The ATR pathway: Fine-tuning the fork

DNA Repair

Volumn 6, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 953-966

  Paulsen, Renee D ^a   Cimprich, Karlene A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ATR pathway; DNA replication; Stalled replication forks

Indexed keywords

ATR PROTEIN; CHECKPOINT KINASE 1; DNA; SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELL SURVIVAL; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; DNA STRUCTURE; DOWN REGULATION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMAN; INHIBITION KINETICS; KARYOTYPE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; HUMANS; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEINS;

EID: 34249937178     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.02.015     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Kastan M.B., and Bartek J. Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer. Nature 432 (2004) 316-323
2. McGowan C.H. Running into problems: how cells cope with replicating damaged DNA. Mutat. Res. 532 (2003) 75-84
3. Rothstein R., Michel B., and Gangloff S. Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break". Genes Dev. 14 (2000) 1-10
4. Hyrien O. Mechanisms and consequences of replication fork arrest. Biochimie 82 (2000) 5-17
5. Glover T.W., Arlt M.F., Casper A.M., and Durkin S.G. Mechanisms of common fragile site instability. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14 2 (2005) R197-R205
6. Branzei D., and Foiani M. The DNA damage response during DNA replication. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17 (2005) 568-575
7. Lambert S., and Carr A.M. Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers. Biochimie 87 (2005) 591-602
8. Lambert S., Watson A., Sheedy D.M., Martin B., and Carr A.M. Gross chromosomal rearrangements and elevated recombination at an inducible site-specific replication fork barrier. Cell 121 (2005) 689-702
9. Friedberg E.C. Suffering in silence: the tolerance of DNA damage. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6 (2005) 943-953
10. Lucca C., Vanoli F., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Haber J., and Foiani M. Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing. Oncogene 23 (2004) 1206-1213
11. Zachos G., Rainey M.D., and Gillespie D.A. Chk1-dependent S-M checkpoint delay in vertebrate cells is linked to maintenance of viable replication structures. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25 (2005) 563-574
12. Cobb J.A., Schleker T., Rojas V., Bjergbaek L., Tercero J.A., and Gasser S.M. Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 3055-3069
13. Cobb J.A., Bjergbaek L., Shimada K., Frei C., and Gasser S.M. DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. EMBO J. 22 (2003) 4325-4336
14. Carr A.M. Checking that replication breakdown is not terminal. Science 297 (2002) 557-558
15. Sogo J.M., Lopes M., and Foiani M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297 (2002) 599-602
16. Cha R.S., and Kleckner N. ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science 297 (2002) 602-606
17. Kolodner R.D., Putnam C.D., and Myung K. Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 297 (2002) 552-557
18. Osborn A.J., Elledge S.J., and Zou L. Checking on the fork: the DNA-replication stress-response pathway. Trends Cell Biol. 12 (2002) 509-516
19. Nyberg K.A., Michelson R.J., Putnam C.W., and Weinert T.A. Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Genet. 36 (2002) 617-656
20. Sancar A., Lindsey-Boltz L.A., Unsal-Kacmaz K., and Linn S. Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73 (2004) 39-85
21. Zhou B.B., and Elledge S.J. The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 408 (2000) 433-439
22. Melo J., and Toczyski D. A unified view of the DNA-damage checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14 (2002) 237-245
23. Brown E.J., and Baltimore D. ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes Dev. 14 (2000) 397-402
24. Cortez D., Guntuku S., Qin J., and Elledge S.J. ATR and ATRIP: partners in checkpoint signaling. Science 294 (2001) 1713-1716
