Improving teaching through observation and feedback: Beyond state and federal mandates

Improving Teaching through Observation and Feedback: Beyond State and Federal Mandates

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 1-172

  Lavigne, Alyson L ^b   Good, Thomas L ^a  

^a Roosevelt University ^*

^b ROOSEVELT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85110783051     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315777030     Document Type: Book

References (386)

1. Duane, D. (2014, May 24). Fitness crazed. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2014/05/25/opinion/sunday/fitness-crazed.html?emc=eta1&_r=0
2. Lavigne, A. L., & Chamberlain, R. (2014, January). Coping with increased demands for teacher evaluation: School leaders’ perceptions of problems and possibility. Invited paper presented at Using Observational and Student Achievement Data to Improve Teaching. Tucson, AZ.
3. Lavigne, A. L., Good, T. L., & Marx, R. M. (Eds.) (2014). High-stakes teacher evaluation: High cost-big losses [Special Issue]. Teachers College Record, 116(1).
4. Berliner, D. C. (2014). Exogenous variables and value-added assessments: A fatal flaw. Teachers College Record, 116(1). Retrieved from www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?content id=17293
5. Berliner, D. C., & Glass, G. V. (2014). Myths and lies that threaten America’s public schools: The real crisis in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Bryk, A. S. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(7), 23-30.
7. Council of Chief State School Officers. (1996). Interstate school leaders licensure consortium: Standards for school leaders. Washington, DC: Author.
8. Ebmeier, H., & Crawford, G. (2008). Principals. In T. L. Good (Ed.), 21st century education: A reference handbook (pp. 31-41). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9. Edmonds, R. (1982). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 40, 12-15.
10. Firestone, W., & Martinez, C. (2007). Districts, teacher leaders, and distributed leadership: Changing instructional practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6, 3-35.
11. Gamson, D. A., Lu, X., & Eckert, S. A. (2013). Challenging the research base of the Common Core State Standards: A historical reanalysis of text complexity. Educational Researcher, 42(7), 381-391.
12. Good, T. (2008). In the midst of Comprehensive School Reform: Principals’ perspectives. Teachers College Record, 110(11), 2341-2360.
13. Good, T. L. (2014). What do we know about how teachers influence student performance on standardized tests: And why do we know so little about other student outcomes? Teachers College Record, 116(1). Retrieved from www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=17289
14. Good, T., & Brophy, J. (1986). School effects. In M. Whitrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 570-602). New York: Macmillan.
15. Good, T., & Brophy, J. (2008). Looking in classrooms (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
16. Goodwin, R., Cunningham, M., & Eagle, T. (2005). The changing role of the secondary principal in the United States: An historical perspective. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 37(1), 1-17.
17. Grissom, J. A., Loeb, S., & Master, B. (2013). Effective instructional time use for school leaders: Longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational Researcher, 42, 433-444.
18. Horng, E., Klasik, D., & Loeb, S. (2010). Principal’s time use and school effectiveness. American Journal of Education, 116(4), 491-523.
19. Ingersoll, R., & Merrill, L. (2012). Seven trends: The transformation of the teaching force. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
20. Ingersoll, R., & Perda, D. (2012). How high is teacher turnover and is it a problem? Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
21. Jones, S. M., Dindia, K., & Tye, S. (2006). Sex equity in the classroom: Do female students lose the battle for teacher attention? In B. M. Gayle, R. W. Preiss, N. Burrell, & M. Allen (Eds.), Classroom communication and instructional processes: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 185-215). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Kafka, J. (2009). The principalship in historical perspective. Peabody Journal of Education, 84, 318-330.
23. Kmetz, J., & Willower, D. (1982). Elementary school principals’ work behavior. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(4), 62-78.
24. Lavigne, A. (2014). Exploring the implications of high-stakes teacher evaluation on schools, teachers, and students. Teachers College Record, 116(1).
25. Lavigne, A., & McCaslin, M. (2008). Student perceptions of teacher support. Teachers College Record, 110(11), 2423-2437.
26. Lavigne, A., & Oberg De La Garza, T. (forthcoming). The practice and evaluation of culturally responsive literacy for English language learners in the 21st century. In R. Gabriel & D. Allington (Eds.), Evaluating literacy research: Principles and promising practices.
27. Martin, W. J., & Willower, D. J. (1981). The managerial behavior of high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 69-60.
28. Marx, R. (2014). Reforming again: Now teachers. In A. Lavigne, T. Good, & R. Marx (Eds.), High-stakes teacher evaluation: High cost-big losses [Special Issue]. Teachers College Record, 116(1). Retrieved from www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=17296
29. Matthews, J., & Crow, G. M. (2003). Being and becoming a principal: Role conceptualizations of contemporary principals and assistant principals. New York: Pearson.
30. McCaslin, M., & Good, T. (2008). A study of Comprehensive School Reform programs in Arizona. Teachers College Record, 110(11), 2319-2340.
31. MetLife Foundation. (2013). The MetLife survey of the American teacher: Challenges for school leadership. Retrieved from www.metlife.com/metlife-foundation/about/survey-americanteacher.html?WT.mc_id=vu1101
32. Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.
33. Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
34. Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
35. Polikoff, M. S. (2014). Does the test matter? Evaluating teachers when tests differ in their sensitivity to instruction. In T. Kane, K. Kerr, & R. Pianta (Eds.), Designing teacher evaluation systems: New guidance from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project (pp. 278-302). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36. Purkey, S. C., & Smith, M. S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 427-452.
37. Ronfeldt, M., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2012). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4-36.
38. Ruzek, E. A., Hafen, C. A., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2014). Value added for the evaluation and professional development of teachers. In T. Kane, K. Kerr, & R. Pianta (Eds.), Designing teacher evaluation systems: New guidance from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project (pp. 205-233). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39. Sass, T., Hannaway, J., Xu, Z., Figlio, D., & Feng, L. (2010). Value added of teachers in high-poverty schools and lower-poverty schools. Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED513819.pdf
40. Sherman, L. (2000, Spring). The new principal. NW Education Magazine, 5(3), 2.
41. Spillane, J. P., Camburn, E. M., & Pareja, A. S. (2007). Taking a distributed perspective to the school principal’s workday. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 103-125.
42. U.S. Department of Education. (2013). Characteristics of public and private elementary and secondary principals in the United States: Results from the 2011-2012 Schools and Staffing Survey. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2013/201
43. Wallace Foundation. (2013). Recent leader standards: From the six principal pipeline districts. Retrieved from www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/school-leadership/principal-training/Documents/Recent-Leader-Standards.pdf
44. Wiley, C.R.H., Good, T., & McCaslin, M. (2008). Comprehensive School Reform instructional practices throughout a school year: The role of subject matter, grade level, and time of year. Teachers College Record, 110(11), 2316-2388.
