The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 427-435

  Beers, Pieter J ^a,b   Boshuizen, Henny P A ^b   Kirschner, Paul A ^b,c   Gijselaers, Wim H ^d  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Common ground; Content analysis; Negotiation; Reliability; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249803262     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alpay L., Giboin A., and Dieng R. Accidentology: an example of problem solving by multiple agents with multiple representations. In: Van Someren M.W., Reimann P., Boshuizen H.P.A., and De Jong T. (Eds). Learning with multiple representations (1998), Elsevier, Oxford, UK 152-174
2. Baker M.J., Hansen T., Joiner R., and Traum D. The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. In: Dillenbourg P. (Ed). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (1999), Pergamon/Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 31-63
3. Beers P.J., Boshuizen H.P.A., Kirschner P.A., and Gijselaers W.H. Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior 21 (2005) 623-643
4. Bromme R. Beyond one's own perspective: the psychology of cognitive interdisciplinarity. In: Weingart P., and Stehr N. (Eds). Practicing interdisciplinarity (2000), University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada 115-133
5. Buckingham Shum S.J., MacLean A., Bellotti V.M.E., and Hammond N.V. Graphical argumentation and design cognition. Human-Computer Interaction 12 (1997) 267-300
6. Chi M.T.H. Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: a practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 6 (1997) 271-315
7. Clark H.H., and Brennan S.E. Grounding in communication. In: Resnick L.B., Levine J.M., and Teasley S.D. (Eds). Perspectives on socially shared cognition (1991), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA 127-149
8. Clark H.H., and Schaefer E.F. Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science 13 (1989) 259-294
9. Dillenbourg P. Over-scripting CSCL: the risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In: Kirschner P.A. (Ed). Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (2002), Open Universiteit Nederland, Heerlen, The Netherlands 61-91
10. Fischer F., Bruhn J., Gräsel C., and Mandl H. Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction 12 (2002) 213-232
11. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1998 August). Transcript analysis of computer-mediated conferences as a tool for testing constructivist and social-constructivist learning theories. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, Madison, WI.
12. Henri F. Computer conferencing and content analysis. In: Kaye A.R. (Ed). Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (1992), Springer, Berlin 117-136
13. Kirschner P., Strijbos J.W., Kreijns K., and Beers P.J. Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development 52 3 (2004) 47-66
14. Krippendorf K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (1980), Sage, Beverly Hills, USA
15. Lomi A., Larsen E.R., and Ginsberg A. Adaptive learning in organizations: a system-dynamics-based exploration. Journal of Management 23 (1997) 561-582
16. Marton F. Phenomenography - describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science 10 (1981) 177-200
17. Nieveen N. Prototyping to reach product quality. In: Van den Akker J., Branch R.M., Gustafson K., Nieveen N., and Plomp T. (Eds). Design approaches and tools in education and training (1999), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 125-135
18. Noldus L.P.J.J., Trienes R.J.H., Hendriksen A.H.M., Jansen H., and Jansen R.G. The Observer Video-Pro: new software for the collection, management, and presentation of time-structured data from videotapes and digital media files. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 32 (2000) 197-206
19. Nutt P.C. Why decisions fail (2002), Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco
20. Rotmans J. Methods for IA: the challenges and opportunities ahead. Challenges and opportunities for Integrated Assessment. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 3 3, Special Issue (1998) 155-179
21. Rourke L., and Anderson T. Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development 52 (2004) 5-18
22. Rourke L., Anderson T., Garrison D.R., and Archer W. Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12 (2001) 8-22
23. Strauss A.L. Qualitative analysis for social scientists (1987), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
24. Strijbos, J. W. (2004). The effect of roles on computer-supported collaborative learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
25. Strijbos J.W., Martens R.L., Prins F.J., and Jochems W.M.G. Content analysis: what are they talking about?. Computers & Education 46 (2006) 29-48
26. Suthers D.D. Towards a systematic study of representational guidance for collaborative learning discourse. Journal of Universal Computer Science 7 3 (2001-2001). http://www.jucs.org/jucs_7_3/towards_a_systematic_study Accessed 23.01.04
27. Van Bruggen, J. M. (2003). Explorations in graphical argumentation: The use of external representations in collaborative problem solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
28. Zhu, E. (1996 February). Meaning negotiation, knowledge construction, and mentoring in a distance learning course. Paper presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology.