4SPPIces: A case study of factors in a scripted collaborative-learning blended course across spatial locations

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 443-465

  Pérez Sanagustín, Mar ^a   Santos, Patricia ^a   Hernández Leo, Davinia ^a   Blat, Josep ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Case study; Computer supported collaborative learning script; Educational spaces; Mobile learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865577594     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-011-9139-3     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Adams, A., Lunt, P., & Cairns, P. (2008). A qualitative approach to HCI research. In P. Cairns & A. L. Cox (Eds.), Research methods for human-computer interaction (pp. 138-157). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Carrol, J. M. (2000). Five reasons for scenario-based design. Interacting with Computers, 13, 43-60.
3. Catalan High School Curriculum - Decret 142/2008. Web: http://www. gencat. cat/diari/5183/08190087. htm. Accessed 20 November 2011.
4. Ciolfi, L. (2004). Understanding spaces as places: Extending interaction design paradigms. Cognition, Technology & Work, 6(1), 37-40.
5. de-la-Fuente-Valentín, L., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Santos, P., Henández-Leo, D., Pardo, A, Blat, J., & Delgado-Kloos, C. System orchestration support for a flow of blended collaborative activities. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCOS 2010), 415-420. Thessaloniki, Greece.
6. Dillenbourg, P., & Fischer, F. (2007). Basics of computer-supported collaborative learning. Zeitschrift Für Berufs- Und Wirtschaftspadagogik, 21, 111-130.
7. Dillenbourg, P., & Hong, F. (2008). The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 5-23.
8. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, J. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In P. Dillenbourg, & P. Jermann (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning. Cognitive, Computational and Educational Perspectives (pp. 275-301). US: Springer.
9. Dillenbourg, P., & Tchounikine, P. (2007). Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(1), 1-13.
10. Dimitriadis, Y., Asensio, J. I., Martínez, A., & Osuna, C. (2003). Component based software engineering and CSCL: Component identification and dimensioning. Upgrade. Digital Journal of European Professional Informatics Societies, Special Issue on e-Learning: Boarderless Education, 4(5), 21-28.
11. Dougiamas, M., & Taylor, P. (2003). Moodle: Using learning communities to create an open source course management system. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (ED-MEDIA 2003) (pp. 171-178). Chesapeake, VA.
12. Facer, K., Joiner, R., Stanton, D., Reid, J., Hull, R., & Kirk, D. (2004). Savannah: Mobile gaming and learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(6), 399-409.
13. Frechtling, J., & Sharp, L. (Eds.) (1997). In J. Frechtling, & L. Sharp (Eds.), User-friendly handbook for mixed method evaluations. US: Directorate for Education and Human Resources Division of Research, Evaluation and Communication NSF.
14. Gahan, C., & Hannibal, M. (Eds.). (1998). Doing qualitative research using QSR NUD* IST. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
15. Gee, J. (2005). Semiotic social spaces and affinity spaces. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond communities of practice: Language power and social context (pp. 214-232). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Google Spreadsheets. Web: http://www. google. com/google-d-s/spreadsheets/. Accessed 19 January 2012.
17. Gregory, J. (2003). Scandinavian approaches to participatory design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(1), 62-74.
18. Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 29(2), 75-91.
19. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 163-194). New Delhi: Sage Publications, Inc.
20. Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., & Villasclaras, E. D. (2010). Pattern languages for generating CSCL scripts: From a conceptual model to the design of a real situation. In P. Goodyear & S. Retalis (Eds.), E-learning, design patterns and pattern languages (pp. 49-64). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
21. Hernández-Leo, D., Villasclaras-Fernández, E. D., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., Ruiz-Requies, I., & Rubia-Avi, B. (2006). Collage, a Collaborative Learning Design Editor Based on Patterns. Educational, Techology & Society, 9(1), 58-71.
22. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133.
23. Kensing, F., & Blomberg, J. (1998). Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 7(3-4), 167-185.
24. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2005). Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers. London: Routledge.
