Essential and dispensable roles of ATR in cell cycle arrest and genome maintenance

Genes and Development

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 615-628

  Brown, Eric J ^a   Baltimore, David ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

ATM; ATR; Cdc2; Checkpoints; Chk1; Chromosome breaks

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; ATR PROTEIN; PROTEIN KINASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; DNA REPLICATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; IONIZING RADIATION; MAMMAL CELL; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; RADIATION INJURY;

ANIMALS; CDC2 PROTEIN KINASE; CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; INTEGRASES; MICE; MICE, KNOCKOUT; MICE, TRANSGENIC; PROTEIN KINASES; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; RADIATION, IONIZING; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEINS; VIRAL PROTEINS;

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 0037335861     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.1067403     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Al-Khodairy, F. and Carr, A.M. 1992. DNA repair mutants defining G2 checkpoint pathways in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J. 11: 1343-1350.
2. Boddy, M.N., Fumari, B., Mondesert, O., and Russell, P. 1998. Replication checkpoint enforced by kinases Cds1 and Chk1. Science 280: 909-912.
3. Brown, E.J. and Baltimore, D. 2000. ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes & Dev. 14: 397-402.
4. Brown, E.J., Albers, M.W., Shin, T.B., Ichikawa, K., Keith, C.T., Lane, W.S., and Schreiber, S.L. 1994. A mammalian protein targeted by G1-arresting rapamycin-receptor complex. Nature 369: 756-758.
5. Buchholz, F., Angrand, P.O., and Stewart, A.F. 1998. Improved properties of FLP recombinase evolved by cycling mutagenesis. Nat. Biotechnol. 16: 657-662.
6. Burma, S., Chen, B.P., Murphy, M., Kurimasa, A., and Chen, D.J. 2001. ATM phosphorylates histone H2AX in response to DNA double-strand breaks. J. Biol. Chem. 276:42462-42467.
7. Carr, A.M. 2002. Checking that replication breakdown is not terminal. Science 297: 557-558.
8. Celeste, A., Petersen, S., Romanienko, P.J., Fernandez-Capetillo, O., Chen, H.T., Sedelnikova, O.A., Reina-San-Martin, B., Coppola, V., Meffre, E., Difilippantonio, M.L., et al. 2002. Genomic instability in mice lacking histone H2AX. Science 296: 922-927.
9. Cha, R.S. and Kleckner, N. 2002. ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science 297: 602-606.
10. Chao, C., Saito, S., Anderson, C.W., Appella, E., and Xu, Y. 2000. Phosphorylation of murine p53 at ser-18 regulates the p53 responses to DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 11936-11941.
11. Chen, H.T., Bhandoola, A., Difilippantonio, M.J., Zhu, J., Brown, M.J., Tai, X., Rogakou, E.P., Brotz, T.M., Bonner, W.M., Ried, T., et al. 2000. Response to RAG-mediated VDJ cleavage by NBS1 and γ-H2AX. Science 290: 1962-1965.
12. Cliby, W.A., Roberts, C.J., Cimprich, K.A., Stringer, C.M., Lamb, J.R., Schreiber, S.L., and Friend, S.H. 1998. Overexpression of a kinase-inactive ATR protein causes sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents and defects in cell cycle checkpoints. EMBO J. 17: 159-169.
13. Cortez, D., Guntuku, S., Qin, J., and Elledge, S.J. 2001. ATR and ATRIP: Partners in checkpoint signaling. Science 294: 1713-1716.
14. Cox, M.M., Goodman, M.F., Kreuzer, K.N., Sherratt, D.J., Sandler, S.J., and Marians, K.J. 2000. The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. Nature 404: 37-41.
15. De Souza, C.P., Osmani, A.H., Wu, LP., Spotts, J.L., and Osmani, S.A. 2000. Mitotic histone H3 phosphorylation by the NIMA kinase in Aspergillus nidulans. Cell 102: 293-302.
16. Dull, T., Zuffcrey, R., Kelly, M., Mandel, R.J., Nguyen, M., Trono, D., and Naldini, L. 1998. A third-generation lentivirus vector with a conditional packaging system. J. Virol. 72: 8463-8471.
17. Enoch, T., Carr, A.M., and Nurse, P. 1992. Fission yeast genes involved in coupling mitosis to completion of DNA replication. Genes & Dev. 6: 2035-2046.
18. Feil, R., Wagner, J., Metzger, D., and Chambon, P. 1997. Regulation of Cre recombinase activity by mutated estrogen receptor ligand-binding domains. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 237: 752-757.
19. Guo, Z., Kumagal, A., Wang, S.X., and Dunphy, W.G. 2000. Requirement for ATR in phosphorylation of Chk1 and cell cycle regulation in response to DNA replication blocks and UV-damaged DNA in Xenopus egg extracts. Genes & Dev. 14: 2745-2756.