45. Wolcott, H. F. (1973). The man in the principal’s office: An ethnography. San Francisco, CA: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
46. Aaronson, D. L., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago Public Schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/508733
47. American Statistical Association. (2014, April 8). ASA statement on the use of value-added models for educational assessment. Retrieved from www.amstat.org/policy/pdfs/ASA_VAM_Statement.pdf
48. Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2014). Rethinking value-added models in education: Critical perspectives on tests and assessment-based accountability. New York: Routledge.
49. Barnes, G., Crowe, E., & Schaefer, B. (2007). The cost of teacher turnover in five school districts: A pilot study. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. Retrieved from www.nctaf.org/resources/demonstration_projects/turnover/documents/CTTFullReportfinal.pdf
50. Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, frauds, and the attack on American’s public schools. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
51. Berliner, D. C., & Glass, G. V. (2014). 50 myths and lies that threaten America’s public schools: The real crisis in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
52. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Retrieved from www.metproject.org/downloads/MET_Gathering_Feedback_Practioner_Brief.pdf
53. Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1974). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
54. Brophy, J., & Good T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook on research in teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
55. Buddin, R., & Zamarro, G. (2009). Teacher qualifications and student achievement in urban elementary schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 66(2), 103-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.05.001
56. Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2013). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 19424. Retrieved from www.nber.org/w19424
57. Cuban, L. (2013). Inside the black box of classroom practice: Change without reform in American education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
58. Danielson Group. (2013). The framework for teaching evaluation instrument. Retrieved from www.danielsongroup.org/userfiles/files/downloads/2013EvaluationInstrument.pdf
59. Dee, T., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). Incentives, selection, and teacher performance: Evidence from IMPACT. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 19529. Retrieved from www.nber.org/papers/w19529
60. District of Columbia Public Schools. (2012). Key changes to IMPACT for 2012-2013 year. Retrieved from http://dcps.dc.gov/DCPS/Files/downloads/ABOUT%20DCPS/Human%20Resources/Downloadables/IMPACT%202012-2013%20Key%20Changes.pdf
61. Downey, C. J., Steffy, B. E., Poston, W. K., Jr., & English, F. W. (2010). Advancing the three-minute walk-through: Mastering reflective practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
62. Dumler, C., Reidy, K., Cadigan, P., & Clem, S. (2014, January). Providing teachers with observational feedback intended to improve teaching performance: Opportunities and challenges. Paper presented at Using Observational and Student Achievement Data to Improve Teaching. Tucson, AZ.
63. Duncan, A. (2009, June 14). States will lead the way to reform: Secretary Arne Duncan’s remarks at the 2009 Governors education symposium. Retrieved from www2.ed.gov/news/speeches/2009/06/06142009.html
64. Ehlert, M., Pepper, M., Parsons, E., Burns, S., & Springer, M. (2013). Educator evaluation in Tennessee: Initial findings from the 2013 First to the Top survey. Tennessee Consortium on Research, Evaluation, and Development. Retrieved from www.tnconsortium.org/data/files/gallery/ContentGallery/Educator_Evaluation_in_Tennessee_Initial_Findings_from_the_2013_First_to_the_Top_Survey6.pdf
65. Fleisher, L. (2013, July 26). Evaluation law may provide protection for teachers. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887324564704578630272100661716
66. Georgia Department of Education. (2012). Teacher keys and leader keys effectiveness systems 2012 pilot evaluation report. Retrieved from www.gadoe.org/School-Improvement/Teacher-and-Leader-Effectiveness/Documents/Pilot%20Report%2012-13-2012%20FINAL%20Clean.pdf
67. Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. (1997). Why don’t schools and teachers seem to matter? Assessing the impact of unobservables on educational productivity. Journal of Human Resources, 42(4), 765-794.
68. Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. (1999). Teacher licensing and student achievement. In C. Finn & M. Kanstoroom (Eds.), Better teachers, better schools (pp. 83-102). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
69. Goldhaber, D., & Hansen, M. (2008). Assessing the potential of using value-added estimates of teacher job performance for making tenure decisions. Center on Reinventing Public Education. Retrieved from www.cedr.us/papers/assessing_the_potential.pdf
70. Good, T. L., & Braden, J. S. (2000). The great school debate: Choice, vouchers, and charters. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. Good, T. L., & Grouws, D. (1979). The Missouri mathematics effectiveness project: An experimental study in fourth-grade classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(3), 355-362. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.3.355
72. Good, T. L., & Grouws, D. A., & Ebmeier, M. (1983). Active mathematics teaching. New York: Longman.
73. Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., & Rivkin, S. G. (1998). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 6691.
74. Harris, D. N. (2008). The policy uses and policy validity of value-added and other teacher quality measures. In D. H. Gitomer (Ed.), Measurement issues and assessment for teacher quality (pp. 99-130). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
75. Harris, D. N. (2012, October 15). How do value-added indicators compare to other measures of teacher effectiveness? Carnegie Knowledge Network. Retrieved from www.carnegieknowledgenetwork.org/briefs/value-added/value-added-othermeasures/#respond
76. Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2006). Value-added models and the measurement of teacher quality. Retrieved from http://myweb.fsu.edu/tsass/Papers/IES%20Harris%20Sass%20EPF%20Value-added%2014.pdf
77. Headden, S., & Silva, E. (2011). Lessons from D.C.‘s evaluation system. Journal of Staff Development, 32(6), 40-44.
78. Henry, G. T., Bastian, K. C., & Fortner, C. K. (2011). Stayers and leavers: Early-career teacher effectiveness and attrition. Educational Researcher, 40(6), 271-280.
79. Hill, H. C., Blazar, D., Humez, A., Litke, E., Beisiegel, M., Barmore, J., . .. Rabinowicz, S. (2014). Examining high and low value-added mathematics instruction: Can observers tell the difference? Retrieved from http://cepr.harvard.edu/cepr-resources/files/news-events/ncte-examining-high-low-vam-hill-et-al.pdf
80. Hill, H. C., Umland, K., Litke, E., & Kapitula, L. R. (2012). Teacher quality and quality teaching: Examining the relationship of a teacher assessment to practice. American Journal of Education, 118, 489-519.
81. Hillsborough County Schools. (2011). Teacher evaluation handbook: Empowering effective teachers. Retrieved from www.fldoe.org/profdev/pdf/pa/Hillsborough.pdf
82. Ingersoll, R., & Merrill, L. (2012). Seven trends: The transformation of the teaching force. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
83. Jacques, C. (2013). Leveraging teacher talent: Peer observation in educator evaluation. Center on Great Teachers & Leaders: American Institutes for Research. Retrieved from www.gtlcenter.org/sites/default/files/docs/GTL_AskTeam_LeveragingTeacherTalent.pdf
84. Kane, T., Rockoff, J. E., & Staiger, D. (2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 615-631.
85. Konstantopoulos, S. (2011). Teacher effects in early grades? Evidence from a randomized experiment. Teachers College Record, 113, 1541-1565.
