Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science

Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Supplement

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 3-54

  Subotnik, Rena F ^a   Olszewski Kubilius, Paula ^b   Worrell, Frank C ^c  

^a AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857490717     PISSN: 15291006     EISSN: 15396053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1529100611418056     Document Type: Article

References (454)

1. About ISE (n.d.). International Society of Extremophiles. Retreived from http://extremophiles.org/index.php/page/About-ISE-2010 -10-29
2. A chorus of disapproval. (2010, September 30). The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/17155766
3. Adams, C. M., & Pierce, R. L. (2008). Science, elementary. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 563-577). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
4. Adelson, J. L., McCoach, D. B., & Gavin, M. K. (2011). Examining the effects of gifted programming in mathematics and reading using the ECLS-K. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5. Albert, R. S. (1969). Genius: Present-day status of the concept and its implications for the study of creativity and giftedness. American Psychologist, 24, 743-753. doi:10.1037/h0027996
6. Albert, R.S. (1978). Observation and suggestions regarding gifted-ness, familial influence and the achievement of eminence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 201-211.
7. Albert, R. S. (1994). The contribution of early family history to the achievement of eminence. Talent development. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Proceedings from the 1993 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 311-360). Dayton: Ohio Psychology Press.
8. Alexander, J. M., & Schnick, A. K. (2008). Motivation. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 423-448). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
9. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
10. Argys, L. M., Rees, D. I., & Brewer, D. J. (1996). Detracking America's schools: Equity at zero cost? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15, 623-645. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199623)15:4<623::AID-PAM7>3.0.CO;2-J
11. Arnold, K. D. (1993). Undergraduate aspirations and career outcomes of academically talented women: A discriminant analysis. Roeper Review, 15, 169-175. doi:10.1080/02783199309553495
12. Arnold, K. D. (1995). Lives of promise. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13. Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113-125. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1491
14. Aronson, J., & Juarez, L. (in press). Growth mindsets in the laboratory and the real world. In R. F. Subotnik, A. Robinson, C. M. Callahan, & P. Johnson (Eds.), Malleable minds: Translating insights from psychology and neuroscience to gifted education. Storrs, CT: National Center for Research on Giftedness and Talent.
15. Aronson, J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Stereotypes and the fragility of academic competence, motivation, and self-concept. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 436-456). New York, NY: Guilford.
16. Aud, S., Fox, M., & KewalRamani, A. (2010). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups (NCES 2010-015). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
17. Augustine, N. R. (Chair). (2005). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
18. Augustine, N. R. (Chair). (2007). Is America falling off the flat earth? Rising Above the Gathering Storm Committee. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
19. Austin, J. H. (1978). Chase, chance, and creativity: The lucky art of novelty. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
20. Badian, N. A. (2001). Phonological and orthographic processing: Their roles in reading prediction. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 179-202. doi:10.1007/s11881-001-0010-5
21. Baldwin, A. Y. (1985). Programs for the gifted and talented: Issues concerning minority populations. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 223-249). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
23. Barnett, L. B., & Durden, W. G. (1993). Education patterns of academically talented youth. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 161-168. doi:10.1177/001698629303700405
24. Baum, S. M., Renzulli, J. S., & Hebert, T. P. (1999). Reversing underachievement: Creative productivity as a system-atic intervention. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 224-235. doi:10.1177/001698629503900406
25. Beilock, S. (2010). Choke: What the secrets of the brain reveal about getting it right when you have to. New York, NY: Free Press.
26. Benbow, C. P. (1990). Long-term effects of acceleration on the social-emotional adjustment of mathematically precocious youths. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 464-470. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.464
27. Benbow, C. P. (1992). Academic achievement in mathematics and science of students between the ages of 13 and 23: Are there differences among students in the top one percent of mathematics ability? Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 51-61. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.51
28. Benbow, C. P., & Arjmand, O. (1990). Predictors of high academic achievement in mathematics and science by mathematically talented students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 430-441. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.430
29. Benbow, C. P., Arjmand, O., & Walberg, H. J. (1991). Educational productivity predictors among mathematically talented students. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 215-223.
30. Bloom, B. J. (Ed.). (1985a). Developing talent in young people. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
31. Bloom, B. J. (1985b). Generalizations about talent development. In B. J. Bloom (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 507-549). New York, NY: Ballantine.
32. Bloom, B. S. (1982a). The master teachers. Phi Delta Kappan, 63, 664-668, 715.
33. Bloom, B. S. (1982b). The role of gifts and markers in the development of talent. Exceptional Children, 48, 510-522.
34. Bloom, B. S., & Sosniak, L. A. (1981). Talent development vs. schooling. Educational Leadership, 39, 86-94.
35. Boe, E. E., & Shin, S. (2005). Is the United States really losing the international horse race in academic achievement? Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 688-695.
36. Borland, J. H. (2005). Gifted children without gifted education. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 1-19). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
37. Braun, H. J. (1997). Advanced weaponry of the stars. Invention & Technology, 12, 4-10.
38. Brody, L. E. (2006, September 26). Measuring the effectiveness of STEM talented initiatives for middle and high school students. Paper prepared for Identifying and Developing STEM Talent: A Planning Meeting. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences.
39. Brody, L. E., Muratori, M. C., & Stanley, J. C. (2004). Early entrance to college. Academic, social and emotional considerations. In N. Colangelo, S. Assouline, & M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students (pp. 97-108). Iowa City, IA: The Belin Blank Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
40. Brody, N. (1997). Intelligence, schooling, and society. American Psychologist, 52, 1046-1050. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.10.1046
41. Brokaw, T. (2002). A long way from home: Growing up in the American heartland in the forties and fifties. New York, NY: Random House.
42. Bruner, M. W., Munroe-Chandler, K. J., & Spink, K. S. (2008). Entry into elite sport: A preliminary investigation into the transition experiences of rookie athletes. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 20, 236-252. doi:10.1080/10413200701867745
43. Burton, D., & Raedeke, T. D. (2008). Sports psychology for coaches. Campaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
44. Buschkuehl, M., Jaeggi, S. M., Shah, P., & Jonides, J. (in press). Working memory and transfer. In R. F. Subotnik, A. Robinson, C. M. Callahan, & P. Johnson (Eds.), Malleable minds: Translating insights from psychology and neuroscience to gifted education. Storrs, CT: National Center for Research on Giftedness and Talent.
45. Busse, T. V., & Mansfield, R. S. (1984). Selected personality traits and achievements in male scientists. Journal of Personality, 11 6, 117-131.
46. Callahan, C. M. (Ed.). (2004). Program evaluation in gifted education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
47. Callahan, C. M. (2006). Developing a plan for evaluating a program in gifted education. In J. H. Purcell & R. D. Eckert (Eds.), Designing services and programs for high ability learners: A guidebook for gifted education (pp. 195-206). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
48. Callard-Szulgit, R. (2003). Perfectionism and gifted children. Lan-ham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
49. Canadian Sport for Life. (n.d.). Long-Term Athlete Development, Appendix 1: Physical, Mental and Cognitive, and Emotional Development Characteristics. Retrieved from http://canadians-portforlife.ca/sites/default/files/resources/LTAD%20Appen-dix%201.pdf
50. Ceci, S. J., & Papierno, P. B. (2005). The rhetoric and reality of gap closing: When the "have-nots" gain but he "haves" gain even more. American Psychologist, 60, 149-160. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.149
51. Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (1997). Schooling, intelligence, and income. American Psychologist, 52, 1051-1058. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.10.1051
52. Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2010). The mathematics of sex: How biology and society conspire to limit talented women and girls. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
53. Chubarikove, V. N., & Pyryt, M. (1993). Educating mathematically gifted pupils at the Komogorov School. Gifted Education International, 9, 110-130.
54. Clotfelter, C., Ladd, H., & Vigdor, J. (2007). The academic achievement gap in Grades 3-9(NBER Working Paper No. 12207). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
55. Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (Eds.). (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students (Vols. 1-2; The Templeton National Report on Acceleration). West Conshohocken, PA: John Templeton Foundation.
56. Coleman, L. J. (1995). The power of specialized environments in the development of giftedness: The need for research on social context. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 171-176. doi:10.1177/001698629503900307
57. Coleman, L. J. (2005). Nurturing talent in high school: Life in the fast lane. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
58. Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L., (2005). Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance, and teaching (2nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press, Inc.