25. Brown E.J., and Baltimore D. Essential and dispensable roles of ATR in cell cycle arrest and genome maintenance. Genes Dev. 17 (2003) 615-628
26. Liu Q., Guntuku S., Cui X.S., Matsuoka S., Cortez D., Tamai K., Luo G., Carattini-Rivera S., DeMayo F., Bradley A., Donehower L.A., and Elledge S.J. Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev. 14 (2000) 1448-1459
27. Takai H., Tominaga K., Motoyama N., Minamishima Y.A., Nagahama H., Tsukiyama T., Ikeda K., Nakayama K., Nakanishi M., and Nakayama K. Aberrant cell cycle checkpoint function and early embryonic death in Chk1(-/-) mice. Genes Dev. 14 (2000) 1439-1447
28. Zachos G., Rainey M.D., and Gillespie D.A. Chk1-deficient tumour cells are viable but exhibit multiple checkpoint and survival defects. EMBO J. 22 (2003) 713-723
29. Nghiem P., Park P.K., Kim Y., Vaziri C., and Schreiber S.L. ATR inhibition selectively sensitizes G1 checkpoint-deficient cells to lethal premature chromatin condensation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98 (2001) 9092-9097
30. Durkin S.G., Arlt M.F., Howlett N.G., and Glover T.W. Depletion of CHK1, but not CHK2, induces chromosomal instability and breaks at common fragile sites. Oncogene 25 (2006) 4381-4388
31. Tercero J.A., Longhese M.P., and Diffley J.F. A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol. Cell 11 (2003) 1323-1336
32. Desany B.A., Alcasabas A.A., Bachant J.B., and Elledge S.J. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 12 (1998) 2956-2970
33. Zhao X., Muller E.G., and Rothstein R. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol. Cell 2 (1998) 329-340
34. Tercero J.A., and Diffley J.F. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412 (2001) 553-557
35. Lopes M., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M., Newlon C.S., and Foiani M. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412 (2001) 557-561
36. Meister P., Taddei A., Vernis L., Poidevin M., Gasser S.M., and Baldacci G. Temporal separation of replication and recombination requires the intra-S checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 168 (2005) 537-544
37. Lisby M., Barlow J.H., Burgess R.C., and Rothstein R. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118 (2004) 699-713
38. Lindsay H.D., Griffiths D.J., Edwards R.J., Christensen P.U., Murray J.M., Osman F., Walworth N., and Carr A.M. S-phase-specific activation of Cds1 kinase defines a subpathway of the checkpoint response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genes Dev. 12 (1998) 382-395
39. Dimitrova D.S., and Gilbert D.M. Temporally coordinated assembly and disassembly of replication factories in the absence of DNA synthesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2 (2000) 686-694
40. Itakura E., Sawada I., and Matsuura A. Dimerization of the ATRIP protein through the coiled-coil motif and its implication to the maintenance of stalled replication forks. Mol. Biol. Cell 16 (2005) 5551-5562
41. Trenz K., Smith E., Smith S., and Costanzo V. ATM and ATR promote Mre11 dependent restart of collapsed replication forks and prevent accumulation of DNA breaks. EMBO J. 25 (2006) 1764-1774
42. Feijoo C., Hall-Jackson C., Wu R., Jenkins D., Leitch J., Gilbert D.M., and Smythe C. Activation of mammalian Chk1 during DNA replication arrest: a role for Chk1 in the intra-S phase checkpoint monitoring replication origin firing. J. Cell Biol. 154 (2001) 913-923
43. Petermann E., Maya-Mendoza A., Zachos G., Gillespie D.A., Jackson D.A., and Caldecott K.W. Chk1 requirement for high global rates of replication fork progression during normal vertebrate S phase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26 (2006) 3319-3326
44. Myung K., Datta A., and Kolodner R.D. Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 104 (2001) 397-408
45. Masumoto H., Sugino A., and Araki H. Dpb11 controls the association between DNA polymerases alpha and epsilon and the autonomously replicating sequence region of budding yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20 (2000) 2809-2817