25. Kurti, A., Spikol, D., & Milrad, M. (2008). Bridging outdoors and indoors educational activities in schools with the support of mobile and positioning technologies. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 2(2), 166-186.
26. Larusson, J., & Alterman, R. (2009). Wikis to support the "collaborative" part of collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(4), 371-402.
27. Lim, K. Y. T. (2006). Pictures in place. Adolescent usage of multimedia messaging in the negotiation, construction and sharing of meaning about local environments. Thousand Oaks: Dissertation. com.
28. Martínez-Monés, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia Avi, B., Gómez Sánchez, E., & de la Fuente Redondo, P. (2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers in Education, 41(4), 353-368.
29. Maxwell, J. A., & Loomis, D. M. (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 241-272). US: Sage Publications.
30. Merriënboer, J. J. G., Clark, R. E., & De Croock, M. B. M. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 39-61.
31. Muller, M. J. & Kuhn, S. (1993). Participatory design. Communications of the ACM - Special issue on graphical user interfaces: The next generation, 36(6), 24-28.
32. Oblinger, D. G. (2005). Leading the transition from classrooms to learning spaces. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 28(1), 14-18.
33. Oblinger, D. G. (2006). Space as a change agent. In D. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces (pp. 1-4). EDUCAUSE. Web: http://www. educause. edu/learningspaces. Accessed 20 November 2011.
34. Park, J., Parsons, D., & Ryu, H. (2010). To flow and not to freeze: Applying flow experience to mobile learning. Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(1), 56-67.
35. Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Nieves, R., Hernández-Leo, D., & Blat, J. (2010). Representing the spaces when planning learning flows. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2010), 276-291. Barcelona, Spain.
36. Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Ramirez-Gonzalez, G., Hernández-Leo, D, Muñoz-Organero, M., Santos, P., Blat, J., & Delgado Kloos C. (2012). Discovering the campus together: A mobile and computer-based learning experience. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(1), 176-188.
37. Roschelle, J. (2003). Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 260-272.
38. Roschelle, J., Rafanan, K., Estrella, G., Nussbaum, M., & Claro, S. (2010). From handheld collaborative tool to effective classroom module: Embedding CSCL in a broader design framework. Computers in Education, 55(3), 1018-1026.
39. Rowley, J. (2002). Using case studies in research. Management Research News, 25(1), 16-27.
40. Ruchter, M., Klar, B., & Geiger, W. (2009). Comparing the effects of mobile computers and traditional approaches in environmental education. Computers in Education, 54(4), 1054-1067.
41. Santos, P., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Hernández-Leo, D., & Blat, J. (2011). QuesTInSitu: From tests to routes for assessment in situ. Computers in Education, 57(4), 2517-2534.
42. Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (Eds.). (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
43. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G., Bachmair, B. (2010). A theory of learning for the mobile age. Learning through conversation and exploration across contexts. In Ben Machmair (Ed.) Medienbildung in neuen Kulturräumen (pp. 87-99). Verlag: Springer 2010.
44. Spikol, D., & Milrad, M. (2008). Combining physical activities and mobile games to promote novel learning practices. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (WMUTE 2008), (pp. 31-38). Beijing, China.
45. Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 79-90.
46. Stake, R. E. (Ed.). (1998). The art of case study research. US/London/New Delhi: Sage Publications.
47. Stenton, S. P. (2007). Mediascapes: Context-aware multimedia experiences. IEEE Multimedia, 14(3), 98-105.
48. Tchounikine, P. (2008). Operationalizing macro-scripts in CSCL technological settings. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 193-233.
49. Weinberger, A., Kollar, I., Dimitriadis, Y., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., & Fischer, F. (2009). Computer-supported collaboration scripts. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 155-173). The Netherlands: Springer.
50. Zelkowitz, M., & Wallace, D. (1998). Experimental models for validating technology. Computer, 31(5), 23-31.