Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 331-340

  De Graaf, Fleur R ^a   Schuijf, Joanne D ^a   Van Velzen, Joëlla E ^a,b   Boogers, Mark J ^a,b   Kroft, Lucia J ^a   De Roos, Albert ^a   Reiber, Johannes H C ^a   Sieders, Allard ^c   Spanó, Fabrizio ^a   Jukema, J Wouter ^a,b   Schalij, Martin J ^a   Van Der Wall, Ernst E ^a,b   Bax, Jeroen J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^c RIJNLAND HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cardiac imaging; In stent restenosis; Multidetector computed tomography; Noninvasive coronary angiography

Indexed keywords

IOMEPROL; METOPROLOL;

AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY STENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DRUG ELUTING STENT; FEMALE; IMAGE QUALITY; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THORAX PAIN;

EID: 77952496942     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181dfa312     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al; Benestent Study Group. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angio-plasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:489-495.
2. Malenka DJ, Kaplan AV, Lucas FL, et al. Outcomes following coronary stenting in the era of bare-metal vs the era of drug-eluting stents. JAMA. 2008;299:2868-2876.
3. Ong AT, Hoye A, Aoki J, et al. Thirty-day incidence and six-month clinical outcome of thrombotic stent occlusion after bare-metal, sirolimus, or pacli-taxel stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:947-953.
4. Morice MC, Colombo A, Meier B, et al. Sirolimus-vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;295:895-904.
5. Vanhoenacker PK, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Van Heste R, et al. Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis. Radiology. 2007;244:419-428.
6. Sun Z, Jiang W. Diagnostic value of multislice computed tomography angiography in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2006;60:279-286.
7. Kruger S, Mahnken AH, Sinha AM, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary stent restenosis and patency. Int J Cardiol. 2003;89:167-172.
8. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16 slice computed tomography. Heart. 2006;92:58-61.
9. Kefer JM, Coche E, Vanoverschelde JL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector-row CT for detection of in-stent restenosis vs detection of stenosis in nonstented coronary arteries. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:87-96.
10. van Mieghem CA, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2006;114:645-653.
11. Cademartiri F, Schuijf JD, Pugliese F, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2204-2210.
12. Kumbhani DJ, Ingelmo CP, Schoenhagen P, et al. Meta-analysis of diagnostic efficacy of 64-slice computed tomography in the evaluation of coronary in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:1675-1681.
13. de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE, et al. Assessment of global left ventricular function and volumes with 320-row multidetector computed tomography: a comparison with 2D-echocardiography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010; 17:225-231.
14. Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML, et al. Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;24:535-546.
15. Hein PA, Romano VC, Lembcke A, et al. Initial experience with a chest pain protocol using 320-slice volume MDCT. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1148-1155.
16. Mori S, Endo M, Nishizawa K, et al. Comparison of patient doses in 256-slice CT and 16-slice CT scanners. Br J Radiol. 2006;79:56-61.
17. Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation. 2009;120: 867-875.
18. de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2010 Jan 4. [Epub ahead of print]
19. Cademartiri F, Nieman K, van der Lugt A, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique. Radiology. 2004;233:817-823.
20. Valentin J; International Commission on Radiation Protection. Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography(MDCT). ICRP Publication 102. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1-79.
21. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975;51(suppl 4):5-40.
22. Ehara M, Kawai M, Surmely JF, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:951-959.
23. Voros S. What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of volumetric CT scanning? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3:67-70.
24. Steigner ML, Otero HJ, Cai T, et al. Narrowing the phase window width in prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;25:85-90.
25. Pasricha SS, Nandurkar D, Seneviratne SK, et al. Image quality of coronary 320-MDCT in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience. Am J Roent-genol. 2009;193:1514-1521.
26. Manghat N, Van Lingen R, Hewson P, et al. Usefulness of 64-detector row computed tomography for evaluation of intracoronary stents in symptomatic patients with suspected in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:1567-1573.
27. Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, et al. Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT. Radiology. 2007; 245:416-423.
28. Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:2567-2572. (Pubitemid 44627301)
29. Carbone I, Francone M, Algeri E, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:234-243.
30. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, et al. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94: 427-430.
31. Gaspar T, Halon DA, Lewis BS, et al. Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1573-1579.
32. Haraldsdottir S, Gudnason T, Sigurdsson AF, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT for detection of in-stent restenosis in an unselected, consecutive patient population. Eur J Radiol. 2009 Jan 29. [Epub ahead of print]
33. Wolf F, Cademartiri F, Loewe C, et al. Evaluation of coronary stents with 64-MDCT: in vitro comparison of scanners from four vendors. Am J Roent-genol. 2009;193:787-794.
34. Pugliese F, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem C, et al. Multidetector CT for visualization of coronary stents. Radiographics. 2006;26:887-904.
35. Pugliese F, Weustink AC, van Mieghem C, et al. Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis. Heart. 2008;94:848-854.
36. Husmann L, Herzog BA, Burkhard N, et al. Body physique and heart rate variability determine the occurrence of stair-step artefacts in 64-slice CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering. Eur Radiol. 2009; 19:1698-1703.
37. Herzog BA, Wyss CA, Husmann L, et al. First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography. Heart. 2009;95:1656-1661.
38. Marquering HA, Dijkstra J, de Koning PJ, et al. Towards quantitative analysis of coronary CTA. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2005;21:73-84.
39. Min JK, Swaminathan RV, Vass M, et al. High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3:246-251.