86. Konstantopoulos, S. (2014). Teacher effects, value-added models, and accountability. In A. L. Lavigne, T. L. Good, & R. M. Marx (Eds.), High-stakes teacher evaluation: High cost-big losses [Special Issue]. Teachers College Record, 116(1).
87. Konstantopoulos, S., & Sun, M. (2012). Is the persistence of teacher effects in early grades larger for lower-performing students? American Journal of Education, 118, 309-339.
88. Lavigne, A. L. (2014). Exploring the implications of high-stakes teacher evaluation on schools, teachers, and students. In A. L. Lavigne, T. L. Good, & R. M. Marx (Eds.), High-stakes teacher evaluation: High cost-big losses [Special Issue]. Teachers College Record, 116(1).
89. Lavigne, A. L., & Chamberlain, R. (2014). Coping with increased demands for teacher evaluation: School leaders’ perceptions of problems and possibility. Invited paper presented at Using Observational and Student Achievement Data to Improve Teaching. Tucson, AZ.
90. Lavigne, A. L., & Good, T. L. (2014). Teacher and student evaluation: Moving beyond the failure of school reform. New York: Routledge.
91. Lavigne, A. L., Good, T. L., & Marx, R. M. (Eds.) (2014). High-stakes teacher evaluation: High cost-big losses [Special Issue]. Teachers College Record, 116(1).
92. Lipscomb, S., Teh, B., Gill, B., Chiang, H., & Owens, A. (2010). Teacher and principal value-added: Research findings and implementation practices. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531785.pdf
93. Loeb, S. (2013, December 19). How can value-added measures be used for teacher improvement? Carnegie Knowledge Network. Retrieved from www.carnegieknowledge network.org/briefs/teacher_improvement/
94. Loeb, S., & Candelaria, C. A. (2012, October 15). How stable are value-added estimates across years, subjects, and student groups? Carnegie Knowledge Network. Retrieved from www.carnegieknowledgenetwork.org/briefs/value-added/value-added-stability/
95. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
96. Marzano, R. (2011). The art and science of teaching causal teacher evaluation model. Blairsville, PA: Learning Sciences International.
97. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (n.d.). Quick reference guide: Educator evaluation training. Retrieved from www.doe.mass.edu/edeval/resources/QRG-TrainingReqs.pdf
98. McCaffrey, D. F., Sass, T. R., Lockwood, J. R., & Mihaly, K. (2009). The variability of teacher effect estimate. Education Finance and Policy, 4, 572.
99. McCaslin, M. (1996). The problem of problem representation: The Summits’ conception of student. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 13-15.
100. McCaslin, M. (2006). Student motivation dynamics in the era of school reform. Elementary School Journal, 106(5), 479-490.
101. McCaslin, M., & Lavigne, A. L. (2010). Co-regulation approach to research on student motivation. In T. C. Urdan & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), The decade ahead: Applications and context of motivation and achievement (pp. 211-249). Bingley, UK: EmeraldBooks.
102. McKown, C. (2013). Social equity theory and the racial-ethnic achievement gaps. Child Development, 84(4), 1120-1136.
103. MetLife. (2013). The MetLife survey of the American teacher. Retrieved from www.metlife.com/assets/cao/foundation/MetLife-Teacher-Survey-2012.pdf
104. Monk, D. H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary math and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13(2), 125-145.
105. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for education reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
106. National Education Commission on Time and Learning. (1994). Prisoners of time. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
107. Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
108. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub L. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et. Seq.
109. North Carolina State Board of Education. (2012). North Carolina teacher evaluation process. Retrieved from www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/effectiveness-model/ncees/instruments/teach-eval-manual.pdf
110. Ohio Department of Education. (2013). Teacher evaluations. Retrieved from http://education.ohio.gov/Topics/Teaching/Educator-Evaluation-System/Ohio-s-Teacher-Evaluation-System
111. Papay, J. P., & Johnson, S. M. (2011). Is PAR a good investment? Understanding the costs and benefits of teacher peer assistance and review programs. Retrieved from www.gse.harvard.edu/~ngt/par/resources/PAR%20Costs%20and%20Benefits%20-%20January%202011.pdf
112. Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
113. Polikoff, M. S., & Porter, A. C. (2014). Instructional alignment as a measure of teaching quality. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. Retrieved from http://epa.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/04/11/0162373714531851.full.pdf+html
114. Pudlow, M. (2014, April 28). FEA lawsuit on state evaluation procedures can move forward. Florida Education Association. Retrieved from http://feaweb.org/fea-lawsuiton-state-evaluation-procedures-can-move-forward
115. Raudenbush, S. (2014). What do we know about the long-term impacts of teacher value-added? Retrieved from www.carnegieknowledgenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/CKN_Raudenbush_Long-Term-Impacts_v2.pdf
116. Raudenbush, S. W., & Jean, M. (2012, October 15). How should educators interpret value-added scores? Carnegie Knowledge Network. Retrieved from www.carnegie knowledgenetwork.org/briefs/value-added/interpreting-value-added/
117. Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.
118. Rhode Island Department of Education. (2013). Rhode Island educator evaluations: Improving teaching and learning (year one report). Retrieved from www.ride.ri.gov/Portals/0/Uploads/Documents/Teachers-and-Administrators-Excellent-Educators/Educator-Evaluation/Education-Eval-Main-Page/2013_Evaluation_Data_External_Report.pdf
119. Rich, M. (2012, December 11). U.S. students still lag globally in Math and Science, tests show. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2012/12/11/education/us-students-still-lag-globally-in-math-and-science-tests-show.html?_r=0
120. Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E., & Kain, J. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458.
121. Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
122. Rosenholtz, S. (1989). Teachers’ workplace: the social organization of schools. New York: Longman.
123. Rothstein, J. (2014, June 12). California ruling on teacher tenure is not the whole picture. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2014/06/13/opinion/californiaruling-on-teacher-tenure-is-not-whole-picture.html?emc=eta1&_r=0
124. Rothstein, J., & Mathis, W. J. (2013). Review of the two culminating reports from the MET project. National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/files/ttr-final-met-rothstein.pdf
125. Sawchuk, S. (2014a, January 7). AFT’s Weingarten backtracks on using value-added measures for evaluations. Education Week. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/teacherbeat/2014/01/weingartens_retrenchment_on_va.html
126. Sawchuk, S. (2014b, March 28). Tenn. Teachers’ union takes evaluation fight into the courtroom. Education Week. Retrieved from www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/03/28/27tennessee.h33.html?cmp=ENL-EU-NEWS2
127. Scott, D. (2014, January). Delving into the data: The mathematics of teacher effectiveness. Paper presented at Using Observational and Student Achievement Data to Improve Teaching. Tucson, AZ.
128. Strong, M. (2011). The highly qualified teacher: What is teacher quality and how do we measure it? New York: Teachers College Press.
