Use of the extreme groups approach: A critical reexamination and new recommendations

Psychological Methods

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 178-192

  Preacher, Kristopher J ^a,d   MacCallum, Robert C ^a,d   Rucker, Derek D ^b   Nicewander, W Alan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Pacific Metrics Corporation   (United States)

^d University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

Dichotomization; Extreme groups; Quartile split; Tertile split

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GROUP PROCESS; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY;

GROUP PROCESSES; HEALTH PLANNING GUIDELINES; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOLOGY; SAMPLING STUDIES;

EID: 22544441296     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.2.178     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Abrahams, N. M., & Alf, E. F., Jr. (1978). Relative costs and statistical power in the extreme groups approach. Psychometrika, 43, 11-17.
2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Alf, E. F., Jr., & Abrahams, N. M. (1975). The use of extreme groups in assessing relationships. Psychometrika, 40, 563-572.
4. Arnold, H. J. (1982). Moderator variables: A clarification of conceptual, analytic, and psychometric issues. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 143-174.
5. Arnold, H. J. (1984). Testing moderator variable hypotheses: A reply to Stone and Hollenbeck. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 214-224.
6. Bartlett, M. S. (1949). Fitting a straight line when both variables are subject to error. Biometrics, 5, 207-212.
7. Bernichon, T., Cook, K. E., & Brown, J. D. (2003). Seeking self-evaluative feedback: The interactive role of global self-esteem and specific self-views. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 194-204.
8. Binet, A. (1900). Attention et adaptation [Attention and adaptation]. L'Année Psychologique, 6, 248-404.
9. Bjerve, S., & Doksum, K. A. (1993). Correlation curves: Measures of association as functions of covariate values. Annals of Statistics, 21, 890-902.
10. Bond, C. F., Wiitala, W. L., & Richard, F. D. (2003). Metaanalysis of raw mean differences. Psychological Methods, 8, 406-418.
11. Borich, G. D., & Godbout, R. C. (1974). Extreme groups designs and the calculation of statistical power. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 663-675.
12. Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory. Psychological Review, 62, 193-217.
13. Campbell, D. T., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). A primer on regression artifacts. New York: Guilford Press.
14. Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249-253.
15. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1999). The problem of units and the circumstance for POMP. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 315-346.
17. Cortina, J. M., & DeShon, R. P. (1998). Determining relative importance of predictors with the observational design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 798-804.
18. Cross, S. E., Morris, M. L., & Gore, J. S. (2002). Thinking about oneself and others: The relational-interdependent self-construal and social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 399-418.
19. Cureton, E. E. (1957). The upper and lower twenty-seven per cent rule. Psychometrika, 22, 293-296.
20. D'Agostino, R. B., & Cureton, E. E. (1975). The 27 percent rule revisited. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 4750.
21. Darvasi, A., & Soller, M. (1992). Selective genotyping for determination of linkage between a marker locus and a quantitative trait locus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 85, 353-359.
22. Deffenbacher, J. L., Huff, M. E., Lynch, R. S., Oetting, E. R., & Salvatore, N. F. (2000). Characteristics and treatment of highanger drivers. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 5-17.
23. Feldt, L. S. (1961). The use of extreme groups to test for the presence of a relationship. Psychometrika, 26, 307-316.
24. Flanagan, J. C. (1939). General considerations in the selection of test items and a short method of estimating the product-moment coefficient from data at the tails of the distribution. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 674-680.
25. Fowler, R. L. (1992). Using the extreme groups strategy when measures are not normally distributed. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 249-259.
26. Gangestad, S., & Snyder, M. (1985). "To carve nature at its joints": On the existence of discrete classes in personality. Psychological Review, 92, 317-349.
27. Garg, R. (1983). An empirical comparison of three strategies used in extreme group designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 359-371.
28. Gibson, W. M., & Jowett, G. H. (1957). 'Three-group' regression analysis: Pt. I. Simple regression analysis. Applied Statistics, 6, 114-122.
29. Henshall, J. M., & Goddard, M. E. (1999). Multiple-trait mapping of quantitative trait loci after selective genotyping using logistic regression. Genetics, 151, 885-894.
30. Humphreys, L. G. (1978). Research on individual differences requires correlational analysis, not ANOVA. Intelligence, 2, 1-5.
31. Humphreys, L. G. (1985). Correlations in psychological research. In D. K. Detterman (Ed.), Current topics in human intelligence: Vol. 1. Research methodology (pp. 3-24). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
32. Humphreys, L. G., & Dachler, H. P. (1969a). Jensen's theory of intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 419-426.
33. Humphreys, L. G., & Dachler, H. P. (1969b). Jensen's theory of intelligence: A rebuttal. Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 432-433.
