Myocardial perfusion imaging based on the blood oxygen level-dependent effect using T2-prepared steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance imaging

Circulation

Volumn 110, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 1284-1290

  Fieno, David S ^a   Shea, Steven M ^a,b   Li, Yongzhong ^a   Harris, Kathleen R ^a   Finn, J Paul ^a   Li, Debiao ^a,b,c  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Northwestern University   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Coronary disease; Magnetic resonance imaging; Myocardium; Perfusion; Vasodilation

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY CIRCUMFLEX BRANCH; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DOG; FLUORESCENCE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; LIGHT INTENSITY; MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OXYGEN BLOOD LEVEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VASODILATATION;

ADENOSINE; ANIMALS; CORONARY CIRCULATION; DOGS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FLUORESCENT DYES; HEART CATHETERIZATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICROSPHERES; MYOCARDIUM; OXYGEN; VASODILATION; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 4444288199     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140673.13057.34     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bonow RO. Diagnosis and risk stratification in coronary artery disease: nuclear cardiology versus stress echocardiography. J Nucl Cardiol. 1997;4:S172-S178.
2. Dilsizian V, Perrone-Filardi P, Arrighi JA, et al. Concordance and discordance between stress-redistribution-reinjection and rest-redistribution thallium imaging for assessing viable myocardium: comparison with metabolic activity by positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1993;88:941-952.
3. Nagel E, Lehmkuhl HB, Bocksch W, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation. 1999;99:763-770.
4. Wilke N, Simm C, Zhang J, et al. Contrast-enhanced first pass myocardial perfusion imaging: correlation between myocardial blood flow in dogs at rest and during hyperemia. Magn Reson Med. 1993;29:485-497.
5. Klocke FJ, Simonetti OP, Judd RM, et al. Limits of detection of regional differences in vasodilated flow in viable myocardium by first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. Circulation. 2001;104:2412-2416.
6. Manning WJ, Atkinson DJ, Grossman W, et al. First-pass nuclear magnetic resonance imaging studies using gadolinium-DTPA in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:959-965.
7. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation. 2001;103:2230-2235.
8. Wendland MF, Saeed M, Lauerma K, et al. Endogenous susceptibility contrast in myocardium during apnea measured using gradient recalled echo planar imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1993;29:273-276.
9. Balaban RS, Taylor JF, Turner R. Effect of cardiac flow on gradient recalled echo images of the canine heart. NMR Biomed. 1994;7:89-95.
10. Atalay MK, Reeder SB, Zerhouni EA, et al. Blood oxygenation dependence of T1 and T2 in the isolated, perfused rabbit heart at 4.7T. Magn Reson Med. 1995;34:623-627.
11. Wright KB, Klocke FJ, Deshpande VS, et al. Assessment of regional differences in myocardial blood flow using T2-weighted 3D BOLD imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46:573-578.
12. Foltz WD, Huang H, Fort S, et al. Vasodilator response assessment in porcine myocardium with magnetic resonance relaxometry. Circulation. 2002;106:2714-2719.
13. Niemi P, Ponce let BP, Kwong KK, et al. Myocardial intensity changes associated with flow stimulation in blood oxygenation sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:78-82.
14. Beache GM, Herzka DA, Boxerman JL, et al. Attenuated myocardial vasodilator response in patients with hypertensive hypertrophy revealed by oxygenation-dependent magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2001;104:1214-1217.
15. Wacker CM, Hartlep AW, Pfleger S, et al. Susceptibility-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging detects human myocardium supplied by a stenotic coronary artery without a contrast agent. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:834-840.
16. Li D, Dhawale P, Rubin PJ, et al. Myocardial signal response to dipyridamole and dobutamine: demonstration of the BOLD effect using a double-echo gradient-echo sequence. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:16-20.
17. Shea SM, Deshpande VS, Chung YC, et al. Three-dimensional true-FISP imaging of the coronary arteries: improved contrast with T2-preparation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;15:597-602.
18. Position of the American Heart Association on research animal use. Circulation. 1985;71:849A-850A.
19. Carr JC, Simonetti O, Bundy J, et al. Cine MR angiography of the heart with segmented true fast imaging with steady-state precession. Radiology. 2001;219:828-834.
20. Li W, Stern JS, Mai VM, et al. MR assessment of left ventricular function: quantitative comparison of fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA) with fast gradient echo cine technique. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16:559-564.
21. Beache GM, Kulke SF, Kantor HL, et al. Imaging perfusion deficits in ischemic heart disease with susceptibility-enhanced T2-weighted MRI: preliminary human studies. Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;16:19-27.
22. Simonetti OP, Finn JP, White RD, et al. "Black blood" T2-weighted inversion-recovery MR imaging of the heart. Radiology. 1996;199: 49-57.