Molecular anatomy and regulation of a stable replisome at a paused eukaryotic DNA replication fork

Genes and Development

Volumn 19, Issue 16, 2005, Pages 1905-1919

  Calzada, Arturo ^a,b   Hodgson, Ben ^a   Kanemaki, Masato ^a   Bueno, Avelino ^b   Labib, Karim ^a  

^a CHRISTIE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Checkpoint; Csm3; DNA replication forks; Mrc1; Recombination; Tof1

Indexed keywords

CD45 ANTIGEN; PROTEIN; PROTEIN MRC1; PROTEIN TOF1; REPLISOME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME REPLICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BINDING; DNA REPLICATION; ENZYME STABILITY; EUKARYOTE; GENE CONTROL; GENETIC STABILITY; GENOMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; YEAST;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA HELICASES; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, FUNGAL; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; MODELS, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 23944507608     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.337205     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Ahn, J.S., Osman, F., and Whitby, M.C. 2005. Replication fork blockage by RTS1 at an ectopic site promotes recombination in fission yeast. EMBO J. 24: 2011-2023.
2. Alcasabas, A.A., Osborn, A.J., Bachant, J., Hu, F., Werler, P.J., Bousset, K., Furuya, K., Diffley, J.F., Carr, A.M., and Elledge, S.J. 2001. Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat. Cell Biol. 3: 958-965.
3. Allen, J.B., Zhou, Z., Siede, W., Friedberg, E.C., and Elledge, S.J. 1994. The SAD1/RAD53 protein kinase controls multiple checkpoints and DNA damage-induced transcription in yeast. Genes & Dev. 8: 2401-2415.
4. Aparicio, O.M., Weinstein, D.M., and Bell, S.P. 1997. Components and dynamics of DNA replication complexes in S. cerevisiae: Redistribution of MCM complexes and Cdc45p during S phase. Cell 91: 59-69.
5. Aparicio, O.M., Stout, A.M., and Bell, S.P. 1999. Differential assembly of Cdc45p and DNA polymerases at early and late origins of DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96: 9130-9135.
6. Bennett, C.B., Lewis, L.K., Karthikeyan, G., Lobachev, K.S., Jin, Y.H., Sterling, J.F., Snipe, J.R., and Resnick, M.A. 2001. Genes required for ionizing radiation resistance in yeast. Nat. Genet. 29: 426-434.
7. Brewer, B.J. and Fangman, W.L. 1987. The localization of replication origins on ARS plasmids in S. cerevisiae. Cell 51: 463-471.
8. -. 1988. A replication fork barrier at the 3′ end of yeast ribosomal RNA genes. Cell 55: 637-643.
9. Brewer, B.J., Lockshon, D., and Fangman, W.L. 1992. The arrest of replication forks in the rDNA of yeast occurs independently of transcription. Cell 71: 267-276.
10. Cha, R.S. and Kleckner, N. 2002. ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science 297: 602-606.
11. Chabes, A., Domkin, V., and Thelander, L. 1999. Yeast Sml1, a protein inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 36679-36683.
12. Chang, M., Bellaoui, M., Boone, C., and Brown, G.W. 2002. A genome-wide screen for methyl methanesulfonate-sensitive mutants reveals genes required for S phase progression in the presence of DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 16934-16939.
13. Chong, J.P., Hayashi, M.K., Simon, M.N., Xu, R.M., and Stillman, B. 2000. A double-hexamer archaeal minichromosome maintenance protein is an ATP- dependent DNA helicase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 1530-1535.
14. Cobb, J.A., Bjergbaek, L., Shimada, K., Frei, C., and Gasser, S.M. 2003. DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. EMBO J. 22: 4325-4336.
15. Cobb, J.A., Shimada, K., and Gasser, S.M. 2004. Redundancy, insult-specific sensors and thresholds: Unlocking the S-phase checkpoint response. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14: 292-300.
16. Dalgaard, J.Z. and Klar, A.J. 1999. Orientation of DNA replication establishes mating-type switching pattern in S. pombe. Nature 400: 181-184.
17. -. 2000. swi1 and swi3 perform imprinting, pausing, and termination of DNA replication in S. pombe. Cell 102: 745-751.
18. Desany, B.A., Alcasabas, A.A., Bachant, J.B., and Elledge, S.J. 1998. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes & Dev. 12: 2956-2970.