34. Humphreys, L. G., & Fleishman, A. (1974). Pseudo-orthogonal and other analysis of variance designs involving individual-differences variables. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 464-472.
35. Iacobucci, D. (Ed.). (2001). Methodological and statistical concerns of the experimental behavioral researcher [Special issue]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(1-2).
36. Irwin, J. R., & McClelland, G. H. (2003). Negative consequences of dichotomizing continuous predictor variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 366-371.
37. Jensen, M. B. (1928). Objective differentiation between three groups in education (teachers, research workers, and administrators). Genetic Psychology Monographs: Child Behavior, Differential and Genetic Psychology, 3, 333-454.
38. Kagan, J., Snidman, N., & Arcus, D. (1998). The value of extreme groups. In R. B. Cairns, L. R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual: Essays in honor of Marian Radke-Yarrow (pp. 65-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Kaiser, H. F., & Dickman, K. (1962). Sample and population score matrices from an arbitrary population correlation matrix. Psychometrika, 27, 179-182.
40. Kelley, T. L. (1939). The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 17-24.
41. Kelley, T. L. (1947). Fundamentals of statistics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746-759.
43. Kirk, R. E. (2001). Promoting good statistical practices: Some suggestions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 213-218.
44. Lenth, R. V. (2001). Some practical guidelines for effective sample size determination. The American Statistician, 55, 187-193.
45. MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19-40.
46. McCabe, G. P. (1980). Use of the 27% rule in experimental design. Communications in Statistics, A9, 765-776.
47. McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376-390.
48. McNemar, Q. (1960). At random: Sense and nonsense. American Psychologist, 15, 295-300.
49. Miller, M. L., & Thayer, J. F. (1989). On the existence of discrete classes in personality: Is self-monitoring the correct joint to carve? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 143-155.
50. Mosteller, F. (1946). On some useful "inefficient" statistics. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 17, 377-408.
51. Muranty, H., & Goffinet, B. (1997). Selective genotyping for location and estimation of the effect of a quantitative trait locus. Biometrics, 53, 629-643.
52. Nair, K. R., & Banerjee, K. S. (1942). A note on fitting of straight lines if both variables are subject to error. Sankhyā, 6, 331.
53. Nair, K. R., & Shrivastava, M. P. (1942). On a simple method of curve fitting. Sankhyā, 6, 121-132.
54. Nicewander, W. A., & Price, J. M. (1983). Reliability of measurement and the power of statistical tests: Some new results. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 524-533.
55. Pearson, E. S., & Hartley, H. O. (1956). Biometrika tables for statisticians (Vol. 1). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
56. Pearson, K. (1903). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution: XI. On the influence of natural selection on the variability and correlation of organs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series A, 200, 1-66.
57. Peters, C. C. (1941). A technique for correlating measurable traits with freely observed social behaviors. Psychometrika, 6, 209-219.
58. Peters, C. C., & Van Voorhis, W. R. (1940). Statistical procedures and their mathematical bases. New York: McGraw-Hill.
59. Pitts, S. C. (1993). The utility of extreme groups analysis to detect interactions among correlated predictor variables. Unpublished master's thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe.
60. Pontari, B. A., & Schlenker, B. R. (2000). The influence of cognitive load on self-presentation: Can cognitive busyness help as well as harm social performance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1092-1108.
61. Ross, J., & Lumsden, J. (1964). Comment on Feldt's "use of extreme groups." Psychometrika, 29, 207-209.
62. Ross, J., & Weitzman, R. A. (1964). The twenty-seven per cent rule. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35, 214-221.
63. Sharma, S., Durand, R. M., & Gur-Arie, O. (1981). Identification and analysis of moderator variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 291-300.
64. Sorrentino, R. M., & Short, J.-A. C. (1977). The case of the mysterious moderates: Why motives sometimes fail to predict behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 478-484.
65. Stone, E. F., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (1989). Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables: Empirical evidence and related matters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 3-10.
66. Torgesen, J. K. (1991). Subtypes as prototypes: Extended studies of rationally defined extreme groups. In L. VernonFeagans & E. J. Short (Eds.), Subtypes of learning disabilities: Theoretical perspectives and research (pp. 229-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. Verplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 434-447.
68. Wald, A. (1940). The fitting of straight lines if both variables are subject to error. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11, 284-300.
69. Waller, N. G., & Meehl, P. E. (1998). Multivariate taxometric procedures: Distinguishing types from continua. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70. Wherry, R. J. (1984). Contributions to correlational analysis. New York: Academic Press.
71. Wilkinson, L., & the APA Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.
72. Zedeck, S. (1971). Problems with the use of "moderator" variables. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 295-310.