Longitudinal stability of reading-related skills and their prediction of reading development

Scientific Studies of Reading

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 111-136

  Hulslander, Jacqueline ^a   Olson, Richard K ^a   Willcutt, Erik G ^a   Wadsworth, Sally J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949550328     PISSN: 10888438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10888431003604058     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arbuckle, J. L. (2005). Amos 6.0 [Computer software]. Spring House, PA: Amos Development Corporation.
2. Boder, E. (1973). Developmental dyslexia: A diagnostic approach based on three atypical reading and spelling patterns. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 15, 663-687.
3. Bowey, J. A. (2008). Is a "Phoenician" reading style superior to a "Chinese" reading style? Evidence from fourth graders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100, 186-214.
4. Bryant, P. E., & Impey, L. (1986). The similarity between normal readers and developmental and acquired dyslexics. Cognition, 24, 121-137.
5. Byrne, B., Samuelsson, S., Wadsworth, S., Hulslander, J., Corley, R., DeFries, J. C., et al. (2007). Longitudinal twin study of early literacy development: Preschool through Grade 1. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 77-102.
6. Catts, H. W., Hogan, T. P., & Adlof, S. M. (2005). Developmental changes in reading and reading disabilities. In H. W. Catts & A. G. Kamhi (Eds.). The connections between language and reading disabilities. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Compton, D. L., Olson, R. K., DeFries, J. C., & Pennington B. (2002). Are all RAN created equal? Comparing the relationships among two different formats of alphanumeric RAN and various word reading skills in normally achieving and reading disabled individuals. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 343-368.
8. Decker, S. N. (1989). Cognitive processing rates among disabled and normal young adults: A nine year follow-up study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 123-134.
9. DeFries, J. C., Filipek, P. A., Fulker, D. W., Olson, R. K., Pennington, B. F., Smith, S. D., et al. (1997). Colorado Learning Disabilities Research Center. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 7-19.
10. de Jong, P., & van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 51-77.
11. Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Rapid "automatized" naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471-479.
12. Dunn, L. M., & Markwardt, F. C. (1970). Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
13. Friend, A., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Phonological spelling and reading deficits in children with spelling disabilities. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 90-105.
14. Fuchs, D., & Young, C. L. (2006). On the irrelevance of intelligence in predicting responsiveness to reading instruction. Exceptional Children, 73(1), 8-30.
15. Gayán, J., & Olson, R. K. (2003). Genetic and environmental influences on individual differences in printed word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 97-123.
16. Gollob, H. F., & Reichardt, C. S. (1987). Taking account of time lags in causal models. Child Development, 58, 80-92.
17. Harlaar, N., Spinath, F. M., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2005). Genetic and environmental influences on word recognition abilities and disabilities: A study of 7 year old twins. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 373-384.
18. Hatcher, P., & Hulme, C. (1999). Phonemes, rhymes, and intelligence as predictors of children's responsiveness to remedial reading instruction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 130-153.
19. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
20. Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). The Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised: Administration manual. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates, Inc.
21. Johnston, R. S., & Morrison, M. (2007). Toward a resolution of inconsistencies in the phonological deficit theory of reading disorders: Phonological reading difficulties are more severe in high-IQ poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 66-79.
22. Judd, C. M., & McClelland, G. H. (1989). Data analysis: A model-comparison approach. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
23. Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447.
24. Lervåg, A., & Hulme, C. (2009). Rapid Naming (RAN) taps a basic neuron-developmental constraint on the development of reading fluency. Psychological Science, 20, 1040-1048.
25. Markwardt, F. C., Jr. (1989). Peabody Individual Achievement Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
26. Meyer, M. S., Wood, F. B., Hart, L. A., & Felton, R. H. (1998). Selective predictive value of rapid automatized naming in poor readers. Journal of Reading Disabilities, 31, 106-117.
27. Olson, R., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 243-277). Baltimore: Brookes.
28. Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Connors, F., Rack, J., & Fulker, D. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 339-348.
29. Parrila, R., Kirby, J. R., & McQuarrie, L. (2004). Articulation rate, naming speed, verbal short-term memory, and phonological awareness: Longitudinal predictors of early reading development? Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(1), 3-26.
30. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Perfetti, C. A., Beck, I., Bell, L. C., & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283-319.
32. Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992).Thenonwordreadingdeficitindevelopmentaldyslexia: a review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 28-53.
33. Rodgers, B. (1983). The identification and prevalence of specific reading retardation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 369-373.
34. Scarborough, H. (1998). Predicting the future achievement of second graders with reading disabilities: Contributions of phonemic awareness, verbal memory, rapid naming, and IQ. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 115-136.
35. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218.
36. Siegel, L. S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 469-478, 486.
37. Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). Guide for administering and scoring the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (4th ed.). Chicago: Riverside.
38. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33-58.
39. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in secondto fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 161-185.
40. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conwary, T., & Garavan, C. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579-593.
41. Wadsworth, S. J., DeFries, J. C., Olson, R. K., & Willcutt, E. G. (2007). Colorado Longitudinal Twin Study of Reading Disability. Annals of Dyslexia, 57, 139-160.
42. Wagner, R. K., Togesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. P., et al. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33,468-479.
43. Wechsler, D. (1974). Examiner's manual: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
44. Wechsler, D. (1991). Examiner's manual: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-3rd edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
45. Wechsler, D. (1993). Examiner's manual: Wechsler Intelligence Scale-3rd edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
46. Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). Examiner's manual: Wide Range Achievement Test-3. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates-Wide Range Inc.
47. Wise, B. W., Ring, J., & Olson, R. K. (1999). Training phonological awareness with and without attention to articulation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 271-304.
48. Wise, B. W., Ring, J., & Olson, R. K. (2000). Individual differences in gains from computer-assisted remedial reading with more emphasis on phonological analysis or accurate reading in context. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 197-235.
49. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415-438.
50. Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.