129. Taylor, E. S., & Tyler, J. H. (2012). The effect of evaluation on teacher performance. American Economic Review, 102(7), 3628-3651.
130. Tennessee Department of Education (n.d.). Tennessee Educator Evaluation Model: Overview. Retrieved from http://team-tn.org/evaluation/overview/
131. Tennessee Department of Education First to the Top. (2012). Teacher evaluation in Tennessee: A report on Year 1 implementation. Retrieved from http://team-tn.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Year-1-Evaluation-Report-TNDOE.pdf
132. Tennessee State Board of Education. (2011). Teacher and principal evaluation policy. Retrieved from www.tn.gov/firsttothetop/docs/IV_C_Teacher_and_Principal_Evaluation_Policy.pdf
133. Tennessee State Board of Education. (2012a). Acceptable range of results policy for 2012-2013. Retrieved from http://team-tn.org/assets/misc/E%20-%20Acceptable%20Range_Final.pdf
134. Tennessee State Board of Education. (2012b). Number of observations. Retrieved from http://team-tn.org/assets/misc/A%20-%20Number%20of%20Observations_12_13_Updated.pdf
135. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1997). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
136. Tyler, R. W. (1969). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
137. U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). Great teachers and great leaders. Retrieved from www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/blueprint/great-teachers-great-leaders.pdf
138. U.S. Department of Education. (2010a, March 29). Delaware and Tennessee win first Race to the Top grants. Retrieved from www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/delaware-and-tennessee-win-first-race-top-grants
139. U.S. Department of Education. (2010b, August 24). Nine states and the District of Columbia win second round Race to the Top grants. Retrieved from www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/nine-states-and-district-columbia-win-second-round-race-top-grants
140. U.S. Department of Education. (2010c). Race to the Top guidance and frequently asked questions. Retrieved from www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/faq.pdf
141. U.S. Department of Education. (2011, December 23). Department of Education awards $200 million to seven states to advance K-12 reform. Retrieved from www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/department-education-awards-200-million-seven-states-advancek-12-reform
142. U.S. Department of Education. (2013a). Race to the Top fund. Retrieved from www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/index.html
143. U.S. Department of Education. (2013b). Summary of discretionary funds. Retrieved from www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/budget14/summary/appendix2.pdf
144. U.S. Department of Education. (2013c, December 17). U.S. Department of Education names five winners of $120 million from Race to the Top-District grant competition. Retrieved from www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/us-department-education-namesfive-winners-120-million-race-top-district-grant-c
145. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2013). Race to the Top: States implementing teacher and principal evaluation systems despite challenges. Retrieved from www.gao.gov/assets/660/657936.pdf
146. Weingarten, R. (2010, January 12). A new path forward: Four approaches to quality teaching and better schools. American Federation of Teachers. Retrieved from www.aft.org/newspubs/news/2010/011210a.cfm
147. Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., & Keeling, D. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on difference in teacher effectiveness. Brooklyn, NY: New Teachers Project. Retrieved from http://widgeteffect.org/downloads/TheWidgetEffect.pdf
148. Whitehurst, G., Chingos, M., & Lindquist, K. (2014). Evaluating teachers with classroom observations: Lessons learned in four districts. Brown Center on Education Policy at the Brookings Institution. Retrieved from www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2014/05/13-teacher-evaluation-whitehurst-chingos
149. Alder, N. (2002). Interpretations of the meaning of care: Creating caring relationships in urban middle school classrooms. Urban Education, 37, 241-266. doi:10.1177/0042085902372005
150. Alpert, J. (1974). Teacher behavior across ability groups: A consideration of the mediation of Pygmalion effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 348-353.
151. Anderman, E. M., & Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64(2), 287-309.
152. Anderson, L., Evertson, C., & Brophy, J. (1979). An experimental study of effective teaching in first-grade reading groups. Elementary School Journal, 79, 193-223.
153. Armor, D., Conry-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N., McDonnell, L., Pascal, A., . .. & Zellman, G. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading program in selected Los Angeles minority schools (Rep. No. R-2007-LAUSD). Santa Monica, CA: Rand. (ERIC No. Ed 140 432).
154. Asch, S. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.
155. Ashton, P., & Webb, R. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
156. Au, K., & Jordan, C. (1981). Teaching reading to Hawaiian children: Finding a culturally appropriate solution. In H. Trueba, G. Guthrie, & K. Au (Eds.), Culture and the bilingual classrooms: Studies in classroom ethnography (pp. 69-86). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
157. Banks, J. (1997). Educating citizens in a multicultural society. New York: Teachers College Press.
158. Barton, P. E., & Coley, R. J. (2009). Parsing the achievement gap II. Retrieved from www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/PICPARSINGII.pdf
159. Battistich, V., & Hom, A. (1997). The relationship between students’ sense of their school as a community and their involvement in problem behaviors. American Journal of Public Health, 87(12), 1997-2001.
160. Becker, H. (1952). Social-class variations in the teacher-pupil relationship. Journal of Educational Sociology, 25, 451-465.
161. Berliner, D., Fisher, C., Filby, N., & Marliave, R. (1978). Executive summary of Beginning Teacher Evaluation Study. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory.
162. Biddle, B. (2014). The unacknowledged disaster: Youth, poverty, and education failure in America. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
163. Brattesani, K., Weinstein, R., & Marshall, H. (1984). Student perceptions of differential teacher treatment as moderators of teacher expectation effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 236-247.
164. Brophy, J. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 631-661.
165. Brophy, J. (2010). Cultivating student appreciation of the value of learning. In R. Marzano (Ed.), On excellence in teaching (pp. 301-318). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
166. Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1974). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
167. Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook on research in teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
168. Burris, C. (2014). On the same track: How schools can join the twenty-first century struggle against resegregation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
169. Carter, R. (1952). How invalid are marks assigned by teachers? Journal of Educational Psychology, 43, 218-228.
170. Castagno, A., McKinley, B., & Brayboy, J. (2008). Culturally responsive schooling for indigenous youth: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 941-993.
171. Cazden, C., & Leggett, E. (1981). Culturally responsive education: Recommendations for achieving LAU remedies. In H. Trueba, G. Guthrie, & K. Au (Eds.), Cultural and the bilingual classrooms: Studies in classroom ethnography (pp. 69-86). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
172. Cohen, G., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., & Master, A. (2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313, 1307-1310.
173. Cohen, G., Steele, C., & Ross, L. (1999). The mentor’s dilemma: Providing critical feedback across the racial divide. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1302-1318.
174. Cooper, H., & Good, T. (1983). Pygmalion grows up: Studies in the expectation communication process. New York: Longman
175. Darley, J. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1980). Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence. American Psychologist, 35, 867-881.
176. Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). The flat earth in education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. Educational Researcher, 36(6), 318-334.
177. Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: New Press.
178. Dunkin, M., & Biddle, B. (1974). The study of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
179. Eder, D. (1981). Ability grouping as a self-fulfilling prophecy: A micro-analysis of teacher-student interaction. Sociology of Education, 54, 151-162.
