Bridging research and practice: Implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Hong Kong classrooms

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 147-186

  Chan, Carol K K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

CSCL pedagogy; Educational practice; Knowledge building; Knowledge forum; Learning technology; Teacher communities

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958271766     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-011-9121-0     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Arnseth, H. C., & Ludvigsen, S. (2006). Appropriating institutional contexts: Systemic versus dialogic research in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 167-185.
2. Barab, S. A., & Luehmann, A. L. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 2003(4), 454-467.
3. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
4. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2008). Toward research-based innovation. In Innovating to learn, learning to innovate (pp. 67-87). Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
5. Bielaczyc, K. (2006). Designing social infrastructure: Critical issues in creating learning environments with technology. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 301-329.
6. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environment for education (pp. 289-325). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
7. Chan, C. K. K. (2008). Pedagogical transformation and knowledge building for the Chinese learner. Evaluation and Research in Education, 21(3), 235-251.
8. Chan, C. K. K. & Chan, Y. Y. (2011). Student views of collaboration and online participation in Knowledge Forum. Computers & Education 57(1), 1445-1457.
9. Chan, C. K. K. & Fu, E. L. F. (2011 July). Principle-based design for collective growth: From knowledge-sharing to explanatory knowledge-building discourse. Conference proceeding paper presented at the International Conference of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Hong Kong.
10. Chan, C. K. K., & Lam, C. K. (2010 June). Conceptual change and epistemic growth through reflective assessment in computer-supported knowledge building. Conference proceeding paper presented at the International Conference of Learning Sciences, Chicago.
11. Chan, C. K. K., Law, N., & van Aalst, J. (2008 April). Developing principle-based understanding for knowledge building in a teacher community. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
12. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.
13. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813-834.
15. Dede, C. (2006). Evolving innovations beyond ideal settings to challenging contexts of practice. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 551-566). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Dede, C., & Honan, J. P. (2005). Scaling up success: A synthesis of themes and insights. In C. Dede, J. P. Honan, & L. C. Peters (Eds.), Lessons learned from technology-based educational innovation (pp. 227-239). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Dillenbourg, P. (2004). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61-91). Open Universiteit Nederland: Heerlen.
18. Dillenbourg, P., Jarvela, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning: From design to orchestration. Technology-Enhanced Learning, 1, 3-19.
19. Doyle, W. (1992). Curriculum and pedagogy. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 486-516). New York: Macmillan.
20. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Suntio, A. (2002). Can a school community learn to master its own future? An activity-theoretical study of expansive learning among middle school teachers. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.) Learning for life in the 21st century.
21. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. M. (Eds.). (2007). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives. New York: Springer.
22. Fishman, B., Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., & Krajcik, J. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43-76.
23. Goldman, S. (2005). Designing for scalable educational improvement: Processes of inquiry in practice. In C. Dede, J. P. Honan, & L. C. Peters (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational improvement (pp. 67-96). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Emergence of progressive-inquiry culture in computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning Environments Research, 6(2), 199-220.
25. Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 213-231.
26. Hakkinen, P., & Makitalo-Siegl, K. (2007). Educational perspectives in scripting CSCL. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 263-274). New York: Springer.
27. Hmelo-Silver, C., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42, 99-107.
28. Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., & Zhang, J. W. (2010). Knowledge Society Network: Toward a dynamic, sustained network for building knowledge. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36 (1).
29. Jones, C., Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Lindström, B. (2006). A relational, indirect, meso-level approach to CSCL design in the next decade. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 35-56.
30. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
31. Koschman, T., Hall, R., & Miyake, N. (2002). CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
32. Krange, I., & Ludvigsen, S. (2009). The historical and situated nature of design experiments-Implications for data analysis. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 25(3), 268-279.
33. Laferrière, T., & Law, N. (2010). Knowledge building international project (KBIP): A nested network of learning and knowledge creation. Conference proceeding paper presented at the International Conference of Learning Sciences, Chicago.
34. Laferrière, T., Erickson, G., & Breuleux, A. (2007). Innovative models of web-supported university-school partnerships. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(1), 211-238.
35. Lai, M., & Law, N. (2006). Peer scaffolding of knowledge building through collaborative groups with differential learning experiences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 123-144.
36. Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (Eds.). (2008). Pedagogy and ICT in schools around the world: Findings from the SITES 2006 study. Hong Kong: CERC.
37. Lee, E. Y. C., Chan, C. K. K., & van Aalst, J. (2006). Students assessing their own collaborative knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 277-307.
38. Lemke, J. L., & Sabelli, N. H. (2008). Complex systems and educational change: Towards a new research agenda. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 118-129.
39. Looi, C. K., So, H. J., Toh, Y., & Chen, W. (2011). The Singapore experience: Synergy of national policy, classroom practice and design research. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 9-38.
40. Means, B., & Penuel, W. R. (2005). Scaling up technology-based educational innovations. In C. Dede, J. P. Honan, & L. C. Peters (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational improvement (pp. 176-197). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557-576.
42. Rasmussen, I., & Ludvigsen, S. (2009). The hedgehog and the fox: A discussion on the approaches to the analysis of ICT reforms in teacher education of Larry Cuban and Yrjö Engeström. Mind, Culture and Activity, 16, 83-104.
43. Resnick, L. B. (2010). Nested learning systems for the thinking curriculum. Educational Researcher, 39(3), 183-197.
44. Roschelle, J., Tatar, D., Shechtman, N., & Knudsen, J. (2008). The role of scaling up research and designing for and evaluating robustness. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68, 149-170.
45. Sabelli, N., & Dede, C. (2000). Integrating educational research and practice: Reconceptualizing the goals and process of research to improve educational practice. Retrieved from http://www. virtual. gmu. edu/SS_research/cdpapers/policy. pdf.
46. Salomon, G. (Ed.). (1997). Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational consideration. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
47. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal Education in a Knowledge Society (pp. 67-98). Chicago: Open Court.
48. Scardamalia, M. (Ed.). (2010). Knowledge building [special issue]. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. 36 (1).
49. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265-283.
50. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-115). New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2006). Notes on the educational steeplechase: Hurdles and jumps in the development of research-based mathematics instruction. In Constas MA & Sternberg RJ (Eds.), Translating theory and research into educational practice (pp. 9-30). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
52. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and on the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
53. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: MIT.
54. Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. (2010). The CSCL field matures. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 1-3.
55. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409-426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington: Brookings.
57. van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 259-287.
58. van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2007). Student-directed assessment of knowledge building using electronic portfolios. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 175-220.
59. van Aalst, J., & Truong, M. S. (2010). Promoting knowledge-building discourse in an Asian primary five classrooms; Results from an inquiry into life cycles. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), 487-515.
60. Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.). (1996). The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences. Melbourne/Hong Kong: Australian Council for Educational Research/Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.
61. Wiske, M. S., & Perkins, D. (2005). Dewey goes digital: Scaling up constructivist pedagogies and the promise of new technologies. In C. Dede, J. P. Honan, & L. C. Peters (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-enhanced educational improvement (pp. 27-47). San Francisco: Jossey-Boss.
62. Zhang, J. (2010). Technology-supported learning innovation in cultural context. Educational Technology and Research Development, 58(2), 229-242.
63. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7-44.
64. Zhang, J., Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262-307.