Intellectual giftedness: Economic, political, cultural, and psychological considerations

Learning and Individual Differences

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 287-297

  Mandelman, Samuel D ^a   Tan, Mei ^b   Aljughaiman, Abdullah M ^c   Grigorenko, Elena L ^a,b,d  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c KING FAISAL UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^d MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Gifted; Gifted education; Gifted identification

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954312181     PISSN: 10416080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.04.014     Document Type: Article

References (154)

1. Ablard K.E., Lipschultz R.E. Self-regulated learning in high-achieving students: Relations to advanced reasoning, achievement goals, and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology 1998, 90:94-101.
2. Aiken L.R. Ability and creativity in mathematics. Review of Educational Research 1973, 43:405-432.
3. Australian Senate Employment, W.R., Small Business and Education References Committee The education of gifted children 2001, Commonwealth of Australia, Sydney, Australia.
4. The Routledge international companion to gifted education 2009, Routledge, London, UK. T. Balchin, B. Hymer, D.J. Matthews (Eds.).
5. Ball S.J. Class strategies and the education market 2003, Routledge/Falmer, London, UK.
6. Bélanger J., Gagné F. Estimating the size of the gifted/talented population from multiple identification criteria. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 2006, 30:131-163.
7. Borland J.H. Gifted education without gifted children. Conceptions of giftedness 2005, 1-19. Cambridge University Press, New York. second edition. R.J. Sternberg, J.E. Davidson (Eds.).
8. Borland J.H. Identification. Critical issues and practices in gifted education 2008, 261-280. Prufrock Press, Inc, Waco, TX. J.A. Plucker, C.M. Callahan (Eds.).
9. Braggett E. Differentiating programs for secondary schools 1997, Hawker Brownlow, Sudney, Australia.
10. Calero M.D., García-Martín M.B., Jiménez M.I., Kazén M., Araque A. Self-regulation advantage for high-IQ children: Findings from a research study. Learning and Individual Differences 2007, 17:328-343.
11. Callahan C.M. Determining the effectiveness of educational services: Assessment issues 1992.
12. Callahan C.M., Moon T.R. Sorting the wheat from the chaff: What makes for good evidence of effectiveness in the literature in gifted education?. Gifted Child Quarterly 2007, 51:305-319.
13. Cavanagh S. Math, science academies favored to challenge top-tier students. Education Week 2006, 26:1-18.
14. Chan D.W. Exploring identification procedures of gifted students by teacher ratings: Parent ratings and student self-reports in Hong Kong. High Ability Studies 2000, 11:69-82.
15. Chan D.W. Components of leadership giftedness and multiple intelligences among Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong. High Ability Studies 2007, 18:155-172.
16. Chan J. Chinese intelligence. The handbook of Chinese psychology 1996, 93-108. Oxford University Press, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. M.H. Bond (Ed.).
17. Chan L.K. Motivational orientations and metacognitive abilities of intellectually gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly 1996, 40:184-193.
18. Christian T. A statewide evaluation of gifted education In Missouri 2008, University of Missouri.
19. Clemons T.L. Underachieving gifted students: A social cognitive model 2008, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, Storrs, CT.
20. Clinkenbeard P.R. Research on motivation and the gifted: Implications for identification, programming, and evaluation. Gifted Child Quarterly 1996, 40:220-228.
21. Coleman L.J. Is consensus on a definition in the field possible, desirable, necessary?. Roeper Review 2004, 27(1):10-11.
22. Crace J. Academy fervour. The Guardian (Education) 20 June, 2004.
23. Crace J. Could do amazingly. Education Guardian 11 July, 2006.
24. Cramond B. Can we, should we, need we agree on a definition of giftedness?. Roeper Review 2004, 27(1):15-16.
25. Cross T.L. Psychological types of academically gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly 2007, 51:285-294.
