Running into problems: How cells cope with replicating damaged DNA

Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis

Volumn 532, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 75-84

  McGowan, Clare H ^a  

^a SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

CANCER; CELL DIVISION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; DNA TEMPLATE; GENE REPLICATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW;

EID: 0345708274     PISSN: 00275107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.08.011     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Painter R.B., Young B.R. Radiosensitivity in ataxia-telangiectasia: a new explanation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77:1980;7315-7317.
2. Bakkenist C.J., Kastan M.B. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature. 421:2003;499-506.
3. Carney J.P., Maser R.S., Olivares H., Davis E.M., Le Beau M., Yates J.R. 3rd, Hays L., Morgan W.F., Petrini J.H. The hMre11/hRad50 protein complex and Nijmegen breakage syndrome: linkage of double-strand break repair to the cellular DNA damage response. Cell. 93:1998;477-486.
4. Larner J.M., Lee H., Little R.D., Dijkwel P.A., Schildkraut C.L., Hamlin J.L. Radiation down-regulates replication origin activity throughout the S phase in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:1999;803-809.
5. Tercero J.A., Diffley J.F. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature. 412:2001;553-557.
6. Abraham R.T. Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases. Genes Dev. 15:2001;2177-2196.
7. Cortez D., Guntuku S., Qin J., Elledge S.J. ATR and ATRIP: partners in checkpoint signaling. Science. 294:2001;1713-1716.
8. Zou L., Elledge S.J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science. 300:2003;1542-1548.
9. Osborn A.J., Elledge S.J., Zou L. Checking on the fork: the DNA-replication stress-response pathway. Trends Cell Biol. 12:2002;509-516.
10. McGowan C.H. CHK2: a tumor suppressor or not? Cell Cycle. 1:2002;401-403.
11. Desany B.A., Alcasabas A.A., Bachant J.B., Elledge S.J. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 12:1998;2956-2970.
12. Tercero J.A., Longhese M.P., Diffley J.F. A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol. Cell. 11:2003;1323-1336.
13. Sogo J.M., Lopes M., Foiani M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science. 297:2002;599-602.
14. Sanchez Y., Bachant J., Wang H., Hu F., Liu D., Tetzlaff M., Elledge S.J. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science. 286:1999;1166-1171.
15. Boddy M.N., Furnari B., Mondesert O., Russell P. Replication checkpoint enforced by kinases Cds1 and Chk1. Science. 280:1998;909-912.
16. Lindsay H.D., Griffiths D.J., Edwards R.J., Christensen P.U., Murray J.M., Osman F., Walworth N., Carr A.M. S-phase-specific activation of Cds1 kinase defines a subpathway of the checkpoint response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genes Dev. 12:1998;382-395.
17. Brondello J.M., Boddy M.N., Furnari B., Russell P. Basis for the checkpoint signal specificity that regulates Chk1 and Cds1 protein kinases. Mol. Cell Biol. 19:1999;4262-4269.
18. Rhind N., Russell P. Chk1 and Cds1: linchpins of the DNA damage and replication checkpoint pathways. J. Cell Sci. 113:2000;3889-3896.
19. Blasina A., de Weyer I.V., Laus M.C., Luyten W., Parker A.E., McGowan C.H. A human homologue of the checkpoint kinase cds1 directly inhibits cdc25 phosphatase. Curr. Biol. 9:1999;1-10.
20. Matsuoka S., Huang M., Elledge S.J. Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase. Science. 282:1998;1893-1897.
21. Chehab N.H., Malikzay A., Appel M., Halazonetis T.D. Chk2/hCds1 functions as a DNA damage checkpoint in G(1) by stabilizing p53. Genes Dev. 14:2000;278-288.
22. Hirao A., Kong Y.Y., Matsuoka S., Wakeham A., Ruland J., Yoshida H., Liu D., Elledge S.J., Mak T.W. DNA damage-induced activation of p53 by the checkpoint kinase Chk2. Science. 287:2000;1824-1827.