59. Collins, M. F., & Buller J. R. (2003). Social exclusion from high-performance sport: Are all talented young sports people being given an equal opportunity of reaching the Olympic podium? Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 27, 420-442. doi:10.1177/ 0193732503255483
60. Columbo, J., Shaddy, D. J., Blaga, O. M., Anderson, C. J., & Kan-nass, K. N. (2009). High cognitive ability in infancy and early childhood. In F. D. Horowitz, R. F. Subotnik, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent across the life span (pp. 23-42). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
61. Colvin, G. (2008). Talent is overrated: What really separates world-class performers from everybody else. New York, NY: Penguin.
62. Cormier, P., & Dea, S. (1997). Distinctive patterns of relationship of phonological awareness and working memory with reading development. Reading and Writing, 9, 193-206. doi:10.1023/A:1007932721290
63. Cote, J. (1999). The influence of the family in the development of talent in sport. The Sport Psychologist, 13, 395-417.
64. Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted and the National Association for Gifted Children. (2009). State of the states in gifted education: National policy and practice data 2008-2009. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
65. Covington, M. V. (1984). The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: Findings and implications. The Elementary School Journal, 85, 5-20. doi:10.1086/461388
66. Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
67. Covington, M. V., & Dray, E. (2002). The developmental course of achievement motivation: A need-based approach. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 33-56). San Francisco, CA: Elsevier Science.
68. Cox, C. M. (1926). Genetic studies of genius: The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
69. Coyle, D. (2009). The talent code: Greatness isn't born. It' grown. Here's how. New York, NY: Bantam Dell.
70. Cramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D., & Zuo, L. (2005). A report on the 40-year follow-up of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Alive and well in the new millennium. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 283-291. doi:10.1177/001698620504900402
71. Cross, T. L. (2011). On the social and emotional lives of gifted children (4th ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
72. Cross, T. L., Adams, C., Dixon, F., & Holland, J. (2004). Psychological characteristics of academically gifted adolescents attending a residential academy: A longitudinal study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 159-181.
73. Cross, T. L., Cassady, J. C., Dixon, F. A., & Adams, C. M. (2008). The psychology of gifted adolescents as measured by the MMPI-A. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 326-339. doi:10.1177/0016986208321810
74. Cross, T. L., & Coleman, L. J. (2005). School-based conception of giftedness. In R.J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 52-63). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
75. Cross, T. L., & Cross, J. R. (2010). Moving the field of gifted studies toward increasingly sophisticated approaches to research:An homage to Michael Pyryt. In B. Thompson & R. F. Subot-nik (Eds.), Methodologies for conducting research on gifted-ness (pp. 229-239). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
76. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1985). Emergent motivation and the evolution of self: Motivation in adulthood. In D. Kleiber & M. H. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 4, pp. 93-119). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
77. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325-339). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
78. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
79. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self: Psychology for the Third Millenium. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
80. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K. R., Whalen, S., & Wong, M. (1997). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
81. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Wolfe, R. (2000). New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 81-94). New York, NY: Elsevier.
82. Cullen, M. J., Waters, S. D., & Sackett, P. R. (2006). Testing stereotype threat theory predictions for math-identified and non-math-identified students by gender. Human Performance, 19, 421-440. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1904_6
83. Cumming, G. (2010). P values vs. confidence intervals as warrants for conclusions that results will replicate. In B. Thompson & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Methodologies for conducting research on gift-edness (pp. 53-69). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12079-003
84. Curby, T. W., Rudasill, K. M., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Konold, T. R. (2008). The role of social competence in predicting gifted enrollment. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 729-744. doi:10.1002/ pits.20338
85. Dai, D. Y. (2010). The nature and nurture of giftedness: A new framework for understanding gifted education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
86. Dai, D. Y., & Coleman, L. J. (2005a). Introduction to the special issue on nature, nurture and the development of exceptional competence. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 254-269.
87. Dai, D. Y., & Coleman, L. J. (Eds.). (2005b). Nature, nurture and the development of exceptional competence [Special issue]. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(3/4).
88. Dai, D. Y., Moon, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). Achievement motivation and gifted students: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 45-63. doi:10.1207/ s15326985ep3302&3_1
89. Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). Inequality and access to knowledge. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 465-583). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
90. Davidson, J. E. (2009). Contemporary models of giftedness. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.) International handbook on giftedness (pp. 81-97). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
91. Deary, I. J., Whalley, L. J., & Starr, J. M. (2009). A lifetime of intelligence: Follow-up studies of the Scottish mental surveys of 1932 and 1947. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
92. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268. doi:10.1207/ S15327965PLI1104_01
93. Delisle, J., & Galbraith, J. (2002). When gifted kids don't have all the answers: How to meet their social and emotional needs. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.
94. Diamond, A. (in press). How I came full circle from the social end of psychology to neuroscience and back again in an effort to understand the development of cognitive control. In R. F. Subotnik, A. Robinson, C. M. Callahan, & P. Johnson (Eds.), Malleable minds, Translating insights from psychology and neuroscience to gifted education. Storrs, CT: National Center for Research on Gifted-ness and Talent.
95. Donoghue, E. F., Karp, A., & Vogeli, B. R. (2000). Russian schools for the mathematically and scientifically talented: Can the vision survive unchanged? Roeper Review, 22, 121-123. doi:10.1080/02783190009554015
96. Duckworth, A. L., Kirby, T. A., Tsukayama, E., Berstein, H., & Ericsson, K. A. (2010). Deliberate practice spells success: Why grittier competitors triumph at the National Spelling Bee. Social Psychology and Personality Science. Advance online publication. Retrieved from http://spp.sagepub.com/content/early/2010/10/01 /1948550610385872. doi:10.1177/1948550610385872
97. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
98. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
99. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindsets. The psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballantine.
100. Dweck, C. S. (in press). Mindsets and malleable minds: Implications for giftedness and talent. In R. F. Subotnik, A. Robinson, C. M. Cal-lahan, & P. Johnson (Eds.), Malleable minds, Translating insights from psychology and neuroscience to gifted education. Storrs, CT: National Center for Research on Giftedness and Talent.
101. Eccles, J. S. (2006). A motivational perspective on school achievement: Taking responsibility for learning, teaching, and supporting. In R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Optimizing student success with the other three Rs: Reasoning, resilience, and responsibility (pp. 199-224). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
102. Eccles, J. S., O'Neill, S.A., & Wigfield, A. (2005). Ability self-perceptions and subjective task values in adolescents and children. In K. Anderson Moore, & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? (pp. 237-249). New York, NY: Springer.
103. Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Kannekens, R., Lyons, J., Tromp, Y., & Viss-cher, C. (2010). Knowing what to do and doing it: Differences in self-assessed tactical skills of regional, sub-elite, and elite youth field hockey players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28, 521-528. doi:10.1080/02640410903582743
104. Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Visscher, C., Lemmink, K. A. P. M., & Mulder, T. (2007). Multidimensional performance characteristics and standard of performance in talented youth field hockey players:A longitudinal study. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 481-489. doi:10.1080/02640410600719945
105. Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.). (1996). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
106. Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
107. Ericsson, K. A., Nandagopal, K., & Roring, R. W. (2005). Giftedness viewed from the expert-performance perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 287-311.
108. Ericsson, K. A., Prietula, M. J., & Cokely, E. T. (2007). The making of an expert. Harvard Business Review, 85, 114-121. Retrieved from http://www.coachingmanagement.nl/The%20Making%20of%20an%20Expert.pdf
109. Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290-309. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
110. Feldhusen, J. F. (2005). Giftedness, talent, expertise, and creative achievement. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 64-79). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
111. Feldman, D. H. (1986). Nature's gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential. New York, NY: Basic Books.
112. Feldman, D. H. (Ed.). (1994). Beyond universals in cognitive development (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
113. Ferguson, R. F. (2008). Toward excellence with equity: An emerging vision for closing the achievement gap. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
114. Fidler, F. (2010). Statistical significance, result worthiness, and evidence: What lessons are there for giftedness education in other disciplines? In B. Thompson & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Methodologies for conducting research on giftedness (pp. 71-88). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
115. Fonseca, C. (2011). Emotional intensity in gifted students: Helping kids cope with explosive feelings. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
116. Ford, D. Y. (1995). Desegregating gifted education: A need unmet. Journal of Negro Education, 64, 52-62. doi:10.2307/2967284
117. Ford, D. Y. (1998). The underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education: Problems and promises in recruitment and retention. Journal of Special Education, 32, 4-14. doi:10.1177/002246699803200102
118. Ford, D. Y., Grantham, T. C., & Whiting, G. W. (2008a). Another look at the achievement gap: Learning from the experiences of gifted Black students. Urban Education, 43, 216-238. doi:10.1177/0042085907312344
119. Ford, D. Y., Grantham, T. C., & Whiting, G. W. (2008b). Culturally and linguistically diverse students in gifted education: Recruitment and retention issues. Exceptional Children, 74, 289-306.