180. Emmer, E., Evertson, C., & Anderson, L. (1980). Effective classroom management at the beginning of the school year. Elementary School Journal, 80, 219-231.
181. Evertson, C. (1982). Differences in instructional activities and higher-and lower-achieving junior high English and math classes. Elementary School Journal, 82, 329-350.
182. Evertson, C., & Weinstein, C. (Eds.) (2006). Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice and contemporary issues. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
183. Ferguson, R., & Danielson, C. (2014). How Framework for Teaching and Tripod 7Cs evidence distinguish key components of effective teaching. In T. Kane, K. Kerr, & R. Pianta (Eds.), Designing teacher evaluation systems: New guidance from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project (pp. 98-144). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
184. Ferreria, M. M., & Bosworth, K. (2001). Defining caring teachers: Adolescents’ perspectives. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(1), 24-30.
185. Fisher, C., Filby, N., Marliave, R., Cahen, L., Dishaw, M., Moore, J., & Berliner, D. (1978). Beginning teacher evaluation study. San Francisco, CA: Far West Regional Educational Laboratory.
186. Freiberg, H., Huzinec, C., & Templeton, S. (2009). Classroom management-a pathway to student achievement: A study of 14 inner-city elementary schools. Elementary Journal, 110, 63-80.
187. Fry, R., & Lopez, M. (2012). Hispanic student enrollments reach new highs in 2011. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
188. Garza, R. (2009). Latino and white high school students’ perceptions of caring behaviors: Are we culturally responsive to our students? Urban Education, 44, 297-321.
189. Good, T. (2014). What do we know about how teachers influence student performance on standardized tests: And why do we know so little about other student outcomes? In A. L. Lavigne, T. L. Good, & R. M. Marx (Eds.), High-stakes teacher evaluation: High cost-big losses [Special Issue]. Teachers College Record, 116(1).
190. Good, T., & Brophy, J. (1974). Changing teacher and student behavior: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(3), 390-405.
191. Good, T., & Brophy, J. (2008). Looking in classrooms (10th ed.). New York: Pearson.
192. Good, T., & Grouws, D. (1975). Teacher rapport: Some stability data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(2), 179-182.
193. Good, T., Grouws, D., & Beckerman, T. (1978). Curriculum pacing: Some empirical data. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 10, 75-81.
194. Good, T., Grouws, D., & Ebmeier, H. (1981). Active mathematics teaching. New York: Longman.
195. Good, T. L., & Weinstein, R. S. (1986). Schools make a difference: Evidence, criticisms, and new directions. American Psychologist, 41, 1090-1097.
196. Good, T. L., Wood, M. B., Sabers, D., Olson, A. M., Lavigne, A. L., Sun, H., & Kalinec-Craig, C. (2013). Strengthening grade 3-5 students’ foundational knowledge of rational numbers. Teachers College Record, 115(7), 1-45.
197. Goodlad, J. I. (1984). Place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
198. Hamre, B., & Pianta. R. (2005). Can instructional and emotional warmth in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76, 949-967.
199. Hanselman, P., Burch, S., Gamoran, A., & Borman, G. (2014). Threat in context: School moderation of the impact of social identity on racial/ethnic achievement gaps. Sociology of Education, 87, 106-124.
200. Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
201. Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371-404). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
202. Hill, H. C., Umland, K., Litke, E., & Kapitula, L. R. (2012). Teacher quality and quality teaching: Examining the relationship of a teacher assessment to practice. American Journal of Education, 118, 489-519.
203. Hines, C., Cruickshank, D., & Kennedy, J. (1985). Teacher clarity and its relationship to student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 87-99.
204. Howard, T. C. (2001). Telling their side of the story: African-American students’ perceptions of culturally relevant teaching. Urban Review, 33(2), 131-149.
205. Jackson, P. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt.
206. Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (1998). The black-white test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
207. Johnson Moore, S., Kraft, M., & Papay, J. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1-39.
208. Jussim, L. (1986). Self-fulfilling prophecies: A theoretical and integrative review. Psychological Review, 93, 429-445.
209. Jussim, L., & Eccles, J. (1992). Teacher explanations: Construction and reflection of student achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 947-961.
210. Jussim, L., Eccles, J., & Madon, S. (1996). Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations: Accuracy and the quest for the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 281-388). New York: Academic Press.
211. Kane, T., Kerr, K., & Pianta, R. (Eds.) (2014). Designing teacher evaluation systems: New guidance from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
212. Kelley, H. (1950). The warm-cold variable in first impressions of people. Journal of Personality, 18, 431-439.
213. Kleinfeld, J. (1972). Instructional style and the intellectual performance of Indian and Eskimo students. Final Report, Project No. 1-J-027, Office of Education, US Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
214. Klingner, J. K., Artiles, A. J., Kozleski, E., Harry, B., Zion, S., Tate, W., . .. Riley, D. (2005). Addressing the disproportionate representation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education through culturally responsive educational systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(38), 1-43. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/ v13n38
215. Kluger, A., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychology Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
216. Konstantopoulos, S. (2014). Teacher effects, value-added models, and accountability. In A. L. Lavigne, T. L. Good, & R. M. Marx (Eds.), High-stakes teacher evaluation: High cost-big losses [Special Issue]. Teachers College Record, 116(1).
217. Kounin, J. S. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
218. Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
219. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Teaching into Practice, 60, 159-165.
220. Lavigne, A., & Good, T. (2013). Teacher and student evaluation: Moving beyond the failure of school reform. New York: Routledge.
221. Leacok, E. (1969). Teaching and learning in city schools. New York: Basic Books.
222. Le Fevre, M., & Robinson, V. (2014). The interpersonal challenges of instructional leadership: Principals’ effectiveness in conversations about performance issues. Educational Administration Quarterly.
223. Lewis, J., Ream, R., Bocian, K. Cardullo, R., & Hammond, K. (2012). Con Cariño: Teacher caring, math self-efficacy, and math achievement among Hispanic English learners. Teachers College Record, 114, 42.
224. Lightfoot, S. (1972). An ethnographic study of the status structure of the classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
225. Lippit, R., & Gold, M. (1959). Classroom social structure as a mental health problem. Journal of Social Issues, 15, 40-49.
226. López, F. (2012). Moderators of language acquisition models and reading achievement for English Language Learners: The role of emotional warmth and instructional support. Teachers College Record, 114(8), 1-30.
227. López, F. (April, 2014). Addressing the need for explicit evidence on the role of culturally responsive teaching and achievement among Latino youth: Preliminary findings for the Spencer/National Academy of Education Postdoctoral Fellowship. Poster presented at the 2014 annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.
228. López, F. A., Heilig, J. V., & Schram, J. (2013). A story within a story: Culturally responsive schooling and American Indian and Alaska Native achievement in the National Indian Education Study. American Journal of Education, 119, 513-538.
