Additional diagnostic value of first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging without stress when combined with 64-row detector coronary CT angiography in patients with coronary artery disease

Heart

Volumn 100, Issue 13, 2014, Pages 1008-1015

  Osawa, Kazuhiro ^a   Miyoshi, Toru ^a   Koyama, Yasushi ^b   Hashimoto, Katsushi ^a   Sato, Shuhei ^a   Nakamura, Kazufumi ^a   Nishii, Nobuhiro ^a   Kohno, Kunihisa ^a   Morita, Hiroshi ^a   Kanazawa, Susumu ^a   Ito, Hiroshi ^a  

^a OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY CALCIFICATION; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY;

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE;

AGED; AREA UNDER CURVE; ARTIFACTS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY STENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ROC CURVE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; VASCULAR CALCIFICATION;

EID: 84902386762     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305468     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1724-32.
2. Rozanski A, Gransar H, Hayes SW, et al. Temporal trends in the frequency of inducible myocardial ischemia during cardiac stress testing: 1991 to 2009. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1054-65.
3. Porter TR, Smith LM, Wu J, et al. Patient outcome following 2 different stress imaging approaches: a prospective randomized comparison. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:2446-55.
4. Bettencourt N, Chiribiri A, Schuster A, et al. Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography stress-rest perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1099-107.
5. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:174-82.
6. Jayaweera AR, Wei K, Coggins M, et al. Role of capillaries in determining CBF reserve: new insights using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Am J Physiol 1999;277:H2363-72. (Pubitemid 30048158)
7. Lindner JR, Skyba DM, Goodman NC, et al. Changes in myocardial blood volume with graded coronary stenosis. Am J Physiol 1997;272:H567-75.
8. Osawa K, Miyoshi T, Sato S, et al . Safety and efficacy of a bolus injection of landiolol hydrochloride as a premedication for multidetector-row computed tomography coronary angiography. Circ J 2012;77:146-52.
9. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2002;18:539-42. (Pubitemid 34262671)
10. Nagao M, Matsuoka H, Kawakami H, et al. Detection of myocardial ischemia using 64-slice MDCT. Circ J 2009;73:905-11.
11. Yoshida K, Shimada K, Tanaka A, et al. Quantitative analysis of myocardial contrast enhancement by first-pass 64-multidetector computed tomography in patients with coronary heart disease. Circ J 2009;73:116-24.
12. Spiro AJ, Haramati LB, Jain VR, et al. Resting cardiac 64-MDCT does not reliably detect myocardial ischemia identified by radionuclide imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:337-42.
13. Guo SL, Guo YM, Zhai YN, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of first generation dual-source computed tomography in the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis from 24 studies. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;27: 755-71.
14. Kwong RY, Sattar H, Wu H, et al. Incidence and prognostic implication of unrecognized myocardial scar characterized by cardiac magnetic resonance in diabetic patients without clinical evidence of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2008;118:1011-20.
15. Schelbert EB, Cao JJ, Sigurdsson S, et al. Prevalence and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction determined by cardiac magnetic resonance in older adults. JAMA 2012;308:890-6.
16. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 2006;113:1305-10. (Pubitemid 43739452)
17. Techasith T, Cury RC. Stress myocardial CT perfusion: an update and future perspective. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:905-16.