120. Fredricks, J. A., Alfeld, C., & Eccles, J. S. (2010). Developing and fostering passion in academic and nonacademic domains. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 18-30. doi:10.1177/0016986209352683
121. Freeman, J. (2000). Children's talent in fine art and music. Roeper Review, 22, 98-101. doi:10.1080/02783190009554010
122. Freeman, J. (2005). Permission to be gifted. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness, second edition (pp. 80-97). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
123. Freeman, J. (2010). Gifted lives: What happens when gifted children grow up. New York, NY: Routledge.
124. Fuller-Rowell, T. E., & Doan, S. N. (2010). The social costs of academic success across ethnic groups. Child Development, 81, 1696-1713. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01504.x
125. Fund for the Advancement of Education. (1957). They went to college early (Evaluation Report No. 2). New York, NY: Ford Foundation.
126. Gagné, F. (1999). Nature or nurture? A re-examination of Sloboda and Howe's 1991 interview study on talent development in music. Psychology of Music, 27, 38-51. doi:10.1177/0305735699271004
127. Gagné, F. (2005a). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness, second edition (pp. 98-119). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
128. Gagné, F. (2005b). From noncompetence to exceptional talent: Exploring the range of academic achievement within and between grade levels. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 139-153. doi:10.1177/001698620504900204
129. Gagné, F. (2010). Motivation within the DMGT 2.0 framework. High Ability Studies, 21, 81-99. doi:10.1080/13598139.2010.525341
130. Gallagher, J. J. (in press). Political issues in gifted education. In C. M. Callahan & H. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education. Florence, KY: Routledge.
131. Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. New York, NY: Appleton.
132. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.
133. Gavin, M. K., & Adelson, J. L. (2008). Mathematics, elementary. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 367-394). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
134. Gellene, D. (2011, June 1). Rosalyn S. Yalow, Nobel medical physicist, dies at 89. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/02/us/02yalow.html?_r=1
135. Gentry, M. L., & Owen, S. V. (1999). An investigation of the effects of total school flexible cluster grouping on identification, achievement, and classroom practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 224-243. doi:10.1177/001698629904300402
136. Gentry, M. L., & Peters, S. J. (2009). Effect sizes in gifted education research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 219-222. doi:10.11 77/0016986209334976
137. Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York, NY: Wiley.
138. Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. New York, NY: Little, Brown & Company.
139. Gobet, F., & Campitelli, G. (2007). The role of domain-specific practice, handedness, and starting age in chess. Developmental Psychology, 43, 159-172. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.159
140. Goertzel, V., & Goertzel, M. G. (1962). Cradles of eminence. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Company.
141. Goertzel, V., & Goertzel, M. G. (2004). Cradles of eminence (2nd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
142. Goldsmith, L. T. (2000). Tracking trajectories of talent: Child prodigies growing up. In R. C. Friedman & B. M. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding, Cognition and development (pp. 89-117). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10373-005
143. Golomb, C. (Ed.). (1995). The development of artistically gifted children: Selected case studies. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
144. Good, C. (in press). Sense of belonging, stereotypes, and achievement. In R. F. Subotnik, A. Robinson, C. M. Callahan, & P. Johnson (Eds.), Malleable minds: Translating insights from psychology and neuroscience to gifted education. Storrs, CT: National Center for Research on Giftedness and Talent.
145. Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). A motivational approach to reasoning, resilience, and responsibility. In R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Optimizing student success with the other three Rs, Reasoning, resilience, and responsibility (pp. 39-56). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
146. Gottfredson, L. S. (1997a). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24, 25-52. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90011-8
147. Gottfredson, L. S. (1997b). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79-132. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90014-3
148. Gottfredson, L. S. (2003). The science and politics of intelligence in gifted education. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 24-40). New York, NY: Pearson.
149. Gottfried, A. E., & Gottfried, A. W. (1996). A longitudinal study of academic intrinsic motivation in intellectually gifted children: Childhood through early adolescence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 179-183. doi:10.1177/001698629604000402
150. Gottfried, A. W., Cook, C. R., Gottfried, A. E., & Morris, P. E. (2005). Educational characteristics of adolescents with gifted academic intrinsic motivation: A longitudinal investigation from school entry through early adulthood. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 172-186. doi:10.1177/001698620504900206
151. Gottfried, A. W., Gottfried, A. E., Bathurst, K., & Guerin, D. W. (1994). Gifted IQ: Early developmental aspects: The Fullerton longitudinal study. New York, NY: Plenum.
152. Gould, D., Dieffenbach, M. S., & Moffett, A. (2001). The development of psychological talent in U.S. Olympic champions. Grant sponsored by the Sport Science and Technology Division of the United States Olympic Committee. Retrieved from http://www.eduC. Msu.edu/ysi/articles/USOCTalentDevelopment.pdf
153. Graham, S. (2004). "I can, but do I want to?" Achievement values in ethnic minority children and adolescents. In G. Philogène (Ed.), Racial identity in context: The legacy of Kenneth B. Clark. Decade of behavior (pp. 125-147). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
154. Graham, S. (2009). Giftedness in adolescence: African American gifted youth and their challenges from a motivational perspective. In F. D. Horowitz, R. F. Subotnik, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent across the life span (pp.109-130). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11867-007
155. Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In D. C. Berliner, & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 63-84). New York, NY: Macmillan.
156. Grigorenko, E. L., & Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1994). An inside view of gifted education in Russia. Roeper Review, 16, 167-171. doi:10.1080/02783199409553566
157. Gross, M. U. M. (1993). Nurturing the talents of exceptionally gifted individuals. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development on gifted-ness and talent (pp. 473-490). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
158. Gross, M. U. M. (2004). The use of radical acceleration in cases of extreme intellectual precocity. In L. E. Brody (Ed.), Grouping and acceleration practices in gifted education. Essential reading in gifted education (pp. 13-31). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
159. Gross, M. U. M. (2006). Exceptionally gifted children: Long-term outcomes of academic acceleration and nonacceleration. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 404-429.
160. Gulbin, J. P., Oldenziel, K. E., Weissensteiner, J. R., & Gagné, F. (2010). A look through the rear view mirror: Developmental experiences and insights of high performance athletes. Talent Development and Excellence, 2, 149-164.
161. Haensly, P., Reynolds, C. R., & Nash, W. R. (1986). Giftedness: Coalescence, context, conflict, and commitment. In R.J. Stern-berg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 112-127). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
162. Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbache, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1-51. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x
163. Hamilton, L. H., & Robson, B. (2006). Performing arts consultation: Developing expertise in this domain. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 37, 254-259. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.37.3.254
164. Hanton, S., Thomas, O., & Mellalieu, S. D. (2009). Management of competitive stress in elite sport. In B. Brewer (Ed.), International Olympic Committee Sport Psychology handbook (pp. 30-42). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
165. Hanushek, E. A., Peterson, P. A., & Woessmann, L. (2010). U.S. math performance in global perspective: How well does each state do at producing high-achieving students? Cambridge, MA: Program on Education Policy and Governance & Education, Harvard University Kennedy School.
166. Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. (2006). School quality and the Black-White achievement gap (NBER Working Paper No. 12651). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
167. Haroutounian, J. (Ed.). (2000). Musical talent development [Special issue]. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12(1).
168. Hassler, M. (1992). The critical teens-Musical capacities change in adolescence. European Journal for High Ability, 3, 89-98. doi:10.1080/0937445920030109
169. Henson, R. K. (2010). Use of factor analysis techniques in the study of giftedness. In B. Thompson & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Methodolo-giesfor conducting research on giftedness (pp. 11-31).Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12079-001
170. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York, NY: Free Press.
171. Hildreth, G. H., Brumbaugh, F. N., & Wilson, F.T. (1952). Educating gifted children at Hunter College Elementary School. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
172. Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
173. Hohmann, A., & Seidel, I. (2003). Scientific aspects of talent development. Journal of Physical Education, 40, 9-20.
