Accuracy of dynamic computed tomography adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in estimating myocardial blood flow at various degrees of coronary artery stenosis using a porcine animal model

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 71-77

  Bamberg, Fabian ^a,b   Hinkel, Rabea ^a   Schwarz, Florian ^a   Sandner, Torleif A ^a   Baloch, Elisabeth ^a   Marcus, Roy ^a   Becker, Alexander ^a   Kupatt, Christian ^a,b   Wintersperger, Bernd J ^a,c   Johnson, Thorsten R ^a   Theisen, Daniel ^a,b   Klotz, Ernst ^d   Reiser, Maximilian F ^a,b   Nikolaou, Konstantin ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b Munich Heart Alliance   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Animal model; Cardiac CT perfusion; Dynamic acquisition; Ischemia

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; IOPROMIDE; MICROSPHERE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BALLOON CATHETER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY STENT; DISEASE SEVERITY; EXPERIMENTAL PIG; FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS; HEART BEAT; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; IMAGE PROCESSING; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MOTION; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING; NONHUMAN; PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS TESTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REST;

EID: 84055199110     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31823fd42b     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hendel RC, Berman DS, Di Carli MF, et al. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine: endorsed by the American College of Emergency Physicians. Circulation. 2009;119:e561-e587.
2. Chae SC, Heo J, Iskandrian AS, et al. Identification of extensive coronary artery disease in women by exercise single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) thallium imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:1305-1311.
3. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation. 2006;114:1761-1791.
4. Nieman K, Shapiro MD, Ferencik M, et al. Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced 64-section CT in comparison to MR imaging. Radiology. 2008;247:49-56.
5. George RT, Silva C, Cordeiro MA, et al. Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:153-160.
6. Schuleri KH, Centola M, George RT, et al. Characterization of peri-infarct zone heterogeneity by contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1699-1707.
7. Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS, et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1072-1084.
8. George R, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller J, et al. Adenosine stress 64-and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia circulation imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:174-182.
9. Tamarappoo BK, Dey D, Nakazato R, et al. Comparison of the extent and severity of myocardial perfusion defects measured by CT coronary angiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:1010-1019.
10. Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Rosenblum MA, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:306-313.
11. Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Pietsch H, et al. Quantitative whole heart stress perfusion CT imaging as noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics in coronary artery stenosis: preliminary animal experience. Invest Radiol. 2010;45: 298-305.
12. Bamberg F, Klotz E, Flohr T, et al. Dynamic myocardial stress perfusion imaging using fast dual-source CT with alternating table positions: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:1168-1173.
13. Boekstegers P, Raake P, Al Ghobainy R, et al. Stent-based approach for ventricle-to-coronary artery bypass. Circulation. 2002;106:1000-1006.
14. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;105:539-542.
15. Glenny RW, Bernard S, Brinkley M. Validation of fluorescent-labeled microspheres for measurement of regional organ perfusion. J Appl Physiol. 1993;74:2585-2597.
16. Thein E, Raab S, Harris AG, et al. Automation of the use of fluorescent microspheres for the determination of blood flow. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2000;61:11-21.
17. Patel AR, Antkowiak PF, Nandalur KR, et al. Assessment of advanced coronary artery disease: advantages of quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:561-569.
18. George RT, Jerosch-Herold M, Silva C, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using dynamic 64-detector computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:815-822.
19. Swindle MM, Smith AC, Hepburn BJ. Swine as models in experimental surgery. J Invest Surg. 1988;1:65-79.
20. Finn JP, Nael K, Deshpande V, et al. Cardiac MR imaging: state of the technology. Radiology. 2006;241:338-354.
21. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA. 2007;298:317-323.
22. Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, et al. Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation. 2007;116:1290-1305.
23. Muizelaar JP, Fatouros PP, Schroder ML. A new method for quantitative regional cerebral blood volume measurements using computed tomography. Stroke. 1997;28:1998-2005.
24. Detter C, Wipper S, Russ D, et al. Fluorescent cardiac imaging: a novel intraoperative method for quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion during graded coronary artery stenosis. Circulation. 2007;116:1007-1014.
25. Mahnken AH, Bruners P, Kinzel S, et al. Late-phase MSCT in the different stages of myocardial infarction: animal experiments. Eur Radiol. 2007;17: 2310-2317.