26. Cross T.L. The psychology of gifted adolescents as measured by the MMPI-A. Gifted Child Quarterly 2008, 52:326-339.
27. Dai D.Y., Moon S.M., Feldhusen J.F. Achievement motivation and gifted students: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist 1998, 33:45-63.
28. Delcourt M.A.B., Cornell D.G., Goldberg M.D. Cognitive and affective learning outcomes of gifted elementary school students. Gifted Child Quarterly 2007, 51:359-381.
29. Department for Education and Employment Excellence in cities 1997, DfEE, London, UK.
30. Department for Education and Employment Excellence in schools 1997, DfEE, London, UK.
31. Doina R.D.J. Evaluating programs for gifted students: Meeting the challenge. Gifted Child Today Magazine 1997, 20:38-40.
32. Dracup T. An outline of England's strategy for gifted and talented education. Gifted Education International 2003, 17:112-119.
33. Dresel M., Haugwitz M. The relationship between cognitive abilities and self-regulated learning: Evidence for interactions with academic self-concept and gender. High Ability Studies 2005, 16:201-218.
34. Farrent S., Grant A. Some Australian findings about the socio-emotional development of gifted pre-schoolers. Gifted Education International 2005, 19:142-153.
35. Feist G. The development of scientific talent in Westinghouse finalists and members of the National Academy of Sciences. Journal of Adult Development 2006, 13:23-35.
36. Feldhusen J.F., Wood B.K. Developing growth plans for gifted students. Gifted Child Today 1997, 20:24-26.
37. Ford D.Y., Moore J.L.I. Being gifted and adolescent: Issues and needs of students of color. The handbook of secondary gifted education 2006, 113-136. Prufrock Press, Waco, TX. F.A. Dixon, S.M. Moon (Eds.).
38. Ford D.Y., Trotman M.F. The Office for Civil Rights and non-discriminatory testing, policies, and procedures: Implications for gifted education. Roeper Review 2000, 23:109-112.
39. Forster J. Policy and practice: A twenty year retrospective on gifted education in the Australian state of New South Wales. Gifted Education International 2005, 19:182-196.
40. Freeman J. Giftedness in the long term. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 2006, 29:384-403.
41. Freeman J., Josepsson B. A aifted programme in Iceland and its effects. High Ability Studies 2002, 13:35-46.
42. Funke K., Krauss J., Schuler H., Stapf K.H. Zur Prognostizierbarkeit wissenschaftlichtechnischer Leistungen mittels Personvariablen: Eine Metaanalyse der Validität diagnostischer Verfahren im Bereich Forschung und Entwicklung. Gruppendynamik 1987, 18:407-428.
43. Gagné F. From giftedness to talent: A developmental model and its impact on the language of the field. Roeper Review 1995, 18:103-111.
44. Gagné F. An imperative, but, alas, improbable consensus!. Roeper Review 2004, 27(1):12-14.
45. Gallagher J.J. According to Jim Gallagher: The role of race in gifted education. Roeper Review 2005, 27:135.
46. Gallagher J.J. According to Jim: Necessary components of national infrastructure to support the development of brilliant minds. Roeper Review 2008, 30:5.
47. Gentry M., Hu S., Thomas A.T. Ethnically diverse students. Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says 2008, 195-212. Prufrock Press, Waco, TX. J.A. Plucker, C.M. Callahan (Eds.).
48. Gonzales P., Williams T., Jocelyn L., Roey S., Kastberg D., Brenwald S. Highlights from TIMSS 2007. Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth and eighth-grade students in an international context 2008, IES, NCES, Washington, DC.
49. Gordon E.W., Bridglall B.L. Nurturing talent in gifted students of color. Conceptions of giftedness 2005, 120-146. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. 2 ed. R.J. Sternberg, J.E. Davidson (Eds.).
50. Gottfried A.E., Gottfried A.W. A longitudinal study of academic intrinsic motivation in intellectually gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly 1996, 40:179.
