The DNA damage response during DNA replication

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 568-575

  Branzei, Dana ^a,b   Foiani, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b RIKEN   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL CYCLE; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; DNA DAMAGE; DNA RECOMBINATION; DNA REPLICATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOME ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SISTER CHROMATID; STRESS;

DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 27544445683     PISSN: 09550674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.09.003     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. K. Myung, and R.D. Kolodner Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99 2002 4500 4507
2. A.M. Deshpande, and C.S. Newlon DNA replication fork pause sites dependent on transcription Science 272 1996 1030 1033
3. Y. Takeuchi, T. Horiuchi, and T. Kobayashi Transcription-dependent recombination and the role of fork collision in yeast rDNA Genes Dev 17 2003 1497 1506
4. J.Z. Dalgaard, and A.J.S. Klar swi1 and swi3 perform imprinting, pausing, and termination of DNA replication in S. pombe Cell 102 2000 745 751
5. R.S. Cha, and N. Kleckner ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones Science 297 2002 602 606
6. F.J. Lemoine, N.P. Degtyareva, K. Lobachev, and T.D. Petes Chromosomal translocations in yeast induced by low levels of DNA polymerase a model for chromosome fragile sites Cell 120 2005 587 598 This study shows that optimal amounts of replication proteins are crucial for preserving genomic integrity. Budding yeast cells replicating with a limited amount of DNA polymerases accumulate site-specific genomic aberrations and hotspots for DSBs.
7. J.A. Cobb, L. Bjergbaek, K. Shimada, C. Frei, and S.M. Gasser DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1 EMBO J 22 2003 4325 4336
8. C. Lucca, F. Vanoli, C. Cotta-Ramusino, A. Pellicioli, G. Liberi, J. Haber, and M. Foiani Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing Oncogene 23 2004 1206 1213
9. J.Z. Torres, S.L. Schnakenberg, and V.A. Zakian Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA helicase promotes genome integrity by preventing replication fork stalling: viability of rrm3 cells requires the intra-S-phase checkpoint and fork restart activities Mol Cell Biol 24 2004 3198 3212
10. K.H. Schmidt, and R.D. Kolodner Requirement of Rrm3 helicase for repair of spontaneous DNA lesions in cells lacking Srs2 or Sgs1 helicase Mol Cell Biol 24 2004 3198 3212
11. J.S. Ahn, F. Osman, and M.C. Whitby Replication fork blockage by RTS1 at an ectopic site promotes recombination in fission yeast EMBO J 24 2005 2011 2023 This study shows that replication fork blockage caused by replication fork barriers placed in a typical genomic locus in fission yeast is associated with increased recombination events. The study suggests that recombination usually occurs without breakage of the fork and suggests a role for Rqh1 in preventing deletion events caused by collapse of the blocked fork.
12. S. Lambert, A. Watson, D.M. Sheedy, B. Martin, and A.M. Carr Gross chromosomal rearrangements and elevated recombination at an inducible site-specific replication fork barrier Cell 121 2005 689 702 By using a system in which fork progression is inhibited by protein-DNA complexes at a specific genomic location in S. pombe, this study describes the consequences of fork collapse. In the system used, checkpoint activation does not occur and instead recombination events are induced, allowing cell survival but inducing site-specific chromosomal rearrangements.
13. A. Kuzminov Collapse and repair of replication forks in Escherichia coli Mol Microbiol 16 1995 373 384
14. P. McGlynn, and R.G. Lloyd Recombinational repair and restart of damaged replication forks Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3 2002 859 870
15. J.M. Sogo, M. Lopes, and M. Foiani Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects Science 297 2002 599 602
16. J.A. Tercero, M.P. Longhese, and J.F. Diffley A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response Mol Cell 11 2003 1323 1336
17. L. Zou, and S.J. Elledge Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes Science 300 2003 1542 1548
18. T.S. Byun, M. Pacek, M-c Yee, J.C. Walter, and K.A. Cimprich Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint Genes Dev 19 2005 1040 1052 This study uses a cell free extract system derived from Xenopus eggs to examine the mechanism by which checkpoint activation occurs in response to different types of intra-S damage. This study clearly indicates that functional uncoupling between the MCM helicase and polymerase activities at the replication fork is a common mechanism to generate the checkpoint signal following different types of DNA damage.
19. C. Cotta-Ramusino, D. Fachinetti, C. Lucca, Y. Doksani, M. Lopes, J. Sogo, and M. Foiani Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells Mol Cell 17 2005 153 159 By using the 2D gel technique combined with electron microscopy, this study shows that the Exo1 exonuclease processes stalled replication forks and counteracts reversed fork accumulation by generating ss-DNA intermediates. The Exo1- mediated resection of nascent chains is important for both fork stability and replication restart.
