:2536-2543
36. Gaemperli O, Husmann L, Schepis T et al (2009) Coronary CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging to detect flow-limiting stenoses: a potential gatekeeper for coronary revascularization? Eur Heart J 30:2921-2929
37. Min J, Leipsic J, Pencina M et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA 308:1237-1245
38. Vavere A, Simon G, George R et al (2011) Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320 row detector computed tomography: design and implementation of the CORE320 multicenter, multinational diagnostic study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:370-381
39. Bottcher M, Refsgaard J, Madsen M et al (2003) Effect of antianginal medication on resting myocardial perfusion and pharmacologically induced hyperemia. J Nucl Cardiol 10:345-352
40. Zoghbi G, Dorfman T, Iskandrian A (2008) The effects of medications on myocardial perfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:401-416
41. Koepfli P, Wyss C, Namdar M et al (2004) Beta-adrenergic blockade and myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease: differential effects in stenotic versus remote myocardial segments. J Nucl Med 45:1626-1631