51. Gottfried A.E., Gottfried A.W. Toward the development of a conceptualization of gifted motivation. Gifted Child Quarterly 2004, 48:121-132.
52. Gottfried A.W., Cook C.R., Gottfried A.E., Morris P.E. Educational characteristics of adolescents with gifted academic intrinsic motivation: A longitudinal investigation from school entry through early adulthood. Gifted Child Quarterly 2005, 49:172-186.
53. Grayson P.J. The performance of "gifted" high school students in university 1999.
54. Grigorenko E.L. Russian gifted education in math and science: Tradition and transformation. International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent 2000, 729-736. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Holland. K.A. Heller, F.J. Mönks, R.J. Sternberg, R.F. Subotnik (Eds.).
55. Grigorenko E.L. Hitting, missing, and in between: A typology of the impact of western education on the non-western world. Western psychological and educational theory in diverse contexts 2008, 165-186. Routledge, London, UK. J.G. Elliott, E.L. Grigorenko (Eds.).
56. Grigorenko E.L., Tan M. Teaching creativity as a demand-led competency. What the West can learn from the East: Asian perspectives on the psychology of learning and motivation 2008, Vol. 7:11-30. Information Age Press (IAP), Greenwich, CT. O.S. Tan, D.M. McInerney, A.D. Liem, A.-G. Tan (Eds.).
57. Gross M.U. Exceptionally gifted children: Long-term outcomes of academic acceleration and nonacceleration. [Feature]. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 2006, 29:404-429.
58. Gruber H.E. On the hypothesized relation between giftedness and creativity. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 1982, 1982(17):7-29.
59. Heller K.A. Identification of gifted and talented students Psychology Science 2004, 46:302-323.
60. Heller K.A. Education and counseling of the gifted and talented in Germany. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling 2005, 27:191-210.
61. Heller K.A. Scientific ability and creativity. High Ability Studies 2007, 18:209-234.
62. International handbook of giftedness and talent 2000, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Holland. K.A. Heller, F.J. Mönks, R.J. Sternberg, R.F. Subotnik (Eds.).
63. Hillebrand C.D. Nobel century: A biographical analysis of physics laureates. Interdisciplinary Science Review 2002, 27:87-93.
64. Holocher-Ertl S., Kubinger K.D., Hohensinn C. Identifying children who may be cognitively gifted: The gap between practical demands and scientific supply. Psychology Science 2008, 50:97-111.
65. Hong E.E.H., Aqui Y.Y.A. Cognitive and motivational characteristics of adolescents gifted in mathematics: Comparisons among students with different types of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly 2004, 48:191-201.
66. Jewell P. Gifted education in a democracy: Refuting the critics. Gifted Education International 2005, 19:107-113.
67. Jimenez E., Patrinos H.A. Can cost-benefit analysis guide education policy in developing countries? 2008, World Bank, Washington, DC.
68. Katz N.L. Math olympians? Go figure. Christian Science Monitor 1997, 89:12.
69. Klapp J., Porath M. Past, present and future of gifted education in British Columbia. AGATE (Journal of the Gifted and Talented Education Council of the Alberta Teachers' Association) 2000, 14(2):26-35.
70. Koshy V., Ernest P., Casey R. Mathematically gifted and talented learners: Theory and practice. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 2009, 40:213-228.
71. Krisjansen I., Lapins B. Gifted education in South Australia: The emerging student aristocracy. Discourse: Studies in the cultural policies of education 2001, 22:49-66.
72. Lind M. The next American nation: The new nationalism and the global American revolution 1995, Free Press, New York, NY.
73. Lipman P. High stakes education: Inequality, globalisation and urban school reform 2004, Routledge/Falmer, New York, NY.
74. Lubinski D., Benbow C.P. Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2006, 1:316-345.
75. Lubinski D., Benbow C.P., Webb R.M., Bleske-Rechek A. Tracking exceptional human capital over two decades. Psychological Science 2006, 17:194-1999.