19. Diffley, J.F. 2004. Regulation of early events in chromosome replication. Curr. Biol. 14: R778-R786.
20. Egel, R., Beach, D.H., and Klar, A.J. 1984. Genes required for initiation and resolution steps of mating-type switching in fission yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 81: 3481-3485.
21. Foss, E.J. 2001. Tof1p regulates DNA damage responses during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 157: 567-577.
22. Friedman, K.L. and Brewer, B.J. 1995. Analysis of replication intermediates by two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis. Methods Enzymol. 262: 613-627.
23. Gangloff, S., Zou, H., and Rothstein, R. 1996. Gene conversion plays the major role in controlling the stability of large tandem repeats in yeast. EMBO J. 15: 1715-1725.
24. Greenfeder, S.A. and Newlon, C.S. 1992. Replication forks pause at yeast centromeres. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12: 4056-4066.
25. Gruber, M., Wellinger, R.E., and Sogo, J.M. 2000. Architecture of the replication fork stalled at the 3′ end of yeast ribosomal genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 5777-5787.
26. Huang, G.S. and Keil, R.L. 1995. Requirements for activity of the yeast mitotic recombination hotspot HOT1: RNA polymerase I and multiple cis-acting sequences. Genetics 141: 845-855.
27. Ishimi, Y. 1997. A DNA helicase activity is associated with an MCM4, -6, and -7 protein complex. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 24508-24513.
28. Ivessa, A.S., Zhou, J.Q., and Zakian, V.A 2000. The Saccharomyces Pif1p DNA helicase and the highly related Rrm3p have opposite effects on replication fork progression in ribosomal DNA. Cell 100: 479-489.
29. Ivessa, A.S., Zhou, J.Q., Schulz, V.P., Monson, E.K., and Zakian, V.A. 2002. Saccharomyces Rrm3p, a 5′ to 3′ DNA helicase that promotes replication fork progression through telomeric and subtelomeric DNA. Genes & Dev. 16: 1383-1396.
30. Ivessa, A.S., Lenzmeier, B.A., Bessler, J.B., Goudsouzian, L.K., Schnakenberg, S.L., and Zakian, VA. 2003. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae helicase Rrm3p facilitates replication past nonhistone protein-DNA complexes. Mol. Cell 12: 1525-1536.
31. Kamimura, Y., Tak, Y.S., Sugino, A., and Araki, H. 2001. Sld3, which interacts with Cdc45 (Sld4), functions for chromosomal DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 20: 2097-2107.
32. Kanemaki, M., Sanchez-Diaz, A., Gambus, A., and Labib, K. 2003. Functional proteomic identification of DNA replication proteins by induced proteolysis in vivo. Nature 423: 720-725.
33. Kaplan, D.L., Davey, M.J., and O'Donnell, M. 2003. Mcm4,6,7 uses a "pump in ring" mechanism to unwind DNA by steric exclusion and actively translocate along a duplex. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 49171-49182.
34. Katou, Y., Kanoh, Y., Bando, M., Noguchi, H., Tanaka, H., Ashikari, T., Sugimoto, K., and Shirahige, K. 2003. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424: 1078-1083.
35. Kaykov, A. and Arcangioli, B. 2004. A programmed strand-specific and modified nick in S. pombe constitutes a novel type of chromosomal imprint. Curr. Biol. 14: 1924-1928.
36. Kearsey, S.E. and Cotterill, S. 2003. Enigmatic variations: Divergent modes of regulating eukaryotic DNA replication. Mol. Cell 12: 1067-1075.
37. Keil, R.L. and McWilliams, A.D. 1993. A gene with specific and global effects on recombination of sequences from tandemly repeated genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 135: 711-718.
38. Keil, R.L. and Roeder, G.S. 1984. Cis-acting, recombinationstimulating activity in a fragment of the ribosomal DNA of S. cerevisiae. Cell 39: 377-386.
39. Kelman, Z., Lee, J.K., and Hurwitz, J. 1999. The single mini-chromosome maintenance protein of methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum ΔH contains DNA helicase activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96: 14783-14788.
40. Knop, M., Siegers, K., Pereira, G., Zachariae, W., Winsor, B., Nasmyth, K., and Schiebel, E. 1999. Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR-based strategy: More tags and improved practical routines. Yeast 15: 963-972.
