Technologies to "bridge the gap" among learning contexts in vocational training

Handbook of Research on Didactic Strategies and Technologies for Education: Incorporating Advancements

Volumn 1, Issue , 2012, Pages 247-265

  Motta, Elisa ^a   Boldrini, Elena ^a   Cattaneo, Alberto ^a  

^a Swiss Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (SFIVET)   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881553260     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2122-0.ch021     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Bain, J. D., Ballantyne, R., Mills, C., & Lester, N. C. (2002). Reflecting on practice: Student teachers' perspectives. Flaxton, Australia: Post Pressed.
2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
3. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307-337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
4. Billett, S. (2001). Learning through work: Workplace affordances and individual engagement. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13, 209-214. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005548
5. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
6. Chambel, T., Zahn, C., & Finke, M. (2004). Hypervideo design and support for contextualized learning. Paper presented at the ICALT '04 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Washington.
7. Collins, A. (1992). Towards a design science of education. In Scanlon, E., & O'Shea, T. (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15-22). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-77750-9_2
8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. doi:10.2307/249008
9. DBRC. (2003). Design based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8. doi:10.3102/0013189X032001005
10. Dillenbourg, P., Bétrancourt, M., Gurtner, J.-L., Jermann, P., Schneider, D. K., & Cattaneo, A. (2008). The dual-t leading house. Proposal for leading house phase II. Document submitted to the Swiss Federal Office for Professional Education and Technology. Lausanne
11. Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. From design to orchestration. In Balacheff, N., Ludvigsen, S., Jong, T., Lazonder, A., & Barnes, S. (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 3-19). Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_1
12. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In Fischer, F., Mandl, H., Haake, J., & Kollar, I. (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning - Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives (pp. 275-301). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-36949-5_16
13. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2010). Technology for classroom orchestration. In M. S. Khine, & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning (pp. 525-552). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.
14. Eraut, M. (2004). Transfer of knowledge between education and workplace settings. In Rainbird, H., Fuller, A., & Munro, A. (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 201-221). London, UK: Routledge.
15. Eteläpelto, A. (2008). Perspectives, prospects and progress in work-related learning. In Billett, S., Harteis, C., & Eteläpelto, A. (Eds.), Emerging perspectives of workplace learning (pp. 233-247). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
16. Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The dynamics of composing: making plans and juggling constraints. In Gregg, L. W., & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Frey, M. (2010). Il y a encore des lieux de formation qui ne collaborent pas bien. Folio, 5, 5-7.
18. Gavota, M., Cattaneo, A., Arn, C., Boldrini, E., Motta, E., Schneider, D. K., & Bétrancour, M. (2010). Computer-supported peer commenting: a promising instructional method to promote skill development in vocational education. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 62(4), 495-511. doi:10.1080/13636820.2010.529499
19. Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1), 1-51.
20. Gurtner, J.-L., Gulfi, A., Genoud, P. A., De Rocha, B., & Schumacher, J. (2009). Learning in multiple contexts: Intra and transcontextual effects on the evolution of the learner's motivation. Paper presented at the EARLI 2009 Fostering Communities of Learners Conference, Amsterdam.
21. Gurtner, J.-L., Monnard, I., & Genoud, P. A. (2001). Towards a multilayer model of context and its impact on motivation. In Volet, S., & Järvelä, S. (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical and methodological implications (pp. 189-208). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pergamon.
22. Heinemann, L., & Rauner, F. (2008). Identität und Engagement: Konstruktion eines Instruments zur Beschreibung der Entwicklung beruflichen Engagements und beruflicher Identität. Bremen, Germany: IBB.
23. Horn, I. S., Nolen, S. B., Ward, C., & Campbell, S. S. (2008). Developing practices in multiple worlds: The role of identity in learning to teach. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(3), 61-72.
24. Iiskala, T., Vauras, P., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. (2011). Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 379-393. doi:10.1016/j.learn-instruc.2010.05.002
25. Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., Jones, A., Yuen Loke, A., McKay, J., & Sinclair, K. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 381-395. doi:10.1080/713611442
26. Landwehr, N. (2002). Der dritte Lernort im Spannungsfeld von schulischem und betrieblichem Lernen. In W. Goetze, P. Gonon, A. Gresele, S. Kübler, H. Landolt, N. Landwehr, et al. (Eds.), Der dritte Lernort. Bildung für die Praxis, Praxis für die Bildung. Bern, Switzerland: hep Verlag.
27. Landwehr, N. (2004). Berufsbildung im gesundheitswesen. Der dritte Lernort. Journal dossier.
28. Leuf, B., & Cunningham, W. (2001). The Wiki way: Quick collaboration on the Web. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
29. Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511816819
30. McFarland, D., & Hamilton, D. (2006). Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 427-447. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.09.009
31. OFS. (2009). Niveau de Formation de la Population Résidante, 2008. Office fédéral de la statistique, Neuchâtel. Retrieved from http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/fr/index/themen/15/01/key/blank/01.html
32. Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2008). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296. doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205
33. Trentin, G. (2003). Dalla formazione a distanza all'apprendimento in rete. Milano, Italy: Franco Angeli.
34. Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review, 3, 130-154. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.12.001
35. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. doi:10.1287/ mnsc.46.2.186.11926
36. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
37. Vermersch, P. (1994). L'entretien d'explicitation. Paris, France: PUF.
38. Volet, S., & Järvelä, S. (Eds.). (2001). Motivation in learning contexts. Theoretical advances and methodological implications. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pergamon.
39. Volet, S., Vauras, M., & Salonen, P. (2009). Self-and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 215-226. doi:10.1080/00461520903213584
40. Zahn, C., Barquero, B., & Schwan, S. (2004). Learning with hyperlinked videos - Design criteria and efficient strategies for using audiovisual hypermedia. Learning and Instruction, 14, 275-291. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.004