46. Aparicio O.M., Stout A.M., and Bell S.P. Differential assembly of Cdc45p and DNA polymerases at early and late origins of DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96 (1999) 9130-9135
47. Cortez D. Unwind and slow down: checkpoint activation by helicase and polymerase uncoupling. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 1007-1012
48. Zou L., and Elledge S.J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300 (2003) 1542-1548
49. Lopes M., Foiani M., and Sogo J.M. Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. Mol. Cell 21 (2006) 15-27
50. Michael W.M., Ott R., Fanning E., and Newport J. Activation of the DNA replication checkpoint through RNA synthesis by primase. Science 289 (2000) 2133-2137
51. Mimura S., Masuda T., Matsui T., and Takisawa H. Central role for cdc45 in establishing an initiation complex of DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts. Genes Cells 5 (2000) 439-452
52. Walter J., and Newport J. Initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication: origin unwinding and sequential chromatin association of Cdc45, RPA, and DNA polymerase alpha. Mol. Cell 5 (2000) 617-627
53. Lupardus P.J., Byun T., Yee M.C., Hekmat-Nejad M., and Cimprich K.A. A requirement for replication in activation of the ATR-dependent DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev. 16 (2002) 2327-2332
54. Walter J., Sun L., and Newport J. Regulated chromosomal DNA replication in the absence of a nucleus. Mol. Cell 1 (1998) 519-529
55. Byun T.S., Pacek M., Yee M.C., Walter J.C., and Cimprich K.A. Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 1040-1052
56. Pacek M., and Walter J.C. A requirement for MCM7 and Cdc45 in chromosome unwinding during eukaryotic DNA replication. EMBO J. 23 (2004) 3667-3676
57. Kumagai A., Dunphy W.G., and Claspin. a novel protein required for the activation of Chk1 during a DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol. Cell 6 (2000) 839-849
58. Ellison V., and Stillman B. Biochemical characterization of DNA damage checkpoint complexes: clamp loader and clamp complexes with specificity for 5′ recessed DNA. PLoS Biol. 1 (2003) E33
59. Zou L., Liu D., and Elledge S.J. Replication protein A-mediated recruitment and activation of Rad17 complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (2003) 13827-13832
60. Majka J., Binz S.K., Wold M.S., and Burgers P.M. Replication protein A directs loading of the DNA damage checkpoint clamp to 5′-DNA junctions. J. Biol. Chem. 281 (2006) 27855-27861
61. Barr S.M., Leung C.G., Chang E.E., and Cimprich K.A. ATR kinase activity regulates the intranuclear translocation of ATR and RPA following ionizing radiation. Curr. Biol. 13 (2003) 1047-1051
62. Binz S.K., Sheehan A.M., and Wold M.S. Replication protein A phosphorylation and the cellular response to DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst.) 3 (2004) 1015-1024
63. Kumagai A., Kim S.M., Dunphy W.G., and Claspin. the activated form of ATR-ATRIP collaborate in the activation of Chk1. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 49599-49608
64. Kumagai A., Lee J., Yoo H.Y., and Dunphy W.G. TopBP1 activates the ATR-ATRIP complex. Cell 124 (2006) 943-955
65. Ivessa A.S., Lenzmeier B.A., Bessler J.B., Goudsouzian L.K., Schnakenberg S.L., and Zakian V.A. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae helicase Rrm3p facilitates replication past non-histone protein-DNA complexes. Mol. Cell 12 (2003) 1525-1536
66. Calzada A., Hodgson B., Kanemaki M., Bueno A., and Labib K. Molecular anatomy and regulation of a stable replisome at a paused eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 1905-1919
67. Gruber M., Wellinger R.E., and Sogo J.M. Architecture of the replication fork stalled at the 3′ end of yeast ribosomal genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20 (2000) 5777-5787
68. Lenzmeier B.A., and Freudenreich C.H. Trinucleotide repeat instability: a hairpin curve at the crossroads of replication, recombination, and repair. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 100 (2003) 7-24
