Adopting the Integrative Model of Behaviour Prediction to explain teachers' willingness to use ICT: A perspective for research on teachers' ICT usage in pedagogical practices

Technology, Pedagogy and Education

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 55-71

  Kreijns, Karel ^a,c   Vermeulen, Marjan ^b,c   Kirschner, Paul A ^c   van Buuren, Hans ^c   van Acker, Frederik ^c  

^a FONTYS UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b KPC Holding   (Netherlands)

^c OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

ICT use; ICT willingness in education; Integrative Model of Behaviour Prediction; teacher professionalisation; Technology Acceptance Model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875947610     PISSN: 1475939X     EISSN: 17475139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2012.754371     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aditiwarman, U., & Hussein, R. (2007, October). Factors influencing e-learning acceptance: A case study of Indonesian open learning university. Paper presented at the E-Learn 2007 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education, Québec City, Canada.
2. Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50: 179-211.
3. Ajzen, I. 2002. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32: 665-683.
4. Ajzen, I. 2005. Attitudes, personality, and behavior, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
5. Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a TpB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Retrieved from University of Massachusetts Amherst website:http://people.umass.edu/aizen/tpb.html.
6. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7. Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8. Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
9. Beckers, J.J., Wichert, J.M. and Schmidt, H.G. 2007. Computer anxiety: 'Trait' or 'state'?. Computers in Human Behavior, 23: 2851-2862.
10. Becta (2008). Harnessing technology review 2008: The role of technology and its impact on education. Coventry: Author.
11. Bozionelos, N. 2001. Computer anxiety: Relationship with computer experience and prevalence. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(2): 213-224.
12. Bozionelos, N. 2003. Socio-economic background: Relation to computer experience, anxiety, and use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61: 725-746.
13. Brown, J.S., Collins, A. and Duguid, P. 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18: 32-42.
14. Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13: 319-339.
15. Davis, F.D. 1993. User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3): 475-487.
16. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35: 982-1003.
17. Doyle, E., Stamouli, I., & Huggard, M. (2005, October). Computer anxiety, self-efficacy, computer experience. An investigation throughout a computer science degree. Paper presented at the 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education conference, Indianapolis, IN.
18. Drent, M. (2005). In transitie: Op weg naar innovatief ICT-gebruik op de PABO [In Transition: Towards innovative use of ICT in the PABO]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Universiteit Twente.
19. Drent, M. and Meelissen, M. 2008. Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively?. Computers in Human Behavior, 51: 187-199.
20. Fishbein, M. 2000. The role of theory in HIV prevention. AIDS Care, 12: 273-278.
21. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Reading, MA: Erlbaum.
22. Fishbein, M. and Yzer, M.C. 2003. Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Communication Theory, 13: 164-183.
23. Garland, K.J. and Noyes, J.M. 2004. Computer experience. A poor predictor of computer attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 20: 823-840.
24. Garland, K.J. and Noyes, J.M. 2008. Computer attitude scales: How relevant today?. Computers in Human Behavior, 24: 563-575.
25. Geissler, J.E. and Horridge, P. 1993. University students' computer knowledge and commitment to learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25: 347-365.
26. Gülbahar, Y. 2007. Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology integration in schools. Computers & Education, 49: 943-956.
27. Hargreaves, A. 2003. Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of uncertainty, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
28. Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J. and Valcke, M. 2008. The impact of primary school teachers' educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51: 1499-1509.
29. Higgins, S. 2003. Does ICT improve learning and teaching in schools? A professional user review of the UK research undertaken for the British Educational Research Association, Southwell: British Educational Research Association.
30. Hogan, R.L. and McKnight, M.A. 2007. Exploring burnout among university online instructors: An initial investigation. Internet and Higher Education, 10: 117-124.
31. Hubona, G. S., & Kennick, E. (1996). The influence of external variables on information technology usage behavior. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-29), vol. 4 (pp. 166-175). Los Almitos, CA: IEEE Press.
32. Imhof, M., Vollmeyer, R. and Beierlein, C. 2007. Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 23: 2823-2837.
33. Jones, T. and Clark, V.A. 1995. Diversity as determinants of attitudes: A possible explanation of the apparent advantage of single-sex settings. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12: 51-64.
34. Karasek, R.A. and Theorell, T. 1990. Healthy work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life, New York: Basic Books.
35. Kennisnet (2011). Four in balance monitor 2011. Zoetermeer, The Netherlands: Author.
36. Kozma, R. 2003. "ICT and educational change: A global phenomenon". In Technology, innovation and educational change: A global perspective, Edited by: Kozma, R. 1-19. Eugene, OR: Information Society for Technology in Education.
