Using interactive whiteboards to orchestrate classroom dialogue

Technology, Pedagogy and Education

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 195-209

  Mercer, Neil ^a   Hennessy, Sara ^a   Warwick, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dialogue; Ict pedagogy; Interactivity; Iwb

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954439856     PISSN: 1475939X     EISSN: 17475139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2010.491230     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alexander, R.J. (2004). Towards dialogic teaching. Rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge: Dialogos UK.
2. Beauchamp, G., & Parkinson, J. (2005). Beyond the 'wow' factor: Developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard. School Science Review, 86(316), 97-103.
3. Becta. (2003). What the research says about interactive whiteboards. Coventry: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency.
4. Brown, A., & Palincsar, A.S. (1989). Guided, co-operative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction (pp. 81-103). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Cardellichio, T., & Field, W. (1997). Seven strategies that encourage neural branching. Educational Leadership, 54(6), 33-36.
6. Crook, C.K. (2007). Learning science and learning technology: A place for cultural psychology. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series, II(5), 1-17.
7. Cutrim Schmid, E. (2010). Developing competencies for using the interactive whiteboard to implement communicative language teaching in the English as a Foreign Language class- room. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19, 159-172.
8. Dawes, L. (2001). What stops teachers using new technology? In M. Leask (Ed.), Issues in teaching using ICT (pp. 61-79). London: Routledge.
9. Dawes, L., Mercer, N., & Wegerif, R. (2004). Thinking Together: A programme of activities for developing speaking, listening and thinking skills for children aged 8-11. Birmingham, UK: Imaginative Minds.
10. Gillen, J., Kleine Staarman, J., Littleton, K., Mercer, N., & Twiner, A. (2007). A 'learning revolution'? Investigating pedagogic practice around interactive whiteboards in British primary schools. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 243-256.
11. Hennessy, S. In Preparation. The role of digital artefacts on the IWB in mediating dialogic teaching and learning.
12. Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2009). 'Intermediate theory' building: Integrating multiple teacher and researcher perspectives through in-depth video analysis of pedagogic strategies. Teachers College Record, 111(7), 1753-1795.
13. Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 283-301.
14. Hennessy, S., Warwick, P., & Mercer, N. In Press. A dialogic inquiry approach to working with teachers in developing classroom dialogue. Teachers College Record.
15. Higgins, S., Falzon, C., Hall, I., Moseley, D., Smith, F., Smith, H., et al. (2005). Embedding ICT in the literacy and numeracy strategies. Final report. Newcastle, UK: Centre for Learning and Teaching, School of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
16. Kennewell, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2007). The feature of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 227-241.
17. Kim, I., Anderson, R.C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., & Archodidou, A. (2007). Discourse patterns during children's collaborative online discussions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 333-370.
18. Kitchen, S., Mackenzie, H., Butt, S., & Finch, S. (2006). Evaluation of Curriculum Online report of the third survey of schools. London: National Centre for Social Research.
19. Lankshear, C. (1997). Changing literacies. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
20. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
21. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and development of children's thinking. London: Routledge.
22. Miller, D., Glover, D., & Averis, D. (2005, September). Developing pedagogic skills for the use of the interactive whiteboard in mathematics. Paper presented at British Educational Research Association conference, University of Glamorgan, UK.
23. Mohon, E.H. (2008). SMART moves? A case-study of one teacher's pedagogical change through use of the interactive whiteboard. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(4), 301-312.
24. Mortimer, E.F., & Scott, P.H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
25. Moss, G., Jewitt, C., Levacic, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini, A., Castle, F. et al. (2007). The interactive whiteboards, pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation: An evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard Expansion (SWE) project: London Challenge. No. RR816. London: Department for Education and Skills.
26. Owen, W. (1984). The complete poems and fragments. London: W.W. Norton.
27. Rojas-Drummond, S., & Mercer, N. (2004). Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1-2), 99-111.
28. Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools: A sociocultural perspective on the human-technology link. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with Computers: Analysing productive interaction (pp. 144-161). London: Routledge.
29. Smardon, D., & Bewley, S. (2007, September). What students say about their learning - How can this improve learning? Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association annual conference, Institute of Education, University of London, UK.
30. Smith, F., Hardman, F., & Higgins, S. (2006). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the national literacy and numeracy strategies. British Educa tional Research Journal, 32(3), 443-457.
31. Smith, H.J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91-101.
32. Somekh, B., Haldane, M., Jones, K., Lewin, C., Steadman, S., Scrimshaw, P., et al. (2007). valuation of the Primary Schools Whiteboard Expansion Project (SWEEP): Report to the Department for Education and Skills. London: Becta.
33. Warwick, P., Hennessy, S., & Mercer, N. In Preparation. Developing interactive whiteboard use in a 'dialogic classroom': Extending classroom practice and school development through co-enquiry.
34. Warwick, P., Mercer, N., Kershner, R., & Kleine Staarman, J. (2010). In the mind and in the technology: The vicarious presence of the teacher in pupils' learning of science in collaborative group activity at the interactive whiteboard. Computers and Education, 55(2), 350-362.
35. Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic, education and technology: Expanding the space of learning. New York: Springer.
36. Wells, G., & Ball, T. (2008). Exploratory talk and guided inquiry. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school (pp. 167-184). London: Sage.
37. Wertsch, J.V., Tulviste, P., & Hagstrom, F. (1993). A sociocultural approach to agency. In E.A. Forman, N. Minick, & C.A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 336-356). New York: Oxford University Press.