20. 2/M arrest Mol Cell 7 2001 293 300
21. K. Shimada, P. Pasero, and S.M. Gasser ORC and the intra-S-phase checkpoint: a threshold regulates Rad53p activation in S phase Genes Dev 16 2002 3236 3252
22. M.B. Vaze, A. Pellicioli, S.E. Lee, G. Ira, G. Liberi, A. Arbel-Eden, M. Foiani, and J.E. Haber Recovery from checkpoint-mediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires Srs2 helicase Mol Cell 10 2002 373 385
23. Y. Katou, Y. Kanoh, M. Bando, H. Noguchi, H. Tanaka, T. Ashikari, K. Sugimoto, and K. Shirahige S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex Nature 424 2003 1078 1083
24. M.N. Nedelcheva, A. Roguev, L.B. Dolapchiev, A. Shevchenko, H.B. Taskov, A.F. Stewart, and S.S. Stoynov Uncoupling of unwinding from DNA synthesis implies regulation of MCM helicase by Tof1/Mrc1/Csm3 checkpoint complex J Mol Biol 347 2005 509 521 By analyzing the DNA topology at the fork as well as genetic and physical interactions between replisome proteins and the checkpoint proteins Mrc1 and Tof1, this study indicates that Mrc1 and Tof1 coordinate DNA synthesis and replication fork stalling with MCM-mediated unwinding.
25. G. Liberi, G. Maffioletti, C. Lucca, I. Chiolo, A. Baryshnikova, C. Cotta-Ramusino, M. Lopes, A. Pellicioli, J.E. Haber, and M. Foiani Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase Genes Dev 19 2005 339 350 This study analyzes the replication intermediates formed during replication of damaged templates in budding yeast and shows that recombination-dependent cruciform structures originating from SCJs accumulate at damaged forks in sgs1 mutants. Srs2 counteracts their formation, while the Sgs1-Top3 complex is crucial for their resolution.
26. R. Koszul, S. Caburet, B. Dujon, and G. Fischer Eucaryotic genome evolution through the spontaneous duplication of large chromosomal segments EMBO J 23 2004 234 243 This study uses a growth recovery assay in S. cerevisiae to monitor gene duplication events induced by deletion of one duplicate from a highly similar gene pair. The study shows that duplications of large DNA segments encompassing numerous genes occur spontaneously and are most likely the results of replication accidents. Such events are also thought to have played a major role in eukaryotic genome evolution.
27. M. Lopes, C. Cotta-Ramusino, G. Liberi, and M. Foiani Branch migrating sister chromatid junctions form at replication origins through Rad51/Rad52-independent mechanisms Mol Cell 12 2003 1499 1510
28. K. Shirahige, Y. Hori, K. Shiraishi, M. Yamashita, K. Takahashi, C. Obuse, T. Tsurimoto, and H. Yoshikawa Regulation of DNA-replication origins during cell-cycle progression Nature 395 1998 618 621
29. C. Santocanale, K. Sharma, and J.F. Diffley Activation of dormant origins of DNA replication in budding yeast Genes Dev 13 1999 2360 2364
30. C. Santocanale, and J.F. Diffley A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication Nature 395 1998 615 618
31. A.G. Paulovich, and L.H. Hartwell A checkpoint regulates the rate of progression through S phase in S. cerevisiae in response to DNA damage Cell 82 1995 841 847
32. J.A. Tercero, and J.F. Diffley Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint Nature 412 2001 553 557
33. M. Kai, M.N. Boddy, P. Russell, and T.S. Wang Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates Mus81 to preserve genome integrity during replication stress Genes Dev 19 2005 919 932 By using chromatin immunoprecipitation and genetic analysis of the mutator phenotype of a replication mutant in fission yeast, this study analyzes the mechanism that regulates Mus81 function in response to different types of replication perturbation. Cds1-dependent phosphorylation of Mus81 is induced in HU-arrested cells and promotes Mus81 dissociation from chromatin, thereby inhibiting recombination repair from occurring at stalled forks.
34. M.N. Boddy, P. Shanahan, W.H. McDonald, A. Lopez-Girona, E. Noguchi, I.J. Yates, and P. Russell Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates recombinational repair protein Rad60 Mol Cell Biol 23 2003 5939 5946
35. A. Pellicioli, C. Lucca, G. Liberi, F. Marini, M. Lopes, P. Plevani, A. Romano, P.P. Di Fiore, and M. Foiani Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase EMBO J 18 1999 6561 6572
36. G.S. Brush, D.M. Morrow, P. Hieter, and T.J. Kelly The ATM homologue MEC1 is required for phosphorylation of replication protein A in yeast Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93 1996 15075 15080
37. P. Meister, A. Taddei, L. Vernis, M. Poidevin, S.M. Gasser, and G. Baldacci Temporal separation of replication and recombination requires the intra-S checkpoint J Cell Biol 168 2005 537 544
38. M. Lisby, J.H. Barlow, R.C. Burgess, and R. Rothstein Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins Cell 118 2004 699 713 This study provides an integrated and comprehensive description of the order in which different repair and checkpoint proteins assemble in subnuclear foci in response to DSBs or replication fork stalling in budding yeast. Mre11, Rfa1 checkpoints and recombination proteins are assembled sequentially at DSB sites, but Mre11 and recombination proteins are not recruited at stalled forks.