69. Arlt M.F., Durkin S.G., Ragland R.L., and Glover T.W. Common fragile sites as targets for chromosome rearrangements. DNA Repair (Amst.) 5 (2006) 1126-1135
70. Lahiri M., Gustafson T.L., Majors E.R., and Freudenreich C.H. Expanded CAG repeats activate the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Mol. Cell 15 (2004) 287-293
71. Casper A.M., Nghiem P., Arlt M.F., and Glover T.W. ATR regulates fragile site stability. Cell 111 (2002) 779-789
72. Ball H.L., Myers J.S., and Cortez D. ATRIP binding to replication protein A-single-stranded DNA promotes ATR-ATRIP localization but is dispensable for Chk1 phosphorylation. Mol. Biol. Cell 16 (2005) 2372-2381
73. Kim S.M., Kumagai A., Lee J., and Dunphy W.G. Phosphorylation of Chk1 by ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR) in Xenopus egg extracts requires binding of ATRIP to ATR but not the stable DNA-binding or coiled-coil domains of ATRIP. J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005) 38355-38364
74. Namiki Y., and Zou L. ATRIP associates with replication protein A-coated ssDNA through multiple interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 (2006) 580-585
75. Dodson G.E., Shi Y., and Tibbetts R.S. DNA replication defects, spontaneous DNA damage, and ATM-dependent checkpoint activation in replication protein A-deficient cells. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 34010-34014
76. Kim H.S., and Brill S.J. Rfc4 interacts with Rpa1 and is required for both DNA replication and DNA damage checkpoints in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21 (2001) 3725-3737
77. Bomgarden R.D., Yean D., Yee M.C., and Cimprich K.A. A novel protein activity mediates DNA binding of an ATR-ATRIP complex. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 13346-13353
78. Unsal-Kacmaz K., and Sancar A. Quaternary structure of ATR and effects of ATRIP and replication protein A on its DNA binding and kinase activities. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24 (2004) 1292-1300
79. Unsal-Kacmaz K., Makhov A.M., Griffith J.D., and Sancar A. Preferential binding of ATR protein to UV-damaged DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 (2002) 6673-6678
80. Jiang G., and Sancar A. Recruitment of DNA damage checkpoint proteins to damage in transcribed and non-transcribed sequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26 (2006) 39-49
81. Parrilla-Castellar E.R., and Karnitz L.M. Cut5 is required for the binding of Atr and DNA polymerase alpha to genotoxin-damaged chromatin. J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003) 45507-45511
82. Kai M., Boddy M.N., Russell P., and Wang T.S. Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates Mus81 to preserve genome integrity during replication stress. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 919-932
83. Post S.M., Tomkinson A.E., and Lee E.Y. The human checkpoint Rad protein Rad17 is chromatin-associated throughout the cell cycle, localizes to DNA replication sites, and interacts with DNA polymerase epsilon. Nucl. Acids Res. 31 (2003) 5568-5575
84. Bao S., Tibbetts R.S., Brumbaugh K.M., Fang Y., Richardson D.A., Ali A., Chen S.M., Abraham R.T., and Wang X.F. ATR/ATM-mediated phosphorylation of human Rad17 is required for genotoxic stress responses. Nature 411 (2001) 969-974
85. Post S., Weng Y.C., Cimprich K., Chen L.B., Xu Y., and Lee E.Y. Phosphorylation of serines 635 and 645 of human Rad17 is cell cycle regulated and is required for G(1)/S checkpoint activation in response to DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98 (2001) 13102-13107
86. Pellicioli A., Lucca C., Liberi G., Marini F., Lopes M., Plevani P., Romano A., Di Fiore P.P., and Foiani M. Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase. EMBO J. 18 (1999) 6561-6572
87. Lemoine F.J., Degtyareva N.P., Lobachev K., and Petes T.D. Chromosomal translocations in yeast induced by low levels of DNA polymerase a model for chromosome fragile sites. Cell 120 (2005) 587-598