229. Madon, S., Jussim, L., & Eccles, J. (1997). In search of the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 791-809.
230. Mason, D., Schroeter, D., Combs, R., & Washington, K. (1992). Assigning average-achieving eighth graders to advanced mathematics classes in an urban junior high. Elementary School Journal, 92, 587-599.
231. McCaslin, M. (1996). The problem of problem representation: The Summit’s conception of students. Educational Researcher, 25, 13-15.
232. McCaslin, M. (2006). Student motivation dynamics in the era of school reform. Elementary School Journal, 106, 479-490.
233. McCaslin, M. (2009). Co-regulation of student motivation and emergent identity. Educational Psychologist, 44, 137-146.
234. McCaslin, M., & Lavigne, A. (2010). Co-regulation approach to research on student motivation. In T. Urdan & A. Karabenick (Eds.), The decade ahead: Applications and context of motivation and achievement (pp. 211-149). Bingley, UK: EmeraldBooks.
235. McCaslin, M., Vriesema, C., & Burggraf, S. (in press). Making mistakes: Emotional adaptation and classroom learning. Teachers College Record.
236. McKown, C. (2013). Social equity theory and racial-achievement gaps. Child Development, 84(4), 1120-1136.
237. McKown, C., & Weinstein, R. (2003). The development and consequences of stereotype consciousness in middle childhood. Child Development, 74, 498-515.
238. Meckler, L. (2014, June 26). Generational race gap grows. Wall Street Journal. p. A5.
239. Murdock, T. B., Miller, A., & Kohlhardt, J. (2004). Effects of classroom context variables on high school students’ judgments of the acceptability and likelihood of cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 765-777.
240. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
241. Newmann, F. M. (1981). Reducing student alienation in high schools: Implications of theory. Harvard Educational Review, 51(4), 546-565.
242. NICHD ECCRN. (2005). A day in third grade: A large-scale study of classroom quality and teacher and student behavior. Elementary School Journal, 105, 305-323.
243. Nichols, S., & Good, T. (2004). America’s teenagers-myths and realities: Media images, schooling, and the social cost of careless indifference. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
244. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
245. Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press.
246. Noddings, N. (2007). Caring as relation and virtue in teaching. In R. Walker & P. Ivanhoe (Eds.), Working virtue: Virtue ethics and contemporary moral problems (pp. 41-60). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
247. Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
248. Oberg De La Garza, T., Roberts, A., & Lavigne, A. L. (2013, November). Cross-cultural relationships: Fostering belonging and achievement of Latino students in U.S. schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the World Education Research Association, Guanajuato, Mexico.
249. Osterman, K. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70, 323-367.
250. Payne, C. (2010). So much reform, so little change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
251. Perry, N. E., Phillips, L., & Hutchinson, L. (2006). Mentoring student teachers to support self-regulated learning. Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 237-254.
252. Pianta, R., Belsky, J., Houts, R., Morrison, F., & NICHD ECCRN. (2007). Opportunities to learn in America’s elementary classrooms. Science, 315, 1795-1796.
253. Pianta, R., & Hamre, B. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38, 109-119.
254. Pianta, R., La Paro, K., & Hamre, B. (2008). Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks.
255. Polikoff, M. (2012). The redundancy of mathematics instruction in US elementary and middle schools. Elementary School Journal, 113, 230-251.
256. Polikoff, M. (2014). Does the test matter? Evaluating teachers when tests differ in their sensitivity to instruction. In T. Kane, K. Kerr, & R. Pianta (Eds.), Designing teacher evaluation systems: New guidance from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project (pp. 278-303). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
257. Porter, A., & Polikoff, M. (2009). National curriculum. In T. Good (Ed.), 21st century education: A reference handbook (Vol. 2., pp. 434-442). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
258. Power, C. (1971). The effects of communication patterns on student socio-economic status, attitudes and achievement in science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland.
259. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
260. Rakes, C., Valentine, J., McGatha, M., & Ronau, R. (2010). Methods of instructional improvement in algebra: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80, 372-400.
261. Raudenbush, S. (1984). Magnitude of teacher expectancy effects on pupil IQ as a function of the credibility of expectancy induction: A synthesis of findings from 18 experiments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 85-97.
262. Raudenbush, S., & Jean, M. (2014). To what extent do student perceptions of classroom quality predict teacher value added? In T. Kane, K. Kerr, & R. Pianta (Eds.), Designing teacher evaluation systems: New guidance from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project (pp. 170-202). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
263. Reese, L., Jensen, B., & Ramirez, D. (2014). Emotionally supportive context for young Latino children in rural California. Elementary School Journal, 114, 501-526.
264. Reyes, M., Brackett, M., Rivers, S., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700-712.
265. Roberts, M. A. (2010). Toward a theory of culturally relevant critical teacher care: African American teachers’ definitions and perceptions of care for African American students. Journal of Moral Education, 39(4), 449-467.
266. Rohrkemper, M. (1984). The influence of teacher socialization style on students’ social cognition and reported interpersonal classroom behavior. Elementary School Journal, 85, 245-275.
267. Rohrkemper, M. (1985). Individual differences in students’ perceptions of routine classroom events. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 29-44.
268. Rohrkemper, M., & Corno, L. (1988). Success and failure on classroom tasks: Adaptive learning and classroom teaching. Elementary School Journal, 88, 296-312.
269. Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Teacher’s workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Longman.
270. Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Effective teaching practices that all teachers should know. Retrieved from www.aft.org//sites/default/files/periodicals/Rosenshine.pdf
271. Rosenshine, B., & Furst, N. (1971). Research on teacher performance criteria. In B. O. Smith (Ed.), Research in teacher education (pp. 37-72). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
272. Rosenshine, B., & Furst, N. (1973). The use of direct observations to study teaching. In R. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching (pp. 122-183). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
273. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1978). Interpersonal expectancy effects: The first 345 studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 377-386.
274. Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2007). Classroom interactions: Exploring the practices of high-and low-expectation teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 289-306.
275. Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2014). Becoming a high expectation teacher: Raising the bar. London: Routledge.
276. Rubie-Davies, C. M., Peterson, E., Sibley, C., & Rosenthal, R. (forthcoming). A teacher expectation intervention: Modelling the practices of high expectation teachers. Journal of Psychological Sciences.
277. Ruzek, E., Hafen, C., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2014). Combining classroom observations and value-added for the evaluation and professional development of teachers. In T. Kane, K. Kerr, & R. Pianta (Eds.), Designing teacher evaluation systems: New guidance from the measures of effective teaching project (pp. 205-233). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
278. Sleeter, C. (2011). An agenda to strengthen culturally responsive pedagogy. English Teaching Practice and Critique, 10, 7-23.
279. Smith, B. (2000). Quantity matters: Annual instructional time in an urban school system. Educational Administration Quarterly, 365(5), 652-682.