39. X. Wang, G. Ira, J.A. Tercero, A.M. Holmes, J.F. Diffley, and J.E. Haber Role of DNA replication proteins in double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 24 2004 6891 6899 This study analyzes the genetic requirements for replication initiation and elongation factors in the DSB-induced gene conversion process in budding yeast. Unlike S-phase replication, DNA synthesis during gene conversion requires only leading strand polymerization.
40. K. Labib, J.A. Tercero, and J.F. Diffley Uninterrupted MCM2-7 function required for DNA replication fork progression Science 288 2000 1643 1647
41. C. Hoege, B. Pfander, G.L. Moldovan, G. Pyrowolakis, and S. Jentsch RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO Nature 419 2002 135 141
42. P. Stelter, and H.D. Ulrich Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation Nature 425 2003 188 191
43. K. Watanabe, S. Tateishi, M. Kawasuji, T. Tsurimoto, H. Inoue, and M. Yamaizumi Rad18 guides poleta to replication stalling sites through physical interaction and PCNA monoubiquitination EMBO J 23 2004 3886 3896
44. P.L. Kannouche, J. Wing, and A.R. Lehmann Interaction of human DNA polymerase eta with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage Mol Cell 14 2004 491 500
45. D. Branzei, M. Seki, and T. Enomoto Rad18/Rad5/Mms2-mediated polyubiquitination of PCNA is implicated in replication completion during replication stress Genes Cells 9 2004 1031 1042
46. B. Pfander, G.L. Moldovan, M. Sacher, C. Hoege, and S. Jentsch SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase Nature 2005
47. E. Papouli, S. Chen, A.A. Davies, D. Huttner, L. Krejci, P. Sung, and H.D. Ulrich Crosstalk between SUMO and Ubiquitin on PCNA Is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p Mol Cell 19 2005 123 133
48. L. Haracska, C.A. Torres-Ramos, R.E. Johnson, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash Opposing effects of ubiquitin conjugation and SUMO modification of PCNA on replicational bypass of DNA lesions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 24 2004 4267 4274
49. X. Veaute, J. Jeusset, C. Soustelle, S.C. Kowalczykowski, E. Le Cam, and F. Fabre The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments Nature 423 2003 309 312
50. L. Krejci, S. Van Komen, Y. Li, J. Villemain, M.S. Reddy, H. Klein, T. Ellenberger, and P. Sung DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament Nature 423 2003 305 309
51. M. Kai, and T.S. Wang Checkpoint activation regulates mutagenic translesion synthesis Genes Dev 17 2003 64 76
52. K. Sugasawa, Y. Okuda, M. Saijo, R. Nishi, N. Matsuda, G. Chu, T. Mori, S. Iwai, K. Tanaka, and F. Hanaoka UV-induced ubiquitylation of XPC protein mediated by UV-DDB-ubiquitin ligase complex Cell 121 2005 387 400
53. P.R. Andreassen, A.D. D'Andrea, and T. Taniguchi ATR couples FANCD2 monoubiquitination to the DNA-damage response Genes Dev 18 2004 1958 1963
54. X. Zhao, and G. Blobel A SUMO ligase is part of a nuclear multiprotein complex that affects DNA repair and chromosomal organization Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 2005 4777 4782 This study identifies Mms21/Nse2 as a new SUMO ligase in budding yeast, and shows that Mms21 is responsible for the sumoylation of yKu70, Smc5 and Smc6 proteins.
55. G. Ira, A. Malkova, G. Liberi, M. Foiani, and J.E. Haber Srs2 and Sgs1-Top3 suppress crossovers during double-strand break repair in yeast Cell 115 2003 401 411
56. L. Wu, S.L. Davies, N.C. Levitt, and I.D. Hickson Potential role for the BLM helicase in recombinational repair via a conserved interaction with RAD51 J Biol Chem 276 2001 19375 19381
57. M. Chang, M. Bellaoui, C. Zhang, R. Desai, P. Morozov, L. Delgado-Cruzata, R. Rothstein, G.A. Freyer, C. Boone, and G.W. Brown RMI1/NCE4, a suppressor of genome instability, encodes a member of the RecQ helicase/Topo III complex EMBO J 24 2005 2024 2033
58. J.R. Mullen, F.S. Nassaseth, Y.Q. Lan, C.E. Slagle, and S.J. Brill Yeast Rmi1/Nce4 controls genome stability as a subunit of the Sgs1-Top3 complex Mol Cell Biol 25 2005 4476 4487
59. J. Yin, A. Sobeck, C. Xu, A.R. Meetei, M. Hoatlin, L. Li, and W. Wang BLAP75, an essential component of Bloom's syndrome protein complexes that maintain genome integrity EMBO J 24 2005 1465 1476