37. Kwakman, K. 2001. Work stress and work-based learning in secondary education: Testing the Karasek model. Human Resource Development International, 4: 487-501.
38. Law, N., Pelgrum, W.J. and Plomp, T., eds. 2008. Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 Study, Hong Kong: Springer.
39. Legris, P., Ingham, J. and Collerette, P. 2003. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 40: 191-204.
40. Levine, T. and Donitsa-Schmidt, S. 1998. Computer use, confidence, attitudes, and knowledge: A causal analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 14: 125-146.
41. Loyd, B.H. and Gressard, C. 1984. Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44: 501-505.
42. Lucas, H.C. Jr. and Spitler, V.K. 1999. Technology use and performance. A field study of broker workstations. Decision Sciences, 30: 291-311.
43. Malhotra, Y., & Galletta, D.F. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence. Theoretical bases and empirical validation. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-32), vol. 1 (pp. 1006-1019). Los Almitos, CA: IEEE Press.
44. Meijer, J., van Eck, E. and Felix, C. 2008. Leren met meer effect: Rapportage van het onderzoek [Learning with more effect: report of the research], Amsterdam: SCO Kohnstamm Instituut.
45. Mumtaz, S. 2000. Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9: 319-341.
46. Murphy, C.A., Coover, D. and Owen, S.V. 1989. Development and validation of the computer self-efficacy scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49: 893-899.
47. Nickell, G.S. and Pinto, J.N. 1986. The computer attitude scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 2: 301-306.
48. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). Assessing the effects of ICT in education: Indicators, criteria and benchmarks of international comparisons (F. Scheuermann & F. Pedró, Eds.). Luxembourg: Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
49. Palaigeorgiou, G.E., Siozos, P.D., Konstantakis, N.I. and Tsoukalas, I.A. 2005. A computer attitude scale for computer science freshmen and its educational implications. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21: 330-342.
50. Paraskeva, F., Bouta, H. and Papagianni, Aik. 2008. Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computers & Education, 50: 1084-1091.
51. Pelgrum, W.J. and Voogt, J. 2009. School and teacher factors associated with frequency of ICT use by mathematics teachers: Country comparisons. Education and Information Technologies, 14: 293-308.
52. Potosky, D. and Bobko, P. 1998. The computer understanding and experience scale: A self-report measure of computer experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 14: 337-348.
53. Robertson, M., Fluck, A. and Webb, I. 2007. Seven steps to success with ICTs: Whole school approaches to sustainable change, Camberwell: ACER Press.
54. Shapka, J.D. and Ferrari, M. 2003. Computer-related attitudes and actions of teacher candidates. Computers in Human Behavior, 19: 319-334.
55. Smith, B., Caputi, P., Crittenden, N., Jayasuriya, R. and Rawstorne, P. 1999. A review of the construct of computer experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(2): 227-242.
56. Somekh, B. (Ed.). (2007). Learning for the twenty-first century: What really matters? [Special issue]. Education and Information Technologies, 10(3).
57. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. 1995. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6: 144-176.
58. Tondeur, J. 2007. Development and validation of a model of ICT integration in primary education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Belgium: Ghent University.
59. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J. and Valcke, M. 2007a. Curricula and the use of ICT in education: Two worlds apart?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38: 962-976.
60. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2007b). Towards a topology of, computer use in primary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 197-206.
61. Valcke, M. 2005. Onderwijskunde als ontwerpwetenschap [Education as a design science], Ghent: Academia Press.
62. van Braak, J. 2001. Factors influencing the use of computers mediated communication by teachers in secondary education. Computers & Education, 36: 41-57.
63. Venezky, R.L., & Davis, C. (2002). Quo Vademus? The transformation of schooling in a networked world. Research report, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development /Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.
64. Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. 2008. Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39: 273-315.
65. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46: 186-204.
66. Voogt, J. and Pelgrum, H. 2005. ICT and curriculum change. Human Technology; An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments, 1: 157-175.
67. Ward, L.W. (2005). Putting policy into practice: Pedagogical reform through ICT (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Auckland.
68. Wilfong, J.D. 2006. Computer anxiety and anger: The impact of computer use, computer experience, and self-efficacy beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 22: 1001-1011.
69. Yaghmaie, F., Jayasuriya, R. and Rawstorne, P. 1998. Computer experience and computer attitude: A model to predict the use of computerized information systems, Wollongong, NSW: University of Wollongong.
70. Yang, S.C. and Huang, Y.-F. 2008. A study of high school English teachers' behavior, concerns and beliefs in integrating information technology into English instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 24: 1085-1103.
71. Yzer, M.C., Cappella, J.N., Fishbein, M., Hornik, R., Sayeed, S. and Ahern, K.K. 2004. The role of distal variables in behavior change: Effects of adolescents' risk for marijuana use on intention to use marijuana. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34: 1229-1250.