Personal and shared experiences as resources for meaning making in a philosophy of science course

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 85-108

  Arvaja, Maarit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Contextual resources; Dialogicality; Intercontextuality; Intertextuality; Meaning making

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857996719     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-011-9137-5     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Akkerman, S. & van Eijck, M. (2011). Re-theorizing the student dialogically across and between boundaries of multiple communities. British Educational Research Journal.
2. Arvaja, M. (2011). Analyzing the contextual nature of collaborative activity. In S. Puntambekar, G. Erkens, & C. Hmelo-Silver (Eds.), Analyzing interactions in CSCL: Methods, approaches and issues, Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, Vol 12 (pp. 25-46). NY: Springer.
3. Baker, M. (2010). Approaches to understanding students' dialogues: articulating multiple modes of interpretation. Keynote speaker lecture in EARLI Sig 17 meeting on "Methodology in Research on Learning", Jena, Germany.
4. Bazerman, C. (2004). Intertextuality: How texts rely on other texts. In P. Prior & C. Bazerman (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices (pp. 83-96). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Black, L. (2007). Analysing cultural models in socio-cultural discourse analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(1-2), 20-30.
6. Bliss, J., & Säljö, R. (1999). The human-technological dialectic. In J. Bliss, R. Säljö, & P. Light (Eds.), Learning sites: Social and technological resources of learning (pp. 1-16). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
7. Castanheira, M. L., Green, J., Dixon, C., & Yeagerb, B. (2007). (Re)Formulating identities in the face of fluid modernity: An interactional ethnographic approach. International Journal of Educational Research, 46, 172-189.
8. Crook, C. (2000). Motivation and the ecology of collaborative learning. In R. Joiner, K. Littleton, D. Faulkner, & D. Miell (Eds.), Rethinking collaborative learning (pp. 161-178). London: Free Association Books.
9. Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 168-182.
10. Ellis, R., Goodyear, P., Prosser, M., & O'Hara, A. (2006). How and what university students learn through online and face-to-face discussions: conceptions, intentions and approaches. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 244-256.
11. Engle, R. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 451-498.
12. Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1981). When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. In J. Green & C. Wallat (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 147-160). Norwood: Ablex.
13. Floriani, A. (1993). Negotiating what counts: Roles and relationships, texts and contexts, content and meaning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 241-274.
14. Gee, J., & Green, J. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119-169.
15. Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489-1522.
16. Goodwin, C., & Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking context: an introduction. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as interactive phenomenon (pp. 1-42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Goodyear, P., & Zenios, M. (2007). Discussion, collaborative knowledge work and epistemic fluency. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(4), 351-368.
18. Grossen, M. (2009). Social interaction, discourse and learning. Methodological challenges of an emergent transdisciplinary field. In K. Kumpulainen, C. Hmelo-Silver, & M. César (Eds.), Investigating classroom interaction (pp. 263-276). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
19. Gudzial, M., & Carroll, K. (2002). Exploring the lack of dialogue in computer-supported collaborative learning. In G. Stahl (Ed.) Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. (pp. 418-424). Proceedings of the conference on computer-supported collaborative learning 2002, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
20. Hämäläinen, R. (2011). Using a game environment to foster collaborative learning: a design-based study. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(1), 61-78.
21. Heikkinen, R-L. & Laine, T. (1997). (Eds) Hoitava kohtaaminen. [Caring encounter] Helsinki: Kirjayhtymä.
22. Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. (2010). Productive use of resources in an online problem-based learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 84-99.
23. Kiikeri, M., & Ylikoski, P. (2004). Tiede tutkimuskohteena: Filosofinen johdatus tieteentutkimukseen. [Science as research object: philosophical introduction to science research]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
24. Kleine Staarman, J., Aarnoutse, C., & Verhoeven, L. (2003). Connecting discourses: Intertextuality in a primary school CSCL practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(8), 807-816.
25. Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue. Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26. Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense making. Charlotte: Information age publishing.
27. Linell, P. & Korolija, N. (1997). Coherence in multi-party conversation: Episodes and contexts in interaction. In T. Givón (ed.) Conversation: Cognitive, communicative and social perspectives (pp. 167-206). Typological studies in language 34. John Benjamins.
28. Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2011). Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 812-819.
29. Marton, F., Dall'alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 277-300.
30. Mercer, N. (2008). The seeds of time: Why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 33-59.
31. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking. A sociocultural approach. NY: Routledge.
32. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
33. Niiniluoto, I. (1984). Tiede, filosofia ja maailmankatsomus: Filosofisia esseitä tiedosta ja sen arvosta. [Science, philosophy and world view: philosophical essays about knowledge and its value]. Helsinki: Otava.
34. Nikander, P. (2008). Constructionism and discourse analysis. In J. Holstein & J. Gubrivm (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 413-428). NY: Guilford Press.
35. Paakkari, L., Tynjälä, P., & Kannas, L. (2011). Critical aspects of student teachers' conceptions of learning. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 705-714.
36. Raatikainen, P. (2004). Ihmistieteet ja filosofia. [Human sciences and philosophy]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
37. Sins, P. (2010). Integrating between perspectives and epistemologies: Analysing tensions in collaborative work. Workshop in EARLI Sig 17 meeting on "Methodology in Research on Learning", Jena, Germany.
38. Stahl, G. (2002). Rediscovering CSCL. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 169-181). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Stahl, G. (2004). Building collaborative knowing. Elements of a social theory of CSCL. In P. Dillenbourg (Series Ed.) & J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. L. Martens (Vol Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning, Vol 3. What we know about CSCL... and implementing it in higher education (pp. 53-85). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
40. Tee, M. Y., & Karney, D. (2010). Sharing and cultivating tacit knowledge in an online learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(4), 385-413.
41. Valsiner, J., & van der Veer, R. (2000). The social mind: Construction of the idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. van Oers, B., & Hännikäinen, M. (2001). Some thoughts about togetherness: an introduction. International Journal of Early Years Education, 9(2), 101-108.
43. Varto, J. (1992). Laadullisen tutkimuksen metodologia. [Methodology of qualitative research]. Helsinki: Kirjayhtymä.
44. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
45. Wells, G. (2007). Who we become depends on the company we keep and on what we do and say together. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(1-2), 100-103.
46. Wertsch, J. (1991). A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 85-100). Washington: American Psychological Association.
47. Zenios, M. (2011). Epistemic activities and collaborative learning: Towards an analytical model for studying knowledge construction in networked learning settings. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 259-268.
48. Zittoun, T. (2011). Sense-making through and across spheres of experiences. Paper presented in a Symposium "Learning in movement: conceptualizing in-between and across site learning" at the 14th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Exeter, Great Britain.