Phase-sensitive inversion-recovery MR imaging in the detection of myocardial infarction

Radiology

Volumn 237, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 854-860

  Huber, Armin M ^a   Schoenberg, Stefan O ^a   Hayes, Carmel ^b   Spannagl, Benedikt ^a   Engelmann, Markus G ^a   Franz, Wolfgang M ^a   Reiser, Maximilian F ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHASE SENSITIVE INVERSION RECOVERY MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHASE TRANSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STEADY STATE; STUDENT T TEST;

ADULT; AGED; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 27744459744     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2373041483     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1445-1453.
2. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999;100:1992-2002.
3. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, et al. An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology 2001;218:215-223.
4. Kuhl HP, Beek AM, van der Weerdt AP, et al. Myocardial viability in chronic ischemic heart disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1341-1348.
5. Kellman P, Arai AE, McVeigh ER, Aletras AH. Phase-sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium-delayed hyperenhancement. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:372-383.
6. Spuentrup E, Buecker A, Karassimos E, Gunther RW, Stuber M. Navigator-gated and real-time motion corrected free-breathing MR imaging of myocardial late enhancement [in German]. Rofo 2002;174:562-567.
7. Chung YC, Lee VS, Laub G, Simonetti OP. Inversion recovery cine TrueFISP (abstr). In: Proceedings of the 10th Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2002; 219.
8. Scheffler K, Henning JT. Quantification with inversion recovery TrueFISP. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:720-723.
9. Moran GR, Thornhill RE, Sykes J, Prato FS. Myocardial viability imaging using Gd-DTPA: physiological modeling of infarcted myocardium, and impact on injection strategy and imaging time. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:791-800.
10. Flacke S, Allen JS, Chia JM, et al. Characterization of viable and nonviable myocardium at MR imaging: comparison of gadolinium-based extracellular and blood pool contrast materials versus manganese-based contrast materials in a rat myocardial infarction model. Radiology 2003;226:731-738.
11. Higgins CB, Herfkens R, Lipton MJ, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of acute myocardial infarction in dogs: alterations in magnetic relaxation times. Am J Cardiol 1983; 52:184-188.
12. Johnston DL, Brady TJ, Ratner AV, et al. Assessment of myocardial ischemia with proton magnetic resonance: effects of a three hour coronary occlusion with and without reperfusion. Circulation 1985;71:595-601.
13. Oshinski JN, Yang Z, Jones JR, Mata JF, French BA. Imaging time after Gd-DTPA injection is critical in using delayed enhancement to determine infarct size accurately with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2001;104:2838-2842.
14. Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation 2002;105:162-167.
15. Rehr RB, Peshock RM, Malloy CR, et al. Improved in vivo magnetic resonance imaging of acute myocardial infarction after intravenous paramagnetic contrast agent administration. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:864-868.
16. Tscholakoff D, Higgins CB, Sechtem U, McNamara MT. Occlusive and reperfused myocardial infarcts: effect of Gd-DTPA on ECG-gated MR imaging. Radiology 1986;160:515-519.
17. Edelman RR, Wallner B, Singer A, Atkinson DJ, Saini S. Segmented turboFLASH: method for breath-hold MR imaging of the liver with flexible contrast. Radiology 1990;177:515-521.
18. Noll DC, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. Homodyne detection in magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1991;1:154-163.
19. Nilsson JC, Nielsen G, Groenning BA, et al. Sustained postinfarction myocardial oedema in humans visualised by magnetic resonance imaging. Heart 2001;85:639-642.
20. Schulz-Menger J, Gross M, Messroghli D, Uhlieh F, Dietz R, Friedrich M. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance of acute myocardial infarction at a very early stage. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:513-518.
21. Li W, Li BS, Polzin JA, Mai VM, Prasad PV, Edelman RR. Myocardial delayed enhancement imaging using inversion recovery single-shot steady-state free precession: initial experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:327-330.
22. Bernstein MA, Thomasson DM, Perman WH. Improved detectability in low signal-to-noise ratio magnetic resonance images by means of a phase-corrected real reconstruction. Med Phys 1989;16:813-817.