88. Bhaumik D., and Wang T.S. Mutational effect of fission yeast polalpha on cell cycle events. Mol. Biol. Cell 9 (1998) 2107-2123
89. West S.C. Molecular views of recombination proteins and their control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4 (2003) 435-445
90. Chen X.B., Melchionna R., Denis C.M., Gaillard P.H., Blasina A., Van de Weyer I., Boddy M.N., Russell P., Vialard J., and McGowan C.H. Human Mus81-associated endonuclease cleaves Holliday junctions in vitro. Mol. Cell 8 (2001) 1117-1127
91. Boddy M.N., Shanahan P., McDonald W.H., Lopez-Girona A., Noguchi E., Yates I.J., and Russell P. Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates recombinational repair protein Rad60. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23 (2003) 5939-5946
92. Raffa G.D., Wohlschlegel J., Yates III J.R., and Boddy M.N. SUMO-binding motifs mediate the Rad60-dependent response to replicative stress and self-association. J. Biol. Chem. 281 (2006) 27973-27981
93. Tong A.H., Lesage G., Bader G.D., Ding H., Xu H., Xin X., Young J., Berriz G.F., Brost R.L., Chang M., Chen Y., Cheng X., Chua G., Friesen H., Goldberg D.S., Haynes J., Humphries C., He G., Hussein S., Ke L., Krogan N., Li Z., Levinson J.N., Lu H., Menard P., Munyana C., Parsons A.B., Ryan O., Tonikian R., Roberts T., Sdicu A.M., Shapiro J., Sheikh B., Suter B., Wong S.L., Zhang L.V., Zhu H., Burd C.G., Munro S., Sander C., Rine J., Greenblatt J., Peter M., Bretscher A., Bell G., Roth F.P., Brown G.W., Andrews B., Bussey H., and Boone C. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303 (2004) 808-813
94. Khakhar R.R., Cobb J.A., Bjergbaek L., Hickson I.D., and Gasser S.M. RecQ helicases: multiple roles in genome maintenance. Trends Cell Biol. 13 (2003) 493-501
95. Bachrati C.Z., Borts R.H., and Hickson I.D. Mobile D-loops are a preferred substrate for the Bloom's syndrome helicase. Nucl. Acids Res. 34 (2006) 2269-2279
96. Myung K., Datta A., Chen C., and Kolodner R.D. SGS1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of BLM and WRN, suppresses genome instability and homeologous recombination. Nat. Genet. 27 (2001) 113-116
97. Pichierri P., and Franchitto A. Werner syndrome protein, the MRE11 complex and ATR: menage-a-trois in guarding genome stability during DNA replication?. Bioessays 26 (2004) 306-313
98. Bjergbaek L., Cobb J.A., Tsai-Pflugfelder M., and Gasser S.M. Mechanistically distinct roles for Sgs1p in checkpoint activation and replication fork maintenance. EMBO J. 24 (2005) 405-417
99. Gangloff S., Soustelle C., and Fabre F. Homologous recombination is responsible for cell death in the absence of the Sgs1 and Srs2 helicases. Nat. Genet. 25 (2000) 192-194
100. Saintigny Y., Makienko K., Swanson C., Emond M.J., and Monnat Jr. R.J. Homologous recombination resolution defect in Werner syndrome. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22 (2002) 6971-6978
101. Sengupta S., Robles A.I., Linke S.P., Sinogeeva N.I., Zhang R., Pedeux R., Ward I.M., Celeste A., Nussenzweig A., Chen J., Halazonetis T.D., and Harris C.C. Functional interaction between BLM helicase and 53BP1 in a Chk1-mediated pathway during S-phase arrest. J. Cell Biol. 166 (2004) 801-813
102. Li W., Kim S.M., Lee J., and Dunphy W.G. Absence of BLM leads to accumulation of chromosomal DNA breaks during both unperturbed and disrupted S phases. J. Cell Biol. 165 (2004) 801-812
103. Davies S.L., North P.S., Dart A., Lakin N.D., and Hickson I.D. Phosphorylation of the Bloom's syndrome helicase and its role in recovery from S-phase arrest. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24 (2004) 1279-1291
104. Venkitaraman A.R. Tracing the network connecting BRCA and Fanconi anaemia proteins. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4 (2004) 266-276
105. D'Andrea A.D., and Grompe M. The Fanconi anaemia/BRCA pathway. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3 (2003) 23-34
106. Gurtan A.M., and D'Andrea A.D. Dedicated to the core: understanding the Fanconi anemia complex. DNA Repair 5 (2006) 1119-1125