41. Kobayashi, T. 2003. The replication fork barrier site forms a unique structure with Fob1p and inhibits the replication fork. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23: 9178-9188.
42. Kobayashi, T. and Horiuchi, T. 1996. A yeast gene product, Fob1 protein, required for both replication fork blocking and recombinational hotspot activities. Genes Cells 1: 465-474.
43. Krings, G. and Bastia, D. 2004. swi1- and swi3-dependent and independent replication fork arrest at the ribosomal DNA of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101: 14085-14090.
44. Kubota, Y., Takase, Y., Komori, Y., Hashimoto, Y., Arata, T., Kamimura, Y., Araki, H., and Takisawa, H. 2003. A novel ring-like complex of Xenopus proteins essential for the initiation of DNA replication. Genes & Dev. 17: 1141-1152.
45. Kumagai, A. and Dunphy, W.G. 2000. Claspin, a novel protein required for the activation of Chk1 during a DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol. Cell 6: 839-849.
46. Labib, K., Tercero, J.A., and Diffley, J.F.X. 2000. Uninterrupted MCM2-7 function required for DNA replication fork progression. Science 288: 1643-1647.
47. Lambert, S., Watson, A., Sheedy, D.M., Martin, B., and Carr, A.M. 2005. Gross chromosomal rearrangements and elevated recombination at an inducible site-specific replication fork barrier. Cell 121: 689-702.
48. Laskey, R.A. and Madine, M.A. 2003. A rotary pumping model for helicase function of MCM proteins at a distance from replication forks. EMBO Rep. 4: 26-30.
49. Lee, J.K. and Hurwitz, J. 2001. Processive DNA helicase activity of the minichromosome maintenance proteins 4, 6, and 7 complex requires forked DNA structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98: 54-59.
50. Linskens, M.H. and Huberman, J.A. 1988. Organization of replication of ribosomal DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8: 4927-4935.
51. Lopes, M., Pellicioli, A., Cotta-Ramusino, C., Liberi, G., Plevani, P., Muzi-Falconi, M., Newlon, C., and Foiani, M. 2001. The checkpoint response stabilizes stalled DNA replication forks. Nature 412: 599-602.
52. Lucca, C., Vanoli, F., Cotta-Ramusino, C., Pellicioli, A., Liberi, G., Haber, J., and Foiani, M. 2004. Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing. Oncogene 23: 1206-1213.
53. Lucchini, R. and Sogo, J.M. 1994. Chromatin structure and transcriptional activity around the replication forks arrested at the 3′ end of the yeast ribosomal-RNA genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14: 318-326.
54. Makovets, S., Herskowitz, I., and Blackburn, E.H. 2004. Anatomy and dynamics of DNA replication fork movement in yeast telomeric regions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24: 4019-4031.
55. Masumoto, H., Sugino, A., and Araki, H. 2000. Dpb11 controls the association between DNA polymerases α and ε and the autonomously replicating sequence region of budding yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 2809-2817.
56. Mayer, M.L., Pot, I., Chang, M., Xu, H., Aneliunas, V., Kwok, T., Newitt, R., Aebersold, R., Boone, C., Brown, G.W., et al. 2004. Identification of protein complexes required for efficient sister chromatid cohesion. Mol. Biol. Cell 15: 1736-1745.
57. Mohanty, B.K. and Bastia, D. 2004. Binding of the replication terminator protein Fob1p to the Ter sites of yeast causes polar fork arrest. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 1932-1941.
58. Nedelcheva, M.N., Roguev, A., Dolapchiev, L.B., Shevchenko, A., Taskov, H.B., Stewart, A.F., and Stoynov, S.S. 2005. Uncoupling of unwinding from DNA synthesis implies regulation of MCM helicase by Tof1/Mrc1/Csm3 checkpoint complex. J. Mol. Biol. 347: 509-521.
59. Osborn, A.J. and Elledge, S.J. 2003. Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes & Dev. 17: 1755-1767.
60. Pacek, M. and Walter, J.C. 2004. A requirement for MCM7 and Cdc45 in chromosome unwinding during eukaryotic DNA replication. EMBO J. 23: 3667-3676.
61. Park, P.U., Defossez, P.A., and Guarente, L. 1999. Effects of mutations in DNA repair genes on formation of ribosomal DNA circles and life span in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 3848-3856.
62. Prado, F. and Aguilera, A. 2005. Impairment of replication fork progression mediates RNA polII transcription-associated recombination. EMBO J. 24: 1267-1276.
