Vocational education approach: New TEL settings-new prospects for teachers' instructional activities?

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 271-291

  Hämäläinen, Raija ^a   de Wever, Bram ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

3D game; Design based research; Teachers' instructional activities; Vocational education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881552709     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-013-9176-1     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Arvaja, M. (2007). Contextual perspective in analyzing collaborative knowledge construction of two small groups in web-based discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2/3), 133-158.
2. Arvaja, M. (2012). Personal and shared experiences as resources for meaning making in a philosophy of science course. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(1), 85-108.
3. Baartman, L. K. J., & de Bruijn, E. (2011). Integrating knowledge, skills, and attitudes: Conceptualizing learning processes towards vocational competence. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 125-134.
4. Barab, S. A., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
5. Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2007). The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 427-435.
6. Bell, P. (2004). On the theoretical breadth of design-based research in education. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 243-253.
7. Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Glencoe: Free Press.
8. Bouta, H., Retalis, S., & Paraskeva, F. (2012). Utilizing a collaborative macro-script to enhance student engagement: A mixed method study in a3D Virtual Environment. Computers in Education, 58(1), 501-517.
9. Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 227-270). Cambridge: MIT Press.
10. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
11. Chan, C. K. K. (2011). Bridging research and practice: Implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Hong Kong classrooms. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 147-186.
12. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271-315.
13. Crook, C., Harrison, C., Farrington-Flint, L., Tomás, C., & Underwood, J. (2010). Impact 09: Final report. Coventry: Becta.
14. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8.
15. de Bruijn, E., & Leeman, Y. (2011). Authentic and self-directed learning in vocational education: challenges to vocational educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 694-702.
16. De Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179-201.
17. De Laat, M., & Lally, V. (2004). It's not so easy: Researching the complexity of emergent participant roles and awareness in asynchronous networked learning discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3), 165-171.
18. De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers in Education, 46(1), 6-28.
19. De Wever, B., van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2007). Applying multilevel modeling to content analysis data: Methodological issues in the study of role assignment in asynchronous discussion groups. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 436-447.
20. De Wever, B., van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2010). Structuring asynchronous discussion groups: Comparing scripting by assigning roles with regulation by cross-age peer tutors. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 349-360.
21. deNoyelles, & Seo, K. K.-J. (2012). Inspiring equal contribution and opportunity in a 3D multi-user virtual environment: Bringing together men gamers and women non-gamers in second Life. Computers in Education, 58(1), 21-29.
22. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
23. Dillenbourg, P. (2012). Classroom orchestration: Interweaving digital and physical workflows. Keynote speaker lecture presented to a 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - The Future of Learning. Sydney, Australia.
24. Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning: From design to orchestration. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, T. A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology enhanced learning: Principles and products (pp. 3-19). Netherlands: Springer.
25. Dillenbourg, P., Dimitriadis, Y., Nussbaum, M., Roschelle, J., Looi, C. K., Asensio, J. I., et al. (2013, in press). Design for Classroom Orchestration. Computers & Education, doi: 10. 1016/j. compedu. 2012. 10. 026.
26. Dimitriadis, Y. A., (2010). Supporting teachers in orchestrating CSCL classrooms. In A. Jimoyiannis (Ed.), 7th Pan-Hellenic Conference with International Participation ICT in Education (vol. I, pp. 33-40). Korinthos, Greece.
27. Dochy, F., Moerkerke, G., & Segers, M. (1999). The effect of prior knowledge on learning in educational practice: Studies using prior knowledge state assessment. Evaluation & Research in Education, 13(3), 345-367.
28. Do-Lenh, S., Jermann, P., Arn, C., Zufferey G. & Dillenbourg P., (2011). Classroom-experience evaluation: Evaluating pervasive technologies in a classroom setting. In Child Computer Interaction: Workshop on UI Technologies and Their Impact on Educational Pedagogy, the ACM International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 11). Retrieved from http://infoscience. epfl. ch/record/164658/files/son-hcieducationchi11_camera%20ready. pdf 16. 4. 2013.