280. Steele, C. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectually identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
281. Steele, C. (2010). Whistling Vivaldi: How stereotypes affect us and what we can do. Issues of our time. New York: W.W. Norton.
282. Stein, M., & Nelson, B. (2003). Leadership content knowledge. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 423-448.
283. St. John, N. (1971). Thirty-six teachers: Their characteristics, and outcomes for black and white pupils. American Educational Research Journal, 8, 635-648.
284. Strong, M. (2011). The highly qualified teacher: What is teacher quality and how do we measure it? New York: Teachers College Press.
285. Timperley, H., & Robinson, V. (2001). Achieving school improvement through challenging and changing teachers’ schema. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 281-300.
286. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248.
287. Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 20-32.
288. Wehlage, G. G., Rutter, R. A., Smith, G. A., Lesko, N., & Fernandez, R. R. (1989). Reducing the risk: Schools as communities of support. New York: Falmer Press.
289. Weinstein, R. (1976). Reading group membership in first grade: Teacher behaviours and pupil experience over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 103-116.
290. Weinstein, R. (2002). Reaching higher: The power of expectations in schooling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
291. Weinstein, R., & Middlestatd, S. (1979). Student perceptions of teacher interactions with male high and low achievers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 421-431.
292. Weinstein, R., Soule, C., Collins, F., Cone, J., Mehorn, M., & Simontacchi, K. (1991). Expectations and high school change: Teacher-researcher collaboration to prevent school failure. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 333-364.
293. Wentzel, K. R. (1997). Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 411-419.
294. West, C., & Anderson, T. (1976). The question of preponderant causation in teacher expectancy research. Review of Educational Research, 46, 613-630.
295. Whitehurst, G., Chingos, M., & Lindquist, K. (2014). Evaluating teachers with classroom observations: Lessons learned in four districts. Brown Center on Education Policy at the Brookings Institute. Retrieved from www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2014/05/13-teacher-evaluation-whitehurst-chingos
296. Anh Le, P. T., & Vásquez, C. (2011). Feedback in teacher education: Mentor discourse and intern perceptions. Teacher Development, 15(4), 453-470.
297. Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1996). Micropolitical strategies used by administrators and teachers in instructional conferences. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 345-360.
298. Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1999). Principals’ instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 349-378.
299. Bridges, E. M. (1992). The incompetent teacher (revised and extended version). Oxford: Routledge.
300. Chi, M.T.H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. (Eds.) (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
301. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294-343.
302. Duffy, G., & Rochler, L. (1986). Constraints on teacher change. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 55-58.
303. Farkas, S., Johnson, J., & Duffet, A. (2003). Rolling up their sleeves: Superintendents and principals talk about what’s needed to fix public schools. New York: Public Agenda.
304. Frase, L. E., & Streshley, W. (1994). Lack of accuracy, feedback, and commitment in teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 47-57.
305. Freiberg, H. J., Waxman, H. C., & Houston, W. R. (1987). Enriching feedback to student-teachers through small group discussion. Teacher Education Quarterly, 14(3), 71-82.
306. Freiberg, H. J., Stein, T., & Huang, S. (1995). The effects of classroom management intervention on student achievement in inner-city elementary schools. Educational Research and Evaluation, 1(1), 33-66.
307. Friedkin, N. E., & Slater, M. R. (1994). School leadership and performance: A social network approach. Sociology of Education, 67, 139-157.
308. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. W. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
309. Glaser, R., & Chi, M.T.H. (1988). Introduction: What is it to be an expert? In M.T.H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. xv-xxiix). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
310. Good, T. L., & Grouws, D. A. (1979). The Missouri mathematics effectiveness project: An experimental study in fourth-grade classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(3), 355-362.
311. Grissom, J. A., & Loeb, S. (2011). Triangulating principal effectiveness: How perspectives of parents, teachers, and assistant principals identify the central importance of managerial skills. American Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 1091-1123.
312. Grissom, J. A., Loeb, S., & Master, B. (2013). Effective instructional time use for school leaders: Longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational Researchers, 42(8), 433-444.
313. Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5-12.
314. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381-391.
315. Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329-351.
316. Hallinger, P., Blickman, L., & Davis, K. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 527-549.
317. Han, S. S., & Weiss, B. (2005). Sustainability of teacher implementation of school-based mental health programs. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(6), 665-679.
318. Harris, A. H. (1989). A search for sources of treatment effects in a teacher effectiveness training program. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA.
319. Henry, G. T., Bastian, K. C., & Fortner, C. K. (2011). Stayers and leavers: Early-career teacher effectiveness and attrition. Educational Researcher, 40(6), 271-280.
320. Hernandez, R., Roberts, M., & Menchaca, V. (2012). Redesigning a principal preparation program: A continuous improvement model. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 7(3), 1-12.
321. Hess, F. (2006). Looking beyond the schoolhouse door. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(7), 513-515.
322. Hess, F. M., & Kelly, A. P. (2005). The politics of principal preparation reforms. Education Policy, 19(1), 155-180.
323. Hess, F. M., & Kelly, A. P. (2007). Learning to lead: What gets taught in principal-preparation programs. Teachers College Record, 109(1), 221-243.
324. Horng, E. L., Klasik, D., & Loeb, S. (2010). Principal’s time use and school effectiveness. American Journal of Education, 116, 491-523.
325. Huberman, M. (1989). On teachers’ careers: Once over lightly, with a broad brush. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(4), 347-362.
326. Kennedy, M. M. (1998). Form and substance in in-service teacher education (Research Monograph No. 13). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
327. Kennedy, M. M. (2005). Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
328. Knoeppel, R. C., & Rinehart, J. S., (2008). Student achievement and principal quality: Examining the relationship. Journal of School Leadership, 18(5), 501-527.
329. Kythreotis, A., Pashiardis, P., & Kyriakides, L. (2010). The influence of school leadership style and culture on students’ achievement in Cyprus primary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(2), 218-240.
330. Leach, D. J., & Conto, H. (1999). The additional effects of process and outcome feedback following brief in-service teacher training. Educational Psychology, 19(4), 441-462.
331. Leach, D. J., & Ingram, K. I. (1989). The effects of information and feedback on teachers’ classroom behavior and students’ academic engaged time. Educational Psychology, 9, 167-184.
332. Lee, M., & Hallinger, P. (2012). National contexts influencing principals’ time use and allocation: Economic development, societal culture, and educational system. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(4), 461-482.
333. Le Fevre, M., & Robinson, V. (2014). The interpersonal challenges of instructional leadership: Principals’ effectiveness in conversations about performance issues. Educational Administration Quarterly, 1-38.
334. Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498-518.
335. Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders. New York: Education Schools Project.
336. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
337. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
338. May, H., & Supovitz, J. A. (2011). The scope of principal efforts to improve instruction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 332-352.
339. McCormick, L. K., Steckler, A. B., & McLeroy, K. R. (1995). Diffusion of innovations in schools: A study of adoption and implementation of school-based tobacco prevention curricula. American Journal of Health Promotion, 9, 210-219.
