Contextual perspective in analysing collaborative knowledge construction of two small groups in web-based discussion

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 2, Issue 2-3, 2007, Pages 133-158

  Arvaja, Maarit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Collaborative knowledge construction; Computer supported collaborative learning; Context; Higher education; Socio cultural learning theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 34748899511     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-007-9013-5     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Arvaja, M., Salovaara, H., Häkkinen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2007). Combining individual and group-level perspectives for studying collaborative knowledge construction in context. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 448-459.
2. Bliss, J., & Säljö, R. (1999). The human-technological dialectic. In J. Bliss, R. Säljö, & P. Light (Eds.), Learning sites: Social and technological resources of learning (pp. 1-16). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
3. Buttny, R. (1998). Putting prior talk into context: Reported speech and the reporting context. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31(1), 45-58.
4. Chen, F. C., Lee, Y. W., Chu, H. J., Wang, H. R., & Jiang, H. M. (2005). Effective discussions, social talks and learning-A paradox on learning in discussion forums. In T. Koschmann, D. D. Suthers, & T-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL 2005. Computer support for collaborative learning: The Next 10 Years! (pp. 33-42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Crook, C. (1999). Computers in the community of classrooms. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers. Analysing productive interaction (pp. 102-117). London: Routledge.
6. Crook, C., & Light, P. (1999). Information technology and the culture of student learning. In J. Bliss, R. Säljö, & P. Light (Eds), Learning sites: Social and technological resources of learning (pp. 183-193). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
7. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (pp. 61-91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
8. Dillenbourg, P., & Tchounikine, P. (2007). Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(1), 1-13.
9. Fischer, F., Bruhn, C., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 213-232.
10. Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489-1522.
11. Goodwin, C., & Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds), Rethinking context: Language as interactive phenomenon (pp.1-42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 437-469.
13. Hicks, D. (1996). Contextual inquiries: A discourse-oriented study of classroom activity. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning and schooling (pp. 104-141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Hmelo-Silver, C. (2003). Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: Multiple methods for integrated understanding. Computers & Education, 41(4), 397-420.
15. Hämäläinen, R., Manninen, T., Järvelä, S., & Häkkinen, P. (2006). Learning to collaborate: Designing collaboration in a 3-D game environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(1), 47-61.
16. Kumpulainen, K., & Mutanen, M. (1999). The situated dynamics of peer group interaction: An introduction to an analytic framework. Learning and Instruction, 9(5), 449-473.
17. Linehan, C., & McCarthy, J. (2001). Reviewing the "Community of practice" metaphor: An analysis of control relations in a primary classroom. Mind, Culture and Activity, 8(2), 129-147.
18. Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue. Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students' computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 487-509.
20. Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6(4), 359-377.
21. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
22. Puntambekar, S. (2006). Analyzing collaborative interactions: Divergence, shared understanding and construction of knowledge. Computers & Education, 47, 332-351.
23. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8-22.
24. Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools. A sociocultural perspective on the human-technology link. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers. Analysing productive interaction (pp. 144-161). London: Routledge.
25. Schrire, S. (2006). Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers & Education, 46, 49-70.
26. Stahl, G. (2002). Rediscovering CSCL. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 169-181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Stahl, G. (2004). Building collaborative knowing. Elements of a social theory of CSCL. In P. Dillenbourg (Series Ed.) & J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner & R. L. Martens (Vol Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning, Vol 3. What we know about CSCL. and implementing it in higher education (pp. 53-85). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
28. Stahl, G. (2006). Scripting group cognition: The problem of guiding situated collaboration. In F. Fischer, H. Kollar, I. Mandl, & J. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp.327-335). New York: Springer.
29. Valleala, U. M. (2006). Yhteinen ymmärtäminen koulutuksessa ja työssä. Kontekstin ymmärtäminen opiskelijaryhmän ja työtiimin keskusteluissa. [Shared understanding in education and work. Context of understanding in student group and work team discussions]. Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social research 280. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
30. Van Boxtel, C. Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 311-330.
31. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1-30.
34. Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46, 71-95.
35. Wertsch, J. (1991). A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 85-100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.