29. Eurydice report from European Commission. (2012). European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice, 2012. Developing key competences at school in Europe: Challenges and opportunities for policy - 2011/12. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
30. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Haake, J. M., & Mandl, H. (2007). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Education (Vol. 6, pp. 1-10). Boston: Springer US. doi: 10. 1007/978-0-387-36949-5.
31. Fominykh, M., & Prasolova-Forland, E. (2012). Educational visualizations in 3D collaborative virtual environments: A methodology. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 9(1), 33-45.
32. Hämäläinen, R. (2008). Designing and evaluating collaboration in a virtual game environment for vocational learning. Computers in Education, 50(1), 98-109.
33. Hämäläinen, R. (2011). Using a game environment to foster collaborative learning: a design-based study. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(1), 61-78.
34. Hämäläinen, R., & Oksanen, K. (2012). Challenge Of Supporting Vocational Learning: Empowering Collaboration In A Scripted 3D Game - How Does Teachers' Real-Time Orchestration Make A Difference? Computers in Education, 59(2), 281-293.
35. Hämäläinen, R., & Vähäsantanen, K. (2011). Theoretical and pedagogical perspectives on orchestrating creativity and collaborative learning. Educational Research Review, 6(3), 169-184.
36. Herrmann, T., & Kienle, A. (2008). Context-oriented communication and the design of computer supported discursive learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(3), 273-299.
37. Huang, H.-M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S.-S. (2010). Investigating learners' attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers in Education, 55(3), 1171-1182.
38. Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. (2011). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an expert panel. Washington: Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Retrieved from https://www. aamc. org/download/186750/data/core_competencies. pdf 4. 12. 2012.
39. John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. K. (2008). Productive failure in CSCL groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 21-46.
41. Kiili, C. (2012). Online reading as an individual and social practice. Jyväskylä, Finland: Jyväskylän yliopisto. Jyväskylä studies in education, psychology and social research, 441. Retrieved from http://dissertations. jyu. fi/studeduc/9789513947958. pdf 9. 12. 2012.
42. Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (1998, March). Internal consistency reliability for the teachers' attitudes toward information technology (TAT) questionnaire. In S. McNeil, J. Price, S. Boger-Mehall, B. Robin, & J. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education Annual Conference (pp. 831-836).
43. Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., et al. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2/3), 211-224.
44. Kreijns, K., Vermeulen, M., Kirschner, P., van Buuren, H., & van Acker, F. (2013). Adopting the Integrative Model of Behaviour Prediction to explain teachers' willingness to use ICT: a perspective for research on teachers' ICT usage in pedagogical practices. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(1), 55-71.
45. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage, 852 Publications.
46. Looi, C.-K., So, H.-J., Toh, Y., & Chen, W. (2011). The Singapore experience: Synergy of national policy, classroom practice and design research. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 9-37.
47. Lund, A., & Smørdal, O. (2006). Is there a space for the teacher in a Wiki? Paper presented at The 2006 International Symposium on Wikis, August 21-23, 2006, Odense, Denmark. Retrieved August 19, 2011 from http://portal. acm. org/citation. cfm?id=1149466.
48. Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2010). Using interactive whiteboards to orchestrate classroom dialogue. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 195-209.
49. Miell, D., & Littleton, K. (2004). Collaborative creativity: Contemporary perspectives. London: Free Association Books.
50. Minnaert, A. M., Boekaerts, M., De Brabander, C., & Opdenakker, M. C. (2011). Students' experiences of autonomy, competence, social relatedness, and interest within a CSCL environment in vocational education: The case of commerce and business administration. Vocations and Learning, 4(3), 175-190.
51. Moscovici, S., & Doise, W. (1994). Conflict and consensus: A general theory of collective decisions. London: Sage Publications.