174. Hollinger, C. L., & Fleming, E. S. (1992). A longitudinal examination of life choices of gifted and talented young women. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 207-212. doi:10.1177/001698629203600407
175. Horowitz, F. D. (2009). Introduction: A developmental understanding of giftedness and talent. In F. D. Horowitz, R. F. Subotnik, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent across the life span (pp. 3-19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11867-001
176. Horowitz, F. D., Subotnik, R. F., & Matthews, D. J. (Eds.). (2009). The development of giftedness and talent across the life span. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
177. Howard, R. W. (2008). Linking extreme precocity and adult eminence: A study of eight prodigies at international chess. High Ability Studies, 19, 117-130. doi:10.1080/13598130802503991
178. Howe, M. J. A., Davidson, J. W., & Sloboda, J. A. (1998). Innate talents: Reality or myth? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 399-442. doi:10.1017/S0140525X9800123X
179. Huijgen, B. C. H., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Post, W., & Visscher, C. (2010). Development of dribbling in talented youth soccer players aged 12-19 years: A longitudinal study. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28, 689-698. doi:10.1080/02640411003645679
180. Hulslander, J., Olson, R. K., Willcutt, E. G., & Wadsworth, S.J. (2010). Longitudinal stability of reading-related skills and their prediction of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 111-136. doi:10.1080/10888431003604058
181. Jarvin, L., & Subotnik, R. F. (2010). Wisdom from conservatory faculty: Insights on success in classical music performance. Roeper Review, 32, 78-87. doi:10.1080/02783191003587868
182. Jonker, L., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., & Visscher, C. (2010). Differences in self-regulatory skills among talented athletes: The significance of competitive level and type of sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28, 901-908. doi:10.1080/02640411003797157
183. Jordan, M., & Vancil, M. (2006). Driven from within. New York, NY: Atria Books.
184. Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 131-155. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_3
185. Kalinowski, A. G. (1985). The development of Olympic swimmers. In B. J. Bloom (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 139-192). New York, NY: Ballantine.
186. Kanevsky, L. (1990). Pursuing qualitative differences in the flexible use of problem solving strategies by young children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 115-140.
187. Karnes, F. A., & Bean, S. M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (3rd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
188. Karp, A. (2010). Teachers of the mathematically gifted tell about themselves and their profession. Roeper Review, 32, 272-280. doi:10.1080/02783193.2010.485306
189. Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004). Hawking's haiku, Madonna's math: Why it is hard to be creative in every room in the house. In R. J. Sternberg, J. Lautrey, & T.I. Lubart (Eds.), Models of intelligence: International perspectives (pp. 3-20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
190. Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1-12. doi:10.1037/a0013688
191. Kay, S. I. (1999). The talent profile as a curricular tool for academics, the arts, and athletics. In S. Cline & K. T. Hegeman (Eds.), Gifted education in the 21st Century: Issues and concerns (pp. 47-60). New York, NY: Winslow Press.
192. Kay, S. I. (2003). Recognizing and developing early talent in the visual arts. In P. Olszewski-Kubilius, L. Limburg-Weber, & S. Pfeiffer (Eds.), Early gifts, Recognizing and nurturing children's talents (pp. 125-138). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
193. Kay, S. I., & Subotnik, R. F. (1994). Talent beyond words: Unveiling spatial, expressive, kinesthetic, and musical talent in young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 70-74. doi:10.1177/ 001698629403800204
194. Kent, S. D. (1992). The effects of acceleration on the social and emotional development of gifted elementary students: A meta-analysis. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 419-4A/ (University Microfilms No. AAT93-16362).
195. Kieffer, K. M., Reese, R. J., & Vacha-Haase, T. (2010). Reliability generalization (RG) methods in the context of giftedness research. In B. Thompson & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Methodologies for conducting research on giftedness (pp. 89-111). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12079-005
196. King, J. E., & Dates, B. G. (2010). Contemporary methods for handling missing data in observational studies of giftedness. In B. Thompson & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Methodologies for conducting research on giftedness (pp. 193-212). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12079-009
197. Kingsbury, H. (1988). Music, talent, and performance: A conservatory cultural system. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
198. Kline, R. B. (2010). Promise and pitfalls of structural equation modeling in gifted research. In B. Thompson & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Methodologies for conducting research on giftedness (pp. 147-169). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
199. Kornspan, A. S. (2009). Fundamentals of sport and exercise psychology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
200. Kover, D. J., & Worrell, F. C. (2010). The influence of instrumentality beliefs on achievement motivation: A study of high achieving adolescents. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 470-498.
201. Krampe, R. T., & Ericsson, K. A. (1996). Maintaining excellence: Deliberate practice and elite performance in young and older pianists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 331-359. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.125.4.331
202. Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
203. Kulik, J. A. (2004). Meta-analytic studies of acceleration. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & M. U. M. Gross (Eds.), A nationdeceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students, Volume II (pp. 13-22). Iowa City: University of Iowa.
204. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1984). Effects of accelerated instruction on students. Review of Educational Research, 54, 409-425.
205. Kuncel, N. R., & Hezlett, S. A. (2007a). Standardized tests predict graduate students' success. Science, 315, 1080-1081. doi:10.1126/science.1136618
206. Kuncel, N. R., & Hezlett, S. A. (2007b). The utility of standardized tests. Science, 316, 1696-1697.
207. Kuncel, N. R., & Hezlett, S. A. (2010). Fact and fiction in cognitive ability testing for admissions and hiring decisions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 339-345. doi:10.1177/0963721410389459
208. Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2001). A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the Graduate Record Examinations: Implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 162-181. doi:10.1037//Q033-2909.127.1.162
209. Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148-161. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.148
210. Kuncel, N. R., Wee, S., Serafin, L., & Hezlett, S. A. (2010). The validity of the Graduate Record Examination for master's and doctoral programs: A meta-analytic review. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 340-352. doi:10.1177/0013164409344508
211. Lederberg, J. (2005). Metaphysical games: An imaginary lecture on crafting Earth's biological future. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294, 1415-1417. doi:10.1001/jama.294.11.1415
212. Lee, S. Y., Matthews, M. S., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2008). A national picture of talent search and talent search educational programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 55-69. doi:10.1177/ 0016986207311152
213. Lee, S. Y., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Peternel, G. (2009). Follow-up with students after six years of their participation in Project Excite. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 137-156. doi:10.1177/0016986208330562
214. Lehman, A. C., Sloboda, J. A., & Woody, R. H. (2007). Psychology for musicians: Understanding and acquiring the skills. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
215. Lepper, M. R., & Henderlong, J. (2000). Turning "play" into "work" and "work" into "play": 25 years of research on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 257-307). San Francisco, CA: Academic Press.
216. Liben, L. S. (2009). Giftedness during childhood: The spatial-graphic domain. In F. D. Horowitz, R. F. Subotnik, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent across the life span (pp. 59-74). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11867-004
217. Liu, C. H. (2008). Learning experiences of gifted young string players in the Taiwan milieu. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32, 245-274.
218. Lockwood, A. T. (1996). Tracking: Conflicts and resolutions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
219. Lohman, D. F. (2005). An aptitude perspective on talent: Implications for identification of academically gifted minority students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 333-360.
220. Lohman, D. F., & Korb, K. A. (2006). Gifted today but not tomorrow? Longitudinal changes in ability and achievement during elementary school. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 451-484.