23. Takai H., Naka K., Okada Y., Watanabe M., Harada N., Saito S., Anderson C.W., Appella E., Nakanishi M., Suzuki H., Nagashima K., Sawa H., Ikeda K., Motoyama N. Chk2-deficient mice exhibit radioresistance and defective p53-mediated transcription. EMBO J. 21:2002;5195-5205.
24. Hirao A., Cheung A., Duncan G., Girard P.M., Elia A.J., Wakeham A., Okada H., Sarkissian T., Wong J.A., Sakai T., De Stanchina E., Bristow R.G., Suda T., Lowe S.W., Jeggo P.A., Elledge S.J., Mak T.W. Chk2 is a tumor suppressor that regulates apoptosis in both an ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-dependent and an ATM-independent manner. Mol. Cell Biol. 22:2002;6521-6532.
25. Jallepalli P.V., Lengauer C., Vogelstein B., Bunz F. The Chk2 Tumor Suppressor Is Not Required for p53 Responses in Human Cancer Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 278:2003;20475-20479.
26. Zhao H., Piwnica-Worms H. ATR-mediated checkpoint pathways regulate phosphorylation and activation of human Chk1a. Mol. Cell Biol. 21:2001;4129-4139.
27. Zhao H., Watkins J.L., Piwnica-Worms H. Disruption of the checkpoint kinase 1/cell division cycle 25A pathway abrogates ionizing radiation-induced S and G2 checkpoints. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99:2002;14795-14800.
28. Takai H., Tominaga K., Motoyama N., Minamishima Y.A., Nagahama H., Tsukiyama T., Ikeda K., Nakayama K., Nakanishi M., Nakayama K. Aberrant cell cycle checkpoint function and early embryonic death in Chk1(-/-) mice. Genes Dev. 14:2000;1439-1447.
29. Liu Q., Guntuku S., Cui X.S., Matsuoka S., Cortez D., Tamai K., Luo G., Carattini-Rivera S., DeMayo F., Bradley A., Donehower L.A., Elledge S.J. Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev. 14:2000;1448-1459.
30. Zachos G., Rainey M.D., Gillespie D.A. Chk1-deficient tumour cells are viable but exhibit multiple checkpoint and survival defects. EMBO J. 22:2003;713-723.
31. Feijoo C., Hall-Jackson C., Wu R., Jenkins D., Leitch J., Gilbert D.M., Smythe C. Activation of mammalian Chk1 during DNA replication arrest: a role for Chk1 in the intra-S phase checkpoint monitoring replication origin firing. J. Cell Biol. 154:2001;913-923.
32. Fogarty P., Campbell S.D., Abu-Shumays R., Phalle B.S., Yu K.R., Uy G.L., Goldberg M.L., Sullivan W. The Drosophila grapes gene is related to checkpoint gene chk1/rad27 and is required for late syncytial division fidelity. Curr. Biol. 7:1997;418-426.
33. Guo Z., Kumagai A., Wang S.X., Dunphy W.G. Requirement for Atr in phosphorylation of Chk1 and cell cycle regulation in response to DNA replication blocks and UV-damaged DNA in Xenopus egg extracts. Genes Dev. 14:2000;2745-2756.
34. Gilbert C.S., Green C.M., Lowndes N.F. Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine. Mol. Cell. 8:2001;129-136.
35. Kumagai A., Dunphy G.W. Claspin, a novel protein required for the activation of Chk1 during a DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol. Cell. 6:2000;839-849.
36. Chini C.C., Chen J. Human claspin is required for replication checkpoint control. J. Biol. Chem. 278:2003;30057-30062.
37. Alcasabas A., Osborn A.J., Hu1 B.J.F., Werler P.J.H., Bousset K., Furuya K., Diffley J.F.X., Carr A., Elledge S.J. Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:2001;958-965.
38. Tanaka K., Russell P. Mrc1 channels the DNA replication arrest signal to checkpoint kinase Cds1. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:2001;966-972.
39. Maya R., Balass M., Kim S.T., Shkedy D., Leal J.F., Shifman O., Moas M., Buschmann T., Ronai Z., Shiloh Y., Kastan M.B., Katzir E., Oren M. ATM-dependent phosphorylation of Mdm2 on serine 395: role in p53 activation by DNA damage. Genes Dev. 15:2001;1067-1077.