20. Hekmat-Neiad, M., You, Z., Yee, M., Newport, J.W., and Cimprieh, K.A. 2000. Xenopus ATR is a replication-dependent chromatin-binding protein required for the DNA replication checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 10: 1565-1573.
21. Jacks, T., Remington, L., Williams, B.O., Schmitt, E.M., Halachmi, S., Bronson, R.T., and Weinberg, R.A. 1994. Tumor spectrum analysis in p53-mutant mice. Curr. Biol. 4: 1-7.
22. Kai, M. and Wang, T.S. 2003. Checkpoint activation regulates mutagenic translesion synthesis. Genes & Dev. 17: 64-76.
23. Kastan, M.B. and Lim, D.S. 2000. The many substrates and functions of ATM. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1: 179-186.
24. Kumagai, A. and Dunphy, W.G. 1995. Control of the Cdc2/cyclin B complex in Xenopus egg extracts arrested at a G2/M checkpoint with DNA synthesis inhibitors. Mol. Biol. Cell 6:199-213.
25. Kumagai, A., Guo, Z., Emami, K.H., Wang, S.X., and Dunphy, W.G. 1998. The Xenopus Chk1 protein kinase mediates a caffeine-sensitive pathway of checkpoint control in cell-free extracts. J. Cell Biol. 142: 1559-1569.
26. 2/M DNA damage checkpoint. Genes & Dev. 14: 1448-1459.
27. Lois, C., Hong, E.J., Pease, S., Brown, E.J., and Baltimore, D. 2002. Germline transmission and tissue-specific expression of transgenes delivered by lentiviral vectors. Science 295: 868-872.
28. Lopes, M., Cotta-Ramusino, C., Pellicioli, A., Liberi, G., Plevani, P., Muzi-Falconi, M., Newlon, C.S., and Foiani, M. 2001. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412: 557-561.
29. Matsuoka, S., Huang, M., and Elledge, S.J. 1998. Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase. Science 282: 1893-1897.
30. Nghiem, P., Park, P.K., Kim, Y., Vaziri, C., and Schreiber, S.L. 2001. ATR inhibition selectively sensitizes G1 checkpoint-deficient cells to lethal premature chromatin condensation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98: 9092-9097.
31. Nghiem, P., Park, P.K., Kim, Y.S., Desai, B.N., and Schreiber, S.L. 2002. ATR is not required for p53 activation but synergizes with p53 in the replication checkpoint. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 4428-4434.
32. Norbury, C. and Nurse, P. 1992. Animal cell cycles and their control. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61: 441-470.
33. Nyberg, K.A., Michelson, R.J., Putnam, C.W., and Weinert, T.A. 2002. Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Genet. 36: 617-656.
34. Paull, T.T., Rogakou, E.P., Yamazaki, V., Kirchgessner, C.U., Gellert, M., and Bonner, W.M. 2000. A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curt. Biol. 10: 886-895.
35. Rogakou, E.P., Pilch, D.R., Orr, A.H., Ivanova, V.S., and Bonner, W.M. 1998. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 5858-5868.
36. Rogakou, E.P., Boon, C., Redon, C., and Bonner, W.M. 1999. Megabasc chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 146: 905-916.
37. Sanchez, Y., Wong, C., Thoma, R.S., Richman, R., Wu, Z., Piwnica-Worms, H., and Elledge, S.J. 1997. Conservation of the Chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: Linkage of DNA damage to Cdk regulation through Cdc25. Science 277: 1497-1501; Comment, 277: 1450-1451.
38. Tibbetts, R.S., Brumbaugh, K.M., Williams, J.M., Sarkaria, J.N., Cliby, W.A., Shieh, S.Y., Taya, Y., Prives, C., and Abraham, R.T. 1999. A role for ATR in the DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of p53. Genes & Dev. 13: 152-157.
39. Tibbetts, R.S., Cortez, D., Brumbaugh, K.M., Scully, R., Livingston, D., Elledge, S.J., and Abraham, R.T. 2000. Functional interactions between BRCAI and the checkpoint kinase ATR during genotoxic stress. Genes & Dev. 14: 2989-3002.
40. Weinert, T. 1997. A DNA damage checkpoint meets the cell cycle engine. Science 277:1450-1451.
41. Weinert, T.A., Kiser, G.L., and Hartwell, L.H. 1994. Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes & Dev. 8: 652-665.
42. 2/M checkpoints are induced by ionizing irradiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 1049-1059.
43. Xu, Y. and Baltimore, D. 1996. Dual roles of ATM in the cellular response to radiation and in cell growth control. Genes & Dev. 10: 2401-2410.
44. Zhao, H. and Piwnica-Worms, H. 2001. ATR-mediated checkpoint pathways regulate phosphorylation and activation of human Chkl. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 4129-4139.
45. Zhou, B.B. and Elledge, S.J. 2000. The DNA damage response: Putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 408: 433-439.
46. Zou, L., Cortez, D., and Elledge, S.J. 2002. Regulation of ATR substrate selection by Rad17-dependent loading of Rad9 complexes onto chromatin. Genes & Dev. 16: 198-208.