76. Lucey H., Reay D. Carrying the beacon of excellence. Journal of Education Policy 2002, 17:321-336.
77. Lupkowski-Shoplik A.E., Benbow C.P., Assouline S.G., Brody L.E. Talent searches: Meeting the needs of academically talented youth. Handbook of gifted education 2003, 204-218. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA. 2 ed. N. Colangelo, G.A. Davis (Eds.).
78. Maajeeny O.H. Gifted and talented learners in the Saudi Arabian regular classroom: A needs assessment 1990, Unpublished Ph.D, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
79. Marland S.P. Education of the gifted and talented 1972, Vol. 1. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
80. McAllister B.A., Plourde L.A. Enrichment curriculum: Essential for mathematically gifted students. Education 2008, 129:40-49.
81. McCann M. Our greatest natural resource: Gifted education in Australia. Gifted Education International 2005, 19:90-106.
82. McCoach D.B., Siegle D. Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly 2003, 47:144-154.
83. McKinsey & Company The economic impact of the achievement gap in America's schools 2009, Social Sector Office, New York, NY.
84. Merriam-Webster Merriam-Webster online dictionary 2009, Retrieved July 23, 2009.
85. Milgram R.M. Identifying and enhancing talent in Israel: A high national priority. Roeper Review 2000, 22:108-110.
86. Ndirangu M., Mwangi J.K., Changeiywo J. Educational provision for the academically gifted: Rhetoric or reality? Case of primary schools in Nyandarua District, Kenya. Eastern Africa Social Science Research Review 2007, 23:55-69.
87. Neber H., Schommer-Aikins M. Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies 2002, 13:59-74.
88. Nokelainen P., Tirri K., Campbell J.R. Cross-cultural predictors of mathematical talent and academic productivity. High Ability Studies 2004, 15:229-242.
89. Nokelainen P., Tirri K., Campbell J.R., Walberg H. Factors that contribute to or hinder academic productivity: Comparing two groups of most and least successful Olympians. Educational Research and Evaluation 2007, 13:483-500.
90. Nokelainen P., Tirri K., Merenti-Välimäki H.-L. Investigating the influence of attribution styles on the development of mathematical talent. The Gifted Child Quarterly 2007, 51:64-81.
91. Olszewski-Kubilius P. The transition from childhood giftedness to adult creative productiveness: Psychological characteristics and social supports. Roeper Review 2000, 23:65-71.
92. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Understanding the brain: Towards a new learning 2002, OECD, Paris, France.
93. Park S.-K., Park K.-H., Ho-Seong C. The relationship between thinking styles and scientific giftedness in Korea. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education 2005, 16:87-97.
94. Pegnato C.W., Birch J.W. Locating gifted children in junior high schools-A comparison of methods. Exceptional Children 1959, 25:300-304.
95. Peyser M. Identifying and nurturing gifted children in Israel. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling 2005, 27:229-243.
96. Plucker J.A., Barab S.A. The importance of contexts in theories of giftedness: Learning to embrace the messy joys of subjectivity. Conceptions of giftedness 2005, 201-216. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. 2 ed. R.J. Sternberg, J.E. Davidson (Eds.).
97. Plunkett M., Kronborg L. Gifted education in Australia: A story of striving for balance. Gifted Education International 2007, 23:72-83.
98. Porath M. Affective and motivational considerations in the assessment of gifted learners. Roeper Review 1996, 19:13-17.
99. Power S., Edwards T., Whitty G., Wigfall V. Education and the middle class 2003, Open University Press, Buckingham, UK.
100. Quek, C. G. (2005). A national study of scientific talent development in Singapore. Unpublished Ph.D., The College of William and Mary, United States - Virginia.