221. Louis, B., Subotnik, R.F., Breland, P., & Lewis, M. (2000). Identification vs. admissions practices: Implications for policies and practices in gifted education. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 295-314. doi:10.1023/A:1009017922302
222. Loveless, T. (1999). The tracking wars: State reform meets school policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
223. Loveless, T. (2009). Tracking and detracking: High achievers in Massachusetts middle schools. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
224. Lubart, T. I. (2003). In search of creative intelligence. In R.J. Stern-berg, J. Lautrey, & T. I. Lubart (Eds.), Models of intelligence: International perspectives (pp. 279-292). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
225. Lubinski, D. (2010a). Neglected aspects and truncated appraisals in vocational counseling: Interpreting the interest-efficacy association form a broader perspective: Comment on Armstrong and Vogel (2009). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 226-238. doi:10.1037/a0019163
226. Lubinski, D. (2010b). Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification and development. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 344-351. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.022
227. Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., Webb, R. M., & Bleske-Rechek, A. (2006). Tracking exceptional human capital over two decades. Psychological Science, 17, 194-199. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01685.x
228. Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L. G. (1992). Some bodily and medical correlates of mathematical giftedness and commensurate levels of socio-economic status. Intelligence, 16, 99-115. doi:10.1016/0160-2896(92)90027-O
229. Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Top 1 in 10,000: A 10 year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 7, 718-729. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.718
230. Lucas, S. R. (1999). Tracking inequality: Stratification and mobility in American high schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
231. Lykken, D. T., McGue, M., Tellegen, A., & Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1992). Emergenesis: Genetic traits that may not run in families. American Psychologist, 47, 1565-1577. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.47.12.1565
232. Mac, B. (2011). Long term athlete development (LTAD). Brian Mac, Sports Coach [Wes site]. Retrieved from http://www.brianmac.co.uk/ltad.htm
233. MacKinnon, D. W. (1968). The identification and development of creative personnel. Personnel Administration, 31, 8-17.
234. MacNamara, A., & Collins, D. (2009). More than the "X" factor! A longitudinal investigation of the psychological characteristics of developing excellence in musical development. Music Education Research, 11, 377-392. doi:10.1080/14613800903144270
235. MacNamara, A., Holmes, P., & Collins, D. (2008). Negotiating transitions in musical development: The role of psychological characteristics of developing excellence. Psychology of Music, 36, 335-352. doi:10.1177/0305735607086041
236. Makel, M. C., Lee, S. Y., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Putallaz, M. (2010). Changing the pond, not the fish: Following high abilitystudents across different educational environments. Manuscript submitted for publication.
237. Maker, C. J. (1996). Identification of gifted minority students: A national problem, needed changes and a promising solution. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 41-50. doi:10.1177/001698629604000106
238. Makris, I., & Mullet, E. (2009). A systematic inventory of motives for becoming an orchestra conductor: A preliminary study. Psychology of Music, 37, 443-458. doi:10.1177/0305735608100373
239. Malina, R. M. (2010). Early sport specialization: Roots, effectiveness, risks. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 9, 364-371.
240. Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 669-685. doi:10.1080/09500690902792385
241. Mandelman, S. D., Tan, M., Aljughaiman, A. M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2010). Intellectual giftedness: Economic, political, cultural, and psychological considerations. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 287-297. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.04.014
242. Margolese, S. K., & Kline, R. B. (1999). Prediction of basic reading skills among young children with diverse linguistic backgrounds. Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 31, 209-216. doi:10.1037/h0087089
243. Marsh, H. W., Chessor, D., Craven, T., & Roche, L. (1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 285-319.
244. Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58, 364-376. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.5.364
245. Martin, C. E., & Cramond, B. (1987). Inservice and preservice teachers' attitudes toward the academically brilliant. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 15-19. doi:10.1177/001698628703100103
246. Martindale, R. J. J., Collins, D., & Abraham, A. (2007). Effective talent development: The elite coach perspective in UK sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 19, 187-206. doi:10.1080/10413200701188944
247. Matthews, D. J., & Foster, J. F. (2009). Being smart about gifted education: A guidebook for educators and parents (2nd ed.). Scotts-dale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
248. Matthews, M. S., Gentry, M., McCoach, D. B., Worrell, F. C., Matthews, D., & Dixon, F. (2008). Evaluating the state of a field: Effect size reporting in gifted education. Journal of Experimental Education, 77, 55-68. doi:10.3200/JEXE.77.1.55-68
249. Mayer, R. E. (2005). The scientific study of giftedness. In R. J. Stern-berg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 437-447). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
250. McBee, M. (2010). Modeling outcomes with floor or ceiling effects: An introduction to the Tobit Model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 314-320. doi:10.1177/0016986210379095
251. McCoach, D. B. (2010a). Dealing with dependence (Part II): A gentle introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 252-256. doi:10.1177/0016986210373475
252. McCoach, D. B. (2010b). Research methods for gifted studies: Comments and future directions. In B. Thompson & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Methodologies for conducting research on giftedness (pp. 241-252). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12079-012
253. McCoach, D. B., & Adelson, J. L. (2010). Dealing with dependence (Part I): Understanding the effects of clustered data. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 152-155. doi:10.1177/0016986210363076
254. McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003). The School Attitude Assessment Survey-Revised: A new instrument to identify academically able students who underachieve. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 63, 414-429.
255. Melesky, T. J. (1985). Identifying and providing for the Hispanic gifted child. The Journal for the National Association of Bilingual Education, 9, 43-56.
256. Memmert, D. (2006). Developing creative thinking in a gifted sport enrichment program and the critical role of attention processes. High Ability Studies, 17, 101-115. doi:10.1080/13598130600947176
257. Memmert, D., Baker, J., & Bertsch, C. (2010). Play and practice in the development of sport-specific creativity in team ball sports. High Ability Studies, 21, 3-18. doi:10.1080/13598139.2010.488083
258. Merton, R. (1968). The Matthew effect of science. The reward and communication system are considered. Science, 159, 56-63. doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56
259. Mickelson, R. A. (1990). The attitude-achievement paradox among Black adolescents. Sociology of Education, 63, 44-61. doi:10.2307/2112896
260. Mighton, J. (2003). The myth of ability: Nurturing mathematical talent in every child. New York, NY: Walker & Company.
261. Milgram, R. M., & Hong, E. (1999). Creative out-of-school activities in intellectually gifted adolescents as predictors of their life accomplishment in young adults: A longitudinal study. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 77-87. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1202_1
262. Miller, L. S. (2004). Promoting sustained growth in the representation of African Americans, Latinos, and Native Americans among top students in the United States at all levels of the education system. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
263. Mountjoy, M., Armstrong, N., Bizzini, L., Blimke, C., Evans, J., & Gerrard, D., Van Mechelin, W. (2008). IOC consensus statement on training the elite child athlete. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 42, 163-164. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2007.044016
264. Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Intelligence praise can undermine motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33-52.
265. National Association for Gifted Children. (2009). State of the states in gifted education. Washington, DC: Author.
266. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: Author.
267. National Research Center on Gifted and Talent. (in press). STEM Schools of Excellence: Examining Best Practices and Characteristics. Charlottesville, VA: Author.
268. National Science Board. (2010). Preparing the next generation of STEM innovators: Identifying and developing our nation's human capital. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
269. Neihart, M. (1999). The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: What does the empirical literature say? Roeper Review, 22, 10-17. doi:10.1080/02783199909553991
270. Neihart, M. (2007). The socioaffective impact of acceleration and ability grouping. Gifted Child Quarterly, 5, 330-341.
271. Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77-101. doi:10.1037/ 0003-066X.51.2.77
272. Noble, K. D. S., Subotnik, R. F., & Arnold, K. D. (1996). A new model for adult female talent development. In K. D. Arnold, K. D. Noble, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Remarkable women, Perspectives on female talent development (pp. 427-440). Cresswell, NJ: Hampton Press.
273. Nokelainen, P., Tirri, K., Campbell, J. R., & Walberg, H. (2007). Factors that contribute to or hinder academic productivity: Comparing two groups of most and least successful Olympians. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13, 483-500. doi:10.1080/13803610701785931
274. Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
275. Ochse, R. (1990). Before the gates of excellence: The determinants of creative genius. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
276. Ogbu, J. U. (2003). Black American students in an affluent suburb: A study of academic disengagement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
277. Olmstead, A. (1999). Juilliard: A history. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
278. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1998). Talent search: Purposes, rationale, and role in gifted education. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 106-113.
279. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2000). The transition from childhood gift-edness to adult creative productiveness: Psychological characteristics and social supports. Roeper Review, 23, 65-71. doi:10.1080/02783190009554068
280. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2004). Talent search: Purposes, rationale and role in gifted education. In J. Stanley & D. Boothe (Eds.), Gifted-ness and cultural diversity (pp. 252-262). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
281. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2008a). The role of the family in talent development. In S.I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psycho-educational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 53-70). New York, NY: Springer.
282. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2008b). Talent search programs for gifted adolescents. In F. A. Dixon (Ed.), Programs and services for gifted secondary students (pp. 163-172). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
283. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2010a). Special schools and other options for gifted STEM students. Roeper Review, 32, 61-70. doi:10.1080/02783190903386892
284. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2010b). Two perspectives on statistics in gifted education. In B. Thompson & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Methodologies for conducting research on giftedness (pp. 215-228). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12079-010
285. Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Kulieke, M. J., & Krasney, N. (1988). Personality dimensions of gifted adolescents: A review of the empirical research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 347-352. doi:10.1177/001698628803200403
286. Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Lee, S. Y. (2004). Parent perceptions of the effects of the Saturday Enrichment Program on gifted students' talent development. Roeper Review, 26, 156-165.
287. Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Lee, S. Y., Ngoi, M., & Ngoi, D. (2004). Addressing the achievement gap between minority and nonmi-nority children by increasing access to gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 127-158.
288. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Collins, K. M. T., Leech, N. L., & Jiao, Q. G. (2010). Mixed data collection and analysis for conducting research on giftedness and beyond. In B. Thompson & R. F. Sub-otnik (Eds.), Methodologies for conducting research on gifted-ness (pp. 113-143). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12079-006
289. Pakulak, E., & Neville, H. (in press). Interacting experiential and genetic effects on human neuro-cognitive development. In R. F. Subotnik, A. Robinson, C. M. Callahan, & P. Johnson (Eds.), Malleable minds, Translating insights from psychology and neuroscience to gifted education. Storrs, CT: National Center for Research on Giftedness and Talent.
290. Papierno, P. B., Ceci, S. J., Makel, M. C., & Williams, W. M. (2005). The nature and nurture of talent: A bioecological perspective on the ontogeny of exceptional abilities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 312-332.
291. Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18, 948-952. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02007.x
292. Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2008). Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity. Psychological Science, 19, 957-961. doi:10.1111/ j.1467-9280.2008.02182.x
293. Paul, K. M., & Plucker, J. A. (2004). Two steps forward, one step back: Effect size reporting in gifted education research from 1995-2000. Roeper Review, 26, 68-72. doi:10.1080/02783190409554244
294. Pfeiffer, S. I. (2009). The gifted: Clinical challenges for child psychiatry. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 48, 787-790. doi:10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181aa039d
295. Piirto, J. (1992). Understanding those who create. Dayton: Ohio Psychology Press.
296. Piirto, J. (1998). Understanding those who create (2nd ed.). Scotts-dale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.
297. Piirto, J. (2004). Understanding creativity. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
298. Plucker, J. A. (1997). Debunking the myth of the "highly significant" result: Effect sizes in gifted education research. Roeper Review, 20, 122-126. doi:10.1080/02783199709553873
299. Plucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalysis of Tor-rance's (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103-114. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1202_3
300. Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R.J. Sternberg, J. Lautrey, & T.I. Lubart (Eds.), Models of intelligence: International perspectives (pp. 153-168). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
301. Plucker, J. A., Burroughs, N., & Song, R. (2010). Mind the (other) gap! Bloomington: Center for Evaluation and Education Policy, Indiana University.
302. Plucker, J. A., Robinson, N. M., Greenspon, T. S., Feldhusen, J. F., McCoach, D.B., & Subotnik, R.R. (2004). It's not how the pond makes you feel, but rather how high you can jump. American Psychologist, 59, 268-269. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.4.268
303. Powell, C. (with Persico, J. E.). (1995). My American journey: An autobiography. New York, NY: Random House.
304. Preacher, K., Rucker, D., MacCallum, R., & Nicewander, W. (2005). Use of the extreme groups approach: A critical reexamination and new recommendations. Psychological Methods, 10, 178-192. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.10.2.178
305. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2010). Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) for America's future. Washington, DC: Author.
306. Preuss, L. J., & Dubow, E. F. (2004). A comparison between intellectually gifted and typical children in their coping responses to a school and a peer stressor. Roeper Review, 26, 105-111. doi:10.1080/02783190409554250
307. Provasnik, S., Gonzales, P., & Miller, D. (2009). U.S. performance across international assessments of student achievement: Special supplement to the Condition of Education 2009 (NCES2009-083). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
308. Pyryt, M. C. (1999). Effectiveness of training children's divergent thinking: A meta-analytic review. In A.S Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating creativity in youth (pp. 351-366) Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
309. Raskin, E. (1936). Comparison of scientific and literary ability: A longitudinal study of eminent scientists and men of letters of the nineteenth century. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 31, 20-35. doi:10.1037/h0060483
310. Reis, S. M. (1995). What gifted education can offer the reform movement: Talent development. In J. L. Genshaft, M. Bireley, & C.L. Hollinger (Eds.), Serving gifted and talented students: A resource for school personnel (pp. 371-387). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
311. Reis, S. M. (2008). Talented readers. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Cal-lahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 655-667). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
312. Reis, S. M., McCoach, D. B., Coyne, M., Schreiber, F. J., Eckert, R. D., & Gubbins, E. J. (2007). Using planned enrichment strategies with direct instruction to improve reading fluency, comprehension, and attitude toward reading: An evidence based study. The Elementary School Journal, 108, 3-24. doi:10.1086/522383
313. Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2010). Is there still a need for gifted education? An examination of current research. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 308-317. doi:10.1016/j.lin-dif.2009.10.012
314. Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Wethers-field, CT: Creative Learning Press.
315. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184, 261.
316. Renzulli, J. S. (1986) The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness (pp. 53-92). New York, NY: Cambridge University press
317. Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness. A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In R.J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246-279). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
318. Roberts, J. K., Nimon, K., & Martin, L. (2010). Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) applications in the context of giftedness research. In B. Thompson & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Methodologies for conducting research on giftedness (pp. 171-191). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12079-008
319. Robertson, K. F., Smeets, S., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2010). Beyond the threshold hypothesis: Even among the gifted and top math/science graduate students, cognitive abilities, vocational interests, and lifestyle preferences matter for career choice, performance, and persistence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 346-351. doi:10.1177/0963721410391442
320. Robinson, A., Shore, B. M., & Enersen, D. (Eds.). (2007). Best practices in gifted education. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
321. Robinson, N. M. (2005). In defense of a psychometric approach to the definition of academic giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 280-294). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
322. Robinson, N. M. (2008a). The social world of gifted children and youth. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psycho-educational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 33-52). New York, NY: Springer.
323. Robinson, N. M. (2008b). The value of traditional assessments as approaches to identifying academically gifted students. In J.L. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.), Alternative assessments with gifted and talented students (pp. 157-174). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
324. Robinson, N. M., & Robinson, H. B. (1982). The optimal match: Devising the best compromise for the highly gifted student. New Directions in Child Development, 17, 79-94. doi:10.1002/ cd.23219821708
325. Robinson, N. M., Zigler, E., & Gallagher, J. J. (2000). Two tails of the normal curve: Similarities and differences in the study of mental retardation and giftedness. American Psychologist, 55, 1413-1424. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.12.1413
326. Roe, A. (1953). The making of a scientist. New York, NY: Dodd, Mead.
327. Roeper, A. (1996). A personal statement of philosophy of George and AnneMarie Roeper. Roeper Review, 19, 18-19. doi:10.1080/ 02783199609553776
328. Rogers, K. B. (1992). A best-evidence synthesis of the research on acceleration options for gifted learners. In N. Colangelo, S.G. Assouline, & D.L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings from the 1991 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 406-409). Unionville, NY: Trillium.
329. Rogers, K. B. (2004). The academic effects of acceleration. In N. Colangelo, S. Assouline, & M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students (pp. 47-57). Iowa City, IA: The Belin Blank Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
330. Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2004). Artistic scientists and scientific artists: The link between polymathy and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 127-152). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
331. Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (2005). Parents' personality and the creative potential of exceptionally gifted boys. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 355-368. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1704_7
332. Ruthsatz, J., Detterman, D., Griscom, W. S., & Cirullo, B. A. (2008). Becoming an expert in the musical domain: It takes more than just practice. Intelligence, 36, 330-338. doi:10.1016/j. intell.2007.08.003
333. Sampson, W. A. (2002). Black students achievement. How much do family and school really matter? Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
334. Sapon-Shevin, M. (1994). Gifted education and disruption of the community. Albany: State University of New York Press.
