|
Volumn 359, Issue 9318, 2002, Pages 1643-1647
|
Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and conventional pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: A prospective study
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CONTRAST MEDIUM;
IOPROMIDE;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DEVICE;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
IMAGE ANALYSIS;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
IONIZING RADIATION;
ISOLATED LUNG;
LUNG ANGIOGRAPHY;
LUNG EMBOLISM;
LUNG PERFUSION;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT;
PREVALENCE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
SAFETY;
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
|
EID: 0037062132
PISSN: 01406736
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08596-3 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (264)
|
References (29)
|