52. Motta, E., Boldrini, E., & Cattaneo, A. (2012). Technologies to "bridge the gap" among learning contexts in vocational training. In P. M. Pumilia-Gnarini, E. Favaron, E. Pacetti, J. Bishop, & L. Guerra (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Didactic Strategies and Technologies for Education: Incorporating Advancements (pp. 247-265). Hershey: IGI Global.
53. Mu, J., Stegmann, K., Mayfield, E., Rosé, C., & Fischer, F. (2012). The ACODEA framework: Developing segmentation and classification schemes for fully automatic analysis of online discussions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(2), 285-305.
54. National qualification requirements for vocational education and training. (2010). Retrieved 4/23, 2013, from http://www. oph. fi/english/sources_of_information/core_curricula_and_qualification_requirements/vocational_education_and_training.
55. Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
56. Onrubia, J., & Engel, A. (2012). The role of teacher assistance on the effects of a macro-script in collaborative writing tasks. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(1), 161-186.
57. Paloniemi, S., & Collin, K. (2012). Discursive power and creativity in inter-professional work. Vocations and Learning, 5(1), 23-40.
58. Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Santos, P., Hernández-Leo, D., & Blat, J. (2012). 4SPPIces: A case study of factors in a scripted collaborative-learning blended course across spatial locations. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(3), 443-465.
59. Peterson, M. (2010). Learner participation patterns and strategy use in "Second Life": An exploratory case study. ReCALL, 22(3), 273-292.
60. Pillen, M., Beijaard, D., & den Brok, P. (2012). Tensions in beginning teachers' professional identity development, accompanying feelings and coping strategies. European Journal of Teacher Education. iFirst Article.
61. Price, S., Rogers, Y., Stanton, D., & Smith, H. (2003). A new conceptual framework for CSCL: supporting diverse forms of reflection through multiple interactions. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen, U. Hoppe, Designing for change in networked learning environments. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. (pp. 513-523). Bergen: InterMedia.
62. Prieto, L. P., Dlab, M., Gutiérrez, I., Abdulwahed, M., & Balid, W. (2011). Orchestrating technology enhanced learning: A literature review and a conceptual framework. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(6), 583-598.
63. Salonen, J., Nykänen, O., Ranta, P., Nurmi, J., Helminen, M., Rokala, M., et al. (2011). An implementation of a semantic, web-based virtual machine laboratory prototyping environment. In The semantic web - ISWC 2011, lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 7032/2011, pp. 221-236.
64. Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative Teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 12-20.
65. Sawyer, R. K., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Journal of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81-92.
66. Schlager, M., & Fusco, J. (2004). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse? In S. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray (Eds.), Designing Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp. 120-153). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Stahl, G. (2010). Guiding group cognition in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(3), 255-258.
68. Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 313-340. 30. 11. 2012 Retrieved from: https://ncrve. berkeley. edu/faculty/RAEngle/SteinEngleSmithHughes(inpress). pdf.
69. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers in Education, 46(1), 29-48.
70. Underwood, J., & Dillon, G. (2011). Chasing dreams and recognizing realities: Teachers' responses to about technology use in an elementary school in ICT. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(3), 317-330.
71. Underwood, J., Smith, H., Luckin, R., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2008). E-Science in the classroom - Towards viability. Computers in Education, 50(2), 535-546.
72. Vähäsantanen, K., & Eteläpelto, A. (2011). Vocational teachers' pathways in the course of a curriculum reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(3), 291-312.
73. Virtanen, A., Tynjälä, P., & Collin, K. (2009). Characteristics of workplace learning among Finnish vocational students. Vocations and Learning, 2(3), 153-175.
74. Vosniadou, S. I., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11(4), 281-419.
75. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
76. Webb, N. (2009). The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 1-28.
77. Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Chan, A., De, T., Freund, D., et al. (2008). The role of teacher instructional practices in student collaboration. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 360-381.
78. Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic education and technology. New York: Springer Verlag.