40. Rhind N., Russell P. Checkpoints: it takes more than time to heal some wounds. Curr. Biol. 10:2000;R908-911.
41. Henry-Mowatt J., Jackson D., Masson J.Y., Johnson P.A., Clements P.M., Benson F.E., Thompson L.H., Takeda S., West S.C., Caldecott K.W. XRCC3 and Rad51 modulate replication fork progression on damaged vertebrate chromosomes. Mol. Cell. 11:2003;1109-1117.
42. Hoeijmakers J.H. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature. 411:2001;366-374.
43. Kolodner R.D., Marsischky G.T. Eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9:1999;89-96.
44. Harfe B.D., Jinks-Robertson S. DNA mismatch repair and genetic instability. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34:2000;359-399.
45. Friedberg E.C., Wagner R., Radman M. Specialized DNA polymerases, cellular survival, and the genesis of mutations. Science. 296:2002;1627-1630.
46. Johnson R.E., Washington M.T., Haracska L., Prakash S., Prakash L. Eukaryotic polymerases iota and zeta act sequentially to bypass DNA lesions. Nature. 406:2000;1015-1019.
47. Masutani C., Kusumoto R., Yamada A., Dohmae N., Yokoi M., Yuasa M., Araki M., Iwai S., Takio K., Hanaoka F. The XPV (xeroderma pigmentosum variant) gene encodes human DNA polymerase eta. Nature. 399:1999;700-704.
48. Tsurimoto T., Stillman B. Replication factors required for SV40 DNA replication in vitro. II. Switching of DNA polymerase alpha and delta during initiation of leading and lagging strand synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 266:1991;1961-1968.
49. Maga G., Hubscher U. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a dancer with many partners. J. Cell Sci. 116:2003;3051-3060.
50. Hoege C., Pfander B., Moldovan G.L., Pyrowolakis G., Jentsch S. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature. 419:2002;135-141.
51. Matunis M.J. On the road to repair: PCNA encounters SUMO and ubiquitin modifications. Mol. Cell. 10:2002;441-442.
52. Thelen M.P., Venclovas C., Fidelis K. A sliding clamp model for the Rad1 family of cell cycle checkpoint proteins. Cell. 96:1999;769-770.
53. Roos-Mattjus P., Vroman B.T., Burtelow M.A., Rauen M., Eapen A.K., Karnitz L.M. Genotoxin-induced Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) chromatin association is an early checkpoint signaling event. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2002;43809-43812.
54. Bermudez V.P., Lindsey-Boltz L.A., Cesare A.J., Maniwa Y., Griffith J.D., Hurwitz J., Sancar A. Loading of the human 9-1-1 checkpoint complex onto DNA by the checkpoint clamp loader hRad17-replication factor C complex in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100:2003;1633-1638.
55. Melo J., Toczyski D. A unified view of the DNA-damage checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14:2002;237-245.
56. Kai M., Wang T.S. Checkpoint activation regulates mutagenic translesion synthesis. Genes Dev. 17:2003;64-76.
57. MacNeill S.A. DNA replication: partners in the Okazaki two-step. Curr. Biol. 11:2001;R842-844.
58. Michel B. Replication fork arrest and DNA recombination. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:2000;173-178.
59. Postow L., Ullsperger C., Keller R.W., Bustamante C., Vologodskii A.V., Cozzarelli N.R. Positive torsional strain causes the formation of a four-way junction at replication forks. J. Biol. Chem. 276:2001;2790-2796.
60. McGlynn P., Lloyd R.G., Marians K.J. Formation of Holliday junctions by regression of nascent DNA in intermediates containing stalled replication forks: RecG stimulates regression even when the DNA is negatively supercoiled. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;8235-8240.
61. Higgins N.P., Kato K., Strauss B. A model for replication repair in mammalian cells. J. Mol. Biol. 101:1976;417-425.
62. Cox M.M., Goodman M.F., Kreuzer K.N., Sherratt D.J., Sandler S.J., Marians K.J. The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. Nature. 404:2000;37-41.
63. McGlynn P., Lloyd R.G. Recombinational repair and restart of damaged replication forks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3:2002;859-870.