101. Radnor H., Koshy V., Taylor A. Gifts, talents and meritocracy. Journal of Education Policy 2007, 22:283-299.
102. Rahn H. Jugend forscht 1986, Hogrefe, Göttingen, Germany.
103. Rindermann H., Sailer M., Thompson J. The impact of smart fractions, cognitive ability of politicians and average competence of peoples on social development. Talent Development & Excellence 2009, 1(1):3-25.
104. Risemberg R., Zimmerman B.J. Self-regulated learning in gifted students. Roeper Review 1992, 15:98.
105. Robinson M. A vision splendid: Gifted education in Australia. Roeper Review 1992, 14:206.
106. Rothenberg A. The janusian process in scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal 1996, 9:207-231.
107. Rothenberg A. Family background and genius II: Nobel laureates in science. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 2005, 50:918-925.
108. Sak U. A synthesis of research on psychological types of gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education 2004, 14:70-79.
109. Schroth S.T., Helfer J.A. Identifying gifted students: Educator beliefs regarding various policies, processes, and procedures. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 2008, 32:155-179.
110. Sennet R. The culture of the New Capitalism 2006, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
111. Shavinina L. Explaining high abilities of Nobel laureates. High Ability Studies 2004, 15:243-254.
112. Shoho A.R. A cross-cultural analysis of similarities and differences among math olympiads in China, Taiwan, and the United States. International Journal of Educational Research 1996, 25(6):575-582.
113. Silverman L.K. Perfectionism: The crucible of giftedness. Gifted Education International 2007, 23:233-245.
114. Singh P. An axperimental study of self-regulated learning with gifted learners. International Journal of Learning 2009, 16:101-117.
115. Smith A. Making mathematics count. The report of Professor Adrian Smith's inquiry into post-14 mathematics education 2004, The Stationery Office, London, UK.
116. Stanley J.C., Benbow C.P. Youths who reason extremely well mathematically. Conceptions of giftedness 1986, 361-387. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. R.J. Sternberg, J.E. Davidson (Eds.).
117. Sternberg R.J. Successful intelligence 1996, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.
118. Conceptions of giftedness 2005, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. R.J. Sternberg, J.E. Davidson (Eds.).
119. Sternberg R.J., Grigorenko E.L., Ferrari M., Clinkenbeard P.A. Triarchic analysis of an aptitude-treatment interaction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 1999, 15:3-13.
120. Stoeger H., Ziegler A. Motivational orientations and cognitive abilities: An empirical investigation in primary school. Gifted Education International 2006, 21:227-246.
121. Street P. The role of motivation to the academic achievement of gifted secondary students. Gifted Education International 2001, 15:164-177.
122. Subotnik R.F., Duschl R.A., Selmon E.H. Retention and attrition of science talent: A longitudinal study of Westinghouse Science Talent Search winners. International Journal of Science Education 1993, 15:61-72.
123. Subotnik R.F., Edmiston A.M., Rayhack K.M. Developing national policies in STEM talent development: Obstacles and opportunities. Science Education: Models & Networking of Student Research Training under 2007, 21(16):28-38.
124. Subotnik R.F., Steiner C.L. Adult manifestations of adolescent talent in Science: A longitudinal study of 1983 Westinghouse Science Talent Search winners. Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent 1994, 52-76. Ablex, Norwood, NJ. R.F. Subotnik, K.D. Arnold (Eds.).
125. Swiatek M.A. The talent search model: Past, present, and future. Gifted Child Quarterly 2007, 51:320-329.
126. Swiatek M.A., Benbow C.P. Ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability-matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students. Journal of Educational Psychology 1991, 83:528-538.
127. Tang M., Neber H. Motivation and self-regulated science learning in high-achieving students: Differences related to nation, gender, and grade-level. High Ability Studies 2008, 19:103-116.
128. Tannenbaum A.J. Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives 1983, Macmillan, New York, NY.
129. Teese R. Academic success and social power: Examinations and inequality 2000, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, Australia.
