Direct comparison of stress- and rest-dual-energy computed tomography for detection of myocardial perfusion defect

International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 30, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2014, Pages 41-53

  Ko, Sung Min ^a   Park, Jeong Hee ^a   Hwang, Hweung Kon ^a   Song, Meong Gun ^a  

^a Konkuk University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Coronary artery disease; Dual energy computed tomography; Invasive coronary angiography; Myocardial perfusion

Indexed keywords

IOPROMIDE; ADENOSINE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE; IOHEXOL; MEGLUMINE; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND; VASODILATOR AGENT;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CARDIAC IMAGING; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIZZINESS; DYSPNEA; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NAUSEA; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REST DUAL ENERGY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; STRESS DUAL ENERGY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; THORAX PAIN; X RAY SYSTEM; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPLICATION; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC USE; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROCEDURES; REST; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

ADENOSINE; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOHEXOL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MEGLUMINE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 84903310198     PISSN: 15695794     EISSN: 15730743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0410-3     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Santana CA, Garcia EV, Faber TL et al (2009) Diagnostic performance of fusion of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and computed tomography coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 16(2):201-211
2. Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I et al (2007) Cardiac image fusion from stand-alone SPECT and CT: clinical experience. J Nucl Med 48(5):696-703 (Pubitemid 47604968)
3. van Werkhoven JM, Heijenbrok MW, Schuijf JD et al (2010) Combined non-invasive anatomical and functional assessment with MSCT and MRI for the detection of significant coronary artery disease in patients with an intermediate pre-test likelihood. Heart 96(6):425-431
4. Donati OF, Scheffel H, Stolzmann P et al (2010) Combined cardiac CT and MRI for the comprehensive workup of hemodynamically relevant coronary stenoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(4):920-926
5. Kurata A, Mochizuki T, Koyama Y et al (2005) Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography: alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Circ J 69(5):550-557 (Pubitemid 40745727)
6. Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS et al (2009) Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 54(12):1072-1084
7. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM et al (2009) Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2(3):174-182
8. Rocha-Filho JA, Blankstein R, Shturman LD et al (2010) Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology 254(2):410-419
9. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM et al (2012) Computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with 320-row detector computed tomography accurately detects myocardial ischemia in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5(3):333-340
10. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Meredith IT et al (2012) Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 33(1):67-77
11. Wang Y, Qin L, Shi X et al (2012) Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(3):521-529
12. Schwarz F, Ruzsics B, Schoepf UJ et al (2008) Dual-energy CT of the heart: principles and protocols. Eur J Radiol 68(3):423-433
13. Ruzsics B, Lee H, Zwerner PL et al (2008) Dual-energy CT of the heart for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemia-initial experience. Eur Radiol 18(11):2414-2424
14. Ruzsics B, Schwarz F, Schoepf UJ et al (2009) Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am J Cardiol 104(3):318-326
15. Wang R, Yu W, Wang Y et al (2011) Incremental value of dual-energy CT to coronary CT angiography for the detection of significant coronary stenosis: comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and single photon emission computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27(5):647-656
16. Ko SM, Choi JW, Song MG et al (2011) Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine-induced stress dual-energy computed tomography of the heart: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and conventional coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 21(1):26-35
17. Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S et al (2009) SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3(2):122-136
18. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105(4):539-542 (Pubitemid 34262671)
19. Pilz G, Klos M, Ali E et al (2008) Angiographic correlations of patients with small vessel disease diagnosed by adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10:8
20. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al (2009) Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301(5):500-507
21. Arnoldi E, Lee YS, Ruzsics B et al (2011) CT detection of myocardial blood volume deficits: dual-energy CT compared with single-energy CT spectra. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5(6):421-429
22. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H et al (1996) Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease: incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification. Circulation 93(5):905-914 (Pubitemid 26074827)
23. Heller GV, Calnon D, Dorbala S (2009) Recent advances in cardiac PET and PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 16(6):962-969
24. Plein S, Kozerke S, Suerder D et al (2008) High spatial resolution myocardial perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 29(17):2148-2155
25. Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF et al (2007) Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 50(14):1343-1353 (Pubitemid 47449733)
26. Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS); European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Wijns W, Kolh P et al (2010) Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 31(20):2501-2555
27. Watkins S, McGeoch R, Lyne J et al (2009) Validation of magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary heart disease. Circulation 120(22):2207-2213
28. Ko SM, Choi JW, Hwang HK et al (2012) Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive anatomic and functional assessment with dual-source CT and adenosine-induced stress dual-energy CT for detection of significant coronary stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(3):512-520
29. Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A et al (2011) Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4(5):540-549
30. Nagao M, Matsuoka H, Kawakami H et al (2008) Quantification of myocardial perfusion by contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT: characterization of ischemic myocardium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(1):19-25 (Pubitemid 351955177)
31. Bischoff B, Bamberg F, Marcus R et al (2013) Optimal timing for first-pass stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29(2):435-442
32. Nieman K, Shapiro MD, Ferencik M et al (2008) Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced 64-Section CT in comparison to MR imaging. Radiology 247(1):49-56
33. Kochar M, Min JK (2013) Physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography. Korean Circ J 43(7):435-442
34. Techasith T, Cury RC (2011) Stress myocardial CT perfusion: an update and future perspective. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4(8):905-916