64. Haber J.E. DNA recombination: the replication connection. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24:1999;271-275.
65. Zou H., Rothstein R. Holliday junctions accumulate in replication mutants via a RecA homolog-independent mechanism. Cell. 90:1997;87-96.
66. Chen X.B., Melchionna R., Denis C.M., Gaillard P.H., Blasina A., Van de Weyer I., Boddy M.N., Russell P., Vialard J., McGowan C.H. Human Mus81-associated endonuclease cleaves Holliday junctions in vitro. Mol. Cell. 8:2001;1117-1127.
67. Constantinou A., Chen X.B., McGowan C.H., West S.C. Holliday junction resolution in human cells: two junction endonucleases with distinct substrate specificities. EMBO J. 21:2002;5577-5585.
68. Constantinou A., Davies A.A., West S.C. Branch migration and Holliday junction resolution catalyzed by activities from mammalian cells. Cell. 104:2001;259-268.
69. Boddy M.N., Lopez-Girona A., Shanahan P., Interthal H., Heyer W.D., Russell P. Damage tolerance protein mus81 associates with the FHA1 domain of checkpoint kinase cds1. Mol. Cell Biol. 20:2000;8758-8766.
70. Mullen J.R., Kaliraman V., Ibrahim S.S., Brill S.J. Requirement for three novel protein complexes in the absence of the Sgs1 DNA helicase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 157:2001;103-118.
71. Hickson I.D. RecQ helicases: caretakers of the genome. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 3:2003;169-178.
72. Constantinou A., Tarsounas M., Karow J.K., Brosh R.M., Bohr V.A., Hickson I.D., West S.C. Werner's syndrome protein (WRN) migrates Holliday junctions and co-localizes with RPA upon replication arrest. EMBO Rep. 1:2000;80-84.
73. Karow J.K., Constantinou A., Li J.L., West S.C., Hickson I.D. The Bloom's syndrome gene product promotes branch migration of holliday junctions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97:2000;6504-6508.
74. Boddy M.N., Gaillard P.H., McDonald W.H., Shanahan P., Yates J.R., Russell P. Mus81-eme1 are essential components of a holliday junction resolvase. Cell. 107:2001;537-548.
75. Kaliraman V., Mullen J.R., Fricke W.M., Bastin-Shanower S.A., Brill S.J. Functional overlap between Sgs1-Top3 and the Mms4-Mus81 endonuclease. Genes Dev. 15:2001;2730-2740.
76. de Los Santos T., Hunter N., Lee C., Larkin B., Loidl J., Hollingsworth N.M. The mus81/mms4 endonuclease acts independently of double-holliday junction resolution to promote a distinct subset of crossovers during meiosis in budding yeast. Genetics. 164:2003;81-94.
77. Fabre F., Chan A., Heyer W.D., Gangloff S. Alternate pathways involving Sgs1/Top3, Mus81/ Mms4, and Srs2 prevent formation of toxic recombination intermediates from single-stranded gaps created by DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99:2002;16887-16892.
78. Bastin-Shanower S.A., Fricke W.M., Mullen J.R., Brill S.J. The mechanism of mus81-mms4 cleavage site selection distinguishes it from the homologous endonuclease rad1-rad10. Mol. Cell Biol. 23:2003;3487-3496.
79. Paques F., Haber J.E. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:1999;349-404.
80. Kraus E., Leung W.Y., Haber J.E. Break-induced replication: a review and an example in budding yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;8255-8262.
81. Interthal H., Heyer W.D. MUS81 encodes a novel helix-hairpin-helix protein involved in the response to UV- and methylation-induced DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 263:2000;812-827.
82. Doe C.L., Ahn J.S., Dixon J., Whitby M.C. Mus81-Eme1 and Rqh1 involvement in processing stalled and collapsed replication forks. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2002;32753-32759.
83. Bolt E.L., Lloyd R.G. Substrate specificity of RusA resolvase reveals the DNA structures targeted by RuvAB and RecG in vivo. Mol. Cell. 10:2002;187-198.
84. de Los Santos T., Loidl J., Larkin B., Hollingsworth N.M. A role for MMS4 in the processing of recombination intermediates during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 159:2001;1511-1525.