63. Rabitsch, K.P., Toth, A., Galova, M., Schleiffer, A., Schaffner, G., Aigner, E., Rupp, C., Penkner, A.M., Moreno-Borchart, A.C., Primig, M., et al. 2001. A screen for genes required for meiosis and spore formation based on whole-genome expression. Curr. Biol. 11: 1001-1009.
64. Raghuraman, M.K., Winzeler, E.A., Collingwood, D., Hunt, S., Wodicka, L., Conway, A., Lockhart, D.L., Davis, R.W., Brewer, B.J., and Fangman, W.L. 2001. Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. Science 294: 115-121.
65. Reynolds, A.E., McCarroll, R.M., Newlon, C.S., and Fangman, W.L. 1989. Time of replication of ARS elements along yeast chromosome III. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9: 4488-4494.
66. Schmidt, K.H., Derry, K.L., and Kolodner, R.D. 2002. Saccharomyces cerevisiae RRM3, a 5′ to 3′ DNA helicase, physically interacts with proliferating cell nuclear antigen. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 45331-45337.
67. Shechter, D.F., Ying, C.Y., and Gautier, J. 2000. The intrinsic DNA helicase activity of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum ΔH minichromosome maintenance protein. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 15049-15059.
68. -. 2004. DNA unwinding is an Mcm complex-dependent and ATP hydrolysis-dependent process. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 45586-45593.
69. Shor, E., Gangloff, S., Wagner, M., Weinstein, J., Price, G., and Rothstein, R. 2002. Mutations in homologous recombination genes rescue top3 slow growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 162: 647-662.
70. Sikorski, R.S. and Hieter, P. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122: 19-27.
71. Sogo, J.M., Lopes, M., and Foiani, M. 2002. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297: 599-602.
72. Stewart, S.E. and Roeder, G.S. 1989. Transcription by RNA polymerase I stimulates mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9: 3464-3472.
73. Stillman, B. 2005. Origin recognition and the chromosome cycle. FEBS Lett. 579: 877-884.
74. Takayama, Y., Kamimura, Y., Okawa, M., Muramatsu, S., Sugino, A., and Araki, H. 2003. GINS, a novel multiprotein complex required for chromosomal DNA replication in budding yeast. Genes & Dev. 17: 1153-1165.
75. Takeuchi, Y., Horiuchi, T., and Kobayashi, T. 2003. Transcription- dependent recombination and the role of fork collision in yeast rDNA. Genes & Dev. 17: 1497-1506.
76. Tanaka, T. and Nasmyth, K. 1998. Association of RPA with chromosomal replication origins requires an Mcm protein, and is regulated by Rad53, and cyclin- and Dbf4-dependent kinases. EMBO J. 17: 5182-5191.
77. Tercero, J.A. and Diffley, J.F. 2001. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412: 553-557.
78. Vengrova, S. and Dalgaard, J.Z. 2004. RNase-sensitive DNA modification(s) initiates S. pombe mating-type switching. Genes & Dev. 18: 794-804.
79. Voelkel-Meiman, K., Keil, R.L., and Roeder, G.S. 1987. Recombination-stimulating sequences in yeast ribosomal DNA correspond to sequences regulating transcription by RNA polymerase I. Cell 48: 1071-1079.
80. Wang, Y., Vujcic, M., and Kowalski, D. 2001. DNA replication forks pause at silent origins near the HML locus in budding yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 4938-4948.
81. Ward, T.R., Hoang, M.L., Prusty, R., Lau, C.K., Keil, R.L., Fangman, W.L., and Brewer, B.J. 2000. Ribosomal DNA replication fork barrier and HOT1 recombination hot spot: Shared sequences but independent activities. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 4948-4957.
82. Weitao, T., Budd, M., Hoopes, L.L., and Campbell, J.L. 2003. Dna2 helicase/nuclease causes replicative fork stalling and double-strand breaks in the ribosomal DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 22513-22522.
83. Zhao, X., Muller, E.G., and Rothstein, R. 1998. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol. Cell 2: 329-340.
84. Zhao, X., Chabes, A., Domkin, V., Thelander, L., and Rothstein, R. 2001. The ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1 is a new target of the Mec1/Rad53 kinase cascade during growth and in response to DNA damage. EMBO J. 20: 3544-3553.