130. Thompson P. Skating on thin ice: The knowledge economy myth 2004, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
131. Tirri K., Nokelainen P. Introduction. Educational Research & Evaluation 2007, 13(6):479-482.
132. Tomlinson S. Education in a post-welfare society 2005, Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education, Berkshire, UK. 2 ed.
133. Tomlinson S. Gifted, talented and high ability: Selection for education in a one-dimensional world. Oxford Review of Education 2008, 34:59-74.
134. Trost G., Sieglen J. Biographische Frühindikatoren herausragender beruflicher Leistungen. Begabung und Hochbegabung 1992, 95-104. Huber, Bern, Switzerland. E.A. Hany, H. Nickel (Eds.).
135. Tsuin-Chen O. Some facts and ideas about talent and genius in Chinese history. Concepts of excellence in education: The yearbook of education 1961, 54-61. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York, NY. G.Z.F. Bereday, J.A. Lauwery (Eds.).
136. Urban K.K., Sekowski A. Programs and practices for identifying and nurturing giftedness and talent in Europe. International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent 1993, 779-795. Pergamon, Oxford, UK. K.A. Heller, F.J. Mönks, A.H. Passow (Eds.).
137. Van Houten J. A century of chemical dynamics traced through the Nobel Prizes. 1995: Paul Crutzen, Sherwood Rowland, and Mario Molina. Journal of Chemical Education 2002, 79:1182-1188.
138. VanTassel-Baska J. A content analysis of evaluation findings across 20 gifted programs: A clarion call for enhanced gifted program development. Gifted Child Quarterly 2006, 50:199-215.
139. VanTassel-Baska J., Brown E.F. Toward best practice: An analysis of the efficacy of curriculum models in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly 2007, 51:342-358.
140. VanTassel-Baska J., Feng A.X., De Brux E. A study of identification and achievement profiles of performance task-identified gifted students over 6years. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 2007, 31:7-34.
141. Vialle W., Heaven P.C.L., Ciarrochi J. On being gifted, but sad and misunderstood: Social, emotional, and academic outcomes of gifted students in the Wollongong Youth Study. Educational Research and Evaluation 2007, 13:569-586.
142. Vrignaud P., Bonora D., Dreux A. Education practices for gifted learners in France: An overview. The Routledge international companion to gifted education 2009, 68-75. Routledge, Abingdon, UK. T. Balchin, B. Hymer, D.J. Matthews (Eds.).
143. Watters J.J., Diezmann C.M. The gifted student in science: Fulfilling potential. Australian Science Teachers Journal 2003, 49:46.
144. Weber C.L., Boswell C., Smith D. Different paths to accountability: Defining rigorous outcomes for gifted learners. Gifted Child Today 2008, 31:54-65.
145. Wenzhong Y. Education of gifted and talented children: What's going on in China. Gifted Education International 2004, 18:313-325.
146. Williams P. Independent review of mathematics teaching in early years settings and primary schools 2008, Department for Children, Schools and Families, Nottingham, UK.
147. Wu E.H. Factors that contribute to talented performance: A theoretical model from a Chinese perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly 2005, 49:231-246.
148. Zeidner M., Schleyer E.J. Evaluating the effects of full-time vs part-time educational programs for the gifted: Affective outcomes and policy considerations. Evaluation and Program Planning 1999, 22:413-427.
149. Zhang H.C. Psychological measurement in China. International Journal of Psychology 1988, 23:101-124.
150. Zuckerman H. Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States 1977, Free Press, New York, NY.
151. Zuckerman H. Careers of men and women scientists: A review of current research. Women: Their under-representation and career differentials in science and engineering 1987, 27-56. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. L.S. Dix (Ed.).
152. Zuckerman H. The scientific elite: Nobel laureates' mutual influences. Genius and eminence 1992, 157-169. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK. R.S. Albert (Ed.).
153. Zuckerman H. Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States 1996, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ.
154. Zuo L., Tao L. Importance of personality in gifted children's identity formation. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education 2001, 12:212.