Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-14

  Barab, Sasha ^a,c   Squire, Kurt ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1042302991     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abbott, A. (1992). What do cased do? Some notes on activity in sociological analysis. In C. C. Ragin & H. S. Becker (Eds.). What is a case? Exploring the foundation of social inquiry (pp. 53-82). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
2. Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of scientists: Issues related to the scientist apprentice camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 70-102.
3. Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M. G., & Keating, T. (2000). Virtual solar system project: Building understanding through model building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(1), 719-756.
4. Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2001). Constructing networks of activity: An in-situ research methodology. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 10(1&2), 63-112.
5. Barab, S. A., & Kirshner, D. (2001). Methodologies for capturing learner practices occurring as part of dynamic learning environments. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 70(1&2), 5-15.
6. Barab, S. A., & Landa, A. (1997). Designing effective interdisciplinary anchors. Educational Leadership, 54(6), 52-55.
7. Barab, S., MaKinster, J. G., Moore, J., Cunningham, D., & the ILF Design Team. (2001). Designing and building an online community: The struggle to support sociability in the Inquiry Learning Forum. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 71-96.
8. Barab,S.A., Thomas,M.K., Dodge,T., Carteaux,B., & Tuzun,H. (in press). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development.
9. Brown,A.L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
10. Cobb, P., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
11. Cobb, P., STephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 113-163.
12. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19, 2-10.
13. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15-22). New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. Collins, A. (1999). The changing infrastructure of education research. In E. C. Lagemann, & L. S. Shulman (Eds.) Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities, (pp. 289-298). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass Publishers.
15. Dewey, J. (1938). Logic, the theory of inquiry. New York: H. Holt and Co.
16. Geertz, C. (1976). From the native's point of view: On the nature of anthropological understanding. In K. Basso & H. A. Selby (Eds.), Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque, N.M: U. of New Mexico Press.
17. Geertz, C. (1983). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In R. M. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research: A collection of readings (pp. 37-59). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
18. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
19. Hoadley, C. P. (2002). Creating context: Design-based research in creating and understanding CSCL. Proceedings of Computer Support for Cooperative Learning, Boulder, CO.
20. Hull, D. L. (1975). Central subjects and historical narratives. History and Theory, 14, 253-274.
21. Isaac, L. W. (1997). Transforming localities: Reflections on time, causality, and narrative in contemporary historical sociology. Historical Methods, 50(1), 4-12.
22. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23. Linn, R. L. (1998). Partitioning responsibility for the evaluation of the consequences of assessment programs. Educational Measurement, 17, 28-30
24. Messick, S. (1992). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23.
25. Mink, L. O., Fay, B., Golob, E. O., & Vann, R. T. (1987). Historical Understanding. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
26. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). On paradigms and methods: What do you do when the ones you know don't do what you want them to? Issues in the analysis of data in the form of videotapes. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 2(2), 179-214.
27. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.