Permission to be gifted: How conceptions of giftedness can change lives

Conceptions of Giftedness: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 80-97

  Freeman, Joan ^a  

^a MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928284009     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511610455.007     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Adimin, J. (2002). Predictive validity of a selection test for accelerated learning in Malaysian primary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Manchester University, Manchester, England.
2. Arnot, M., Gray, J., & Rudduck, J. (with Duveen, G.) (1998). Recent research on gender and educational performance. London: Stationery Office.
3. Baltes, P. B., Staudinger, U. M., & Lindberger, U. (1999). Lifespan psychology: Theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 471-507.
4. Brumbaugh, K., Marchaim, U., & Litto, F. M. (1994, March). How should developing countries plan for and implement educational technology: One example. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Technology and Education, London, March 27-30.
5. Council of Europe. (1994). Recommendation no. 1248 on education for gifted children. Strasbourg, France.
6. Dahme, G. (1996, September). Teachers’ conceptions of gifted students in Indonesia (Java), Germany and USA. Paper presented at the 5th conference of the European Council for High Ability, Vienna, Austria.
7. Department for Education and Skills. (2000). The Standards Site: Gender and achievement. Retrieved December 20, 2002, from http://www.standards.dfee.gov.uk
8. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
9. Field, T., Harding, J., Yando, R., Gonzales, K., Lasko, D., Bendell, D., et al. (1988). Feelings and attitudes of gifted students, Adolescence, 33, 331-342.
10. Flynn, J. R. (1991). Asian Americans: Achievement beyond IQ. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Fox, L. H., Engle, J. L., & Paek, P. (2001). An exploratory study of social factors and mathematics achievement among high-scoring students: Cross-cultural perspectives from TIMSS. Gifted and Talented International, 16, 7-15.
12. Freeman, J. (1995). Conflicts in creativity. European Journal for High Ability, 6, 188-200.
13. Freeman, J. (1998). Educating the very able: Current international research. London: Stationery Office. (www.joanfreeman.com)
14. Freeman, J. (2001). Gifted children grown up. London: David Fulton.
15. Freeman, J. (2002). Out of school educational provision for the gifted and talented around the world: Report for the Department for Education and Skills (U.K. Government). (www.joanfreeman.com).
16. Freeman, J. (2003). Gender differences in gifted achievement in Britain and the USA, Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 202-211.
17. Freeman, J. (2004, September). The gifted and moral values. Paper presented at the Conference of the European Council for High Ability, Pamplona, Spain.
18. Gagné, F. (1995). Learning about the nature of gifts and talents through peer and teacher nominations. In M. W. Katzko & F. J. Mönks (Eds.), Nurturing talent: Individual needs and social ability. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
19. Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius. London: Macmillan.
20. George, D. (1992). The challenge of the able child. London: David Fulton.
21. Gross, M. U. M. (1992). The early development of three profoundly gifted children of IQ 200. InP. S. Klein&A. J.Tannenbaum (Eds.), To be young and gifted. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
22. Hansen, J. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 115-121.
23. Hany, E. A. (1993). How teachers identify gifted students: Feature processing or concept based classification. European Journal for High Ability, 4, 196-211.
24. Hany, E. A. (1995). Teachers’ cognitive processes of identifying gifted students. In M. W. Katzko & F. J. Mönks (Eds.), Nurturing talent: Individual needs and social ability. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
25. Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41-45.
26. Heller, K. A., & Ziegler, A. (1996). Gender differences in mathematics and natural sciences: Can attributional retraining improve the performance of gifted females? Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 200-210.
27. Herrnstein, R. J. & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. New York: Free Press.
28. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. London: Praeger.
29. Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development. Vol 2. Essays on moral development. New York: Harper and Row.
30. Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Morelock, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in engineering and the physical sciences among the gifted:Aninorganic-organic distinction. In K. A. Heller, F. J.Mönks, R. Sternberg, & R. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent(pp. 203-212). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
31. Luthar, S. S., Zigler, E., & Goldstein, D. (1992). Psychosocial adjustment among intellectually gifted adolescents: The role of cognitive-developmental and experiential factors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 361-373.
32. Lynn, R., & Vanhanen, T. (2002). IQ and the wealth of nations. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
33. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, O., Gonzales, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Garden, R. A., O’Connor, K. M., et al. (1999). Third International Mathematics and Science Study. International Mathematics Report. Findings from the IEA’s repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the eighth grade. Retrieved July 14, 2002, from http://isc.bc.edu/tmss1999i/math achievement report.html
34. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. The imperative for educational reform.Areport to the nation and the Secretary of Education; United States Department of Education. Washington, DC: April, 1983. http://www.ed.gov/pubs/
35. NatAtRisk Northamptonshire County Council. (1994). The more able child. Northampton, England: NIAS.
36. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America’s talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
37. Ojanen, S., & Freeman, J. (1994). The attitudes and experiences of headteachers, classteachers, and highly able pupils towards the education of the highly able in Finland and Britain. Savonlinna, Finland: University of Joensuu.
38. Pagnin, A., & Adreani, O. D. (2000). New trends in research on moral development in the gifted. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. Sternberg, & R. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent(pp. 467-484). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
39. Persson, R. S., Joswig, H., & Balogh, L. (2000). Gifted education in Europe: Programs, practices, and current research. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. Sternberg, & R. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent(pp. 203-212). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
40. Piaget, J. (1948). Moral judgement of the child. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
41. Plucker, J. A., & Levy, J. J. (2001). The downside of being talented. American Psychologist, 56(1), 75-76.
42. Rothman, G. R. (1992). Moral reasoning, moral behavior, and moral giftedness: A developmental perspective. In Pnina S. Klein & A. J. Tannenbaum (Eds.), To be young and gifted. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
43. Sisk, D. A. (2001). Creative leadership: A study of middle managers, senior level managers and CEOs. Gifted Education International, 15, 281-290.
44. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
45. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York: Plume.
46. Stevenson, H. W. (1998). Cultural interpretations of giftedness: The case of East Asia. In Friedman, R., & Rogers, K. B. (Eds.), Talent in context: Historical and social perspectives on giftedness(pp. 61-77). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
47. Stevenson, H. W., Lee, S., & Mu, X. (2000). Successful achievement in mathematics: China and the United States. In C. F. M. Lieshout & P. G. Heymans (Eds.), Developing talent across the life span(pp. 167-183). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
48. Subotnik, R. (2003). A developmental view of giftedness: From being to doing. Roeper Review, 26, 14-15.
49. Wilson, J. S., Stocking, V. B., & Goldstein, D. (1994). Gender differences in motivations for course selection: Academically talented students in an intensive summer program. Sex Roles, 3, 349-367.
50. Winner, E. (1996). Gifted children: Myths and realities. New York: Basic Books.
51. Zilmer, E. A., Harrower, M., Rizler, B. A., & Archer, R. P. (1995). The quest for the Nazi personality: A psychological investigation of Nazi war criminals. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.