107. Arlt M.F., Xu B., Durkin S.G., Casper A.M., Kastan M.B., and Glover T.W. BRCA1 is required for common-fragile-site stability via its G2/M checkpoint function. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24 (2004) 6701-6709
108. Howlett N.G., Taniguchi T., Durkin S.G., D'Andrea A.D., and Glover T.W. The Fanconi anemia pathway is required for the DNA replication stress response and for the regulation of common fragile site stability. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14 (2005) 693-701
109. Lomonosov M., Anand S., Sangrithi M., Davies R., and Venkitaraman A.R. Stabilization of stalled DNA replication forks by the BRCA2 breast cancer susceptibility protein. Genes Dev. 17 (2003) 3017-3022
110. Andreassen P.R., D'Andrea A.D., and Taniguchi T. ATR couples FANCD2 monoubiquitination to the DNA-damage response. Genes Dev. 18 (2004) 1958-1963
111. Ho G.P., Margossian S., Taniguchi T., and D'Andrea A.D. Phosphorylation of FANCD2 on two novel sites is required for mitomycin C resistance. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26 (2006) 7005-7015
112. Tibbetts R.S., Cortez D., Brumbaugh K.M., Scully R., Livingston D., Elledge S.J., and Abraham R.T. Functional interactions between BRCA1 and the checkpoint kinase ATR during genotoxic stress. Genes Dev. 14 (2000) 2989-3002
113. Gatei M., Zhou B.B., Hobson K., Scott S., Young D., and Khanna K.K. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase and ATM and Rad3 related kinase mediate phosphorylation of Brca1 at distinct and overlapping sites. In vivo assessment using phospho-specific antibodies. J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 17276-17280
114. Ting N.S., and Lee W.H. The DNA double-strand break response pathway: becoming more BRCAish than ever. DNA Repair 3 (2004) 935-944
115. Howlett N.G., Taniguchi T., Olson S., Cox B., Waisfisz Q., De Die-Smulders C., Persky N., Grompe M., Joenje H., Pals G., Ikeda H., Fox E.A., and D'Andrea A.D. Biallelic inactivation of BRCA2 in Fanconi anemia. Science 297 (2002) 606-609
116. Brush G.S., and Kelly T.J. Phosphorylation of the replication protein A large subunit in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint response. Nucl. Acids Res. 28 (2000) 3725-3732
117. Brush G.S., Morrow D.M., Hieter P., and Kelly T.J. The ATM homologue MEC1 is required for phosphorylation of replication protein A in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93 (1996) 15075-15080
118. Fanning E., Klimovich V., and Nager A.R. A dynamic model for replication protein A (RPA) function in DNA processing pathways. Nucl. Acids Res. 34 (2006) 4126-4137
119. Olson E., Nievera C.J., Klimovich V., Fanning E., and Wu X. RPA2 is a direct downstream target for ATR to regulate the S-phase checkpoint. J. Biol. Chem. 281 (2006) 39517-39533
120. Arunkumar A.I., Klimovich V., Jiang X., Ott R.D., Mizoue L., Fanning E., and Chazin W.J. Insights into hRPA32 C-terminal domain-mediated assembly of the simian virus 40 replisome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12 (2005) 332-339
121. Cortez D., Glick G., and Elledge S.J. Minichromosome maintenance proteins are direct targets of the ATM and ATR checkpoint kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (2004) 10078-10083
122. Tsao C.C., Geisen C., and Abraham R.T. Interaction between human MCM7 and Rad17 proteins is required for replication checkpoint signaling. EMBO J. 23 (2004) 4660-4669
123. Yoo H.Y., Shevchenko A., and Dunphy W.G. Mcm2 is a direct substrate of ATM and ATR during DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoint responses. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 53353-53364
124. Katou Y., Kanoh Y., Bando M., Noguchi H., Tanaka H., Ashikari T., Sugimoto K., and Shirahige K. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424 (2003) 1078-1083
125. Pacek M., Tutter A.V., Kubota Y., Takisawa H., and Walter J.C. Localization of MCM2-7, Cdc45, and GINS to the site of DNA unwinding during eukaryotic DNA replication. Mol. Cell 21 (2006) 581-587