335. Seaton, M., Marsh, H., & Craven, R. G. (2009). Earning its place as a pan-human theory: Universality of the big-fish-little-pond effect across 41 culturally and economically diverse countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 403-419. doi:10.1037/a0013838
336. Shatil, E., & Share, D. L. (2003). Cognitive antecedents of early reading ability: A test of the modularity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 1-31. doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00106-1
337. Shaunessy, E., & Suldo, S. M. (2010). Strategies used by intellectually gifted students to cope with stress during their participation in a high school International Baccalaureate program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 127-137. doi:10.1177/0016986209355977
338. Shenk, D. (2010). The genius in all of us: Why everything you've been told about genetics, talent, and IQ is wrong. New York, NY: Doubleday.
339. Shore, B. M., & Delcourt, M. (1996). Effective curricular and program practices in gifted education and interface with general education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 138-154.
340. Simon, H. A., & Chase, W. G. (1973). Skill in chess. American Scientist, 61, 394-403.
341. Simonton, D. K. (1977). Creative productivity, age, and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 829-840. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.5.829
342. Simonton, D. K. (1984a). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1273-1286. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1273
343. Simonton, D. K. (1984b). Genius, creativity, and leadership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
344. Simonton, D. K. (1991). Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 829-840. doi:10.1037/0022-3 514.61.5.829
345. Simonton, D. K. (1992a). Leaders of American psychology, 1879-1967: Career development, creative output, and professional achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 5-17. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.1.5
346. Simonton, D. K. (1992b). The social context of career success and course for 2,026 scientists and inventors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 452-463. doi:10.1177/0146167292184009
347. Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York, NY: Guilford.
348. Simonton, D. K. (1996). Creative expertise: A life-span developmental perspective. In A.K. Anders (Ed.), The road to excellence (pp. 227-253). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
349. Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66-89. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.66
350. Simonton, D. K. (1998). Achieved eminence in minority and majority cultures: Convergence versus divergence in the assessments of 294 African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 805-817. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.804
351. Simonton, D. K. (1999). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 106, 435-457. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.435
352. Simonton, D. K. (2000a). Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review, 20, 283-318. doi:10.1006/drev.1999.0504
353. Simonton, D. K. (2000b). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55, 151-157. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.151
354. Simonton, D. K. (2001). Talent development as a multidimensional multiplicative, and dynamic process. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 39-43. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00110
355. Simonton, D. K. (2005). Giftedness and genetics: The emergenic-epigenetic model and its implications. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 270-286.
356. Simonton, D. K. (2007). Creative life cycles in literature: Poets versus novelists or conceptualists versus experimentalists? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 1, 133-139. doi:10.1037/1931-3896.1.3.133
357. Simonton, D. K. (2008). Scientific talent, training, and performance: Intellect, personality, and genetic endowment. Review of General Psychology, 12, 28-46. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.12.1.28
358. Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creativity in highly eminent individuals. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 174-188). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
359. Simonton, D. K., & Song, A. V. (2009). Eminence, IQ, physical and mental health, and achievement domain: Cox's 282 geniuses revisited. Psychological Science, 20, 429-434. doi:10.1111/ j.1467-9280.2009.02313.x
360. Sisk, D. A. (2009). Making great kids greater: Easing the burden of being gifted. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
361. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57, 293-336.
362. Sloane, K. D., & Sosniak, L. A. (1985). The development of accomplished sculptors. In B. J. Bloom (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 90-138). New York, NY: Ballantine.
363. Sloboda, J. A., & Howe, M. J. (1991). Biographical precursors of musical excellence: An interview study. Psychology of Music, 19, 3-21. doi:10.1177/0305735691191001
364. Sosniak, L. A. (1985a). Becoming an outstanding research neurologist. In B. J. Bloom (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 348-408). New York, NY: Ballantine.
365. Sosniak, L. A. (1985b). Learning to be a concert pianist. In B. J. Bloom (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 19-67). New York, NY: Ballantine.
366. Sosniak, L. A. (1985c). A long-term commitment to learning. In B. J. Bloom (Ed.), Developing talent in young people. (pp. 477-506). New York, NY: Ballantine.
367. Sosniak, L. A. (1985d). Phases of learning. In B. J. Bloom (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 409-538). New York, NY: Ballantine.
368. Sosniak, L. A. (1990). The tortoise, the hare, and the development of talent. In M. J. A. Howe (Ed.), Encouraging the development of exceptional abilities and talents (pp. 149-164). Leichester, England: The British Psychological Society.
369. Sosniak, L. A. (1995). Inviting adolescents into academic communities: An alternative perspective on systemic reform. Theory Into Practice, 34, 35-42. doi:10.1080/00405849509543655
370. Sosniak, L. A. (2005, June 6). The summer educational divide. Retrieved from http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/ chronicle/archive/2005/06/06/EDG6LD39U91.DTL
371. Sosniak, L. A., & Gabelko, N. H. (2008). Every child's right: Academic talent development by choice, not chance. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
372. Stanley, J. C. (1976). The case for extreme educational acceleration of intellectually brilliant youths. Gifted Child Quarterly, 20, 66-75.
373. Stanovich, K. E. (2010). How to think straight about psychology (9th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Allyn & Bacon.
374. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613
375. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
376. Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Abilities are forms of developing expertise. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 11-20.
377. Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Giftedness as developing expertise: A theory of the interface between high abilities and achieved knowledge. High Ability Studies, 12, 159-179. doi:10.1080/13598130120084311
378. Sternberg, R. J. (2003). WICS as a model of giftedness. High Ability Studies, 14, 109-137. doi:10.1080/1359813032000163807
379. Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Culture and intelligence. American Psychologist, 59, 325-338. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.5.325
380. Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The WICS model of giftedness. In R.J. Stern-berg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness, second edition (pp. 327-342). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
381. Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Wisdom, intelligence, creativity, synthesized: A model of giftedness. In T. Balchin, B. J. Hymer, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The Routledge-Falmer international companion to gifted education (pp. 255-264). New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
382. Sternberg, R. J. (2010). Foreword. In B. Thompson & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Methodologies for conducting research on giftedness (pp. ix-xi). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
383. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
384. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
385. Sternberg, R. J., Jarvin, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2011). Explorations in giftedness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
386. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York, NY: Free Press.
387. Stollery, P., & McPhee, A. D. (2002). Some perspectives on musical gift and musical intelligence. British Journal of Music Education, 19, 89-102. doi:10.1017/S0265051702000165
388. Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859-884. doi:10.1037/a0017364
389. Subotnik, R. F. (2000). Developing young adolescent performers at Julliard: An educational prototype for elite level talent development in the arts and sciences. In C.F. Van Lieshout & P.G. Hey-mans (Eds.), Talent, resilience, and wisdom across the lifespan (pp. 249-276). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
390. Subotnik, R. F. (2002). Talent developed-Conversations with masters in the Arts and Sciences. Eliot Feld: Innovator in choreography and dance company development. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25, 290-302.
391. Subotnik, R. F. (2003). A developmental view of giftedness: From being to doing. Roeper Review, 26, 14-15. doi:10.1080/ 02783190309554233
392. Subotnik, R. F. (2004). Transforming elite musicians into professional artists: A view of the talent development process at the Juilliard School. In L. V. Shavinina & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Beyond knowledge, extra cognitive aspects of developing high ability (pp. 137-166). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
393. Subotnik, R. F., & Arnold, K. D. (1994). Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent. Westport. CT: Ablex Publishing.
394. Subotnik, R. F., Duschl, R. A., & Selmon, E. H. (1993). Retention and attrition of science talent: A longitudinal study of Westinghouse Science Talent Search winners. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 61-72. doi:10.1080/0950069930150105
395. Subotnik, R. F., & Jarvin, L. (2005). Beyond expertise: Conceptions of giftedness as great performance. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 343-357). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
396. Subotnik, R. F., Karp, D. E., & Morgan, E. R. (1989). High IQ children at mid-life: An investigation into the generalizability of Terman's "Genetic Studies of Genius." Roeper Review, 11, 139-144. doi:10.1080/02783198909553190
397. Subotnik, R. F., Kassan, L., Summers, E., & Wasser, A. (1993). Genius revisited: High IQ children grown up. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
398. Subotnik, R. F., & Rickoff, R. (2010). Should eminence based on outstanding innovation be the goal of gifted education and talent development? Implications for policy and research. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 358-364. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.12.005
399. Subotnik, R. F., Robinson, A., Callahan, C. M., & Johnson, P. (Eds.). (in press). Malleable minds: Translating insights from psychology and neuroscience to gifted education. Storrs, CT: National Center for Research on Giftedness and Talent.
400. Subotnik, R. F., Stone, K. M., & Steiner, C. (2001). Lost generation of elite talent in science. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13, 33-43.
