The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity

Conceptions of Giftedness: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 246-279

  Renzulli, Joseph S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928297811     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511610455.015     Document Type: Chapter

References (105)

1. Ahuvia, A. C. (2002). Individualism/collectivism and cultures of happiness: A theoretical conjecture on the relationship between consumption, culture and subjective well-being at the national level. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 23-36.
2. Albert, R. S. (1975). Toward a behavioral definition of genius. American Psychologist, 30, 140-151.
3. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
4. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
5. Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950-967.
6. Barron, F. (1968). Creativity and personal freedom. New York: Van Nostrand.
7. Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
8. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1. Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
9. Bloom, B. S. (1963). Report on creativity research by the examiner’s office of the University of Chicago. In C. W. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development(pp. 263-315). New York: Wiley.
10. Bloom, B. S., & Sosniak, L. A. (1981). Talent development vs. schooling. Educational Leadership, 38, 86-94.
11. Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380-400.
12. Chambers, J. A. (1969). A multidimensional theory of creativity. Psychological Reports, 25, 779-799.
13. Collins, M. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Motivation and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity(pp. 297-312). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Cox, C. M. (1926). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 2. The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.
16. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
17. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26, 325-346.
18. Dellas, M., & Gaier, E. L. (1970). Identification of creativity: The individual. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 55-73.
19. DuBois, P. H. (1970). A history of psychological testing. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
21. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
22. Gowan, J. C. (1978, July 25). New directions for gifted education. Paper presented at the University of Connecticut, Storrs.
23. Guilford, J. P. (1964). Some new looks at the nature of creative processes. In M. Fredrickson&H. Gilliksen (Eds.), Contributions to mathematical psychology(pp. 42-66). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
24. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25. Harmon, L. R. (1963). The development of a criterion of scientific competence. In C.W. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development(pp. 147-165). New York:Wiley.
26. Helson, R., & Crutchfield, R. S. (1970). Mathematicians: The creative researcher and the average Ph.D. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 250-257.
27. Holland, J. L., & Astin, A.W. (1962). The prediction of the academic, artistic, scientific and social achievement of undergraduates of superior scholastic aptitude. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 182-183.
28. Hoyt, D.P. (1965). The relationship between college grades and adult achievement:Areview of the literature (Research Report No. 7). Iowa City: American College Testing Program.
29. Hudson, L. (1960). Degree class and attainment in scientific research. British Journal of Psychology, 51, 67-73.
30. Huer, J. (1991). The wages of sin: America’s dilemma of profit against humanity. New York: Praeger.
31. Jones, J. (1982). The gifted student at university. Gifted International, 1, 49-65.
32. Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. LaBonte, R. (1999). Social capital and community development: Practitioner emptor. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 23(4), 430-433.
34. MacKinnon, D.W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484-495.
35. MacKinnon, D.W. (1964). The creativity of architects. In C.W. Taylor (Ed.), Widening horizons in creativity. New York: Wiley.
36. MacKinnon, D. W. (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20, 273-281.
37. Mandela, N. www.thinkexist.com/English/Author/x/Author37611.htm. Retreieved February 12, 2004.
38. McCurdy, H. G. (1960). The childhood pattern of genius. Horizon, 2, 33-38.
39. McGue, M., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Iacono, W. G., & Lykken, D. T. (1993). Behavioral genetics of cognitive ability:Alife-span perspective. In R. Plomin&G. E. McClearn (Eds.), Nature, nurture and psychology, pp. 59-76. Washington, DC: American Psychology Association
40. McNemar, Q. (1964). Lost: Our intelligence? Why? American Psychologist, 19, 871-882.
41. Mednick, M. T. (1963). Research creativity in psychology graduate students. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 27, 265-266.
42. Miele, F. (1995). Magazine interview with Robert Sternberg on The bell curve. Skeptic, 3(3), 72-80.
43. Moon, S. M. (2000, May). Personal talent: What is it and how can we study it? Paper presented at the Fifth Biennial Henry B. and JoycelynWallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development, Iowa City, IA.
44. Munday, L. A., & Davis, J. C. (1974). Varieties of accomplishment after college: Perspectives on the meaning of academic talent (Research Report No. 62). Iowa City: American College Testing Program.
45. Myers, D. G. (1993). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Avon Books.
46. Neisser, U. (1979). The concept of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & D. K. Detterman (Eds.), Human Intelligence(pp. 179-189). Norwood, NJ.: Ablex.
47. Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Boykin, A.W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., et al. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77-101.
48. Netemeyer, R. G., Burton, S., & Lichtenstein, D. R. (1995). Trait aspects of vanity: Measurement and relevance to consumer behavior. The Journal of Consumer Research, 21(4), 612-626.
49. Nicholls, J. C. (1972). Creativity in the person who will never produce anything original and useful: The concept of creativity as a normally distributed trait. American Psychologist, 27, 717-727.
50. Oden, M. H. (1968). The fulfillment of promise: 40-year follow-up of the Terman gifted group. Genetic Psychology Monograph, 77, 3-93.
51. Parloff, M. B., Datta, L., Kleman, M., & Handlon, J. H. (1968). Personality characteristics which differentiate creative male adolescents and adults. Journal of Personality, 36, 528-552.
52. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
53. Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54. Putnam, R. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal Of Democracy, 6(January 1995), 65-78.
55. Reis, S. M. (1981). An analysis of the productivity of gifted students participating in programs using the revolving door identification model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
56. Reis, S. M., Burns, D. E., & Renzulli, J. S. (1992). Curriculum compacting: The complete guide to modifying the regular curriculum for high ability students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
57. Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (1982). A research report on the revolving door identification model: A case for the broadened conception of giftedness. Phi Delta Kappan, 63, 619-620.
58. Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
59. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184, 261.
60. Renzulli, J. S. (1982). What makes a problem real: Stalking the illusive meaning of qualitative differences in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26(4), 148-156.
61. Renzulli, J. S. (1983). Guiding the gifted in the pursuit of real problems: The transformed role of the teacher. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 17(1), 49-59.
62. Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness(pp. 53-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
63. Renzulli, J. S. (1988). A decade of dialogue on the three-ring conception of giftedness. Roeper Review, 11, 18-25.
64. Renzulli, J. S. (1990).Apractical system for identifying gifted and talented students. Early Childhood Development, 63, 9-18.
65. Renzulli, J. S. (1992). A general theory for the development of creative productivity in young people. In F. J. M¨onks & W. A. M. Peters (Eds.), Talent for the future(pp. 51-72). Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
66. Renzulli, J. S. (1997a). Interest-A-Lyzer: Family of instruments. A manual for teachers. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
67. Renzulli, J. S. (1997b). The Total Talent Portfolio: Looking at the best in every student. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
68. Renzulli, J. S. (1999). What is this thing called giftedness, and how do we develop it? A twenty-five year perspective. Journal for the education of the gifted, 23, 3-54.
69. Renzulli, J. S. (2002). Expanding the conception of giftedness to include co-cognitive traits and to promote social capital. Phi Delta Kappan, 84, 33-40, 57-58.
70. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1994). Research related to the Schoolwide Enrichment Triad Model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(1), 7-20.
71. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
72. Renzulli, J. S., Rizza, M. G., & Smith, L. H. (2002). Learning styles inventory-version III: A measure of student preferences for instructional techniques. Technical and administration manual. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
73. Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., & Reis, S. M. (1992). Curriculum compacting: The complete guide to modifying the regular curriculum for high ability students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
74. Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., & Westberg, K. L. (2002). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students-revised edition. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
75. Richards, J. M, Jr., Holland, J. L., & Lutz, S.W. (1967). Prediction of student accomplishment in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 343-355.
76. Roe, A. (1952). The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead.
77. Shapiro, R. J. (1968). Creative research scientists. Psychologia Africana. Monograph supplement 4.
78. Shrader, W. K. (1992). Media blight and the dehumanizing of America. New York: Praeger.
79. Stein, M. I. (1968). Creativity. In E. Borgalta & W. W. Lambert (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
80. Sternberg, R. J. (1981). Intelligence and nonentrenchment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 1-16.
81. Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Lies we live by: Misapplication of tests in identifying the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26(4), 157-161.
82. Sternberg, R. J. (1984). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,7(2), 269-316.
83. Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Interview with Robert Sternberg on The Bell Curve. Skeptic, 3(5), 72-80.
84. Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
85. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
86. Sternberg, R. J. (1998). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2(4), 347-365.
87. Sternberg, R. J. (2001, November). The theory of wisdom. Talk given at the 48th annual conference of the National Association for Gifted Children, Cincinnati, OH.
88. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1982, June). The mind of the puzzler. Psychology Today, 16, 37-44.
89. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). The theory of successful intelligence as a basis for gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 265-277.
90. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995).Aninvestment perspective on creative insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight(pp. 535-558). Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
91. Sternberg, R. J., & O’Hara, L. A. (1999). Creativity and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity(pp. 251-272). New York: Cambridge University Press.
92. Tatzel, M. (2002). “Money worlds” and well-being: An integration of money dispositions, materialism and price-related behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 103-126.
93. Terman, L.M.(1954). The discovery and encouragement of exceptional talent. American Psychologist, 9, 221-230.
94. Terman, L. M., Baldwin, B. T., Bronson, E., DeVoss, J. C., Fuller, F., Goodenough, F. L., Kelley, T. L., et al. (1926). Genetic studies of genius: Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children (2nd ed.) Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
95. Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). Genetic studies of genius: The gifted group at mid-life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
96. Thorndike, E. L. (1921). Intelligence and its measurement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12, 124-127.
97. Torrance, E. P. (1969). Prediction of adult creative achievement among high school seniors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 13, 223-229.
98. Turkheimer, E., Haley, A., Waldron, M., D’Onofrio, B., & Gottesman, I. I. (2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heratibility of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14, 623-628.
99. Vernon, P. E. (1967). Psychological studies of creativity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 8, 153-164.
100. Walberg, H. J. (1969). A portrait of the artist and scientist as young men. Exceptional Children, 35, 5-12.
101. Walberg, H. J. (1971). Varieties of adolescent creativity and the high school environment. Exceptional Children, 38, 111-116.
102. Wallach, M. A. (1976). Tests tell us little about talent. American Scientist, 64, 57-63.
103. Wallach, M. A., & Wing, C. W., Jr. (1969). The talented students: A validation of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
104. Witty, P. A. (1958). Who are the gifted? In N. B. Henry (Ed.), Education of the gifted. Fifty-seventhYearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2(pp. 41-63). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
105. Zuckerman, H. (1979). The scientific elite: Nobel laureates’ mutual influences. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence(pp. 241-252). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.