Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive anatomic and functional assessment with dual-source CT and adenosine- induced stress dual-energy CT for detection of significant coronary stenosis

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 198, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 512-520

  Ko, Sung Min ^a   Choi, Jin Woo ^a   Hwang, Hweung Kon ^a   Song, Meong Gun ^a   Shin, Je Kyoun ^a   Chee, Hyun Keun ^a  

^a Konkuk University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease; Coronary CT angiography; CT perfusion imaging; Dual energy CT; Myocardial perfusion

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; DUAL SOURCE CORONARY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS TESTING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADENOSINE; AGED; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOHEXOL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 84863258793     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7029     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: global burden of disease study. Lancet 1997; 349:1269-1276 (Pubitemid 27192468)
2. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, et al. Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease: incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification. Circulation 1996; 93:905-914 (Pubitemid 26074827)
3. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 2001; 103:2230-2235 (Pubitemid 32433710)
4. Vanhoenacker PK, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Van Heste R, et al. Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis. Radiology 2007; 244:419-428 (Pubitemid 47080873)
5. Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, et al. Dualsource computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J 2008; 29:766-776 (Pubitemid 351431025)
6. Sato A, Hiroe M, Tamura M, et al. Quantitative measures of coronary stenosis severity by 64-slice CT angiography and relation to physiologic significance of perfusion in nonobese patients: comparison with stress myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med 2008; 49:564-572 (Pubitemid 351520604)
7. Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I, et al. Functionally relevant coronary artery disease: comparison of 64-section CT angiography with myocardial perfusion SPECT. Radiology 2008; 248:414-423
8. Santana CA, Garcia EV, Faber TL, et al. Diagnostic performance of fusion of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and computed tomography coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2009; 16:201-211
9. Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I, et al. Cardiac image fusion from stand-alone SPECT and CT: clinical experience. J Nucl Med 2007; 48:696-703 (Pubitemid 47604968)
10. George RT, Silva C, Cordeiro MA, et al. Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48:153-160 (Pubitemid 43929222)
11. George RT, Jerosch-Herold M, Silva C, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using dynamic 64-detector computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2007; 42:815-822 (Pubitemid 350126563)
12. Kurata A, Mochizuki T, Koyama Y, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography: alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Circ J 2005; 69:550-557 (Pubitemid 40745727)
13. Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS, et al. Adenosine- induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54:1072-1084
14. Rocha-Filho JA, Blankstein R, Shturman LD, et al. Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology 2010; 254:410-419
15. Ruzsics B, Lee H, Zwerner PL, et al. Dual-energy CT of the heart for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemia: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:2414-2424
16. Schwarz F, Ruzsics B, Schoepf UJ, et al. Dualenergy CT of the heart: principles and protocols. Eur J Radiol 2008; 68:423-433
17. Ruzsics B, Schwarz F, Schoepf UJ, et al. Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104:318-326
18. Ko SM, Choi JW, Song MG, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine-induced stress dual-energy computed tomography of the heart: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and conventional coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 2011; 21:26-35
19. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975; 51[4 suppl]:5-40
20. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002; 105:539-542 (Pubitemid 34262671)
21. Morin RL, Gerber TC, McCollough CH. Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation 2003; 107:917-922 (Pubitemid 36241053)
22. van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Gaeperli O, et al. Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography and gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53:623-632
23. Tamarappoo BK, Dey D, Nakazato R, et al. Comparison of the extent and severity of myocardial perfusion defects measured by CT coronary angiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3:1010-1019
24. Cury RC, Magalhaes TA, Borges AC, et al. Dipyridamole stress and rest myocardial perfusion by 64-detector row computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2010; 106:310-315
25. Okada DR, Ghoshhajra BB, Blankstein R, et al. Direct comparison of rest and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion CT with rest and stress SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2009; 17:27-37
26. Kang DK, Schoepf UJ, Bastarrika G, et al. Dualenergy computed tomography for integrative imaging of coronary artery disease: principles and clinical applications. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2010; 31:276-291
27. Zhang LJ, Peng J, Wu SY, et al. Dual source dualenergy computed tomography of acute myocardial infarction: correlation with histopathologic findings in a canine model. Invest Radiol 2010; 45:290-297
28. Rodriguez-Granillo GA, Rosales MA, Degrossi E, Rodriguez AE. Signal density of left ventricular myocardial segments and impact of beam hardening artifact: implications for myocardial perfusion assessment by multidetector CT coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 26:345-354
29. DePuey EG, Garcia EV. Optimal specificity of thallium-201 SPECT through recognition of imaging artifacts. J Nucl Med 1989; 30:441-449 (Pubitemid 19096588)
30. Plein S, Kozerke S, Suerder D, et al. High spatial resolution myocardial perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2008; 29:2148-2155
31. Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF, et al. Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50:1343-1353 (Pubitemid 47449733)
32. Lu B, Lu JG, Sun ML, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose between prospective triggering and retrospective gated coronary angiography by dual-source computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2011; 107:1278-1284
33. Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H, et al. Dualsource CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. Radiology 2008; 249:71-80