401. Subotnik, R. F., Tai, R. H., Rickoff, R., & Almarode, J. (2010). Specialized public high schools of science, mathematics, and technology and the STEM pipeline: What do we know now and what will we know in 5 years? Roeper Review, 32, 7-16. doi:10.1080/02783190903386553
402. Subotnik, R. F., & Thompson, B. (2010). Introduction. In B. Thompson & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Methodologies for conducting research on giftedness (pp. 3-8). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
403. Suldo, S. M., Shaunessy, E., Michalowski, J., & Shaffer, E. J. (2008). Coping strategies of high school students in an International Baccalaureate program. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 960-975. doi:10.1002/pits.20345
404. Syed, M. (2010). Bounce: Mozart, Federer, Picasso, Beckham, and the science of success. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
405. Tai, R. H., Liu, C.Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning for early careers in science. Science, 312, 1143-1144. doi:10.1126/ science.1128690
406. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1962). Adolescent attitudes toward academic brilliance. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
407. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York, NY: Macmillan.
408. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychosocial approach. In R.J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 21-52). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
409. Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 45-59). New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.
410. Terman, L. M. (1922). A new approach to the study of genius. Psychological Review, 29, 310-318. doi:10.1037/h0071072
411. Terman, L. M. (1925). Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Genetic studies of genius, Vol. 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
412. Terman, L. M. (1954a). The discovery and encouragement of exceptional talent. American Psychologist, 9, 221-230. doi:10.1037/ h0060516
413. Terman, L. M. (1954b). Scientists and non-scientists in a group of 800 gifted men. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 68, 1-44.
414. Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1947). The gifted group grows up: Twenty five years' follow-up of a superior group. Genetic studies of genius, Vol. 4. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
415. Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). The gifted group at mid-life: 35 years' follow up of the superior child. Genetic Studies of Genius (Vol. V). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
416. Thomas, J., & Williams, C. (2010). The history of specialized STEM schools and the formation and role of NCSSSMST. Roeper Review, 32, 17-24. doi:10.1080/02783190903386561
417. Thompson, B. (2010). Q-technique factor analysis as a vehicle to intensively study especially interesting people. In B. Thompson & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Methodologies for conducting research on giftedness (pp. 33-52). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12079-002
418. Thompson, B., & Subotnik, R. F. (Eds.). (2010). Methodologies for conducting research on giftedness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
419. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Benson-ville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
420. VanTassel-Baska, J. L. (1989). Characteristics of the developmental path of eminent and gifted adults. In J. L. VanTassel-Baska & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Patterns of influence on gifted learners: The home, the self, and the school (pp. 146-162). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
421. VanTassel-Baska, J. L. (1996). The talent development process in women writers: A study of Charlotte Bronte and Virginia Woolf. In K. Arnold, K. D. Noble, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development (pp. 295-316). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
422. VanTassel-Baska, J. L. (2007). Alternative program and services: A creative response to unmet needs of gifted students. In J. Van-Tassel-Baska (Ed.), Serving gifted and talented learners beyond the traditional classroom: A guide to alternative programs and services (pp. 241-256). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press Inc.
423. VanTassel-Baska, J. L., Bracken, B., Feng, A., & Brown, E. (2009). A longitudinal study of enhancing critical thinking and reading comprehension in Title 1 classrooms. Journal of the Education of the Gifted, 33, 7-37.
424. VanTassel-Baska, J. L., Robinson, N. M., Coleman, L. J., Shore, B. M., & Subotnik, R. F. (2006). A report card on the state of research in the field of gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 339-355. doi:10.1177/001698620605000406-410
425. Van Yperin, N.W. (2009). Why some make it and others do not: Identifying psychological factors that predict career success in professional adult soccer. The Sport Psychologist, 23, 317-329.
426. Wagner, R. K. (1994). Practical intelligence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 162-169.
427. Wagner, R. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 436-458. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.2.436
428. Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2005). Creativity and occupational accomplishments among intellectually precocious youths: An age 13 to age 33 longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 484-492. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.484
429. Wai, J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2010). Accomplishment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational dose: A 25-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 860-871. doi:10.1037/a0019454
430. Walberg, H., Williams, D. B., & Zeiser, S. (2003). Talent, accomplishment, and eminence. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.), The handbook of gifted education (pp. 350-357). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
431. Waller, N. G., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Lykken, D. T., Tellegen, A., & Blacker, D.M. (1993). Creativity, heritability, familiality: Which word does not belong? Psychological Inquiry, 4, 235-237. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0403_18
432. Walton, G. M., & Spencer, S. J. (2009). Latent ability: Grades and test scores systematically underestimate the intellectual ability of negatively stereotyped students. Psychological Science, 20, 1132-1139. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02417.x
433. Watts, C., Barnes-Burroughs, K., Andrianopoulos, M., & Carr, M. (2003). Potential factors related to untrained singing talent: A survey of singing pedagogues. Journal of Voice, 17, 298-307. doi:10.1067/S0892-1997(03)00068-7
434. Webb, J. T. (1993). Nurturing social-emotional development of gifted children. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of gifted-ness and talent (pp. 525-538). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
435. Weinberg, R. S., & Comar, W. (1994). The effectiveness of psychological interventions in competitive sport. Sports Medicine, 18, 406-418. doi:10.2165/00007256-199418060-00005
436. Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
437. Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational Psychologist, 45, 28-36. doi:10.1080/00461520903433596
438. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
439. Williamon, A. (2004). Musical excellence: strategies and techniques to enhance performance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
440. Williams, J. M., & Krane, V. (2005). Psychological characteristics of peak performance. In J. Williams (Ed.), Applied sport psychology: Personal growth to peak performance (5th ed., pp. 162-178). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
441. Winerip, M. (2010, July 25). Equity of test is debated as children compete for gifted kindergarten. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/26/education/26winerip.html?_r=1
442. Winner, E. (1996). Gifted children: Myths and realities. New York, NY: Basic Books.
443. Winner, E. (2009). Toward broadening our understanding of gifted-ness: The spatial domain. In F. D. Horowitz, R. F. Subotnik, & DJ. Matthews (Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent across the lifespan (pp. 75-85). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11867-005
444. Witty, P. A., & Lehman, H. C. (1928). Ability versus effective ability. Psychological Review, 35, 67-86. doi:10.1037/h0074994
445. Worrell, F.C. (2003). Why are there so few African Americans in gifted programs? In C. C. Yeakey & R. D. Henderson (Eds.), Surmounting the odds: Education, opportunity, and society in the new millennium (pp. 423-454). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
446. Worrell, F. C. (2009). What does gifted mean? Personal and social identity perspectives on giftedness in adolescence. In F. D. Horowitz, R. F. Subotnik, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent across the lifespan (pp. 131-152). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11867-008
447. Worrell, F. C. (2010a, August). Giftedness: Endowment, context, timing, development, or performance? Does it matter? American Psychological Foundation's Esther Katz Rosen Lecture on Gifted Children and Adolescents presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association. San Diego, CA.
448. Worrell, F. C. (2010b). Psychosocial stressors in the development of gifted learners with atypical profiles. In J. L. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.), Patterns and profiles of promising learners from poverty (pp. 33-58). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
449. Worrell, F. C. (in press). Mindsets and giftedness: Assumptions and implications. In R. F. Subotnik, A. Robinson, C. M. Callahan, & P. Johnson (Eds.) (in press). Malleable minds, translating insights from psychology and neuroscience to gifted education. Storrs, CT: National Center for Research on Giftedness and Talent.
450. Wylleman, P., & Reints, A. (2010). A lifespan perspective on the career of talented and elite athletes: Perspectives on high-intensity sports. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 20(Suppl. 2), 88-94. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01194.x
451. Wyner, J. S., Bridgeland, J. M., & Dilulio, J. J., Jr. (2009). Achievement trap: How America is failing millions of high-achieving students from low-income families (Rev. ed.). Lansdowne, VA: Jack Kent Cooke Foundation Civic Enterprises.
452. Yarrow, K., Brown, P., & Krakauer, J. W. (2009). Inside the brain of an elite athlete: The neural processes that support high achievement in sports. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 10, 585-596. doi:10.1038/nrn2672
453. Zifcak, M. (1981). Phonological awareness and reading acquisition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 117-126. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(81)90040-0
454. Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New York, NY: Free Press.