340. Meyer, L. (1988). Research on implementation: What seems to work. In S. J. Samuels & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Changing school reading programs (pp. 41-57). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
341. Ogawa, R. T., & Hart, A. W. (1985). The effect of principals on the instructional performance of schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 23(1), 59-72.
342. Payne, C. (2010). So much reform so little change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
343. Pitner, N. J. (1988). Leadership substitutes: Their factorial validity in educational organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 307-315.
344. Richardson, V. (1998). How teachers change: What will lead to change that most benefits student learning? Focus on the Basics: Connecting Research to Practice, 2(C). Retrieved from www.ncsall.net/index.html@id=395.html
345. Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417-458. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x
346. Robinson, V.M.J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635-674.
347. Rohrbach, L. A., Graham, J. W., & Hansen, W. B. (1993). Diffusion of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: Predictors of program implementation. Preventive Medicine, 22, 237-260.
348. Sebastian, J., & Allensworth, E. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 626-663.
349. Shatzer, R. H., Caldarella, P., Hallam, P. R., & Brown, B. L. (2014). Comparing the effects of instructional and transformational leadership on student achievement: Implications for practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(4), 445-459.
350. Short, E. C. (1995). A review of studies in the first 10 volumes of the Journal of Curriculum and Supervision. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 11(1), 87-105.
351. Shulman, L., & Carey, N. (1984). Psychology and the limitations of individual rationality: Implications for the study of reasoning and civility. Review of Educational Research, 54(4), 501-524.
352. Stallings, J. A. (1986). Using time effectively: A self-analytic approach. In K. Zumwalt (Ed.), Improving teaching (pp. 15-27). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
353. Stein, M. K., & Wang, M. C. (1988). Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 171-187.
354. Styron, R. A., & LeMire, S. D. (2009). Principal preparation programs: Perceptions of high school principals. Journal of College Teacher and Learning, 6(6), 51-61.
355. Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31-56.
356. Tuckman, B. W., & Oliver, W. T. (1986). Effectiveness of feedback to teachers as a function of source. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59(4), 297-301.
357. U.S. Department of Education. (2013). Characteristics of public and private elementary and secondary principals in the United States: Results from the 2011-2012 Schools and Staffing Survey. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2013/2013313.pdf
358. Wang, M. C., & Gennari, P. (1983). Analysis of the design, implementation, and effects of a data-based staff development program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 6, 211-226.
359. Waters, T., Marzano, R. J., & McNulty, B. (2004). Developing the science of educational leadership. ERS Spectrum, 22(1), 4-13.
360. Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., & Keeling, D. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on difference in teacher effectiveness. Brooklyn, NY: New Teachers Project. Retrieved from http://widgeteffect.org/downloads/TheWidgetEffect.pdf
361. Witziers, B., Bosker, R. J., & Krüger, M. L. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 398-425.
362. Yeany, R. H., & Padilla, M. J. (1986). Training science teachers to utilize better teaching strategies: A research synthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(2), 85-95.
363. Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through the imitation of aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 575-502.
364. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323-370.
365. Bell, C. A., Q, Y., Croft, A. J., Leusner, D., McCaffrey, D. F., Gitomer, D. H., & Pianta, R. C. (2014). Improving observational score quality: Challenges in observer thinking. In T. J. Kane, K. A. Kerr, & R. C. Pianta (Eds.), Designing teacher evaluation systems: New7 guidance from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project (pp. 50-97). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
366. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2013). Ensuring fair and reliable measures of effective teaching: Culminating findings from the MET project’s three-year study. Retrieved from www.metproject.org/downloads/MET_Ensuring_Fair_and_Reliable_Measures_Practitioner_Brief.pdf
367. Brinko, K. T. (1990). Optimal conditions for effective feedback. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Boston, MA.
368. Britton, E., Paine, L., & Raizen, S. (1999). Middle grades mathematics and science teacher induction in selected countries: Preliminary findings. Washington, DC: National Center for Improving Science Education. WestEd.
369. DeNisi, A. S., & Kluger, A. N. (2000). Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? Academy of Management Executive, 14, 129-139.
370. Friedkin, N. E., & Slater, M. R. (1994). School leadership and performance: A social network approach. Sociology of Education, 67, 139-157.
371. Fuller, F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 207-226.
372. Goldenberg, C., Haertel, E., Coleman, R., Reese, L., & Rodriguez-Mojica, C. (2013). Classroom qualities for English Language Learners in language arts instruction: Technical report. Retrieved from https://people.stanford.edu/claudeg/cqell/about
373. Hattie, J. (1999). Influences on student learning. University of Auckland. Retrieved from https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/education/about/research/documents/influenceson-student-learning.pdf
374. Hattie, J., & Timperly, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
375. Holdheide, L. R., Goe, L., Croft, A., & Reschly, D. J. (2010). Challenges in evaluating special education teachers and English Language Learner specialists. Research and policy brief prepared for the National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved from www.gtlcenter.org/sites/default/files/docs/July2010Brief.pdf
376. Huling-Austin, L. (1986). What can and cannot reasonably be expected from teacher induction programs? Journal of Teacher Education, 27, 2-5.
377. Johnson, S. (2004). Finders and keepers: Helping new teachers survive and thrive in our schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
378. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
379. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1998). Feedback interventions: Toward the understanding of a double-edged sword. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 67-72.
380. Lavigne, A. L., & Chamberlain, R. (2014, January). Coping with increased demands for teacher evaluation: School leaders’ perceptions of problems and possibility. Invited paper presented at Using Observational and Student Achievement Data to Improve Teaching. Tucson, AZ.
381. Lavigne, A., & Good, T. (2014). Teacher and student evaluation: Moving beyond the failure of school reform. New York: Routledge.
382. Lavigne, A. L., & Oberg De La Garza, T. (forthcoming). The practice and evaluation of culturally responsive literacy for English Language Learners in the 21st century. Invited chapter in R. Allington and R. Gabriel (Eds.), Evaluating literacy instruction: Principles and promising practices.
383. López, F. (2014, April). Addressing the need for explicit evidence on the role of culturally responsive teaching and achievement among Latino youth: Preliminary findings for the Spencer/National Academy of Education Postdoctoral Fellowship. Poster presented at the 2014 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Philadelphia, PA.
384. McCaffrey, D. F., & Buzick, H. (2014, January 14). Is value-added accurate for teachers of students with disabilities? Carnegie Knowledge Network. Retrieved from www.carnegieknowledgenetwork.org/briefs/teacher_disabilities/#footnote-15
385. Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143-178.
386. Whitehurst, G., Chingos, M., & Lindquist, K. (2014). Evaluating teachers with classroom observations: Lessons learned in four districts. Brown Center on Education Policy at the Brookings Institution. Retrieved from www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2014/05/13-teacher-evaluation-whitehurst-chingos